Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
PLoS One ; 13(7): e0200653, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30059507

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Cryopreservation of leukocytes isolated from the cervicovaginal and colorectal mucosa is useful for the study of cellular immunity (see Hughes SM et al. PLOS ONE 2016). However, some questions about mucosal biology and sexually transmitted infections are better addressed with intact mucosal tissue, for which there is no standard cryopreservation protocol. METHODS AND FINDINGS: To find an optimal preservation protocol for mucosal tissues, we tested slow cooling (1°C/min) with 10% dimethylsulfoxide (designated "cryopreservation") and fast cooling (plunge in liquid nitrogen) with 20% dimethylsulfoxide and 20% ethylene glycol ("vitrification"). We compared fresh and preserved human cervicovaginal and colorectal tissues in a range of assays, including metabolic activity, human immunodeficiency virus infection, cell phenotype, tissue structure by hematoxylin-and-eosin staining, cell number and viability, production of cytokines, and microbicide drug concentrations. Metabolic activity, HIV infectability, and tissue structure were similar in cryopreserved and vitrified vaginal tissues. However, vitrification led to poor cell recovery from the colorectal mucosa, with 90% fewer cells recovered after isolation from vitrified colorectal tissues than from cryopreserved. HIV infection rates were similar for fresh and cryopreserved ectocervical tissues, whereas cryopreserved colorectal tissues were less easily infected than fresh tissues (hazard ratio 0.7 [95% confidence interval 0.4, 1.2]). Finally, we compared isolation of cells before and after cryopreservation. Cell recoveries were higher when cells were isolated after freezing and thawing (71% [59-84%]) than before (50% [38-62%]). Cellular function was similar to fresh tissue in both cases. Microbicide drug concentrations were lower in cryopreserved explants compared to fresh ones. CONCLUSIONS: Cryopreservation of intact cervicovaginal and colorectal tissues with dimethylsulfoxide works well in a range of assays, while the utility of vitrification is more limited. Cell yields are higher from cryopreserved intact tissue pieces than from thawed cryopreserved single cell suspensions isolated before freezing, but T cell functions are similar.


Assuntos
Bioensaio/métodos , Criopreservação/métodos , Crioprotetores/química , Mucosa , Vitrificação , Colo do Útero , Dimetil Sulfóxido/química , Feminino , HIV/patogenicidade , Infecções por HIV/transmissão , Infecções por HIV/virologia , Humanos , Intestino Grosso , Linfócitos T , Vagina
2.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother ; 60(5): 2765-70, 2016 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26902757

RESUMO

A long-acting injectable form of rilpivirine (RPV) is being evaluated in clinical trials for the prevention of HIV infection. Preclinical testing was undertaken to define RPV pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) activities in ectocervical and colonic tissue treated in vitro Tenfold dilutions of RPV were added to the basolateral medium of polarized ectocervical and colonic explant tissues. To half the explants, HIV-1BaL was applied to the apical tissue surface. After culture overnight, all the explants were washed and the RPV in the explants not exposed to HIV was quantified using a validated liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry assay. For efficacy, explants exposed to HIV remained in culture, and supernatants were collected to assess viral replication using a p24 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The data were log10 transformed, and PK/PD correlations were determined using GraphPad Prism and SigmaPlot software. The application of RPV to the basolateral medium at 10 µM and 1 µM was effective in protecting ectocervical and colonic tissues, respectively, from HIV infection. When the RPV in paired ectocervical and colonic explant tissues was quantified, significant inverse linear correlations (P < 0.001) between p24 and RPV concentrations were obtained; more viral replication was noted at lower drug levels. Using a maximum effect model, RPV concentrations of 271 nM in ectocervical tissue and 45 nM in colonic tissue were needed to achieve a 90% effective concentration (EC90). These data demonstrate that RPV can suppress HIV infection in mucosal tissue but that higher levels of RPV are needed in female genital tract tissue than in gastrointestinal tract tissue for protection.


Assuntos
Fármacos Anti-HIV/farmacocinética , Fármacos Anti-HIV/uso terapêutico , Rilpivirina/farmacocinética , Rilpivirina/uso terapêutico , Ensaio de Imunoadsorção Enzimática , Feminino , Infecções por HIV/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por HIV/metabolismo , HIV-1/efeitos dos fármacos , HIV-1/patogenicidade , Humanos , Software
3.
Pharm Res ; 32(11): 3768-81, 2015 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26078001

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Dapivirine (DPV), a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor, and maraviroc (MVC), a CCR5 antagonist, were formulated into aqueous gels designed to prevent mucosal HIV transmission. METHODS: 0.05% DPV, 0.1% MVC, 0.05% DPV/0.1% MVC and placebo gels were evaluated for pH, viscosity, osmolality, and in vitro release. In vitro assays and mucosal tissues were used to evaluate anti-HIV activity. Viability (Lactobacilli only) and epithelial integrity in cell lines and mucosal tissues defined safety. RESULTS: The gels were acidic and viscous. DPV gel had an osmolality of 893 mOsm/kg while the other gels had an osmolality of <100 mOsm/kg. MVC release was similar from the single and combination gels (~5 µg/cm(2)/min(1/2)), while DPV release was 10-fold less from the single as compared to the combination gel (0.4331 µg/cm(2)/min(1/2)). Titrations of the gels showed 10-fold more drug was needed to protect ectocervical than colonic tissue. The combination gel showed ~10- and 100-fold improved activity as compared to DPV and MVC gel, respectively. All gels were safe. CONCLUSIONS: The DPV/MVC gel showed a benefit blocking HIV infection of mucosal tissue compared to the single entity gels. Combination products with drugs affecting unique steps in the viral replication cycle would be advantageous for HIV prevention.


Assuntos
Fármacos Anti-HIV/farmacologia , Cicloexanos/farmacologia , Infecções por HIV/prevenção & controle , HIV-1/efeitos dos fármacos , Pirimidinas/farmacologia , Triazóis/farmacologia , Administração Tópica , Fármacos Anti-HIV/administração & dosagem , Fármacos Anti-HIV/efeitos adversos , Sobrevivência Celular/efeitos dos fármacos , Colo do Útero/metabolismo , Colo do Útero/virologia , Colo/metabolismo , Colo/virologia , Cicloexanos/administração & dosagem , Cicloexanos/efeitos adversos , Combinação de Medicamentos , Liberação Controlada de Fármacos , Feminino , Géis , Inibidores da Fusão de HIV/administração & dosagem , Inibidores da Fusão de HIV/farmacologia , Infecções por HIV/transmissão , Transcriptase Reversa do HIV/administração & dosagem , Transcriptase Reversa do HIV/farmacologia , Humanos , Técnicas In Vitro , Maraviroc , Mucosa/metabolismo , Mucosa/virologia , Pirimidinas/administração & dosagem , Pirimidinas/efeitos adversos , Reto/metabolismo , Reto/virologia , Reologia , Triazóis/administração & dosagem , Triazóis/efeitos adversos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...