RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to gain insight from patients with refractory Mycobacterium avium complex lung disease (MAC-LD) into strategies used to manage adverse events (AEs) associated with amikacin liposome inhalation suspension (ALIS). METHODS: We conducted semi-structured interviews with US patients with refractory MAC-LD prescribed ALIS in a real-world setting. Interview transcripts were analyzed and coded to identify patterns in participants' descriptions of their ALIS treatment experiences, including AEs and their disruptiveness, and AE mitigation strategies, including participants' ratings of strategies' effectiveness. Concept saturation was also assessed. RESULTS: Twenty participants (mean age 48.7 years; 80% women; mean ALIS duration 5.45 months) were interviewed. At the time of the interview, 15 participants (75%) had received ALIS for > 1 month and 13 (65%) were currently receiving ALIS. Participants described 44 unique AE mitigation strategies, which can be categorized into three groups: prepare for treatment; prevent increased emergence of AEs; and persist on treatment by mitigating AEs. Common strategies (reported by ≥ 50% of participants) included use of educational materials from the patient support program, localized management of throat irritation, and symptom management to reduce fatigue. Evidence of concept saturation was observed: no new strategies were identified in the last five interviews, which suggests the sample was robust enough to identify all mitigation strategies likely to be used by the broader patient population. CONCLUSIONS: This real-world study identified a diverse set of potential AE mitigation strategies intended to help individual patients prepare for ALIS treatment, prevent the increased emergence of certain AEs, and mitigate the impact of AEs on treatment persistence. Developing a comprehensive accounting of the types of mitigation strategies in use among patients in real-world settings can inform future investigation of the effectiveness of such strategies, and support evidence-based recommendations for treatment management.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the association between the number of non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis (bronchiectasis) exacerbations during baseline and follow-up (objective 1) and to identify longitudinal changes in FEV1 associated with exacerbation frequency (objective 2). METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of adult patients enrolled in the US Bronchiectasis and Nontuberculous Mycobacteria Research Registry September 2008 to March 2020. Objective 1 outcome was association between exacerbations during baseline (24 months) and 0-to-24 month and 24-to-48 month follow-up windows. Objective 2 outcomes were change in FEV1 and FEV1 % predicted over 24 months stratified by baseline exacerbation frequency. RESULTS: Objective 1 cohort (N = 520) baseline frequency of any exacerbations was 59.2%. Overall, 71.4% and 75.0% of patients with ≥1 baseline exacerbations had ≥1 exacerbations during the 0-to-24 and 24-to-48 month follow-ups. Having ≥1 exacerbation during baseline was significantly associated with ≥1 exacerbation during the 0-to-24 month (P = 0.0085) and 24-to-48 month follow-ups (P=<0.0001). Objective 2 cohort (N = 431) baseline FEV1 was significantly lower in patients who had more exacerbations; however, decline in FEV1 from baseline was not significantly different between patients with 0, 1, and ≥2 exacerbations. In patients with more baseline exacerbations, FEV1 % predicted was significantly lower at baseline (P < 0.0001) and at 12 (P = 0.0002) and 24 month follow-ups (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with frequent bronchiectasis exacerbations may be more likely than those with less frequent exacerbations to experience disease progression based on future exacerbation frequency and lower FEV1 at baseline, although FEV1 decline may not differ by baseline exacerbation frequency.