G-estimation and artificial censoring: problems, challenges, and applications.

In principle, G-estimation is an attractive approach for dealing with confounding by variables affected by treatment. It has rarely been applied for estimation of the effects of treatment on failure-time outcomes. Part of this is due to artificial censoring, an analytic device which considers some subjects who actually were observed to fail as if they were censored. Artificial censoring leads to a lack of smoothness in the estimating function, which can pose problems in variance estimation and in optimization. It also can lead to failure to have solutions to the usual estimating functions, which then raises questions about the appropriate criteria for optimization. To improve performance of the optimization procedures, we consider approaches for reducing the amount of artificial censoring, propose the substitution of smooth for indicator functions, and propose the use of estimating functions scaled to a measure of the information in the data; we evaluate performance of these approaches using simulation. We also consider appropriate optimization criteria in the presence of information loss due to artificial censoring. We motivate and illustrate our approaches using observational data on the effect of erythropoietin on mortality among subjects on hemodialysis.

Selective ignorability assumptions in causal inference.

Most attempts at causal inference in observational studies are based on assumptions that treatment assignment is ignorable. Such assumptions are usually made casually, largely because they justify the use of available statistical methods and not because they are truly believed. It will often be the case that it is plausible that conditional independence holds at least approximately for a subset but not all of the experience giving rise to one's data. Such selective ignorability assumptions may be used to derive valid causal inferences in conjunction with structural nested models. In this paper, we outline selective ignorability assumptions mathematically and sketch how they may be used along with otherwise standard G-estimation or likelihood-based methods to obtain inference on structural nested models. We also consider use of these assumptions in the presence of selective measurement error or missing data when the missingness is not at random. We motivate and illustrate our development by considering an analysis of an observational database to estimate the effect of erythropoietin use on mortality among hemodialysis patients.

HLA-A amino acid polymorphism and delayed kidney allograft function.

Delayed allograft function (DGF) is a common adverse event in postrenal transplantation. The etiology of DGF is thought to include both nonimmunologic (donor age, cold ischemia time, and recipient race) and immunologic factors. We examined the association of DGF with amino acid mismatches at 66 variable sites of the HLA-A molecule in a prospective cohort study of 697 renal transplant recipients of deceased donors. Using a multivariate logistic regression model adjusted for nonimmunologic risk factors, we show that combinations of a few amino acid mismatches at crucial sites of HLA-A molecules were associated with DGF. In Caucasian recipients, a mismatch at position 62, 95, or 163, all known to be functionally important within the antigen recognition site, was associated with an increased risk for DGF. Furthermore, a decreased risk for DGF was associated with a mismatch at HLA-A family-specific sites (149, 184, 193, or 246), indicating that evolutionary features of HLA-A polymorphism separating HLA-A families and lineages among donor-recipient pairs may correlate with the magnitude of alloreactivity influencing the development of DGF. These findings suggest that amino acid polymorphisms at functionally important positions at the antigen recognition site of the HLA-A molecule have a significant influence on DGF.