[Effects of Introducing PBPM for Outpatient Cancer Drug Therapy and Its Impact on Physician Workload].

In May 2022, Hyogo Medical University Hospital introduced protocol-based pharmacotherapy management(PBPM), which is jointly planned by doctors and pharmacists, for certain cancer drug therapies. Colorectal cancer patients who underwent outpatient cancer chemotherapy in the Department of Lower Gastrointestinal Surgery from October to December 2021(before the introduction of PBPM)and from May to August 2022(after the introduction of PBPM)were retrospectively studied. The proportion of clinical examinations performed, number of prescription questions, and time taken by pharmacists to solve the prescription questions before and after the introduction of PBPM were compared. Additionally, the number of modifications made in the medical record by pharmacists on behalf of doctors in response to the prescription questions was assessed. The proportion of clinical examinations performed(clinical examinations actually performed/clinical examinations that should have been performed)improved from 93.2%(260/279)before to 98.8%(405/410)after the introduction of PBPM(p<0.001). The number of prescription questions decreased from an average of 64.7(±11.9)per month before to an average of 29.5(±3.4)per month after the introduction of PBPM. The average number of modifications made in the medical record by pharmacists on behalf of the doctors in response to the prescription questions was 25.8(±5.4)per month after the introduction of PBPM. There was no significant difference before and after the introduction of PBPM in regard to the median(interquartile range)time taken by pharmacists to solve the prescription questions (before PBPM: 1.88 minutes per case[1.70-2.28 minutes]; after PBPM: 1.71 minutes per case[1.61-2.06 minutes][p= 0.75]). The increased proportion of clinical examinations performed after the implementation of PBPM may have improved the safety of cancer drug management, and the decreased number of prescription questions is speculated to have led to a reduction in physician workload.

[Educational Project of Self-Removal of the Intravenous Central Venous Access Port Guided by Patients with Advanced Colorectal Cancer Instructed by a Nurse in the University Hospital].

BACKGROUND: Fluorouracil infusion for 46±5h from the central venous(CV)port is required for mFOLFOX6, FOLFIRI, and FOLFOXIRI in patients with advanced colorectal cancer(CRC), followed by self-removal of the needle by patients. At our hospital, outpatients were instructed for self-removal of the needle, but the results were unsatisfactory. Therefore, instructions for self-removal of the needle from the CV port have been initiated at the patient ward since April 2019, making use of a hospital stay of 3 days. PATIENTS: We retrospectively enrolled patients with chemotherapy-introduced advanced CRC from the CV port who received instructions for self-removal of the needle in the outpatient department and ward between January 2018 and December 2021. RESULTS: Of all patients with advanced CRC, 21 received instructions at the outpatient department(OP)while 67 at patient ward(PW). Incidences of successful self-removal of the needle without the aid of others were similar: 47% in OP and 52% in PW(p=0.80). However, after several additional instructions involving their families, it was higher in PW than in OP(97.0 vs 76.1%, p=0.005). Incidences of successful self-removal of the needle without the aid of others in those aged≥75/<75, and≥65/<65 years were 0%/61.1%, and 35.4%/67.5%, respectively. OP was as a risk factor for failed self-removal of the needle in the logistic regression analysis(odds ratio: 11.19, 95%CI: 1.86- 67.30). CONCLUSION: Repeated instructions involving patients' families during the hospital stay improved the incidence of successful self-removal of the needle. Involvement of patients' families from the beginning may effectively improve self- removal of the needle, particularly in the elderly patients with advanced CRC.

[Challenge of Skin Treatment Led by Nurses and Pharmacists for Advanced Colorectal Cancer Patients Treated with Anti-EGFR Antibodies].

Preemptive skin treatment led by nurses and pharmacists was started for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)who received anti-EGFR antibody treatment. Incidence of skin-related toxicities, amount of topical moisturizers used, and administered cycles of anti-EGFR antibody were retrospectively compared between a preemptive skin treatment group and a control group. Thirty-four mCRC patients before the introduction of preemptive skin treatment led by nurses and 23 mCRC patients treated with preemptive skin treatment led by nurses were evaluated. The incidence of 6- and 12- week Grade 2 or higher skin-related toxicity was 23.5% in the control group and 8.7% in the preemptive group(p=0.18), and 67.7% in the control group and 30.4% in the preemptive group(p=0.0076), respectively. Mean amounts of moisturizer used were both lower in the control group than in the preemptive group at both 6 weeks and 7-12 weeks(6 weeks; 275 g vs 550 g, p=0.036, 7-12 weeks; 575 g vs 1,175 g, p=0.013). However, the amount of topical steroid used was similar in both groups. Preemptive moisturizer skin treatment led by nurses and pharmacists may decrease the incidence of skin- related toxicity.