RESUMO
Background: Esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) is an aggressive cancer with poor prognosis. Thus, this study aimed to identify a prognostic molecular signature to predict the overall survival (OS) of patients with EAC. Methods: The mRNA microarray data sets GSE13898 and GSE26886 were downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. RNA sequencing profile and clinical data of EAC patients were downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between EAC tissues and adjacent non-cancerous tissues were obtained using R software. DEGs associated with prognosis of OS were assessed by univariate Cox analysis, and a prognostic signature was built using stepwise multivariate Cox analysis. Time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and stratification analysis were conducted to evaluate its predictive performance. Functional enrichment analysis was performed for genes co-expressed with the signature to explore its biological functions in EAC. Results: A total of 336 genes were identified to be differentially expressed between EAC tissues and adjacent non-cancerous tissues. After univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis, four genes (ALAD, ABLIM3, IL17RB and IFI6) were screened out to construct a prognostic signature. According to this signature, patients could be assigned into high-risk and low-risk group with significantly different OS (P=4.92e-05<0.0001). Multivariate Cox regression analysis suggested that the four-gene signature served as an independent factor in OS prediction. In the time-dependent ROC analysis, the areas under the curves (AUCs) were 0.804, 0.792 and 0.695 for 1-, 3- and 5-year survival prediction, respectively, suggesting a good performance. Functional enrichment analysis showed that the signature was mainly clustered in cell proliferation related biological processes or pathways. Conclusions: The four-gene signature identified in the current study may be a potential prognostic factor for predicting OS of EAC patients.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Tacrolimus is used clinically for the long-term treatment of antirejection of transplanted organs in liver and kidney transplant recipients, although dose optimization is poorly managed. The aim of this study was to examine the association between tacrolimus pharmacokinetic variability and CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 genotypes by a population pharmacokinetic analysis based on routine drug monitoring data in adult renal transplant recipients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Trough tacrolimus concentrations were obtained from 161 adult kidney transplant recipients after transplantation. The population pharmacokinetic analysis was carried out using the nonlinear mixed-effect modeling software NONMEM version 7.2. The CYP3A4*1G and CYP3A5*3 genetic polymorphisms from the patients studied were determined by direct sequencing using a validated automated genetic analyzer. RESULTS: A one-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination adequately described the pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus. Covariates including CYP3A5*3 and CYP3A4*1G alleles and hematocrit were retained in the final model. The apparent clearance of tacrolimus was about two-fold higher in kidney transplant patients with higher enzymatic activity of CYP3A5*1 and CYP3A4*1G (with the CYP3A5*1/*1 or *1/*3 and CYP3A4*1/*1G or CYP3A4*1G/*1G) compared with those with lower enzymatic activity (CYP3A5*3/*3 and CYP3A4*1/*1). CONCLUSION: This is the first study to extensively determine the effect of CYP3A4*1G and CYP3A5*3 genetic polymorphisms and hematocrit value on tacrolimus pharmacokinetics in Chinese renal transplant recipients. The findings suggest that CYP3A5*3 and CYP3A4*1G polymorphisms and hematocrit are determinant factors in the apparent clearance of tacrolimus. The initial dose design is mainly based on CYP3A5 and CYP3A4 genotypes as well as hematocrit. This result may also be useful for maintenance tacrolimus dose optimization and may help to avoid fluctuating tacrolimus levels and improve the efficacy and tolerability of tacrolimus in kidney transplant recipients.
