Halide Double Perovskites Cs2PdBr6-xIx with Tunable Bandgaps for Solar Cells.

Inorganic lead-free vacancy-ordered double perovskites with the chemical formula A2BX6 are promising candidates to overcome Pb-based organic-inorganic perovskite's toxicity and instability issues. We designed the mixed-halide double perovskites Cs2PdBr6-xIx by halogen anions substitution. The structure, stability, and electronic and photoelectric properties were explored using density functional theory (DFT). The negative value of the formation energy indicated that the Cs2PdBr6-xIx perovskites are thermodynamically stable. These perovskites exhibit tunable bandgap values in the range of 0.77-1.73 eV, which are direct or quasi-direct bandgaps except for Cs2PdBr3I3. Their absorption spectrum shows that the absorption range of visible light expands significantly. The theoretical spectral limit maximum efficiency (SLME) of Cs2PdBr5I with 1.3 eV and Cs2PdBr4I2 with 1.04 eV reached 32 and 30.4%, respectively, which are becoming comparable to or slightly surpassing CH3NH3PbI3, indicating they could be candidates for single-junction solar cells. In addition, the Cs2PdBr3I3 and the Cs2PdBr4I2, with the bandgap of 1.12 and 1.04 eV, respectively, could be the bottom cell to form the homogeneous tandem solar cells with the Cs2PdBr6, which could be the top cell with the bandgap of 1.73 eV.

Radiotherapy-induced malfunctions of cardiac implantable electronic devices: A meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Radiation therapy (RT) may pose acute and long-term risks for patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs), including pacemakers (PMs) and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs). OBJECTIVE: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the association between RT and PM/ICD malfunctions in patients with cancer. METHODS: We searched the literature using the PubMed, the Cochrane Library the Web of Science, and Embase for relative publications until April 2022. Of the 550 initially identified studies, 17 retrospective observational studies including 2454 patients were finally analyzed. RESULTS: The meta-analysis showed that RT was associated with an increased risk of ICD malfunctions (odds ratio [OR] 2.75; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.74-4.33). Five studies were included in the subgroup analysis regarding photon beam energy, showing that radiation-induced CIED failure was more likely to occur in ICDs when beam energy was ≥10 MV (OR 5.28; 95% CI 2.14-13.03). Neutron-generating RT significantly increased the risk of CIED malfunctions (OR 3.97; 95% CI 1.70-9.26), especially the risk of reset (OR 5.79; 95% CI 2.37-14.12; P = .0001). We did not find significant differences in the risk of CIED failure between chest RT and other RT sites (OR 1.09; 95% CI 0.63-1.88). CONCLUSION: Our meta-analysis suggests that ICDs are more likely to be affected by RT than PMs. These adverse events, especially reset, in patients with cancer were associated with neutron-generating RT and beam energy ≥10 MV. Given the increasing requirement for RT in several patients with cancer as well as the increasing implantation rates of CIEDs, a better risk stratification is needed in this setting.

Clinical research on the combined use of systemic chemotherapy and CT-guided radiofrequency ablation in treatment of lung cancer.

The purpose of this study is to describe the clinical efficacy and safety of the combined use of systemic chemotherapy and CT-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in treatment of lung cancer. A panel of 256 patients with lung cancer who were admitted to our hospital from June 2017 to October 2019 were recruited. According to the treatment plan, the patients were divided into test group (n = 128) and control group (n = 128). Patients in the test group were treated by systemic chemotherapy combined with CT-guided RFA, while patients in the control group were given systemic chemotherapy only. After treatment, a comparative analysis was conducted in terms of clinical efficacy, level of tumor markers, and adverse reactions. Meanwhile, patients in the two groups were followed up for analysis of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). After treatment, the tumor objective response rate and disease control rate of patients in the test group were significantly higher than those in the control group. Besides, in patients of the test group, tumor markers, such as serum carcino-embryonic antigen, neuro-specific enolase, cytokeratin-19, and carbohydrate antigen-199, presented a remarkably lower level relative to those in the control group (p < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference observed with regard to the incidence of complications (p > 0.05). Additionally, patients in the test group were more likely to have better PFS and OS. Notably, we monitored that in the test group, superior clinical efficacy was achieved in patients with non-small cell lung cancer and lung adenocarcinoma relative to that in patients with small cell lung cancer and lung squamous cell carcinoma, respectively. The combined use of systemic chemotherapy and CT-guided RFA can produce good clinical efficacy in treatment of lung cancer. It is relatively safe and deserves promotion and application in clinic.

Clinical Research on Systemic Chemotherapy Combined With Bronchoscopic Seed Implantation in the Treatment of Advanced Lung Cancer.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to explore the clinical value of systemic chemotherapy combined with bronchoscopic seed implantation in advanced lung cancer treatment. METHODS: The study enrolled 253 patients with advanced lung cancer in Cangzhou People's Hospital from March 2018 to March 2020, and they were divided into test group and control group. Test group was given systemic chemotherapy combined with bronchoscopic seed implantation, while control group was given systemic chemotherapy. The objective response rate of tumor (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), serum tumor marker level, survival time and adverse reactions of 2 groups were compared. RESULTS: After treatment, the levels of serum tumor markers including carcino-embryonic antigen, neuro-specific enolase, cytokeratin-19 and pro-gastrin-releasing peptide were markedly decreased in test group compared with those in control group (P < 0.05). Therein, the serum tumor marker level of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients was significant decreased compared with that of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients in test group. Meanwhile, in test group, the serum tumor marker level of lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) patients was significant decreased compared with that of lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC, P < 0.05). The ORR and DCR in test group were superior to those in control group (63.4%, 92.5% vs 38.7%, 72.3%, P < 0.05), while those were much higher in patients with NSCLC and LUAD relative to those in patients with SCLC and LUSC, respectively (P < 0.05). Furthermore, the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in test group were significantly greater than those in control group. In test group, the PFS and OS of patients with NSCLC and LUAD were higher than those of patients with SCLC and LUSC. CONCLUSION: The efficacy of systemic chemotherapy combined with bronchoscopic seed implantation was superior to that of systemic chemotherapy, which is worthy of promoting in clinical practice.

Clinical study of systemic chemotherapy combined with bronchoscopic interventional cryotherapy in the treatment of lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: This study is designed to investigate the clinical value of systemic chemotherapy combined with bronchoscopic interventional cryotherapy in the treatment of lung cancer. METHODS: A total of 412 lung cancer patients admitted to Cangzhou People's Hospital from March 2018 to March 2020 were collected and divided into test group and control group based on their treatment schedules. The test group received systemic chemotherapy combined with bronchoscopic interventional cryotherapy, while the control group received systemic chemotherapy alone. Tumor objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), serum tumor marker levels, serum matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) content, T cell subset level, survival time and adverse reactions of the two groups were observed. RESULTS: The ORR and DCR of the test group were better than those of the control group, while those of the non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients in the test group were better than patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) (P <  0.05). There was no significant difference in serum tumor marker levels, MMP content and T cell subset level between the two groups before treatment. After treatment, the serum tumor marker levels along with serum MMP-2, MMP-9 and CD8+ levels in the test group decreased more remarkably, while CD4+ and CD4+/CD8+ levels increased more significantly than those in the control group (P <  0.05). The serum MMP-2 and MMP-9 of NSCLC patients in the test group decreased more remarkably than those of SCLC patients, while there was no significant difference in CD8+, CD4+ and CD4+/CD8+. The progression-free survival and overall survival of the test group were obviously longer than those of the control group. The same trend was observed in NSCLC patients compared with SCLC patients in the test group (P <  0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Systemic chemotherapy combined with bronchoscopic interventional cryotherapy for lung cancer has good clinical efficacy and safety, and can be widely used in clinical practice.