Rule Out Acute Kidney Injury in the Emergency Department With a Urinary Dipstick.

INTRODUCTION: The identification of acute injury of the kidney relies on serum creatinine (SCr), a functional marker with poor temporal resolution as well as limited sensitivity and specificity for cellular injury. In contrast, urinary biomarkers of kidney injury have the potential to detect cellular stress and damage in real time. METHODS: To detect the response of the kidney to injury, we have tested a lateral flow dipstick that measures a urinary protein called neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL). Analysis of urine was performed in a prospective cohort of 479 patients (final cohort N = 426) entering an emergency department in New York City and subsequently admitted for inpatient care. RESULTS: Colorimetric development had high interrater reliability (88% concordance rate) and correlated with traditional enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) measurements (ρ = 0.732, P < .0001). Of the 14% of the cohort who met Acute Kidney Injury Network (AKIN) SCr criteria for acute kidney injury (AKI), 67% demonstrated transient (<2 days) and 33% demonstrated sustained (>2 days) elevation of SCr. Comparing the outcomes of patients with sustained versus transient or undetectable changes in SCr revealed that the urinary NGAL (uNGAL) dipstick had high specificity and negative predictive value (NPV) (high- vs. low-intermediate readings, sensitivity = 0.55, specificity = 0.91, positive predictive value = 0.24, NPV = 0.97, χ2 = 20.39, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: We show that the introduction of a bedside uNGAL dipstick permits accurate triage by identifying individuals who do not have tubular injury. In an era of shortening length of stay and rapid decisions based on isolated SCr measurements, real-time exclusion of kidney injury by a dipstick will be particularly useful to overcome the retrospective, insensitive, and nonspecific attributes of SCr.

The Energy Index Does Not Affect Local Control of Brain Metastases Treated by Gamma Knife Stereotactic Radiosurgery.

BACKGROUND: The energy index (EI) is a measure of dose homogeneity within a target volume calculated by the integral dose divided by the product of prescription dose and tumor volume. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether a higher EI is associated with greater local control for brain metastases (BMs) treated by Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS). METHODS: We reviewed all patients treated with GKRS for BM at our institution between January 2009 and February 2014. Data on the prescription dose, prescription isodose line, minimum dose, mean dose, integral dose, tumor volume, and EI were collected. Tumor response was assessed by reviewing follow-up brain imaging studies and classified according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Local control per lesion and dosimetric prognostic factors for local control were assessed by univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analyses. RESULTS: Of 213 patients treated, 126 had follow-up imaging available with a median follow-up of 6 months. Three hundred seventy-three individual tumors were analyzed. Of these, 133 showed a complete response, 157 showed a partial response, 46 remained stable, and 37 developed local failure. Tumors with EI ≥1.6 mJ·mL(-1)·Gy(-1) showed a higher rate of complete response. Local control rates at 6, 11, and 17 months were 95.4%, 86.5%, and 81.5%, respectively. On univariate analysis, the following factors were associated with higher rates of local failure: prescription doses of 16 and 18 Gy compared with a prescription dose of 20 Gy. The following factors were associated with a greater rate of local control: maximum dose and mean dose. On multivariate analysis, the only statistically significant factor associated with a greater rate of local failure was prescription dose of 16 Gy compared with 20 Gy. CONCLUSION: GKRS for BM results in a high rate of local control with an 11-month rate of 86.5%. A higher EI was not significantly associated with a higher rate of local control on multivariate analysis. Prescription dose was found to be the only significant predictor of local control on multivariate analysis.

Does lung cancer mutation status and targeted therapy predict for outcomes and local control in the setting of brain metastases treated with radiation?

BACKGROUND: We investigated effects of genetic alterations in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), and Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) on overall survival (OS) and local control after stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: A cohort of 89 out of 262 NSCLC patients (2003-2013) treated with gamma knife radiosurgery for brain metastases had genotyping available and were selected as our study population. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 12 months. Median OS rates for the EGFR, KRAS, echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like 4 (EML4)-ALK mutated, and wild-type cohorts were 17, 7, 27, and 12 months, respectively (P = .019), and for targeted versus nontargeted therapy 21 and 11 months, respectively (P = .071). Targeted therapy was a strong predictor of increased OS on univariate (P = .037) and multivariate (P = .022) analysis. Gender, primary tumor controlled status, recursive partitioning analysis class, and graded prognostic assessment score were associated with OS (P < .05). On multivariate analysis, positive EGFR mutational status was a highly significant predictor for decreased survival (hazard ratio: 8.2; 95% CI: 2.0-33.7; P = .003). However, when we recategorized EGFR-mutant cases based on whether they received tyrosine kinase inhibitor, OS was no longer significantly shorter (hazard ratio: 1.5; P = .471). Median OS for patients with and without local failure was 17 and 12 months, respectively (P = .577). Local failure rates for EGFR, KRAS, EML4-ALK mutated, and wild-type cohorts by lesion were 8.7%, 5.4%, 4.3%, and 5.1%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that EGFR tyrosine kinase mutation and ALK translocation results in improved survival to targeted therapies and that mutation status itself does not predict survival and local control in patients with brain metastases from NSCLC.