Assessing Postoperative Phosphate and Calcium/Phosphate Ratio as Surrogates for Parathyroid Hormone Following Total Thyroidectomy.

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate utility of postoperative phosphate and calcium/phosphate ratio (Ca/P) as surrogates for parathyroid hormone (PTH) following total thyroidectomy. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary care hospital. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients 18 years or older who underwent total thyroidectomy in a tertiary care hospital by a single surgeon from 2015 through 2021. Patients with incomplete data, pre-existing hypoparathyroidism, vitamin D deficiency, or renal failure were excluded. All patients had PTH drawn within 4 hours of surgery and serum calcium, albumin, and phosphate levels on postoperative Day 1. Corrected calcium was used to calculate a Ca/P. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated to compare phosphate level or Ca/P with PTH. Each possible surrogate was assessed relative to PTH cutoffs of less than 5, 10, 15, and 20 pg/mL. A good screening test was defined as having an area under the curve (AUC) greater than 0.8. RESULTS: A total of 185 patients underwent total thyroidectomy with 1 fellowship-trained otolaryngologist. Most patients were female (62%), median age 48 years. Most surgeries were performed for cancer (68%). Six (3.2%) patients required IV calcium supplementation and 2 (1.1%) required readmission for symptomatic hypocalcemia. ROC curves comparing phosphate and Ca/P to PTH at the listed cutoffs demonstrated AUC ranging from 0.55 to 0.66 and 0.61 to 0.79, respectively. None met the threshold for a good screening test. CONCLUSION: Postoperative phosphate and Ca/P ratio are not surrogates for PTH levels following total thyroidectomy. More research is needed to identify cost-effective strategies for postoperative calcium monitoring in patients undergoing total thyroidectomy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective cohort study.

Thyroid Ethanol and Radiofrequency Ablation: A Call for Patient-Friendly Online Resources.

INTRODUCTION: The multiple treatment options available to patients with thyroid nodules can generate uncertainty and confusion. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and ethanol ablation (EA) are two alternative modalities to manage thyroid nodules. As patients more frequently utilize online resources to guide their decision-making, the quality of such resources must be evaluated. The goal of this study was to assess the quality of online patient materials relating to RFA and EA compared to standard thyroidectomy. METHODS: The terms "thyroidectomy," "thyroid radiofrequency ablation," and "thyroid ethanol ablation" were searched on Google. Flesch Reading Ease (FRE), Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL), Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG), and Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT) understandability and actionability were calculated for each website. Statistical analysis was conducted on SPSS Statistics. Google trends were used to determine search interest for each term (May 2016 - May 2021). RESULTS: Of the 77 websites that met our inclusion criteria (30 thyroidectomy sites, 30 RFA sites, and 17 EA sites), the average FRE, FKGL, and SMOG scores of the RFA websites were significantly worse than those of the thyroidectomy websites (p < 0.05). The FKGL and SMOG scores of the EA websites were significantly worse than those of the thyroidectomy websites (p < 0.05). The average understandability and actionability scores for thyroidectomy websites were significantly higher than those of RFA and EA websites (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Ablation websites have lower search interest, readability, validity, understandability, and actionability scores in comparison to traditional thyroidectomy websites. Our findings emphasize the need to consider readability and PEMAT scores when developing online educational resources for ablative alternatives to thyroidectomy to allow for greater patient accessibility.