[Expression and significance analysis of GDF3 in testicular cancer based on TCGA and GTEx databases].

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the expression and significance of GDF3 in testicular cancer through bioinformatics analysis. METHODS: Using the TCGA and GTEx databases, differential expression analysis and pan-cancer analysis were performed to identify the target gene GDF3, and the clinical relevance of GDF3 in testicular cancer was analyzed using the UALCAN database. Based on the R packages "org.Hs.eg.db" and "clusterProfiler," gene ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment analyses were conducted to explore the potential functions of GDF3 in testicular cancer. The correlation of GDF3 with immune chemokines and immune inhibitors in testicular cancer was investigated using the TISIDB database. RESULTS: The GDF3 was significantly upregulated in testicular cancer (P<0.001) and closely associated with clinical staging (P<0.05) and tumor subtypes (P<0.001). The immune-related analysis revealed that GDF3 was strongly correlated with immune chemokines CCL26 (rho=0.599, P<0.001), CCL7 (rho=0.525, P<0.001), immune inhibitor ADORA2A (rho=0.723, P<0.001), and PVRL2 (rho=0.585, P<0.001). CONCLUSION: The GDF3 is closely related to the occurrence, development, and immune microenvironment of testicular cancer.

[Correlation of the prostatic exosomal protein content with conventional indicators of EPS and NIH-CPSI].

OBJECTIVE: To study the relationship of the content of prostatic exosomal protein (PSEP) in the urine with the counts of WBCs and small particles of lecithin (SPL) in the EPS and NIH-CPSI in patients with chronic prostatitis. METHODS: We collected mid-stream urine samples from 367 chronic prostatitis patients in the Department of Andrology of the General Hospital of Eastern Theater Command from November 2017 to August 2018. We measured the content of PSEP in the urine, counted WBCs and SPLs in the EPS of the patients, obtained their NIH-CPSI scores, and analyzed the correlation of the PSEP level with the WBC and SPL counts and NIH-CPSI scores of the patients. RESULTS: The PSEP level in the urine was elevated with the increase of the WBC count in the EPS of the patients (r = 0.19, P = 0.047) but not significantly correlated with the SPL count in the EPS (r = 0.02, P = 0.48). A significant correlation was observed between the PSEP level and the NIH-CPSI scores of the patients (r = 0.31, P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The PSEP content in the urine can be used as an indicator in the clinical diagnosis and assessment of the inflammation degree of chronic prostatitis.

[Impact of Mycoplasma genitalium infection on the semen quality of infertile males].

OBJECTIVE: To explore Mycoplasma genitalium (MG) infection in the urogenital tract of infertile men and its influence on semen quality. METHODS: Semen samples were collected from 352 infertile males in the Center of Reproductive Medicine of Nanjing General Hospital from March to July 2015. MG infection was detected by real-time fluorescence simultaneous amplification and testing and semen analyses were conducted according to the WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination and Processing of Human Semen (5th Ed) on the semen pH value, semen volume, total sperm count, sperm concentration, total sperm motility, percentages of progressively motile sperm (PMS) and immotile sperm (IMS), and sperm DNA fragmentation index (DFI). The data obtained were subjected to statistical analysis by t-test and non-parametric test (Wilcoxon test). RESULTS: MG infection was found in 3.4% (12/352) of the infertile patients. Compared with the MG-positive cases, the MG-negative ones showed a significantly higher semen volume (ï¼»2.85 ± 0.14ï¼½ vs ï¼»3.84 ± 0.12ï¼½ ml, P = 0.008) and percentage of PMS (ï¼»15.86±1.72ï¼½ vs ï¼»60.95 ± 5.63ï¼½ %, P = 0.032) but a lower DFI (ï¼»30.73 ±2.24ï¼½ vs ï¼»20.71 ± 1.55ï¼½%, P = 0.014). However, no statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups in the semen pH value (7.38 ±0.02 vs 7.39 ± 0.01, P = 0.774), sperm concentration (ï¼»52.96 ± 15.78ï¼½ vs ï¼»60.05 ± 4.29ï¼½×106/ml, P = 0.683), sperm count (ï¼»154.15 ± 46.37ï¼½ vs ï¼»221.56 ± 15.43ï¼½×106, P = 0.236), total sperm motility (ï¼»29.04 ± 3.11ï¼½ vs ï¼»33.52 ± 1.51ï¼½ %, P = 0.626), or percentage of IMS (ï¼»23.57 ± 0.99ï¼½ vs ï¼»62.34 ± 1.69ï¼½ %, P = 0.691). CONCLUSIONS: Urogenital MG infection is common in infertile males and potentially affects the semen quality, especially sperm vitality of the patient.

Polymorphism of A133S and promoter hypermethylation in Ras association domain family 1A gene (RASSF1A) is associated with risk of esophageal and gastric cardia cancers in Chinese population from high incidence area in northern China.

BACKGROUND: The role of tumor suppressor gene RASSF1A in the esophageal and gastric cardia carcinogenesis is still inconclusive. In this study, the polymorphism, promoter methylation and gene expression of RASSF1A were characterized in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and gastric cardia adenocarcinoma (GCA). METHODS: We firstly analyzed the prevalence of RASSF1A A133S in a total of 228 cancer patients with ESCC (n=112) and GCA (n=116) and 235 normal controls by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and restriction enzyme-digestion assay. Then, the promoter methylation status of the RASSF1A in ESCC (n=143), GCA (n=92) and corresponding adjacent normal tissues were further investigated using methylation-specific PCR (MSP) approach. Finally, the RASSF1A protein expression were determined in ESCC (n=27), GCA (n=24) and the matched adjacent normal tissues by immunohistochemical method. RESULTS: The frequency of 133Ala/Se and Ser/Ser genotype was significantly higher in GCA patients than in normal controls (19.0% vs. 10.2%, P=0.02). Compared with Ala/Ala genotype, Ala/Se and Ser/Ser genotype significantly increased susceptibility to GCA (OR=2.06, 95% CI=1.09-3.97). However, this polymorphism had no association with ESCC (P=0.69). The promoter methylation of RASSF1A gene was significantly increased the risk to both ESCC (OR=5.90, 95% CI=2.78-12.52) and GCA (OR=7.50, 95% CI= 2.78-20.23). Promoter methylation of RASSF1A gene in ESCC was also associated with age and cancer cell differentiation (for age: OR=3.11, 95% CI=1.10-8.73; for differentiation: OR=0.29, 95% CI=0.12-0.69). RASSF1A positive expression was significantly decreased the risk of GCA (OR=0.16, 95% CI=0.03-0.83). In contrast, there was no statistical significance between RASSF1A positive expression and ESCC. The expression of RASSF1A protein trend to be positively related with older GCA patients (OR=16.20, 95% CI=1.57-167.74). CONCLUSIONS: The present findings suggest that alterations of RASSF1A may play an important role in gastric cardia carcinogenesis in terms of polymorphism, promoter hypermethylation and protein expression. Whereas, RASSF1A hypermethylation may probably also be involved in esophageal squamous cell carcinogenesis.