Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
World J Gastroenterol ; 21(12): 3564-70, 2015 Mar 28.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25834321

RESUMO

AIM: To evaluate the feasibility of hepatectomy and primary closure of common bile duct for intrahepatic and extrahepatic calculi. METHODS: From January 2008 to May 2013, anatomic hepatectomy followed by biliary tract exploration without biliary drainage (non-drainage group) was performed in 43 patients with intrahepatic and extrahepatic calculi. After hepatectomy, flexible choledochoscopy was used to extract residual stones and observe the intrahepatic bile duct and common bile duct (CBD) for determination of biliary stricture and dilatation. Function of the sphincter of Oddi was determined by manometry of the CBD. Primary closure of the CBD without T-tube drainage or bilioenteric anastomosis was performed when there was no biliary stricture or sphincter of Oddi dysfunction. Dexamethasone and anisodamine were intravenously injected 2-3 d after surgery to prevent postoperative retrograde infection due to intraoperative bile duct irrigation, and to maintain relaxation of the sphincter of Oddi, respectively. During the same period, anatomic hepatectomy followed by biliary tract exploration with biliary drainage (drainage group) was performed in 48 patients as the control group. Postoperative complications and hospital stay were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: There was no operative mortality in either group of patients. Compared to intrahepatic and extrabiliary drainage, hepatectomy with primary closure of the CBD (non-drainage) did not increase the incidence of complications, including residual stones, bile leakage, pancreatitis and cholangitis (P > 0.05). Postoperative hospital stay and costs were nevertheless significantly less in the non-drainage group than in the drainage group. The median postoperative hospital stay was shorter in the non-drainage group than in the drainage group (11.2 ± 2.8 d vs 15.4 ± 2.1 d, P = 0.000). The average postoperative cost of treatment was lower in the non-drainage group than in the drainage group (29325.6 ± 5668.2 yuan vs 32933.3 ± 6235.1 yuan, P = 0.005). CONCLUSION: Hepatectomy followed by choledochoendoscopic stone extraction without biliary drainage is a safe and effective treatment of hepatolithiasis combined with choledocholithiasis.


Assuntos
Coledocolitíase/cirurgia , Ducto Colédoco/cirurgia , Hepatectomia , Litíase/cirurgia , Hepatopatias/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/administração & dosagem , Coledocolitíase/complicações , Coledocolitíase/diagnóstico , Coledocolitíase/economia , Redução de Custos , Análise Custo-Benefício , Dexametasona/administração & dosagem , Drenagem , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Glucocorticoides/administração & dosagem , Hepatectomia/efeitos adversos , Hepatectomia/economia , Custos Hospitalares , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Litíase/complicações , Litíase/diagnóstico , Litíase/economia , Hepatopatias/complicações , Hepatopatias/diagnóstico , Hepatopatias/economia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Estudos Retrospectivos , Alcaloides de Solanáceas/administração & dosagem , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
2.
World J Gastroenterol ; 20(36): 13200-4, 2014 Sep 28.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25278718

RESUMO

Surgery such as digestive tract reconstruction is usually required for pancreatic trauma and severe pancreatitis as well as malignant pancreatic lesions. The most common digestive tract reconstruction techniques (e.g., Child's type reconstruction) for neoplastic diseases of the pancreatic head often encompass pancreaticojejunostomy, choledochojejunostomy and then gastrojejunostomy with pancreaticoduodenectomy, whereas these techniques may not be applicable in benign pancreatic diseases due to an integrated stomach and duodenum in these patients. In benign pancreatic diseases, the aforementioned reconstruction will not only increase the distance between the pancreaticojejunostomy and choledochojejunostomy, but also the risks of traction, twisting and angularity of the jejunal loop. In addition, postoperative complications such as mixed fistula are refractory and life-threatening after common reconstruction procedures. We here introduce a novel pancreaticojejunostomy, hepaticojejunostomy and double Roux-en-Y digestive tract reconstruction in two cases of benign pancreatic disease, thus decreasing not only the distance between the pancreaticojejunostomy and choledochojejunostomy, but also the possibility of postoperative complications compared to common reconstruction methods. Postoperatively, the recovery of these patients was uneventful and complications such as bile leakage, pancreatic leakage and digestive tract obstruction were not observed during the follow-up period.


Assuntos
Anastomose em-Y de Roux , Jejunostomia/métodos , Pancreatopatias/cirurgia , Pancreaticojejunostomia , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica , Ferimentos e Lesões/cirurgia , Doença Aguda , Colangiopancreatografia por Ressonância Magnética , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pancreatopatias/diagnóstico , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Resultado do Tratamento , Ferimentos e Lesões/diagnóstico
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA