Landscape context and nutrients modify the effects of coastal urbanisation.

Estuaries are focal points for coastal cities worldwide, their habitats frequently transformed into engineered shorelines abutting waters with elevated nutrients in an urbanised landscape. Here we test for relationships between shoreline armouring and nutrients on the diversity and trophic composition of fish assemblages across 22 estuaries in eastern Australia. Urbanisation was associated with fish diversity and abundance, but there were differences in the effects of shoreline armouring and nutrient level on the trophic composition of fish assemblages. Fish diversity and the abundance of most trophic groups, particularly omnivores, zoobenthivores and detritivores, was greatest in highly urban estuaries. We show that estuarine fish assemblages are associated with urbanisation in more nuanced ways than simple habitat transformation would suggest, but this depends on the broader environmental context. Our findings have wider implications for estuarine conservation and restoration, emphasizing that ecological benefits of habitat measures may depend on both landscape attributes and water quality in urban settings.

Effects of seascape connectivity on reserve performance along exposed coastlines.

Seascape connectivity (landscape connectivity in the sea) can modify reserve performance in low-energy marine ecosystems (e.g., coral reefs, mangroves, and seagrass), but it is not clear whether similar spatial linkages also shape reserve effectiveness on high-energy, exposed coastlines. We used the surf zones of ocean beaches in eastern Australia as a model system to test how seascape connectivity and reserve attributes combine to shape conservation outcomes. Spatial patterns in fish assemblages were measured using baited remote underwater video stations in 12 marine reserves and 15 fished beaches across 2000 km of exposed coastline. Reserve performance was shaped by both the characteristics of reserves and the spatial properties of the coastal seascapes in which reserves were embedded. Number of fish species and abundance of harvested fishes were highest in surf-zone reserves that encompassed >1.5 km of the surf zone; were located < 100 m to rocky headlands; and included pocket beaches in a heterogeneous seascape. Conservation outcomes for exposed coastlines may, therefore, be enhanced by prioritizing sufficiently large areas of seascapes that are strongly linked to abutting complementary habitats. Our findings have broader implications for coastal conservation planning. Empirical data to describe how the ecological features of high-energy shorelines influence conservation outcomes are lacking, and we suggest that seascape connectivity may have similar ecological effects on reserve performance on both sheltered and exposed coastlines.

Efectos de la Conectividad de Paisajes Marinos sobre el Desempeño de las Reservas a lo largo de Costas Expuestas Resumen La conectividad entre paisajes marinos puede modificar el desempeño de las reservas en los ecosistemas marinos de baja energía (p. ej.: arrecifes de coral, manglares, pastos marinos), pero no está claro si las conexiones espaciales similares también moldean la efectividad de las reservas en costas expuestas con alta energía. Usamos las zonas de rompimiento de las playas oceánicas en el este de Australia como sistema modelo para probar cómo la conectividad entre paisajes marinos y los atributos de la reserva se combinan para moldear los resultados de la conservación. Los patrones espaciales en los ensamblados de peces se midieron con estaciones remotas de video subacuático con carnada en doce reservas marinas y 15 playas a lo largo de 2000 km de costas expuestas. El desempeño de las reservas estuvo moldeado por las características de las reservas y las propiedades espaciales de los paisajes costeros en los cuales estaban insertadas las reservas. El número de especies de peces y la abundancia de peces recolectados fue mucho mayor en las reservas en las zonas de rompimiento que abarcaban >1.5 km de la zona de rompimiento; estaban localizadas a <100 m de cabos rocosos; e incluían playas pequeñas entre los cabos en un paisaje marino heterogéneo. Los resultados de conservación para las costas expuestas pueden, por lo tanto, mejorarse con la priorización suficiente de grandes áreas de paisajes marinos que están conectados fuertemente con hábitats complementarios colindantes. Nuestros hallazgos tienen consecuencias más generales para la planeación de la conservación costera. Los datos empíricos para describir cómo las características ecológicas de las costas con alta energía influyen sobre los resultados de conservación son muy pocos, y sugerimos que la conectividad entre paisajes marinos puede tener efectos ecológicos similares sobre el desempeño de las reservas en costas expuestas y resguardadas.

Resource type influences the effects of reserves and connectivity on ecological functions.

Connectivity is a pivotal feature of landscapes that affects the structure of populations and the functioning of ecosystems. It is also a key consideration in conservation planning. But the potential functional effects of landscape connectivity are rarely evaluated in a conservation context. The removal of algae by herbivorous fish is a key ecological function on coral reefs that promotes coral growth and recruitment. Many reef herbivores are harvested and some use other habitats (like mangroves) as nurseries or feeding areas. Thus, the effects of habitat connectivity and marine reserves can jointly promote herbivore populations on coral reefs, thereby influencing reef health. We used a coral reef seascape in eastern Australia to test whether seascape connectivity and reserves influence herbivory. We measured herbivore abundance and rates of herbivory (on turf algae and macroalgae) on reefs that differed in both their level of connectivity to adjacent mangrove habitats and their level of protection from fishing. Reserves enhanced the biomass of herbivorous fish on coral reefs in all seascape settings and promoted consumption of turf algae. Consumption of turf algae was correlated with the biomass of surgeonfish that are exploited outside reserves. By contrast, both reserve status and connectivity influenced herbivory on macroalgae. Consumption of macroalgae was greatest on fished reefs that were far from mangroves and was not strongly correlated with any fish species. Our findings demonstrate that landscape connectivity and reserve status can jointly affect the functioning of ecosystems. Moreover, we show that reserve and connectivity effects can differ markedly depending on resource type (in this case turf algae vs. macroalgae). The effectiveness of conservation initiatives will therefore depend on our ability to understand how these multiple interactive effects structure the distribution of ecological functions. These findings have wider implications for the spatial conservation of heterogeneous environments and strengthen the case that the impact of conservation on ecosystem functioning is contingent on how reserves are positioned in landscapes.