Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Surg Radiol Anat ; 37(9): 1049-54, 2015 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25944253

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Conventional surgical therapy for an intercondylar humerus fracture might result in multiple potential complications. Our study was conducted to evaluate the modified anconeus flap approach by adequately exposing the distal humeral articular surface, avoiding osteotomy of the olecranon and transection of the main part of the triceps brachial tendon from the olecranon. METHODS: Preparations of 20 upper limb specimens from adult cadavers were used in this study. We investigated the anatomical features of the distal tendon of the triceps brachii. Then, we designed a modified anconeus flap approach in cadaver specimens combined with the medial paratricipital approach, and we compared the extent of exposure of the distal humeral articular surface between the triceps-reflecting anconeus pedicle approach and this modified approach. RESULTS: The downward neurovascular bundles supplying the anconeus were located far from the intramuscular tendon of the triceps brachii. In addition, the medial head of the triceps was continuous with the anconeus near the lateral epicondyle of the humerus. These anatomical properties could assist in reducing adverse events in surgery. The percentage of the exposed humerus distal articular surface was 42.7% by applying the modified anconeus flap approach combined with the medial paratricipital approach. The modified anconeus flap approach can overcome the shortcomings of osteotomy or triceps transverse and fulfill reduction and internal fixation of most distal humerus intercondylar fractures. CONCLUSIONS: The present study has demonstrated a new approach for adequately exposing the distal humeral articular surface during surgery for an intercondylar humerus fracture. With this modified approach, osteotomy of the olecranon and the separation or transection of the main part of the triceps brachial tendon from the olecranon are not necessarily required. Therefore, we suggest that this novel approach could be applied as the primary surgical approach in intercondylar humerus fracture surgeries if the surgeons are familiar with the regional features of distal tendon of the triceps brachii and anconeus.


Assuntos
Articulação do Cotovelo/anatomia & histologia , Articulação do Cotovelo/cirurgia , Úmero/anatomia & histologia , Olécrano/anatomia & histologia , Retalhos Cirúrgicos , Adulto , Cadáver , Humanos , Úmero/cirurgia , Olécrano/cirurgia
3.
Orthop Surg ; 1(4): 269-74, 2009 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22009874

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To discuss the classification, management and outcome of fractures of the ulnar coronoid process. METHODS: Retrospective analysis was carried out in 31 patients (19 men and 12 women of average age 29.8 years [range, 18-52 years]) with fractures of the ulnar coronoid process. The fractures were classified into four major groups based on the extent of injury to the ulnar coronoid process, the state of the anterior bundle of the ulnar collateral ligaments (UCL) and elbow stability. A fracture of the coronoid process less than halfway up was defined as type I (eleven cases); of the middle of the coronoid process with injury of the UCL as type II (nine cases); of the base of coronoid process with dislocation of the elbow joint, sometimes with injury of the UCL, as type III (six cases); and severe comminuted fracture of the coronoid process with elbow instability as type IV (five cases). We chose treatment according to the type of injury. RESULTS: Follow-up was 18-72 months (average 28.6 months). All patients achieved fracture union without inflammation, neural injuries or elbow instability. One type III and two type IV patients had traumatic osteoarthritis, and two type III and two type IV developed heterotopic ossification. There was a statistically significant difference between the ranges of movement of the two-side joints in type IV. CONCLUSION: We choose conservative treatment for type I fractures unless the bone fragment affected movement of the elbow joint, in which case we chose operative treatment so that elbow stability was not affected. Type II and type III fractures with elbow instability were reduced by internal fixation and the ligament repaired or reconstructed. In type IV cases, bone reconstruction was necessary to recover elbow stability. Proper post-operative rehabilitation can decrease the occurrence of traumatic osteoarthritis.


Assuntos
Pinos Ortopédicos , Parafusos Ósseos , Articulação do Cotovelo/cirurgia , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/métodos , Luxações Articulares/cirurgia , Fraturas da Ulna/cirurgia , Adolescente , Adulto , Articulação do Cotovelo/fisiopatologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Luxações Articulares/etiologia , Luxações Articulares/fisiopatologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Radiografia , Amplitude de Movimento Articular , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Fraturas da Ulna/complicações , Fraturas da Ulna/diagnóstico por imagem , Adulto Jovem , Lesões no Cotovelo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA