RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Arterial catheter (A-line) is essential for managing severely ill patients, and the radial artery is the most common insertion site in the intensive care unit (ICU). However, many accidental removals occur because the insertion site of A-line in the traditional radial approach (TRA) overlaps with the joint flexion. Recent reports have shown no significant difference in the complication rates between coronarography using the distal radial approach (DRA) and that using TRA. However, to date, no report has examined accidental removals of DRA in the ICU. This study aimed to retrospectively evaluate the safety of the DRA A-line in ICU management. METHODS: This retrospective, descriptive, and observational study enrolled patients who underwent A-line insertion using the DRA at the authors' facility, which is a university hospital with approximately 1100 beds, from January 1, 2019 to August 31, 2019. The participants' clinical data were extracted from their medical records. The primary outcome was the number of accidental removals. RESULTS: The study included 20 patients with a median age of 70 (interquartile range (IQR): 58.5-77) years: 10 patients with traumas, 6 with cerebral hemorrhages, 2 with gastrointestinal perforations, and 2 with other diagnoses. The number of punctures was 1 in 15 patients, 2 in 4 patients, and 3 in 1 patient. Only 1 patient required ultrasound guidance, whereas 12 patients required the use of guidewires. The median duration after insertion was 3 (IQR 2.5-5.5) days. Accidental removal was noted in only one patient. No other complications were observed during the period from insertion to removal. CONCLUSIONS: DRA may be a safe option for insertion of a new A-line in the ICU.