Electrocardiographic modifications induced by breast implants.

BACKGROUND: Echocardiography realization can be challenging in the presence of breasts implants (BI). It is less known if electrocardiograms (ECG) may be modified in the presence of BI. METHODS: ECG from women with BI (and without any known cardiac structural disease) were sent and analyzed by two experienced electrophysiologists (EP1 and EP2) who were blinded and completely unaware of the context of the patients (Group 1). ECG from a control matched-group of female women without BI (Group 2) were also blindly sent for analysis. RESULTS: ECG were collected from 28 women with BI (42 ± 8 years) without any acute medical condition. A proportion of 42% of the ECG were considered abnormal by EP1 and 46% by EP2. The abnormalities were for EP1: negative T waves (5), ST depression in inferolateral leads (2), absence of R wave progression from V1 to V4 (4), left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy (1), long QT(1), early repolarization (1), short PR (1); For EP2: negative T waves (6), ST depression in inferolateral leads (2), absence of R wave progression from V1 to V4 (4), LV hypertrophy(3), long QT (1), early repolarization (1). ECG from group 2 were considered abnormal in only 1 patient (5%) for EP1, and normal in all for EP2 (P = 0.0002 between the groups). CONCLUSIONS: ECG from women with BI were considered abnormal in 42% to 46% of the cases by expert readers. ECG interpretation can thus be misleading in these women.

Pacemakers implantation and radiofrequency catheter ablation procedures during medical missions in Morocco: an 8-year experience.

AIMS: Radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) for arrhythmias in the context of short-term medical missions (MM) in a developing country has not been reported so far. We describe here our experience with RFCA and pacemaker implantation in Morocco with a fully portable electrophysiological (EP) system under the auspice of the Monaco-Morocco Cardiology Association. METHODS AND RESULTS: Since November 2007, two to three MM (mean duration 4 days including transportation) per year were conducted (including two physicians and one nurse from Monaco) and were alternately located in Marrakech, Fes, Agadir, Casablanca, Rabat, Essaouira, and Oujda. All patients' files were sent by local teams and/or referring Moroccan cardiologists before MM. Each case was discussed with the Monaco EP team before the MM. Pacemakers and leads were donated by companies (Sorin Group, Medtronic, Saint-Jude Medical). The EP system (EP Tracer, CardioTek) as well as diagnostic/ablation catheters were brought for RFCA procedures. After the procedures, follow-up was performed by local teams. Procedures took place in gynaecological or orthopaedic operating room, or, when available, in the interventional cardiology cathlab. Thirty-one RFCA were performed during 11 MM (atrioventricular node re-entrant tachycardia = 12; atrioventricular re-entrant tachycardia/Mahaïm fibre = 15; typical atrial flutter = 3; ventricular ectopy = 1). Acute success was 93.5% for RFCA. Two major RFCA-related complications occurred (air embolism and complete atrioventricular block). No complication was related to pacemaker implantations (n = 44; mean 4 pacemakers per mission). CONCLUSION: Radiofrequency catheter ablation for arrhythmias in developing countries is technically challenging but feasible, despite technical and cultural difficulties.

Slow pathway radiofrequency ablation in patients with AVNRT: junctional rhythm is less frequent during magnetic navigation ablation than with the conventional technique.

INTRODUCTION: The occurrence of accelerated junctional rhythm (JR) during radiofrequency ablation of the slow pathway in patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) is frequent. The aim of the present study was to compare the occurrence of JR during magnetic remote catheter ablation to the conventional manual ablation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty six patients (males: seven; age: 51 + or - 15 years) underwent slow pathway ablation with magnetic navigation (MN) system (Niobe, Stereotaxis Inc., St. Louis, MO, USA) and were compared to a control group of 11 patients (males: three; age: 53 + or - 16 years) treated with conventional manual ablation. A 4-mm nonirrigated tip catheter was used in both groups with a maximum of 30 W and 60 degrees C. Acute success was obtained in all patients. In the MN group, three patients out of 24 had no junctional beat (JB) at all and seven patients had 10 or less JB. In contrast, in the conventional group no patient had less than 10 JB. The mean number of JB in the MN group was 66 + or - 94.9 (0-410) and 200 + or - 243.1 (43-914) in the control group (P = 0.019). In the MN group one patient had a first-degree atrioventricular block. No other complication occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Magnetic remote catheter ablation of AVNRT is effective and is associated with less JB than the manual conventional technique. Therefore, JB may not be considered as a mandatory indicator for successful AVNRT ablation with MN system.

Robotic magnetic navigation for ablation of human arrhythmias: initial experience.

BACKGROUND: Magnetic navigation system (MNS) (Niobe, Stereotaxis, Saint-Louis, Missouri, USA) allows remote control of a radiofrequency ablation catheter using a steerable magnetic field and a catheter advancement system. AIMS: We report our initial experience of ablation of human arrhythmias using the MNS. METHODS: Eighty-four patients (mean age 54+/-17years; 39 women) had an electrophysiologic study followed by ablation with the MNS using non-irrigated 4, 8 and 3.5mm-tip catheters with three distal magnets. All patients were symptomatic, with commonly-accepted indications for ablation: atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT; n=37); typical atrial flutter (n=15); accessory pathway (n=12); atypical atrial flutter (n=7); ventricular tachycardia (n=7); atrial tachycardia (n=3); paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (n=3). Electroanatomical mapping was used for atrial flutter, atrial fibrillation, atrial tachycardia and ventricular tachycardia procedures (29 patients, 34%). RESULTS: Ablation was performed successfully in 69 (82%) patients. In 15 patients (18%), MNS technique was unsuccessful: seven typical atrial flutters, four accessory pathways, two left atrial flutters after atrial fibrillation ablation, one ventricular tachycardia and one AVNRT; in all these cases except one typical atrial flutter and two left atrial flutters, success was obtained by switching to the manual technique by means of an irrigated catheter. Total fluoroscopy time was 14+/-11minutes; operator exposure fluoroscopy time was 1.5+/-0.6minutes; procedure time was 169+/-72minutes. CONCLUSION: MNS ablation is a feasible treatment for various human arrhythmias, with a high success rate. Mapping with a magnetic catheter is safe. However, magnetic ablation of typical atrial flutter remains challenging, probably because of insufficient pressure for cavotricuspid isthmus ablation.