Predicting factors of symptomatic radiation pneumonitis induced by durvalumab following concurrent chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) followed by durvalumab is the standard of care for unresectable locally-advanced non-small cell carcinoma (LA-NSCLC). However, a major concern about administration of durvalumab after CCRT is whether the incidence of symptomatic radiation pneumonitis (RP) may increase or not. In the present analysis, we report the initial results of CCRT followed by durvalumab in patients with LA-NSCLC in a real-world setting with focus on predicting factors for symptomatic RP. METHODS: Patients who were pathologically diagnosed as NSCLC and initiated treatment with CCRT followed by durvalumab between July 2018 to December 2019 were eligible for this study. Patients were included if they completed the planned CRT course and administered at least one course of durvalumab. We retrospectively investigated the preliminary survival outcome and incidence and predicting factors for symptomatic RP. RESULTS: Of the 67 patients who planned CCRT, 63 patients completed the entire CCRT course. Of these, 56 patients proceeded to consolidation with durvalumab. The median time to eternal discontinuation of durvalumab was 9.7 months. The cumulative proportion of the patients who exhibited symptomatic RP was 30, 40 and 44% at 3, 6 and 12 months, respectively. In multivariate analyses, pulmonary fibrosis score and lung V40 were significant predictive factors for symptomatic RP (p < 0.001, HR: 7.83, 95% CI: 3.38-18.13, and p = 0.034, HR: 3.17, 95% CI: 1.09-9.19, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Pulmonary fibrosis sore and lung V40 were significant predictive factors for symptomatic RP. We should be cautious about the administration of durvalumab for patients having subclinical pulmonary fibrosis. To our best knowledge, this is one of the first report showing the predictive value of high dose volumes to the lung in patients with LA-NSCLC who received CCRT followed by durvalumab.

Plan comparison of prostate stereotactic radiotherapy in spacer implant patients.

In prostate stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), hydrogel spacers are increasingly used. This study aimed to perform a dosimetry comparison of treatment plans using CyberKnife (CK), commonly used for prostate SBRT, Helical TomoTherapy (HT), and TrueBeam (TB) in patients with hydrogel spacer implantations. The data of 20 patients who received hydrogel spacer implantation for prostate SBRT were retrospectively analyzed. The prescription dose was 36.25 Gy in five fractions to 95% of the planning target volume (PTV; D95). The conformity index (CI), gradient index (GI), homogeneity index (HI), and dose-volume histogram (DVH) were analyzed for the three modalities, using the same PTV margins. The monitor unit (MU) and the beam-on-time (BOT) values were subsequently compared. The CI of TB (0.93 ± 0.02) was significantly superior to those of CK (0.82 ± 0.03, p < 0.01) and HT (0.86 ± 0.03, p < 0.01). Similarly, the GI value of TB (3.59 ± 0.12) was significantly better than those of CK (4.31 ± 0.43, p < 0.01) and HT (4.52 ± 0.24, p < 0.01). The median doses to the bladder did not differ between the CK and TB (V18.1 Gy: 16.5% ± 4.5% vs. 15.8% ± 4.4%, p = 1.00), but were significantly higher for HT (V18.1 Gy: 33.2% ± 7.3%, p < 0.01 vs. CK, p < 0.01 vs. TB). The median rectal dose was significantly lower for TB (V18.1 Gy: 5.6% ± 4.5%) than for CK (V18.1 Gy: 11.2% ± 6.7%, p < 0.01) and HT (20.2% ± 8.3%, p < 0.01). TB had the shortest BOT (2.6 min; CK: 17.4 min, HT: 6.9 min). TB could create treatment plans dosimetrically comparable to those of CK when using the same margins, in patients with hydrogel spacers.

Proton Beam Therapy for Locally Recurrent Parotid Gland Cancer.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of proton beam therapy for patients with locally recurrent parotid cancer. Between 2009 and 2012, ten patients with locally recurrent parotid gland cancer were treated with proton beam therapy (70.2 Gy equivalents in 32 fractions) with or without intra-arterial infusion chemotherapy of cisplatin (50 mg/body/week, for a total of 5-8 weeks). The median follow-up was 24 months (range 10-49 months). The 1-year overall survival and local control rates were 80 %, and the 3-year overall survival and local control rates were 60 %. None of the patients experienced grade 3-5 toxicities in the treatment or the follow-up periods. These findings suggest that proton beam therapy could be applied effectively and safely for patients with locally recurrent parotid gland cancer.

High Dose Hypofractionated Proton Beam Therapy is a Safe and Feasible Treatment for Central Lung Cancer.

BACKGROUND: There have been few reports about high total dose hypofractionated proton beam therapy for central lung cancer. The aim of this study was to examine retrospectively the safety and efficacy of high total dose hypofractionated proton beam therapy for central lung cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients treated by proton beam therapy for central lung cancer located less than 2 cm from the trachea, mainstem bronchus, or lobe bronchus were included in this study. All patients received 80 Gy of relative biological dose effectiveness (RBE) in 25 fractions with proton beam therapy over 5 weeks between January 2009 and February 2015. The toxicities were evaluated using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer criteria. RESULTS: Twenty patients, including 14 clinically inoperable patients (70%), received proton beam therapy for central lung cancer. The median patient age was 75 years (range: 63-90 years), the median follow up time was 27.5 months (range: 12-72 months), and the median tumor diameter was 39.5 mm (range: 24-81 mm). All patients were followed for at least 20 months or until death. The 2-year overall survival rate was 73.8% (100% in operable patients, and 62.5% in inoperable patients), and the 2-year local control rate was 78.5%. There was no Grade 3 or higher toxicities, including bronchial stricture, obstruction, and fistula. CONCLUSIONS: The present study suggests that a high total dose hypofractionated proton beam therapy for central lung cancer was safe and feasible.

Re-irradiation using proton beam therapy combined with weekly intra-arterial chemotherapy for recurrent oral cancer.

AIM: The purpose of this study was to clarify the efficacy and toxicities of re-irradiation using proton beam therapy combined with weekly intra-arterial chemotherapy for recurrent oral cancer. METHODS: Between October 2009 and July 2014, 34 patients who had recurrent oral cancer were treated by proton beam therapy combined with intra-arterial infusion chemotherapy at the Southern Tohoku Proton Therapy Center, Japan. RESULTS: For all patients, the median follow-up was 25 months (range, 3-77 months). After treatment, 22 patients (65%) achieved a complete response, and 12 patients (35%) achieved a partial response at the primary tumor site. One-year and 2-year overall survival (OS) rates were 62% and 42%, respectively. One-year and 2-year LC rates were 77% and 60%, respectively. No treatment-related deaths were observed during the treatment and follow-up periods. CONCLUSION: Re-irradiation using proton beam therapy combined with weekly intra-arterial chemotherapy improved OS and local control rates compared with other treatment modalities and could become a new treatment modality for patients with recurrent oral cancer.

Clinical Outcomes and Prognostic Factors of High-Dose Proton Beam Therapy for Peripheral Stage I Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy, toxicity, and prognostic factors of high-dose proton beam therapy (PBT) for peripheral stage I non-small-cell lung cancer were assessed in this retrospective study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty patients with peripheral stage I non-small-cell lung cancer, two of whom had heterochronic multiple lung cancers, underwent high-dose PBT between January 2009 and September 2014. The relative biological effectiveness of the proton beam was defined as 1.1. The beam energy and spread-out Bragg peak were fine-tuned for the 90% isodose volume of the prescribed dosage to encompass the planning target volume. The cumulative survival curves were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Treatment toxicities were evaluated using version 4 of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4. RESULTS: The study included 35 males and 15 females with a median age of 72.5 years. The median follow-up period was 22.8 months. The clinical stage was IA in 44 (85%) and IB in eight (15%) tumors. The total dose of PBT was 66 GyE in 10 fractions in all tumors. Three-year overall survival rate among all patients was 87.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 94.8%-73.2%). Forty-five patients were alive, and 5 were dead. Three-year local control and progression-free survival rates were 95.7% (95% CI, 98.9%-83.8%) and 76.3% (95% CI, 86.9%-59.3%), respectively. Only one patient experienced Grade 2 pneumonitis. CONCLUSION: High-dose PBT may be an effective and safe treatment option for patients with stage I non-small-cell lung cancer.

Three-dimensional summation of rectal doses in brachytherapy combined with external beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To determine the dose constraints for rectal bleeding in brachytherapy (BRT) combined with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Post-BRT, pelvic computed tomography images were used for subsequent EBRT planning and BRT postplans in 37 patients. The physical doses for each plan were converted to biologically effective doses, and corresponding voxel doses were integrated to plot the summed dose-volume histogram (sum-DVH). Between 5 patients with (bled-pts) and 32 without (spared-pts) grade 2 or 3 rectal bleeding, the differences in the mean minimal dose (rDn) covering the rectal volume of 0.5-10.0 cc and the rectal volume (rVn) receiving the calculated dose of 20-150Gy were compared. RESULTS: The differences in the summed-rDn were determined by BRT exposure, while those of the summed-rVn were determined in the low-dose range and superimposed in the high-dose range by EBRT exposure. Of the 13 patients with rV150 of >1.2 cc, 4 were bled-pts (30.8%). Of the 24 patients with rV150 of ≤ 1.2cc, 1 was a bled-pts (4.2%) (p=0.024; odds ratio, 10.2; CI (95%), 1.0-104.3). CONCLUSIONS: The mono-scale DVH analysis is a promising method for exploring the threshold for rectal bleeding in combined radiotherapy.

Narrow safety range of intraoperative rectal irradiation exposure volume for avoiding bleeding after seed implant brachytherapy.

BACKGROUND & PURPOSE: Rectal toxicity is less common after 125I seed implant brachytherapy for prostate cancer, and intraoperative rectal dose-volume constraints (the constraint) is still undetermined in pioneering studies. As our constraint failed to prevent grade 2 or 3 rectal bleeding (bled-pts) in 5.1% of patients, we retrospectively explored another constraint for the prevention of rectal bleeding. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study population consisted of 197 patients treated with the brachytherapy as monotherapy using real-time intraoperative transrectal ultrasound (US)-guided treatment at a prescribed dose of 145 Gy. Post-implant dosimetry was performed on Day 1 and Day 30 after implantation using computed tomography (CT) imaging. Rectal bleeding toxicity was classified by CTC-AE ver. 3.0 during a mean 29-month (range, 12-48 months) period after implantation. The differences in rV100s were compared among intraoperative, Day 1 and Day 30 dosimetry, and between that of patients with grade 2 or 3 rectal bleeding (the bled-pts) and of the others (the spared-pts). All patients were divided into groups based on provisional rV100s that were increased stepwise in 0.1-cc increments from 0 to 1.0 cc. The difference in the ratios of the bled-pts to the spared-pts was tested by chi-square tests, and their odds ratios were calculated (bled-OR). All statistical analyses were performed by t-tests. RESULTS: The mean values of rV100us, rV100CT_1, and rV100CT_30 were 0.31 ± 0.43, 0.22 ± 0.36, and 0.59 ± 0.68 cc, respectively. These values temporarily decreased (p = 0.020) on Day 1 and increased (p = 0.000) on Day 30. There was no significant difference in rV100s between the bled-pts and spared-pts at any time of dosimetry. The maximum bled-OR was identified among patients with an rV100us value above 0.1 cc (p = 0.025; OR = 7.8; 95% CI, 1.4-145.8); an rV100CT_1 value above 0.3 cc (p = 0.014; OR = 16.2; 95% CI, 3.9-110.7), and an rV100CT_30 value above 0.5 cc (p = 0.019; OR = 6.3; 95% CI, 1.5-42.3). CONCLUSION: By retrospective analysis exploring rV100 as intraoperative rectal dose-volume thresholds in 125I seed implant brachytherapy for prostate cancer, it is proved that rV100 should be less than 0.1 cc for preventing rectal bleeding.