Evaluation of Serum Calprotectin Levels in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

BACKGROUND: Fecal calprotectin has been proposed as a useful biomarker of disease activity in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, the role of calprotectin in systemic circulation is not well established. Thus, this study aimed to quantify serum calprotectin levels to identify a potential inflammatory marker for IBD. METHODS: Ninety-eight patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and 105 patients with Crohn's disease (CD) were prospectively enrolled and clinically scored. Ninety-two healthy, age-matched subjects served as controls. Blood samples from UC and CD patients and controls were analyzed for serum calprotectin levels and routine laboratory parameters. Disease activity was assessed by partial Mayo score and Harvey-Bradshaw index for UC and CD, respectively. RESULTS: Serum calprotectin levels were higher in CD and UC patients than in controls and were higher during active disease than during inactive disease in CD but not in UC. In UC, serum calprotectin levels were correlated with C-reactive protein (CRP) but not with other laboratory parameters or disease activity. In CD, serum calprotectin levels were positively correlated with disease activity, serum CRP, and platelet count. In UC and CD, serum calprotectin and CRP levels increased during the acute phase and decreased towards remission. CONCLUSIONS: Serum calprotectin is an inflammatory marker in IBD but might be more effective in evaluating patients with CD than those with UC. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings and to better determine the specific uses of serum calprotectin in routine practice.

Altered serum profile of the interleukin-22 system in inflammatory bowel disease.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Interleukin-22 (IL-22), plays a vital role in the mucosal repair of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Serum levels of IL-22 and IL-22 binding protein (IL-22BP), a soluble inhibitory IL-22 receptor, were measured in patients with IBD to investigate the profile of IL-22 in the systemic circulation. METHODS: Blood samples from 92 healthy subjects, 98 patients with ulcerative colitis (UC), and 105 patients with Crohn's disease (CD) were analyzed for serum levels of IL-22, IL-22BP, human ß-defensin 2 (hBD-2), and serum inflammatory parameters. Disease activity was assessed by the partial Mayo score and Harvey-Bradshaw index for UC and CD, respectively. RESULTS: Serum IL-22 level was lower in UC (P < 0.001) and CD (P < 0.001) vs control and its decrease was more pronounced in CD than in UC (P = 0.019). Serum IL-22BP level was lower in UC (P < 0.001) and CD (P < 0.001) vs control and correlated with inflammatory parameters (albumin and C-reactive protein (CRP) in UC; hemoglobin, albumin, and CRP in CD). Serum IL-22/IL-22BP ratios were higher in UC (P = 0.009) vs control and correlated with inflammatory parameters (albumin and CRP). Serum hBD-2 level was higher only in CD (P = 0.015) but did not correlate with serum IL-22 levels, IL-22BP levels, IL-22/IL-22BP ratios, or inflammatory parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Dysregulation of the IL-22 system in the blood may play a role in the pathogenesis of IBD. Further studies are needed to understand the pathogenic and clinical significance of the blood IL-22 system in IBD.

Gene Expression of Transient Receptor Potential Channels in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells of Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients.

We examined the expression profile of transient receptor potential (TRP) channels in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). PBMCs were obtained from 41 ulcerative colitis (UC) patients, 34 Crohn's disease (CD) patients, and 30 normal subjects. mRNA levels of TRP channels were measured using the quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction, and correlation tests with disease ranking, as well as laboratory parameters, were performed. Compared with controls, TRPV2 and TRPC1 mRNA expression was lower, while that of TRPM2, was higher in PBMCs of UC and CD patients. Moreover, TRPV3 mRNA expression was lower, while that of TRPV4 was higher in CD patients. TRPC6 mRNA expression was higher in patients with CD than in patients with UC. There was also a tendency for the expression of TRPV2 mRNA to be negatively correlated with disease activity in patients with UC and CD, while that of TRPM4 mRNA was negatively correlated with disease activity only in patients with UC. PBMCs from patients with IBD exhibited varying mRNA expression levels of TRP channel members, which may play an important role in the progression of IBD.

Safety and efficacy of single-needle leukocyte apheresis for treatment of ulcerative colitis.

Leukocyte apheresis (LCAP) is a safe and effective treatment for active ulcerative colitis (UC) in Japan. Nevertheless, a limitation of LCAP is its requirement for two puncture sites (double-needle [DN] apheresis), sometimes leading to problems with needle puncture. Single-needle (SN) apheresis is useful in hemodialysis and reduces needle puncture pain. If SN apheresis were found to be useful in LCAP for UC, it may reduce patient burden. The aim of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of SN apheresis with that of DN apheresis. Twenty-four patients with active UC were retrospectively enrolled. They underwent either SN apheresis (n = 12) or conventional double-needle (DN) apheresis (n = 12) at the Kurume University Hospital from February 2014 to March 2018. At each session, we recorded access problems defined by the time required to initiate apheresis and the frequency of puncture-related problems, as well as blood circuit clotting, defined as clotting necessitating interruption of apheresis and changing of the circuit. Efficacy was assessed using partial Mayo scores. The number of apheresis sessions was comparable between SN and DN apheresis (9.0 ± 2.0 times vs 9.6 ± 1.4 times, mean ± SEM). SN significantly reduced the time required to start apheresis (10.0 ± 5.4 minutes vs 19.4 ± 11.9 minutes, P < .05) as well as needle puncture troubles (0.9% vs 11.5%, P < .05). SN had comparable frequency of blood clotting episodes (5.6% vs 8.7%). SN apheresis had similar clinical efficacy (P < .001 in SN and P < .01 in DN). The improvement and remission rates were comparable between groups. SN apheresis may be safe and effective and may reduce patient burden during UC treatment. Nevertheless, further comparative studies are needed.