RESUMO
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of prospectively collected data. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to accurately map the lower extremity muscles innervated by the lumbar spinal roots by directly stimulating the spinal roots during surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Innervation of the spinal roots in the lower extremities has been estimated by clinical studies, anatomical studies, and animal experiments. However, there have been discrepancies between studies. Moreover, there are no studies that have studied the laterality of lower limb innervation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 73 patients with lumbar degenerative disease, a total of 147 spinal roots were electrically stimulated and the electromyographic response was recorded at the vastus medialis (VM), gluteus medius (GM), tibialis anterior (TA), biceps femoris (BF), and gastrocnemius (GC). The asymmetry index (AI) was obtained using the following equation to represent the left-right asymmetry in the CMAP amplitude. Paired t-tests were used to compare CMAP amplitudes on the right and left sides. Differences in the AI among the same spinal root groups were determined using one-way analysis of variance. RESULTS: The frequency of compound muscle action potentials (CMAP) elicitation in VM, GM, TA, BF, and GC were 100%, 75.0%, 50.0%, 83.3%, and 33.3% in L3 spinal root stimulation, 90.4%, 78.8%, 59.6%, 73.1%, and 59.6% in L4 spinal root stimulation, 32.2%, 78.0%, 93.2%, 69.5%, and 83.1% in L5 spinal root stimulation, and 40.0%, 100%, 80.0%, 70.0%, and 80.0% in S1 spinal root stimulation, respectively. The most frequent muscle with maximum amplitude of the CMAP in L3, L4, L5, and S1 spinal root stimulation was the VM, GM, TA, and GM respectively. Unilateral innervation occurred at high rates in the TA in L4 root stimulation and the VM in L5 root stimulation in 37.5% and 42.3% of patients, respectively. Even in patients with bilateral innervation, a 20-38% asymmetry index of CMAP amplitude was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The spinal roots innervated a much larger range of muscles than what is indicated in general textbooks. Furthermore, a non-negligible number of patients showed asymmetrical innervation of lower limb by the lumbar spinal roots.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: The measurement of distal motor latency (DML) is an established method for diagnosing entrapment peripheral neuropathy. DML can also serve as an index for disease severity and prognosis. We considered that measuring DML could be useful in estimating the severity of spinal root impairment and predicting prognosis in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy of intraoperative direct electrical stimulation of the spinal root and the measurement of DML in LSS. METHODS: In 39 patients with LSS, a total of 93 spinal roots were stimulated, and evoked electromyography was recorded at the leg muscles after decompression. DML was measured and its correlation with clinical severity, as evaluated by Zurich claudication questionnaire (ZCQ) and Short Form 36 (SF-36), was investigated. RESULTS: For the stimulation of the L3, L4, and L5 spinal root, the mean DML (ms) were 6.8 (±1.4), 7.4 (±1.3), and 6.0 (±1.3) in gluteus medius, 9.3 (±1.5), 9.2 (±1.5), and 9.0 (±1.6) in biceps femoris, 9.7 (±1.0), 9.8 (±1.8), and 9.4 (±1.2) in vastus medialis, 16.1 (±1.0), 14.7 (±1.3), and 14.1 (±1.5) in tibialis anterior, and 16.4 (±1.4), 14.3 (±1.8), and 13.9 (±1.9) in gastrocnemius muscles. Statistically significant positive correlations were observed between DML and height. Preoperative symptom and function scores of ZCQ and postoperative bodily pain scores of SF-36 were significantly worse in the patients with prolonged DML. CONCLUSIONS: DML is thought to be useful for estimating the severity of spinal root impairment and for predicting the prognosis.