Bevacizumab in Combination With Oxaliplatin-Based Chemotherapy As First-Line Therapy in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Randomized Phase III Study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab when added to first-line oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy (either capecitabine plus oxaliplatin [XELOX] or fluorouracil/folinic acid plus oxaliplatin [FOLFOX-4]) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with MCRC were randomly assigned, in a 2 × 2 factorial design, to XELOX versus FOLFOX-4, and then to bevacizumab versus placebo. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: A total of 1,401 patients were randomly assigned in this 2 × 2 analysis. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 9.4 months in the bevacizumab group and 8.0 months in the placebo group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.83; 97.5% CI, 0.72 to 0.95; P = .0023). Median overall survival was 21.3 months in the bevacizumab group and 19.9 months in the placebo group (HR, 0.89; 97.5% CI, 0.76 to 1.03; P = .077). Response rates were similar in both arms. Analysis of treatment withdrawals showed that, despite protocol allowance of treatment continuation until disease progression, only 29% and 47% of bevacizumab and placebo recipients, respectively, were treated until progression. The toxicity profile of bevacizumab was consistent with that documented in previous trials. CONCLUSION: The addition of bevacizumab to oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy significantly improved PFS in this first-line trial in patients with MCRC. Overall survival differences did not reach statistical significance, and response rate was not improved by the addition of bevacizumab. Treatment continuation until disease progression may be necessary in order to optimize the contribution of bevacizumab to therapy.

Randomized, open-label phase 2 study comparing frontline dovitinib versus sorafenib in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

UNLABELLED: Angiogenesis inhibition by the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) and platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR) inhibitor sorafenib provides survival benefit in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); however, angiogenic escape from sorafenib may occur due to angiogenesis-associated fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) pathway activation. In addition to VEGFR and PDGFR, dovitinib inhibits FGFR. Frontline oral dovitinib (500 mg/day, 5 days on, 2 days off; n = 82) versus sorafenib (400 mg twice daily; n = 83) was evaluated in an open-label, randomized phase 2 study of Asian-Pacific patients with advanced HCC. The primary and key secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and time to tumor progression (TTP) as determined by a local investigator, respectively. Patients included in the study were ineligible for surgical and/or locoregional therapies or had disease progression after receiving these therapies. The median OS (95% confidence interval [CI]) was 8.0 (6.6-9.1) months for dovitinib and 8.4 (5.4-11.3) months for sorafenib. The median TTP (95% CI) per investigator assessment was 4.1 (2.8-4.2) months and 4.1 (2.8-4.3) months for dovitinib and sorafenib, respectively. Common any-cause adverse events included diarrhea (62%), decreased appetite (43%), nausea (41%), vomiting (41%), fatigue (35%), rash (34%), and pyrexia (30%) for dovitinib and palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome (66%) and decreased appetite (31%) for sorafenib. Subgroup analysis revealed a significantly higher median OS for patients in the dovitinib arm who had baseline plasma soluble VEGFR1 (sVEGFR1) and hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) below median levels versus at or above the median levels (median OS [95% CI]: sVEGFR1, 11.2 [9.0-13.8] and 5.7 [4.3-7.0] months, respectively [P = .0002]; HGF, 11.2 [8.9-13.8] and 5.9 [5.0-7.6] months, respectively [P = 0.0002]). CONCLUSION: Dovitinib was well tolerated, but activity was not greater than sorafenib as a frontline systemic therapy for HCC. Based on these data, no subsequent phase 3 study has been planned. (Hepatology 2016;64:774-784).

Efficacy and safety of the FOLFOX4 regimen versus doxorubicin in Chinese patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a subgroup analysis of the EACH study.

BACKGROUND: The EACH study assessed the efficacy of oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin (the FOLFOX4 regimen) compared with doxorubicin alone in terms of overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and safety in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We present the results of this study in Chinese patients. METHODS: In a multicenter, open-label, randomized, phase III study (NCT00471965), 371 patients (279 patients from the People's Republic of China) were randomized 1:1 to receive either FOLFOX4 or doxorubicin until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, death, or surgical resection. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics of the Chinese patients enrolled in the study were similar for the 2 treatment groups and in comparison with the whole EACH cohort. Median OS at the prespecified time point of treatment was 5.7 months with FOLFOX4 and 4.3 months with doxorubicin (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.55-0.98; p = .03). At the end of the follow-up period, median OS was 5.9 months with FOLFOX4 and 4.3 months with doxorubicin (HR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.58-0.98; p = .03). Median PFS was 2.4 months and 1.7 months in the FOLFOX4 and doxorubicin groups, respectively (HR: 0.55; 95% CI: 0.45-0.78; p = .0002). The response rate (RR) and disease control rate (DCR) were significantly higher in the FOLFOX4 group than in the doxorubicin group (RR: 8.6% vs. 1.4%, p = .006; DCR: 47.1% vs. 26.6%, p = .0004). Hematological toxicity was more frequently reported in the FOLFOX4 group. CONCLUSION: For Chinese HCC patients enrolled in the EACH study, FOLFOX4 significantly improved the RR and DCR and prolonged survival compared with doxorubicin. Systemic chemotherapy with oxaliplatin-based regimens may play an important role in the treatment of Chinese patients with advanced HCC.

Cisplatin, tegafur-uracil and leucovorin plus mitomycin C: an acceptably effective and toxic regimen for patients with recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: This prospective phase II clinical trial evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of cisplatin, oral tegafur-uracil, leucovorin, and mitomycin C in patients with recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma. METHODS: Patients with histologically proven non-keratinizing or undifferentiated nasopharyngeal carcinoma were prospectively enrolled from April 2002 to June 2005. Cisplatin 50 mg/m(2) on day 1, 22 and mitomycin C 6 mg/m(2) on day 1 were administered. Oral tegafur-uracil 300 mg/m(2)/day and oral leucovorin 60 mg/day were given on day 1-14 and day 22-35, respectively. Each cycle was repeated every 6 weeks. Primary and secondary endpoints are response rate and toxic profiles with survivals, respectively. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients with the median age of 47 (35-69) years were enrolled in the study. Sixteen (72.7%) patients had undifferentiated nasopharyngeal carcinoma. The regimen was well-tolerated by all patients with the exception of one patient (4.6%) who experienced grade IV anorexia, and two patients (9.1%) who had grade IV vomiting. There was no treatment-related death. The overall response rate was 59.1%, including 3 (13.6%) complete remissions. The median duration of response was 15.9 months, the median time to tumor progression was 10.0 months, and the median overall survival was 16.0 months. CONCLUSION: This outpatient chemotherapy regimen is acceptably effective and toxic among patients with recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Randomized, multicenter, open-label study of oxaliplatin plus fluorouracil/leucovorin versus doxorubicin as palliative chemotherapy in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma from Asia.

PURPOSE: To determine whether FOLFOX4 (infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin) administered as palliative chemotherapy to patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) provides a survival benefit and efficacy versus doxorubicin. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This multicenter, open-label, randomized, phase III study in mainland China, Taiwan, Korea, and Thailand involved 371 patients age 18 to 75 years who had locally advanced or metastatic HCC and were ineligible for curative resection or local treatment. They were randomly assigned at a ratio of one to one to receive either FOLFOX4 (n = 184) or doxorubicin (n = 187). The primary end point was overall survival (OS); secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), response rate (RR) by RECIST (version 1.0), and safety. RESULTS: At the prespecified final analysis, median OS was 6.40 months with FOLFOX4 (95% CI, 5.30 to 7.03) and 4.97 months with doxorubicin (95% CI, 4.23 to 6.03; P = .07; hazard ratio [HR], 0.80; 95% CI, 0.63 to 1.02). Median PFS was 2.93 months with FOLFOX4 (95% CI, 2.43 to 3.53), and 1.77 months with doxorubicin (95% CI, 1.63 to 2.30; P < .001; HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.49 to 0.79). RR was 8.15% with FOLFOX4 and 2.67% with doxorubicin (P = .02). On continued follow-up, the trend toward increased OS with FOLFOX4 was maintained (P = .04; HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.63 to 0.99). Toxicity was consistent with previous experiences with FOLFOX4; proportions of grade 3 to 4 adverse events were similar between treatments. CONCLUSION: Although the study did not meet its primary end point, the trend toward improved OS with FOLFOX4, along with increased PFS and RR, suggests that this regimen may confer some benefit to Asian patients, but an OS benefit cannot be concluded from these data.

Bevacizumab with erlotinib as first-line therapy in Asian patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicenter phase II study.

OBJECTIVES: The bevacizumab/erlotinib combination was reported with high clinical activity for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) by a phase II study conducted in the USA. This multicenter study across several Asian countries was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the combination in this population. METHODS: Patients with histology-proven HCC, advanced disease and Child-Pugh class A liver function received bevacizumab 5 mg/kg intravenously every 2 weeks and erlotinib 150 mg/day orally as first-line therapy. The primary end point was progression-free survival at 16 weeks (PFS-16W). The expression of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), phospho-AKT and vascular endothelial growth factor, the microvessel density and the EGFR gene copy number in HCC tissues were correlated with treatment efficacy. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients were enrolled. The PFS-16W was 35.3% (95% CI 22.4-49.9), the median PFS was 2.9 months (95% CI, 1.3-4.4) and the median overall survival was 10.7 months (95% CI, 6.2-15.2). Grade 3/4 toxicities were uncommon, including rash, acne (10% each), diarrhea (6%) and gastrointestinal bleeding (4%). None of the evaluated biomarkers correlated with disease control or PFS. CONCLUSIONS: Bevacizumab plus erlotinib showed good tolerability and modest activity in this Asian cohort. Further studies are warranted to identify the predictive biomarkers of this combination.

The role of HER2 in metastatic breast cancer treated with a combination of taxanes and cisplatin.

BACKGROUND: A combination of taxanes and cisplatin have shown modest activity as second-line chemotherapy in breast cancer patients who have been exposed to anthracyclines. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively assess whether HER2 is associated with clinical sensitivity or with prognostic significance in breast cancer patient groups who had received chemotherapy with taxanes and cisplatin. METHODS: Patients were treated either with docetaxel 60 mg/m square or paclitaxel 175 mg/m square in combination with cisplatin 50 mg/m/every 3 weeks. The tumor specimens were checked for estrogen receptor (ER), progestrone receptor (PR), and HER2 status by immunohistochemical stain. Prognostic factors such as performance status, status of metastases, history of prior anthracycline response, and biomarkers such as ER and HER2 were analyzed. RESULTS: Ninety patients were eligible for HER2 assessment. Only eighty-five patients were eligible for response assessment. The overall response rate to chemotherapy with the taxanes/cisplatin regimen was 52%. In patients who were HER2-positive, the response rate was 62% and in HER2-negative patients, it was 46%, p= 0.17. Univariate analysis showed no prognostic factors were significant in predicting a response to chemotherapy. In addition, it appeared that there was no difference in time to progression and overall survival based on HER2 status. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicated that HER2 status is independent of a response to a taxanes/cisplatin combination and is also not a prognostic factor for survival.

A multiple-center phase II study of biweekly oxaliplatin and tegafur-uracil/leucovorin for chemonaive patients with advanced gastric cancer.

PURPOSE: The current study assessed the efficacy and safety of biweekly oxaliplatin combining oral tegafur-uracil/leucovorin in treating chemonaive patients with advanced gastric cancer. METHODS: Eligible patients were 18-75 years old, had stage IV disease or post-surgery recurrence, no prior palliative chemotherapy, and an ECOG performance status of 0-2. Patients in the current study received 2-h i.v. infusion of oxaliplatin at a dose of 100 mg/m(2) after diluting in 500 mL 5% dextrose/water (dexan premedication), and 5-HT3 antagonist biweekly. Oral tegafur-uracil and leucovorin was given at a dose of 300 mg/m(2)/day and 60 mg/day three times daily from day 1 to 21, respectively, followed by a 1-week rest. Response assessment was based on the RECIST criteria and was performed every two courses. Toxicity was assessed according to NCI common toxicity criteria version 2. RESULTS: From October 2003 to April 2006, 57 patients were evaluated (55 eligible) with a median age of 61 years (range 31-75). According to the assessment of response in 48 evaluable patients, partial response rate was 24/48 (50.0%) (95% CI: 35.23-64.73%) and stable disease was observed in 11 patients (22.92%), and diseased progressed in 13 patients (27.08%). Mean number of oxaliplatin cycles was 3 (0.5-6.5). Median time to progression was 177 days. Median overall survival was 318 days. Major-grade (III/IV) toxicities were diarrhea 25.5%, vomiting 16.5%, anemia 10.9%, numbness 12.7%, thrombocytopenia 7.3%, neutropenia 3.6% and leucopenia 1.8%. CONCLUSIONS: Biweekly, oxaliplatin combining oral tegafur-uracil/leucovorin in treating patients with advanced gastric cancer showed acceptable activity and manageable toxicity.

Randomized phase III study of capecitabine plus oxaliplatin compared with fluorouracil/folinic acid plus oxaliplatin as first-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (XELOX) is noninferior to fluorouracil. folinic acid, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX-4) as first-line therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The initial design of this trial was a randomized, two-arm, noninferiority, phase III comparison of XELOX versus FOLFOX-4. After patient accrual had begun, the trial design was amended in 2003 after bevacizumab phase III data became available. The resulting 2 x 2 factorial design randomly assigned patients to XELOX versus FOLFOX-4, and then to also receive either bevacizumab or placebo. We report here the results of the analysis of the XELOX versus FOLFOX-4 arms. The analysis of bevacizumab versus placebo with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy is reported separately. The prespecified primary end point for the noninferiority analysis was progression-free survival. RESULTS: The intent-to-treat population comprised 634 patients from the original two-arm portion of the study, plus an additional 1,400 patients after the start of the amended 2 x 2 design, for a total of 2,034 patients. The median PFS was 8.0 months in the pooled XELOX-containing arms versus 8.5 months in the FOLFOX-4-containing arms (hazard ratio [HR], 1.04; 97.5% CI, 0.93 to 1.16). The median overall survival was 19.8 months with XELOX versus 19.6 months with FOLFOX-4 (HR, 0.99; 97.5% CI, 0.88 to 1.12). FOLFOX-4 was associated with more grade 3/4 neutropenia/granulocytopenia and febrile neutropenia than XELOX, and XELOX with more grade 3 diarrhea and grade 3 hand-foot syndrome than FOLFOX-4. CONCLUSION: XELOX is noninferior to FOLFOX-4 as a first-line treatment for MCRC, and may be considered as a routine treatment option for appropriate patients.

Bevacizumab in combination with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy as first-line therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized phase III study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab when added to first-line oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy (either capecitabine plus oxaliplatin [XELOX] or fluorouracil/folinic acid plus oxaliplatin [FOLFOX-4]) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with MCRC were randomly assigned, in a 2 x 2 factorial design, to XELOX versus FOLFOX-4, and then to bevacizumab versus placebo. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: A total of 1,401 patients were randomly assigned in this 2 x 2 analysis. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 9.4 months in the bevacizumab group and 8.0 months in the placebo group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.83; 97.5% CI, 0.72 to 0.95; P = .0023). Median overall survival was 21.3 months in the bevacizumab group and 19.9 months in the placebo group (HR, 0.89; 97.5% CI, 0.76 to 1.03; P = .077). Response rates were similar in both arms. Analysis of treatment withdrawals showed that, despite protocol allowance of treatment continuation until disease progression, only 29% and 47% of bevacizumab and placebo recipients, respectively, were treated until progression. The toxicity profile of bevacizumab was consistent with that documented in previous trials. CONCLUSION: The addition of bevacizumab to oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy significantly improved PFS in this first-line trial in patients with MCRC. Overall survival differences did not reach statistical significance, and response rate was not improved by the addition of bevacizumab. Treatment continuation until disease progression may be necessary in order to optimize the contribution of bevacizumab to therapy.

A phase II randomized study of two taxanes and cisplatin for metastatic breast cancer after anthracycline: a final analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study is to compare two taxanes/cisplatin combinations for metastatic breast cancer in terms of time to disease progression, response rates and toxicity. METHODS: Between April 2000 and December 2002, 101 patients with advanced breast carcinoma, previously treated with an anthracycline but not with a taxane, were enrolled. Fifty patients were treated with docetaxel 60 mg/m2 and cisplatin 50 mg/m2, and 51 patients were treated with paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 and cisplatin 50 mg/m2. Each cycle repeated every 3 weeks. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 62.5 and 42.6% in the docetaxel and palcitaxel groups respectively (P = 0.06). Median time to disease progression was 9.8 and 6.5 months in docetaxel and paclitaxel groups respectively (P = 0.15). The median overall survival time was 22.7 months in the docetaxel arm and 22.4 months in the paclitaxel arm. Grade 3/4 arthralgia/myalgia, sensory neuropathy and anemia occurred more frequently in the paclitaxel arm, while more mucositis, fatigue and neutropenia occurred in the docetaxel arm. CONCLUSION: Taxane/cisplatin combinations were active for advanced breast cancer, while there appeared to be evidence in favor of a docetaxel/cisplatin combination. The toxicity in favor of docetaxel/cisplatin warrants future first-line clinical trials.

Phase I dose escalation study of oxaliplatin combined with oral tegafur-uracil and leucovorin in patients with advanced gastric cancer.

Our aim was to determine the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended dose of oxaliplatin combined with oral tegafur-uracil and leucovorin. Twenty-eight chemo-naive patients with advanced gastric cancer were enrolled. Oxaliplatin (55, 70, 85, 100 and 115 mg/m2) was given as a 2-h infusion on days 1 and 15. Oral tegafur-uracil (300 mg/m2 per day) and leucovorin (60 mg/day) were given 3 times a day from days 1 to 21 (28-day cycle). DLTs were defined as grade IV hematologic toxicity or grade III non-hematologic toxicity. The MTD for oxaliplatin was 100 mg/m2. The most common DLT was diarrhea. Major grade III/IV toxicities included vomiting, diarrhea, renal dysfunction, leukopenia and thrombocytopenia. There were two treatment-related deaths. Intent-to-treat response was graded as partial response in 13 patients (46.4%; 95% confidence interval 26.74-66.12%), stable disease in nine and disease progression in five. As of June 2004, 17 patients had died. The median time to treatment failure, time to progression and overall survival were 124, 308 and 434 days, respectively. The recommended dose for the phase II study is oxaliplatin 100 mg/m2 biweekly with oral tegafur-uracil (300 mg/m2 per day) and leucovorin (60 mg/day) 3 times a day for 21 days.

Malignant melanoma in Taiwan: a prognostic study of 181 cases.

This study was performed to determine the characteristics and clinical outcome of patients with cutaneous malignant melanoma in Taiwan. The medical records of patients with primary cutaneous melanoma between 1992 and 2001 at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (CGMH) were retrieved from the cancer registry. Survival was analysed by the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate analyses of factors associated with survival were performed using the Cox proportional hazard model. One hundred and eighty-one cases were retrieved from the cancer registry of CGMH. The male to female ratio was 1 : 1.13. The most common age of onset was the sixth decade. The median age of onset was 61 years (2-95 years). There were 105 cases (58%) of acral lentiginous melanoma (ALM), 55 cases (30.4%) of nodular melanoma (NM), 19 cases (10.5%) of superficial spreading melanoma (SSM) and two cases (1.1%) of lentigo maligna melanoma. The median survival of the 181 patients was 3.71 years, and the 5-year survival rate was 45.63%. Five-year survival rates of patients with stages I, II, III and IV disease were 84.39%, 56.03%, 34.7% and 0%, respectively. Sex, Breslow thickness, Clark's level, pathological type and age were significant prognostic factors. There were no survival differences between ALM and NM. Both ALM and NM were associated with a poor prognosis when compared with SSM. In conclusion, ALM is the most common type of cutaneous malignant melanoma in Taiwan. The prognostic factors in Taiwan are similar to those in melanoma-prevalent countries.

A modified low-dose regimen of mitoxantrone and prednisolone in patients with androgen-independent prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: We conducted this retrospective study to analyze a modified dose schedule of mitoxantrone and prednisolone (MP) in patients with androgen-independent prostate cancer. METHODS: From June 1997 to April 2002, 28 patients were enrolled. Their median age was 69 years (range, 58-79 years). The median duration of hormonal therapy was 30 months (range, 6-84 months). The median performance status was 2. Sixteen of the patients had bone disease only. The chemotherapy consisted of 8 mg/m2 mitoxantrone by intravenous infusion every 3 weeks and 10 mg prednisolone orally twice per day. WHO response criteria, prostatic-specific antigen (PSA), pain and performance status were used to assess the response. RESULTS: The median number of treatment cycles was six (range, 2-20). Nine (32.1%) and 15 patients (53.8%) had > or =80% and > or =50% reduction in serum PSA level, respectively. Of 16 patients using narcotics, five (31.3%) had a > or =50% reduction in narcotics consumption compared with the baseline. Nine patients (32.1%) showed improved performance. For 12 patients with measurable disease, only two (16.7%) showed a partial response. Grade 3-4 toxicities included neutropenia (three patients), anemia (three patients) and vomiting (one patient). The median survival was 12 months and the median time to PSA progression was 4 months. CONCLUSIONS: This modified regimen is feasible for palliative intent. The toxicity of this regimen is manageable. Exploring further combinations of this regimen with novel agents against androgen-independent prostate cancer is warranted.

Oxaliplatin added to simplified bimonthly low-dose leucovorin and 5-FU for pretreated advanced colorectal cancer is effective and not affected by different previous 5-FU regimens.

This phase II study examined bimonthly oxaliplatin (85 mg/m2) added to a continuous infusion of fluorouracil (3000 mg/m2 for 46 h following a 400 mg/m2 bolus), with leucovorin (LV) (150 mg/m2) administrated in a simplified way to patients with metastatic colorectal cancers (CRC) refractory or resistant to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). Sixty patients were registered. Of the 52 evaluable patients, 3 (5.8%) achieved a complete response (CR) and 18 (34.6%) achieved a partial response (PR). The overall response rate (CR + PR) was 40.4% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 26.6%-54.2%) for evaluable patients and 35% (95% CI: 22.6%-47.4%) by intention to treat. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.2 months, and the median survival was 14.2 months. No significant differences were seen in response rates and PFS of patient groups pretreated either with high-dose 5-FU/LV by continuous infusion or with intravenous 5-FU/LV by a weekly bolus. From the 421 cycles analyzed, dose-limiting toxicities included cumulative sensory neuropathy and leukopenia, accounting for 11.6% and 10.0%, National Cancer Institute-Common Toxicity Criteria grade 3/4 toxicities per patient, respectively. Two (3.3%) patients experienced hepatic encephalopathy related to high-dose 5-FU. With necessary caution, this regimen was effective for 5-FU-pretreated CRC, regardless of ethnic differences, and it had the advantage of LV being administrated at a low dose in a simplified way.

Chemotherapy using 5-fluorouracil, mitoxantrone, and cisplatin for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: an analysis of 63 cases.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the anti-tumor efficacy and toxicity of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), mitoxantrone, and cisplatin (FMP) in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and conducted an analysis of the prognostic factors for response to such therapy and patient survival. METHODS: Sixty-three patients suffering from unresectable and non-embolizable HCC and who had objectively measurable tumors, adequate liver and renal function, and adequate bone-marrow reserve were enrolled in this study. The therapeutic regimen consisted of cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) and mitoxantrone 6 mg/m(2) intravenously on day 1, and 5-FU 450 mg/m(2) per day continuous infusion for a period of 5 days. Univariate and multivariate analyses of patient and disease characteristics were used to identify factors predicting patient response and survival. RESULTS: The objective response was 23.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 13.0-34.6%). The median survival for all 63 patients was 4.9 months (95% CI, 3.2-6.6 months). The median time to progression was 2.5 months (95% CI, 1.7-3.3 months). Multivariate analysis identified only performance status ( P = 0.050) and liver tumor size ( P = 0.012) as being significantly related to patient objective response. Independent variables associated with a better patient survival included: the absence of ascites ( P = 0.003), a lower total bilirubin level ( P = 0.026), and the patient being a positive chemotherapy responder ( P = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: The response rate to an FMP regimen was still unsatisfactory, although a specific subgroup of patients (good performance status, smaller liver tumor mass, good liver reserve, and distant metastasis) may benefit from this regimen.We evaluated the anti-tumor efficacy and toxicity of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), mitoxantrone, and cisplatin (FMP) in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and conducted an analysis of the prognostic factors for response to such therapy and patient survival.

A phase II trial of tegafur-uracil plus leucovorin (LV) in the treatment of advanced biliary tract carcinomas.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety profile of oral tegafur-uracil (tegafur combined with uracil in a molar of 1:4 ratio) plus leucovorin (LV) in patients with advanced biliary tract carcinoma (BTC). METHODS: Sixteen chemotherapy-naïve patients (nine males and seven females with a median age of 58.0 years) with BTC were prospectively enrolled in this study. The dose of tegafur-uracil (UFUR; TTY Biopharm Co. Ltd, Taipei, Taiwan) was 300 mg/m(2)/d (according to the dose of tegafur) and LV was 60 mg/day on day 1-28, followed by a 1-week break. The site of primary tumor included 10 intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas (CC), one perihilar CC, four gallbladder cancers and one periampullar cancer. Fourteen patients were evaluated for tumor response. RESULTS: No objective complete or partial responses were observed. Two patients had stable disease and 12 patients had disease progression. The median time to progression was 68 days (8-159 days) and the median survival time was 155 days (69-570 days). Sixteen patients were evaluable for toxicity. Grade III/IV toxicities were found in two patients only; one patient had grade III thrombocytopenia and one patient stopped therapy early due to grade IV diarrhea. CONCLUSIONS: Oral tegafur-uracil plus LV is well tolerated but ineffective in patients with advanced BTC.

Oxaliplatin with weekly bolus 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in pretreated advanced colorectal cancer patients: a phase II study.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy and toxicity of oxaliplatin in combination with weekly bolus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV) in patients with 5-FU-pretreated advanced colorectal cancer. METHODS: A total of 39 patients with documented 5-FU-resistant advanced colorectal cancer were enrolled. All 39 patients had previously received weekly high-dose 5-FU/LV (2,600 mg/m(2) 5-FU plus 100 mg/m(2) LV as 24-hour infusion) as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic disease. Oxaliplatin (85 mg/m(2)) was delivered as an intravenous infusion over 2 h on days 1 and 15, while 5-FU (500 mg/m(2)) and LV (20 mg/m(2)) were administered as an intravenous bolus on days 1, 8 and 15. One treatment course consisted of 3 consecutive weeks of therapy followed by a 1-week rest. RESULTS: In an intent-to-treat analysis, the objective response rate for the 39 patients was 20.5% (95% confidence interval, 7.2-33.8%). The disease was stable in 19 patients (48.7%), and progressive in 11 (28.2%). The median survival for all 39 patients was 8.9 months. The median time to progression was 5.0 months. Grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in only 1 patient (2.6%), and grade 2 and 3/4 peripheral neuropathy occurred in 10 (25.6%) and 5 (12.8%) patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: Oxaliplatin in combination with weekly bolus 5-FU/LV is also active in patients with advanced colorectal cancer where first-line treatment has failed.

Biweekly bolus 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin plus oxaliplatin in pretreated patients with advanced colorectal cancer: a dose-finding study.

The primary objective of this study was to determine the maximum tolerable dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) for bolus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) administered on a biweekly schedule and in combination with fixed doses of leucovorin (LV) and oxaliplatin. The secondary objectives were to evaluate the toxicity profile and antitumor activity of this regimen for pre-treated patients with advanced colorectal cancer. A total of 26 patients with documented fluoropyrimidine-resistant, advanced colorectal cancer were enrolled into this phase I study. Fixed dose of oxaliplatin (85 mg/m2) was delivered as an i.v. infusion over 2 h, followed by LV (20 mg/m2) and 5-FU bolus every 2 weeks. The starting dose of 5-FU was 600 mg/m2, which was then incremented by 100 mg/m2 for each dose level. The DLT was determined for the first two treatment cycles, while toxicity and efficacy were evaluated throughout treatment. Six dose levels were tested. The MTD of 5-FU was deemed to be 1000 mg/m2 since dose-limiting fatigue was noted for three of the five-patient cohort during the first two cycles of chemotherapy at dose level 6. The most frequent treatment-related toxicities during the study were neutropenia, vomiting, diarrhea, fatigue and neuropathy. In an intent-to-treat analysis, the objective response rate was 30.8% (95% confidence interval 11.8-49.8%) for the 26 patients. The combination of bolus 5-FU/LV and oxaliplatin every 2 weeks is a feasible and effective treatment at the recommended dosages. A phase II study, to more-precisely define activity and toxicity, is ongoing.

Oral uracil/ftorafur (UFT) plus leucovorin as first-line chemotherapy and salvage therapy with weekly high-dose 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy and toxicity of uracil/ftorafur (UFT) plus oral leucovorin (LV) as first-line chemotherapy for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer and salvage chemotherapy with weekly high-dose 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/LV 24 h infusion. METHODS: Adult patients with no prior chemotherapy for metastatic diseases were enrolled to receive oral UFT 300 mg/m(2)/d plus LV 90 mg/d for 28 days. Treatment was given continuously for 28 days followed by a 7 day rest period from all treatment. For UFT failed patients, weekly 24 h infusion of 5-FU 2600 mg/m(2) plus LV 100 mg/m(2) was used as salvage therapy. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients with metastatic colorectal cancer were enrolled in the study. The objective response rate was 29.5% [95% confidence interval (CI), 16.8-45.2%] among the 44 evaluable patients and 25.5% in the intent-to-treat population. The median survival for all 51 patients was 16.6 months. The median time to progression was 5.9 months. Diarrhea was the major adverse effect of UFT/LV that made patients reduce dosage. Grade 3 or 4 diarrhea developed in 13.7% of patients. Twenty-six patients were treated with weekly 24 h infusional 5-FU/LV as salvage therapy and only two patients responded. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that this 28 day schedule of UFT/LV regimen may offer a well-tolerated, full oral treatment option with efficacy that appears comparable to that of intravenous 5-FU/LV regimens. Parenteral 5-FU/LV as salvage therapy for UFT refractory patients is not recommended.