Evaluation of Food Effect on the Pharmacokinetics of Velufenacin, a New Muscarinic Receptor Antagonist, in Healthy Subjects.

Velufenacin (DA-8010) is a new muscarinic receptor antagonist under development for the treatment of overactive bladder. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of food on the pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety of velufenacin in healthy subjects. A randomized, open-label, single-dose, 4-sequence, 4-treatment, 4-period crossover study was conducted. Subjects received a single oral dose of velufenacin 2.5 or 5 mg in a fasted or fed (high-fat meal) state in each period with a 7-day washout. PK parameters including maximum plasma concentration (Cmax ) and area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to the last measurable point were compared between the fed and fasted states. Twenty-seven subjects completed the study. The mean area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to the last measurable point of the velufenacin 2.5 and 5 mg doses under the fed condition showed a 1.5- and 1.3-fold increase, respectively, compared to the fasted condition. The corresponding values for Cmax were a 2.3- and 2.0-fold increase, respectively. The time to reach Cmax was comparable regardless of the dose or food intake, showing median values of 4.5-5.0 hours. These results suggest a modest increase of velufenacin absorption by food intake. Velufenacin was generally safe and well tolerated at the 2.5 and 5 mg doses regardless of food.

Effects of food and ethnicity on the pharmacokinetics of venadaparib, a next-generation PARP inhibitor, in healthy Korean, Caucasian, and Chinese male subjects.

AIM: Venadaparib is a next-generation poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor under development for treating gastric cancer. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of food and ethnicity on the pharmacokinetics (PKs) and safety of venadaparib after a single oral administration in healthy Korean, Caucasian, and Chinese male subjects. METHODS: In this randomized, open-label, single-dose, two-sequence, two-period, and crossover study, Korean and Caucasian subjects received venadaparib 80 mg in each period (fasted or fed state) with a seven-day washout. In an open-label, single-dose study, Chinese subjects received venadaparib 80 mg only in the fasted state. Serial blood samples were collected up to 72 h post-dosing. RESULTS: Twelve subjects from each ethnic group completed the study. The geometric mean ratios (90% confidence intervals) of the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to the last measurable time point (AUClast) of venadaparib for the fed to fasted state were 0.82 (0.7457-0.9094) and 1.02 (0.9088-1.1339) in Koreans, and 0.77 (0.6871-0.8609) and 0.96 (0.9017-1.0186) in Caucasians, respectively. No statistically significant differences were observed in Cmax (P-value = 0.45) or AUClast (P-value = 0.30) among the three ethnic groups. A single venadaparib dose was well-tolerated. CONCLUSION: The overall systemic exposure of venadaparib was not affected by the high-fat meal, despite delayed absorption with a decreased Cmax in the fed state. The PK profiles were comparable among the Korean, Caucasian, and Chinese subjects. A single venadaparib 80 mg dose was safe and well-tolerated in both fasted and fed states.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic exploration of various combinations of tegoprazan immediate and delayed-release formulations.

AIMS: The new modified-release formulation of tegoprazan, a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker, is expected to improve the management of acid-related disease, including nocturnal acid breakthrough, by prolonging the duration of acid suppression. This study aimed to explore the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of various combinations of tegoprazan with immediate-release (IR) and delayed-release (DR) formulations. METHODS: A three-cohort, open-label, randomized, single-dose, three-treatment, six-sequence, three-period crossover study was conducted. Various combinations of tegoprazan IR and DR formulations (50, 75 or 100 mg) were administered orally once per period. The 24-h intragastric pH was monitored before and after each administration. PK blood samples were collected for up to 48 h. PK and PD were compared among treatments. RESULTS: Eighteen healthy Korean subjects completed the study. All treatment groups showed intragastric pH above 4 approximately 1 h following tegoprazan administration. Among the various combinations, the IR and DR combination at a 1:1 ratio induced greater gastric acid suppression (%Time pH ≥ 4) than IR alone in each dose group, both for 24 h (50 mg; 59% vs. 52%, P = .2188, 95% confidence interval [CI] -6.92-22.27, 100 mg; 85% vs. 70%, P < .05, 95% CI 8.92-22.19) and at night (50 mg; 27% vs. 16%, P = .1563, 95% CI -11.79-37.71, 100 mg; 77% vs. 49%, P < .05, 95% CI 16.14-42.98), with similar systemic exposure. CONCLUSIONS: The combinatorial tegoprazan in the IR and DR 1:1 ratio formulation was found to induce stronger gastric acid suppression throughout the day and at night, compared to the conventional IR formulation.

Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Esomezol DR, a New Dual Delayed-Release Formulation of Esomeprazole 20 Mg or 40 Mg, in Healthy Subjects.

Background: Esomeprazole, a proton pump inhibitor (PPI), is widely used to treat acid-related disorders, but it has short plasma half-life which can cause insufficient gastric acid suppression, such as nocturnal acid breakthrough. A new dual delayed-release (DR) formulation of esomeprazole (Esomezol DR), was developed to extend the duration of gastric acid suppression. Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PKs) and pharmacodynamics (PDs) of esomeprazole for the DR formulation compared to a conventional enteric-coated (EC) formulation (Nexium) in healthy male subjects. Methods: Two randomized, open-label, multiple-dose, two-way crossover studies with esomeprazole 20 mg and 40 mg were conducted. Subjects received the DR formulation or the EC formulation once daily for 7 days in each period with a 7-day washout. Serial blood samples were collected up to 24 hours after the 1st dose, and 24-hour intragastric pH was continuously monitored before the 1st dose as baseline and after the 1st and the 7th dose. Results: In 20 mg and 40 mg dose groups, 38 and 44 subjects completed the study, respectively. The DR formulation exhibited the dual-release pattern of esomeprazole, resulting in more sustained plasma concentration-time profiles compared to the EC formulation. The systemic exposure of esomeprazole for the DR formulation was comparable to that for the EC formulation, showing the similar area under the plasma concentration-time curve. The 24-hour gastric acid suppression was also similar between the two formulations, while the inhibition during night-time (22:00-06:00) showed a better tendency in the DR formulation. Conclusion: The sustained exposure of esomeprazole in the DR formulation led to well-maintained and higher acid inhibition compared to the EC formulation, especially during the night-time. These results suggest that the DR formulation can be an alternative formulation to the conventional EC formulation, expecting the potential of relieving nocturnal acid-related symptoms.

Prediction of gastric pH-mediated drug exposure using physiologically-based pharmacokinetic modeling: A case study of itraconazole.

Abnormal gastric acidity, including achlorhydria, can act as a significant source of variability in orally administered drugs especially with pH-sensitive solubility profiles, such as weak bases, potentially resulting in an undesirable therapeutic response. This study aimed to evaluate the utility of physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling in the prediction of gastric pH-mediated drug exposure by using itraconazole, a weak base, as a case. An itraconazole PBPK model was developed on the mechanistic basis of its absorption kinetics in a middle-out manner from a stepwise in vitro-in vivo extrapolation to in vivo refinement. Afterward, an independent prospective clinical study evaluating gastric pH and itraconazole pharmacokinetics (PKs) under normal gastric acidity and esomeprazole-induced gastric hypoacidity was conducted for model validation. Validation was performed by comparing the predicted data with the clinical observations, and the valid model was subsequently applied to predict PK changes under achlorhydria. The developed itraconazole PBPK model showed reasonable reproducibility for gastric pH-mediated exposure observed in the clinical investigation. Based on the model-based simulations, itraconazole exposure was expected to be decreased up to 65% under achlorhydria, and furthermore, gastric pH-mediated exposure could be mechanistically interpreted according to sequential variation in total solubility, dissolution, and absorption. This study suggested the utility of PBPK modeling in the prediction of gastric pH-mediated exposure, especially for drugs whose absorption is susceptible to gastric pH. Our findings will serve as a leading model for further mechanistic assessment of exposure depending on gastric pH for various drugs, ultimately contributing to personalized pharmacotherapy.

Evaluation of CYP2C19-Mediated Pharmacokinetic Drug Interaction of Tegoprazan, Compared with Vonoprazan or Esomeprazole.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: CYP2C19-mediated drug interactions of acid-reducing agents are clinically important given the high possibility of concomitant administration with CYP2C19 substrates. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of tegoprazan on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of a CYP2C19 substrate, proguanil, compared with vonoprazan or esomeprazole. METHODS: A two-part, randomized, open-label, two-sequence, three-period crossover study was conducted in 16 healthy CYP2C19 extensive metabolizers (eight subjects per part). In each period, a single oral dose of atovaquone/proguanil 250/100 mg was administered alone or co-administered with tegoprazan 50 mg, esomeprazole 40 mg (Part 1 only) or vonoprazan 20 mg (Part 2 only). The plasma and urine concentrations of proguanil and its metabolite, cycloguanil, were measured up to 48 h post-dose. PK parameters were calculated using a non-compartmental method and compared between administered alone and co-administered with tegoprazan, vonoprazan or esomeprazole. RESULTS: Co-administration of tegoprazan did not significantly affect the systemic exposure of proguanil and cycloguanil. In contrast, co-administration of vonoprazan or esomeprazole increased proguanil systemic exposure and decreased cycloguanil systemic exposure, and the magnitude of the corresponding change was greater with esomeprazole co-administration than vonoprazan co-administration. CONCLUSION: Tegoprazan, unlike vonoprazan and esomeprazole, exhibited negligible CYP2C19-mediated PK interaction. It suggests that as an alternative to other acid-reducing agents, tegoprazan can be used concomitantly with CYP2C19 substrates in clinical settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT04568772 (Registered on September 29, 2020).

Pharmacodynamic and Pharmacokinetic Drug Interactions between Fexuprazan, a Novel Potassium-Competitive Inhibitor, and Aspirin, in Healthy Subjects.

Acid-reducing agents are commonly used for the prevention of aspirin-induced gastrointestinal complications such as peptic ulcers. As a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker, fexuprazan is expected to prevent aspirin-induced gastrointestinal complications. This randomized, open-label study aimed to evaluate the pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic interactions between aspirin and fexuprazan in healthy Koreans. Subjects randomized to the aspirin group received 500 mg aspirin in combination with 80 mg fexuprazan. For the fexuprazan group, fexuprazan 80 mg was administered alone and then in combination with aspirin 500 mg. Platelet aggregation inhibited by aspirin and the pharmacokinetic parameters of aspirin and fexuprazan were compared between monotherapy and combination therapy. A total of 22 subjects completed the study. The platelet aggregation-inhibitory activity and systemic exposure to aspirin were not significantly affected by fexuprazan coadministration. The systemic exposure of fexuprazan was decreased up to 20% by aspirin coadministration, which was not regarded as clinically meaningful considering the previously reported exposure-response relationship. In conclusion, there were no clinically relevant pharmacodynamic or pharmacokinetic interactions between aspirin and fexuprazan. This finding suggests the potential of fexuprazan for the prevention of aspirin-induced gastrointestinal complications, serving as a baseline for optimizing its therapeutic application with aspirin.

Evaluation of food effects on the pharmacokinetics of Pelargonium sidoides and Coptis with each bioactive compound berberine and epicatechin after a single oral dose of an expectorant and antitussive agent UI026 in healthy subjects.

UI026 is an expectorant and antitussive agent which is a new combination of Pelargonium sidoides extract and Coptis extract. The bioactive compounds of Pelargonium sidoides and Coptis extracts were identified as epicatechin and berberine, respectively. This study evaluated the effect of food on the pharmacokinetics (PKs) and safety of UI026. A randomized, open-label, single-dose, 2-treatment, parallel study in 12 healthy male subjects was performed. Subjects received a single oral dose of UI026 (27 mL of syrup) under a fed or fasted condition according to their randomly assigned treatment. Blood samples for the PK analysis were obtained up to 24 hours post-dose for berberine and 12 hours post-dose for epicatechin. The PK parameters were calculated by non-compartmental analysis. In the fed condition, the mean maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and mean area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to the last observed time point (AUClast) for berberine were approximately 33% and 67% lower, respectively, compared with the fasted condition, both showing statistically significant difference. For epicatechin, the mean Cmax and mean AUClast were about 29% and 45% lower, respectively, compared to the fasting condition, neither of which showed a statistically significant difference. There were no drug-related adverse events. This finding suggests that food affects the systemic exposure and bioavailability of berberine and epicatechin. Trial Registration: Clinical Research Information Service Identifier: KCT0003451.

Night-time gastric acid suppression by tegoprazan compared to vonoprazan or esomeprazole.

AIMS: Nocturnal acid breakthrough has been considered an unmet need of proton-pump inhibitors. Tegoprazan, a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker, is expected to show improved properties for this unmet need. This study was aimed to compare night-time acid suppression by tegoprazan with that by vonoprazan or esomeprazole, and to explore the effect of CYP2C19 phenotypes on acid-suppressive effects. METHODS: A randomized, open-label, 3-period, 6-sequence crossover study was conducted. A single oral dose of tegoprazan 50 mg, vonoprazan 20 mg or esomeprazole 40 mg was administered at night in each period. Continuous intragastric pH was monitored at baseline and after each dosing. RESULTS: Sixteen healthy subjects (6 CYP2C19 extensive metabolizers, 5 intermediate metabolizers, 5 poor metabolizers) completed the study. After a single dose of tegoprazan, intragastric pH increased more rapidly to over 4 at approximately 1 hour compared to the other treatments, and elevated intragastric pH was maintained stably at night. Tegoprazan exhibited night-time acid suppression for slightly but not significantly longer than vonoprazan, and greater than esomeprazole; % time at pH ≥ 4 at night was 66.0%, 60.5% and 36.1% for tegoprazan, vonoprazan and esomeprazole, respectively. Night-time acid suppression by tegoprazan and vonoprazan was not dependent on CYP2C19 phenotypes, while that by esomeprazole tended to be influenced by CYP2C19 phenotypes. CONCLUSION: Tegoprazan produced more rapid, potent and well sustained night-time acid suppression vs. vonoprazan or esomeprazole when administered at night. Furthermore, tegoprazan showed no CYP2C19 phenotype dependency in acid suppression. It suggests the potential of tegoprazan, especially in preventing nocturnal acid breakthrough.

Comparative Pharmacokinetics Between a Fixed-Dose Combination of Pitavastatin/Valsartan 4/160 mg and the Corresponding Individual Components Through a Partial Replicated Crossover Design in Healthy Male Subjects.

Hypertension and hyperlipidemia are often comorbid, requiring combination therapies of antihypertensive drugs and antihyperlipidemia drugs. Taking 1 fixed-dose combination (FDC) may increase patient compliance rather than taking each of the drugs separately. This study aimed to evaluate the pharmacokinetic bioequivalence between an FDC of pitavastatin/valsartan 4/160 mg and the corresponding individual components. Considering that valsartan is a highly variable drug for maximum plasma concentration (Cmax ), an open-label, randomized, partial replicated crossover study was conducted in 54 healthy subjects. The subjects received a single oral dose of the FDC of pitavastatin/valsartan 4/160 mg in 1 period or the corresponding individual components in the other 2 periods. The geometric mean ratios and their 90%CIs of the FDC to the corresponding individual components for Cmax and area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to the last measurable time point were 1.05 (90%CI, 0.96-1.15) and 0.10 (90%CI, 0.95-1.04) for pitavastatin and 1.15 (90%CI, 1.06-1.25) and 1.06 (0.99-1.14) for valsartan, respectively. The geometric mean ratios (90%CIs) for area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to the last measurable time point and Cmax of both drugs were included in the bioequivalence criteria. In conclusion, the FDC of pitavastatin/valsartan 4/160 mg showed pharmacokinetic equivalence with the corresponding individual components.

Pharmacokinetics and safety of cenobamate, a novel antiseizure medication, in healthy Japanese, and an ethnic comparison with healthy non-Japanese.

Cenobamate (XCOPRI and ONTOZRY) is a novel antiseizure medication for the treatment of focal-onset seizures. Nonetheless, there is limited information on the pharmacokinetics (PKs), safety, and efficacy of cenobamate in Asian people, including Japanese people. This study aimed to evaluate the PKs and safety of cenobamate after a single oral dose in healthy Japanese subjects and to compare the PKs with that reported in non-Japanese subjects. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single ascending dose study was conducted at four dose levels of 50, 100, 200, and 400 mg. Subjects were randomly assigned to cenobamate or placebo in a 6:2 ratio. Cenobamate was rapidly absorbed, reaching its maximum plasma concentration (Cmax ) in 0.75 to 2.25 h, and was eliminated with a mean half-life of 37.0 to 57.7 h. The Cmax increased dose proportionally, whereas area under the concentration-time curve increased more than dose proportionally, which was consistent with the findings in non-Japanese subjects. The systemic exposure of cenobamate was comparable between Japanese and non-Japanese subjects at all dose levels evaluated. All adverse events were mild in severity, and their incidence did not show dose-dependent trends. Furthermore, there were no clinically significant issues in safety parameters, including sedation tests, neurologic examinations, and Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale interviews. In conclusion, the systemic exposure of cenobamate after a single dose in Japanese subjects increased by dose, which was similar to the pattern in non-Japanese subjects. In addition, a single dose of cenobamate was well-tolerated in the dose range of 50 to 400 mg in healthy Japanese subjects.

A first-in-human study of KMRC011, a potential treatment for acute radiation syndrome, to explore tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics.

KMRC011 is a novel Toll-like receptor 5 agonist under development as a treatment for acute radiation syndrome (ARS). The aim of this first-in-human study was to investigate the tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of a single intramuscular dose of KMRC011 in healthy subjects. A randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled, single dose-escalation study was conducted with the starting dose of 5 µg. Eight (4 only for 5 µg cohort) subjects per cohort were randomly assigned to KMRC011 or placebo in a 3:1 ratio. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was assessed throughout the study. Serum concentrations of KMRC011, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), and interleukin-6 (IL-6) were measured up to 48 h postdose. Based on safety review, the dose of KMRC011 escalated up to 20 µg, and consequently, a total of 4 dose levels (5, 10, 15, and 20 µg) were explored. The most common adverse event was injection site reaction, showing no dose-related trend. Three DLTs (2 cases of hepatic enzyme increased and 1 of pyrexia) were observed; 1 in the 15 µg cohort and 2 in the 20 µg cohort. A developed method could not detect any KMRC011 in serum. KMRC011 15 µg and 20 µg showed significant increases of G-CSF, IL-6, and absolute neutrophil counts, compared with the placebo. A single intramuscular administration of KMRC011 ranging from 5 to 15 µg was tolerated in healthy subjects. Doses of KMRC011 equal to or greater than 15 µg exerted TLR5 agonist-like activities by increasing serum G-CSF and IL-6. It suggests that KMRC011 has the potential for a treatment for ARS.

Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Comparison of Two Formulations of a Fixed-Dose Combination of Gemigliptin/Rosuvastatin 50/20 mg: A Randomized, Open-Label, Single-Dose, Two-Way Crossover Study.

PURPOSE: A fixed-dose combination (FDC) of gemigliptin/rosuvastatin 50/20 mg as a monolayer tablet has been used to treat patients with both type 2 diabetes mellitus and dyslipidemia. To improve the stability of the FDC, a new FDC formulation as a bilayer tablet was developed. This study aimed to compare the pharmacokinetics (PKs) and pharmacodynamics (PDs) of the FDC of gemigliptin/rosuvastatin 50/20 mg between the newly developed bilayer tablet and the approved monolayer tablet in healthy subjects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A randomized, open-label, single-dose, two-treatment, two-way crossover study was conducted. Subjects received a single dose of the FDC of gemigliptin/rosuvastatin 50/20 mg as the bilayer tablet or the monolayer tablet in each period with a 7-day washout. For PK and PD analyses, serial blood samples were collected up to 72 hours after dosing to determine plasma concentrations of gemigliptin, its active metabolite LC15-0636 and rosuvastatin, and plasma dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) activity. PK and PD parameters were calculated using non-compartmental methods and compared between the two formulations. RESULTS: A total of 48 healthy subjects were randomized, and 45 subjects completed the study. The concentration-time profiles of gemigliptin, LC15-0636 and rosuvastatin were comparable between the two formulations. All geometric mean ratios (90% confidence intervals) of the bilayer tablet to the monolayer tablet for maximum plasma concentration and area under concentration-time curve from 0 to last measurable time point of the three compounds fulfilled the bioequivalence criteria of 0.80-1.25. Likewise, area under plasma DPP-4 activity inhibition from baseline-time curve from 0 to last measurable time point and maximum inhibition of plasma DPP-4 activity were similar between the two formulations. CONCLUSION: The FDC of gemigliptin/rosuvastatin 50/20 mg as the bilayer tablet showed equivalent PK and PD properties with the FDC of gemigliptin/rosuvastatin 50/20 mg as the monolayer tablet in healthy subjects. These results suggest that the newly developed bilayer tablet can become an alternative formulation to the commercially available monolayer tablet.

Intraocular Distribution and Kinetics of Intravitreally Injected Antibodies and Nanoparticles in Rabbit Eyes.

Purpose: To investigate the intraocular distribution and kinetics of antibodies and nanoparticles in the experimental model. Methods: Antibodies (whole IgG 149kDa, antigen-binding fragments 48.39 kDa) and four kinds of nondegradable nanoparticles (25, 50, 200, and 250 nm) were intravitreally injected in the right eye of New Zealand white rabbits. The average optical density and concentration were used to measure intraocular distribution and kinetics. Results: After intravitreal injection, antibodies were distributed throughout the vitreous humor and eliminated gradually into anterior and posterior routes. Fluorescence intensity decreased 1 day after injection and was not detected 25 days after injection. The nondegradable nanoparticles migrated posteriorly to the retina 7 days after injection onward and anteriorly to the aqueous humor from 1 hour to 1 day after injection. The fluorescence intensity of the nanoparticles was relatively stable in the vitreous humor, compared to antibodies. Nanoparticles accumulated on the internal limiting membrane of the retina with no penetration into deeper retinal tissue, whereas the smaller size 25 nm nanoparticles passed across the ciliary body and moved into choroid, retina, and suprachoroidal space. A gradual decrease of nanoparticles by their sizes in the vitreous after 30 days after injection was described as the percentage ratio: 61.1% (25 nm), 69.1% (50 nm), 78.6% (200nm), and 85.3% (250 nm). Conclusions: Our study revealed the in vivo intraocular distribution and kinetics of antibodies and nanoparticles with diverse sizes and the result might help to develop newer intraocular drugs and drug delivery systems to treat retinal diseases. Translational Relevance: These experimental results can be valuable data for human research.

Pharmacokinetic comparison between fixed-dose combination of fimasartan/amlodipine 60/10 mg and the corresponding loose combination through partial replicated crossover study in healthy subjects.

Combination therapies of antihypertensive drugs are recommended in cases where hypertension is not controlled by monotherapy. This study aimed to compare the pharmacokinetics (PKs) between fixed-dose combination (FDC) of fimasartan/amlodipine 60/10 mg and the corresponding loose combination. Because of the high intra-subject variability for maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) of fimasartan, a randomized, open-label, 3×3 partial replicated crossover design was adopted. Subjects received a single dose of FDC of fimasartan/amlodipine 60/10 mg or the corresponding loose combination in each period. Blood samples for PK analysis were collected up to 48 hours for fimasartan and 144 hours for amlodipine, respectively. Geometric mean ratios (GMRs) and its 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of the FDC to the loose combination for Cmax and area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to the last quantifiable time point (AUClast) were calculated. Sixty healthy subjects were randomized, and 57 subjects completed the study. The concentration-time profiles of fimasartan and amlodipine were similar between the FDC and loose combination. The GMRs (90% CIs) of the FDC to the loose combination for Cmax and AUClast were 1.0440 (0.9202-1.1844) and 1.0412 (0.9775-1.1090) for fimasartan, and 1.0430 (1.0156-1.0711) and 1.0339 (1.0055-1.0631) for amlodipine, respectively. The GMRs and its 90% CIs for Cmax and AUClast of fimasartan and amlodipine were included not only in the scaled bioequivalence criteria but also in the conventional bioequivalence criteria. In conclusion, FDC of fimasartan/amlodipine 60/10 mg showed comparable PK profiles with the corresponding loose combination, which suggests their bioequivalence.