Noninvasive ventilation failure in patients with hypoxemic respiratory failure: the role of sepsis and septic shock.

BACKGROUND: Sepsis and septic shock are common in noninvasive ventilation (NIV) patients. However, studies on the association between sepsis and NIV failure are lacking. METHODS: A prospective multi-center observational study was performed in 16 Chinese intensive care units (ICUs). Patients who used NIV due to hypoxemic respiratory failure were enrolled. Sepsis and septic shock were diagnosed according to the guideline of sepsis-3. RESULTS: A total of 519 patients were enrolled. Sepsis developed in 365 patients (70%) and septic shock developed in 79 patients (15%). However, 75 patients (14%) had no sepsis. NIV failure was 23%, 38%, and 61% in patients, with no sepsis, sepsis, and septic shock, respectively. Multivariate analysis found that sepsis [odds ratio (OR) = 1.95, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.06-3.61] and septic shock (OR = 2.47, 95% CI: 1.12-5.45) were independently associated with NIV failure. In sepsis and septic shock population, the NIV failure was 13%, 31%, 37%, 53%, and 67% in patients with sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) scores of ⩽2, 3-4, 5-6, 7-8, and ⩾9, respectively. Patients with nonpulmonary induced sepsis had similar NIV failure rate compared with those with pulmonary induced sepsis, but had higher proportion of septic shock (37% versus 10%, p ⩽ 0.01) and lower ICU mortality (10% versus 22%, p ⩽ 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Sepsis was associated with NIV failure in patients with hypoxemic respiratory failure, and the association was stronger in septic shock patients. NIV failure increased with the increase of organ dysfunction caused by sepsis. The reviews of this paper are available via the supplemental material section.

Semiquantitative cough strength score for predicting reintubation after planned extubation.

BACKGROUND: Semiquantitative cough strength score (SCSS, graded 0-5) and cough peak flow (CPF) have been used to predict extubation outcome in patients in whom extubation is planned; however, the correlation of the 2 assessments is unclear. METHODS: In the intensive care unit of a university-affiliated hospital, 186 patients who were ready for extubation after a successful spontaneous breathing trial were enrolled in the study. Both SCSS and CPF were assessed before extubation. Reintubation was recorded 72 hours after extubation. RESULTS: Reintubation rate was 15.1% within 72 hours after planned extubation. Patients in whom extubation was successful had higher SCSSs than did reintubated patients (mean [SD], 3.2 [1.6] vs 2.2 [1.6], P = .002) and CPF (74.3 [40.0] vs 51.7 [29.4] L/min, P = .005). The SCSS showed a positive correlation with CPF (r = 0.69, P < .001). Mean CPFs were 38.36 L/min, 39.51 L/min, 44.67 L/min, 57.54 L/min, 78.96 L/min, and 113.69 L/min in patients with SCSSs of 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, respectively. The discriminatory power for reintubation, evidenced by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, was similar: 0.677 for SCSS and 0.678 for CPF (P = .97). As SCSS increased (from 0 to 1 to 2 to 3 to 4 to 5), the reintubation rate decreased (from 29.4% to 25.0% to 19.4% to 16.1% to 13.2% to 4.1%). CONCLUSIONS: SCSS was convenient to measure at the bedside. It was positively correlated with CPF and had the same accuracy for predicting reintubation after planned extubation.

Voluntary is better than involuntary cough peak flow for predicting re-intubation after scheduled extubation in cooperative subjects.

BACKGROUND: In this study, we compared the predictive accuracy of voluntary cough peak flow (V-CPF) and involuntary cough peak flow (IV-CPF) for re-intubation in mechanically ventilated subjects. METHODS: Endotracheally intubated patients who passed a spontaneous breathing trial and assessment of readiness for extubation were enrolled. Before extubation, V-CPF and IV-CPF were measured. Re-intubation was recorded at 72 h after extubation. RESULTS: A total of 115 extubations in 106 cooperative subjects (including 9 subjects with second extubation) and 5 extubations in 5 uncooperative subjects were recorded. At 72 h, 20 (17.4%) and 1 (25%) instances of re-intubation occurred in cooperative and uncooperative subjects, respectively. In cooperative subjects, those who had been successfully extubated had higher V-CPF than re-intubated subjects (81.3 ± 41.4 vs 51.3 ± 31.7, P = .003). However, rates were not significantly different with IV-CPF (70.9 ± 39.8 vs 55.7 ± 37.9, P = .121). Areas under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic in V-CPF and IV-CPF were 0.743 ± 0.057 and 0.632 ± 0.069 (P < .001 and P = .058, respectively, compared with area under the curve = 0.5). V-CPF had higher predictive accuracy for re-intubation than IV-CPF (P = .034). In subjects with a lower quartile and third quartile V-CPF (≤ 43.2 L/min and 43.2-68.4 L/min, respectively), V-CPF was similar to IV-CPF. However, in second quartile and upper quartile V-CPF (68.4-99.0 L/min and > 99.0 L/min, respectively), V-CPF was higher than IV-CPF (82.1 ± 9.6 vs 66.6 ± 19.5 L/min, P < .001; 135.5 ± 29.8 vs 116.2 ± 38.2 L/min, P = .006, respectively). Overall, V-CPF was higher than IV-CPF (76.0 ± 41.4 vs 68.2 ± 39.7, P = .003). In uncooperative subjects, the IV-CPF was higher than V-CPF (40.2 ± 10.2 vs 79.2 ± 29.0, P = .042). CONCLUSIONS: V-CPF is noninvasive. It is much more accurate than IV-CPF as a predictor of re-intubation in cooperative patients because the IV-CPF may underestimate cough strength in patients with high V-CPF. However, it is unclear which is optimal for use in uncooperative patients.

Risk factors for venous thrombosis associated with peripherally inserted central venous catheters.

To evaluate the risk factors associated with an increased risk of symptomatic peripherally inserted central venous catheter (PICC)-related venous thrombosis. Retrospective analyses identified 2313 patients who received PICCs from 1 January 2012 to 31 December 2013. All 11 patients with symptomatic PICC-related venous thrombosis (thrombosis group) and 148 who did not have thromboses (non-thrombosis group) were selected randomly. The medical information of 159 patients (age, body mass index (BMI), diagnosis, smoking history, nutritional risk score, platelet count, leucocyte count as well as levels of D-dimer, fibrinogen, and degradation products of fibrin) were collected. Logistic regression analysis was undertaken to determine the risk factors for thrombosis. Of 2313 patients, 11 (0.47%) were found to have symptomatic PICC-related venous thrombosis by color Doppler ultrasound. Being bedridden for a long time (odds ratio [(OR]), 17.774; P=0.0017), D-dimer >5 mg/L (36.651; 0.0025) and suffering from one comorbidity (8.39; 0.0265) or more comorbidities (13.705; 0.0083) were the major risk factors for PICC-catheter related venous thrombosis by stepwise logistic regression analysis. Among 159 patients, the prevalence of PICC-associated venous thrombosis in those with ≥1 risk factor was 10.34% (12/116), in those with ≥2 risk factors was 20.41% (10/49), and in those with >3 risk factors was 26.67% (4/15). Being bedridden >72 h, having increased levels of D-dimer (>5 mg/L) and suffering from comorbidities were independent risk factors of PICC-related venous thrombosis.