No significant difference in thick versus thin osteochondral flap trochleoplasty in the treatment of trochlear dysplasia: A systematic review.

PURPOSE: Trochleoplasty has become increasingly utilised to address patellar instability in the setting of severe trochlear dysplasia. There remains a paucity of literature on the outcomes of 'thick'- versus 'thin'-osteochondral flap trochleoplasty. The purpose of this study is to compare clinical and radiographic outcomes between patients with patellar instability with symptomatic trochlear dysplasia treated using a 'thick' versus 'thin' osteochondral flap trochleoplasty. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines using a PRISMA checklist. Quality assessment of final articles was conducted by two blinded reviewers. Articles were separated based on the use of a 'thick' versus 'thin' flap trochleoplasty. Data collection consisted of recording the following variables: patient demographics, indications for trochleoplasty, mean follow-up time, additional procedures performed during trochleoplasty, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), radiographic outcomes (tibial tubercle-trochlear groove [TT-TG] distance, Caton-Deschamps Index [CDI] and sulcus angle [SA]) and the incidence of any postoperative complications and patellar redislocation rates. RESULTS: A total of 24 studies, consisting of 927 patients, were identified as meeting inclusion criteria. A total of five papers described a 'thick' flap technique, while 19 papers described the use of a 'thin' flap technique. No significant difference in the mean improvement of Kujala scores was appreciated when comparing 'thick' versus 'thin' techniques (p > 0.05). Improvements in mean radiographic outcomes based on TT-TG, CDI and SA were observed in both 'thick' and 'thin' flap trochleoplasty groups. The overall redislocation rate was 0.35%. CONCLUSION: No significant difference in Kujala scores was observed in patients undergoing trochleoplasty utilising 'thick' versus 'thin' technique, while improvements in mean TT-TG, CDI and SA were noted in both technique groups, with an overall redislocation rate of 0.35%. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Lateral Opening-Wedge Distal Femoral Osteotomy Made Easy: Tips and Tricks.

A lateral opening-wedge distal femoral osteotomy is useful to offload the lateral tibiofemoral compartment for focal chondral defects or isolated lateral compartment arthritis. Although beneficial for these lateral compartment disorders, a distal femoral osteotomy requires careful forethought to optimize correction accuracy and safety. We recommend the following for effective execution of a distal femoral osteotomy: (1) Plan the desired correction preoperatively while accounting for an individual patient's anatomy and femoral width. (2) Perform an iliotibial band Z-lengthening for large deformity corrections to not overconstrain the lateral structures. (3) Use the plate to help guide the level of the osteotomy, which will facilitate bony contact after the osteotomy and decrease plate prominence. (4) Perform the osteotomy with a saw anteriorly and an osteotome posteriorly for safety and stop the osteotomy approximately 1 cm short of the far cortex. (5) Fashion tricortical wedge grafts at the height of the planned correction to maintain reduction and facilitate plate placement. (6) Control the plate position to lie optimally at the level of the osteotomy, ensuring it is not proud and is parallel with the femoral shaft. With these presurgical and intraoperative steps, a lateral opening-wedge distal femoral osteotomy can be performed effectively.

Revision and Primary Meniscal Allograft Transplantations Provide Clinical Benefit at Mid-Term Follow-Up: A Matched-Cohort Analysis of Patient-Reported Outcomes, Reoperations, and Failures.

PURPOSE: To report the mid-term outcomes of patients who underwent revision meniscal allograft transplantation (RMAT) and compare survivorship free from reoperation and failure with a matched cohort of patients who underwent primary meniscal allograft transplantation (PMAT). METHODS: A retrospective review of prospectively collected data identified patients who underwent RMAT and PMAT between 1999 and 2017. A cohort of PMAT patients matched at a ratio of 2:1 with respect to age, body mass index, sex, and concomitant procedures served as the control group. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) at baseline and at a minimum of 5 years postoperatively were collected. PROMs and the achievement of clinically significant outcomes were analyzed within groups. Graft survivorship free from meniscal reoperation and failure (arthroplasty or subsequent RMAT) was compared between cohorts using log-rank testing. RESULTS: During the study period, 22 RMATs were performed in 22 patients. Of these RMAT patients, 16 met the inclusion criteria (73% follow-up rate). The mean age of RMAT patients was 29.7 ± 9.3 years, and the mean follow-up period was 9.9 ± 4.2 years (range, 5.4-16.8 years). There were no differences between the RMAT cohort and the 32 matched PMAT patients with respect to age (P = .292), body mass index (P = .623), sex (P = .537), concomitant procedures (P ≥ .286), or baseline PROMs (P ≥ .066). The patient acceptable symptomatic state was achieved by the RMAT cohort for the subjective International Knee Documentation Committee score (70%), Lysholm score (38%), and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score subscales (Pain [73%], Symptoms [64%], Sport [45%], Activities of Daily Living [55%], and Quality of Life [36%]). In the RMAT cohort, 5 patients (31%) underwent subsequent reoperation at a mean of 4.7 ± 2.1 years (range, 1.7-6.7 years) and 5 patients met the criteria for failure at a mean of 4.9 ± 2.9 years (range, 1.2-8.4 years). There were no significant differences in survivorship free from reoperation (P = .735) or failure (P = .170) between the RMAT and PMAT cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: At mid-term follow-up, most patients who underwent RMAT achieved the patient acceptable symptomatic state for the subjective International Knee Documentation Committee score and the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score subscales of Pain, Symptoms, and Activities of Daily Living. Additionally, there were no differences in survival free from meniscal reoperation or failure between the PMAT and RMAT cohorts. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative cohort.

Revision and Conversion to Arthroplasty Are Low Among Adolescents Undergoing Meniscal Allograft Transplantation Using the Bridge-In-Slot Technique at Midterm Follow-Up.

PURPOSE: To report midterm outcomes after primary medial and lateral meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT) with fresh-frozen allografts implanted with the bridge-in-slot technique in the adolescent patient population. METHODS: Adolescent patients less than 18 years old at the time of primary MAT from 1999 to 2016 were retrospectively identified. International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective form, Lysholm, and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) subscales scores were collected before surgery and at 1-year, 2-year, and a minimum 5-year follow-up. Thresholds for achieving clinically significant outcomes were calculated, and the proportion of patients achieving minimal clinically important difference (MCID), patient-acceptable symptomatic state (PASS), and substantial clinical benefit (SCB) was determined. Meniscus reoperation (partial, subtotal, or total meniscectomy, repair, or failure) and failure (revision MAT or conversion to arthroplasty) rates were determined. RESULTS: Forty-four (female n = 33; male n = 11) of 62 identified patients met inclusion criteria and were followed for a mean of 9.5 ± 3.8 years (range, 5.0-17.7). Lateral MAT was performed in most patients (n = 35/44 [80%]). Isolated MAT was performed in 27 (61%) patients. Common concomitant procedures included osteochondral allograft transplantation (32%), autologous chondrocyte implantation (18%), and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (14%). MCID, PASS, and SCB were achieved by patients at a minimum 5-year follow-up for IKDC (62%; 76%; 31%), Lysholm (62%; 79%; 23%), and KOOS questionnaires (Pain [65%; 81%; 41%], Symptoms [58%; 81%; 47%], Activities of Daily Living [53%; 77%; 35%], Sport [86%; 75%; 50%], and Quality of Life [59%; 81%; 59%]), respectively. Fourteen patients (32%) underwent reoperation at an average of 5.0 ± 4.3 years (range, 0.8-14.0) after MAT. Three (7%) patients met criteria for failure, requiring revision MAT an average of 3.8 ± 1.1 years (range, 2.8-4.9) after transplantation. No patients underwent arthroplasty. Overall survival free from failure at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years was 100%, 100%, 93%, and 93%, respectively. At the time of final follow-up, 80% of patients reported satisfaction with their current physical status. CONCLUSIONS: Primary MAT in adolescent patients resulted in significant and durable functional improvements at mid- to long-term follow-up. At an average of 9.5 years after surgery, meniscal reoperation rate was 32% whereas graft survival free of revision MAT was 93%. Adolescents undergoing MAT demonstrated similar functional outcomes and graft survivability when compared to available adult MAT literature. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, retrospective case series.

Concomitant Treatment of High-Grade Cartilage Lesions Mitigates Risk of Meniscal Allograft Transplant Failure.

PURPOSE: To identify frequently studied significant preoperative risk factors for meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT) failure. METHODS: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines were used to conduct this systematic review. The database analysis was performed in May of 2022 and included PubMed, Embrace, and Cochrane. Studies between January 1, 2000, and January 1, 2021, were reviewed with search terms, including "meniscal," "meniscus," "transplantation," "transplant," and "allograft." Twenty-one full-text manuscripts met inclusion criteria of studies assessing preoperative risk factors for MAT failure defined as either clinical failure (Lysholm <65) or surgical failure (revision, removal, or conversion to knee arthroplasty). RESULTS: In total, 21 studies were included, comprising 47.6% with a Level of Evidence of Level III and 52.4% with Level of Evidence IV. The analysis involved 2,533 patients, and the mean final follow-up ranged from 2.2 to 20.0 years. The presence of high-grade cartilage defects was the only factor found predictive of MAT surgical failure in the majority of studies in which it was analyzed (5/7 studies, 71.4%). Four of the five studies that found high-grade cartilage defects to be a predictor of MAT surgical failure did not treat all cartilage lesions, while the 2 studies that found high-grade cartilage defects an insignificant predictor of MAT surgical failure treated all defects at the time of MAT. For clinical failure, no risk factors were predictive of MAT failure in the majority of studies, although smoking and concomitant ligamentous or realignment procedures were significant in 1 study. CONCLUSION: The presence of untreated high-grade cartilage appears to elevate the risk of surgical MAT failure; however, concomitant treatment of defects may mitigate their detrimental effect. There is no clear risk factor that consistently predicts clinical failure. Age, sex, BMI, knee compartment, time from prior meniscectomy, femorotibial alignment (after correction), concomitant cartilage procedure, and laterality do not routinely impact MAT failure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, systematic review.

Patient-reported outcomes measurement information system depression psychometrically underperforms compared to legacy measures and is poorly associated with postoperative functional outcomes in shoulder arthroplasty patients.

Background: The purpose of this study was to investigate the associations between each mental health patient-reported outcome measure with postoperative functional outcomes following shoulder arthroplasty, and to compare psychometric properties of patient-reported outcomes measurement information system depression to the legacy (VR-12 Mental) patient-reported outcome measure. Methods: Patients who underwent primary shoulder arthroplasty from July 2018 to February 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Patient-reported outcomes measurement information system depression and VR-12 Mental were administered preoperatively; American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation were administered at 6-month and 1-year postoperatively. Rasch partial credit modeling analysis was used to compare psychometric properties of legacy versus patient-reported outcomes measurement information system instruments in assessing mental health. Results: Ninety-three patients who underwent total shoulder arthroplasty (n = 52), reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (n = 39), or hemiarthroplasty (n = 2) were included. Preoperative VR-12 Mental scores were moderately associated with American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons at 6-months (coefficient: 0.52, P = 0.026) and 1-year (coefficient: 0.65, P = 0.002), while preoperative patient-reported outcomes measurement information system depression scores were not. Patient-reported outcomes measurement information system depression demonstrated significant floor effects (16%); VR-12 Mental demonstrated minimal floor and ceiling effects (1.1% for both). VR-12 Mental demonstrated broader coverage of mental outlook on Rasch modeling than patient-reported outcomes measurement information system depression and had adequate model fit after one round of reiterative item elimination. Discussion: Patient-reported outcomes measurement information system depression was poorly associated with postoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores, demonstrated significant floor effects, and had limited coverage of mental health on Rasch modeling with reiterative elimination. Level of Evidence: IV.

PROMIS physical function and pain perform poorly psychometrically in patients undergoing medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the validity, floor and ceiling effects, and dimensionality of PROMIS Physical Function (PF) and Pain compared to legacy patient reported outcome (PRO) measures in patients undergoing medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction. METHODS: Patients who underwent MPFL reconstruction between 2018 to 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Preoperatively, patients completed the IKDC, VR-12, Kujala, SF-12, KOOS JR, PROMIS PF and Pain surveys. Inter-survey convergence was assessed with Spearman correlations. Psychometric analysis included investigations of inter-survey convergent validity, intra-survey floor and ceiling effects, and Rasch analyses with person-item fit and iterative question elimination model fit testing. RESULTS: A total of 76 patients (mean age: 22.6 ± 8.4 years) who completed preoperative surveys were included (compliance: 91.7-96.2%). Preoperatively, age was significantly associated with both PROMIS PF (coefficient: - 0.291, P = 0.005) and Pain scores (coefficient: 0.294, P = 0.002). PROMIS PF had a Very Good correlation with IKDC and PROMIS Pain had a Very Good correlation with KOOS JR. Other correlations ranged from Poor to Good. No significant floor or ceiling effects were observed for any PRO. On iterative question elimination Rasch modelling, only two questions from PROMIS PF remained after 6 rounds of elimination while PROMIS Pain had no questions remaining after 3 rounds of elimination. CONCLUSION: Preoperative PROMIS PF and Pain provided only Fair to Good correlations with most legacy PROs. Although no significant floor and ceiling effects were observed, PROMIS PF and Pain did not perform well psychometrically in this population of patients undergoing MPFL reconstruction. These results suggest PROMIS questionnaires should be used with caution in this population, especially if used in isolation, when discussing clinical expectations with patients. The authors recommend continued use of legacy PROs specific to assessment of patellar instability and function that have established validity in patellar instability populations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

A Radiostereometric Analysis of Tendon Migration After Arthroscopic and Mini-Open Biceps Tenodesis: Interference Screw Versus Single Suture Anchor Fixation.

BACKGROUND: Studies suggest that similar clinical results are achieved via arthroscopic and open biceps tenodesis (BT) techniques. PURPOSE: To quantify the postoperative migration of the BT construct between arthroscopic suprapectoral BT (ASPBT) and open subpectoral BT (OSPBT) techniques via interference screw (IS) or single-suture suture anchor (SSSA) fixation using radiostereometric analysis. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: Distal migration of the biceps tendon after OSPBT with a polyetheretherketone IS, OSPBT with 1 SSSA, ASPBT with polyetheretherketone IS, and ASPBT with 2 SSSAs was measured prospectively. Patients with symptomatic biceps tendinopathy and preoperative patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) including Constant-Murley subjective, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, or Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Upper Extremity scores were included. A tantalum bead was sutured on the proximal end of the long head of the biceps tendon before fixation of tendon tissue. Anteroposterior radiographs were performed immediately postoperatively, at 1 week, and at 3 months. Bead migration was measured, and preoperative PROMs were compared with those at latest follow-up. RESULTS: Of 115 patients, 94 (82%) were available for final follow-up. IS fixation yielded the least tendon migration with no difference between the open and arthroscopic approaches (4.31 vs 5.04 mm; P = .70). Fixation with 1 suture anchor demonstrated significantly greater migration than that achieved with an IS at both 1 week (6.47 vs 0.1 mm, 6.47 vs 1.75 mm, P < .001;) and 3 months (14.76 vs 4.31 mm, 14.76 vs 5.04 mm, P < .001) postoperatively. Two-suture anchor fixation yielded significantly greater migration than IS fixation at 1 week (7.02 vs 0.1 mm, P < .001; 7.02 vs 1.75 mm, P = .003) but not 3 months postoperatively (8.06 vs 4.31 mm, P = .10; 8.06 vs 5.04 mm, P = .07). Four patients with suture anchor fixation (3 patients in the OSPBT 1 SSSA group, 9.4%, and 1 patient in the ASPBT 2 SSSAs group, 3.8%) developed a Popeye deformity, whereas no Popeye deformities occurred in the IS groups. Mean 3-month bead migration in patients with and without a Popeye deformity was 60.8 and 11.2 mm, respectively (P < .0001). PROMs did not differ among groups at final follow-up. CONCLUSION: Interference screw fixation yielded the least tendon migration whether achieved arthroscopically or open. The available data indicated that fixation with 1 SSSA but not 2 SSSAs resulted in significantly greater migration than that achieved with an IS. Despite variations in tendon migration, PROMs were similar among all groups. When SSSAs are used, tendon migration may be minimized by using ≥2 anchors.

Minimum 10-Year Clinical Outcomes and Survivorship of Meniscal Allograft Transplantation With Fresh-Frozen Allografts Using the Bridge-in-Slot Technique.

BACKGROUND: Meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT) has been shown to provide clinical benefits in patients with symptomatic meniscal deficiency in the short term and midterm. There is, however, a paucity of data regarding long-term outcomes after MAT using fresh-frozen allografts and the bridge-in-slot technique. PURPOSE: To report clinical outcomes and revision rates after primary MAT with fresh-frozen allografts and the bridge-in-slot technique in a large case series of patients at a 10-year minimum follow-up. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: A retrospective review of prospectively collected data was performed on patients undergoing primary MAT between 2001 and 2012. Lysholm, International Knee Documentation Committee subjective form, and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score subscales were collected preoperatively and at 1-, 2-, 5-, and minimum 10-year follow-ups. Cox proportional hazards modeling was used to identify variables associated with reoperation and failure, defined as revision MAT or conversion to arthroplasty. Reoperation was defined as a subsequent surgical intervention on the transplanted meniscus, including partial or total meniscectomy, meniscal repair, or failure as defined in the previous sentence. RESULTS: A total of 174 patients undergoing MAT met the inclusion criteria and were followed for a mean of 12.7 ± 2.7 years (range, 10.0-21.0 years). The mean age at surgery was 28.3 ± 10.1 years. The patients were predominantly female (n = 92; 53%), and medial MAT was the most commonly performed procedure (n = 91; 52%). Concomitant procedures were performed in 115 patients (66%), with the most common procedure being osteochondral allograft transplantation (n = 59; 34%). Patients demonstrated statistically significant postoperative improvements at all time points for all patient-reported outcome measures (P≤ .0001). A total of 65 patients (37%) underwent a meniscal reoperation at a mean time of 6.6 ± 5.5 years (range, 0.3-16.7 years) postoperatively. A total of 40 patients (23%) met the criteria for failure at a mean time of 7.3 ± 5.0 years (range, 1.0-17.4 years) after MAT, with 22 of these patients having undergone a previous meniscal reoperation. At the final follow-up, 13 patients (7%) had undergone revision MAT and 27 (15%) had converted to arthroplasty. The MAT survival rates free of meniscal reoperation and failure were 73% and 85% at 10 years and 60% and 72% at 15 years, respectively. At the time of the final follow-up, 86% of patients reported that they were satisfied with their overall postoperative condition. CONCLUSION: Primary MAT demonstrates efficacy and durability with high rates of patient satisfaction at a minimum 10-year follow-up. Patients should be counseled that although reoperation rates may approach 40% at 15 years, rates of overall revision MAT and conversion to arthroplasty remain low at long-term follow-up.

Patient Demographic Factors Are Not Associated With Mesenchymal Stromal Cell Concentration in Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate.

Purpose: To describe the capacity for concentration of a single processing machine for bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) production and investigate the effects of demographic factors on the number of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) in BMAC. Methods: Patients enrolled in our institution's randomized control trials involving BMAC who had complete BMAC flow cytometry data were included. Multipotent MSC phenotype, defined as cell-surface coexpression of specific-identifying antigens (≥95% positive) and the absence of hematopoietic lineage markers (≤2% positive), was determined for both patient bone marrow aspirate (BMA) and BMAC samples. The ratio of cells in BMA:BMAC samples was calculated and Spearman correlations (i.e., body mass index [BMI]) and Kruskall-Wallis (i.e., age: <40, 40-60, >60 years) or Mann-Whitney (i.e., sex) tests were used to determine the relationship of cell concentration to demographic factors. Results: Eighty patients were included in analysis (49% male, mean age: 49.9 ± 12.2 years). Mean concentration of BMA and BMAC was 2,048.13 ± 2,004.14 MSCs/mL and 5,618.87 ± 7,568.54 MSC/mL, respectively, with a mean BMAC:BMA ratio of 4.35 ± 2.09. A significantly greater MSC concentration was observed in the BMAC samples when compared with BMA (P = .005). No patient demographic factors (age, sex, height, weight, BMI) were found to predict MSC concentration in the BMAC samples (P ≥ .01). Conclusions: Demographic factors, including age, sex, and BMI do not impact the final concentration of MSCs in BMAC when using a single harvest technique (anterior iliac crest) and a single processing system. Clinical Relevance: As the role of BMAC therapy expands in clinical application, it becomes increasingly important to understand the determinants of BMAC composition and how it is affected by different harvesting techniques, concentrating processes, and patient demographics.

Biomechanical Analysis of Anteroinferior Bankart Repair Anchor Types.

BACKGROUND: All-suture anchors and knotless anchors are increasingly used in the repair of anteroinferior labral tears in patients with shoulder instability. Optimal repair constructs may limit recurrent instability. PURPOSE: To perform a quantitative biomechanical comparison of 3 labral fixation devices for soft tissue Bankart lesions: knotless soft-body tensionable anchor (SB knotless), knotted soft-body anchor (SB knotted), and knotless hard-body PEEK (polyether ether ketone) interference anchor (HB knotless). STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: A total of 21 glenoid specimens were randomized into 3 groups: SB knotless, SB knotted, and HB knotless. Artificial Bankart lesions were created at the anteroinferior labrum. Anchors were placed at the 3:30, 4:30, and 5:30 clockface positions, and sutures were passed through 1 cm of tissue. Anchors were tested simultaneously as one construct by pulling capsular tissue connected to the anteroinferior quadrant. Cyclic loading (5-25 N, 100 cycles) was followed by load-to-failure testing (15 mm/min). Biomechanical testing variables were collected, and failure mechanisms were recorded per individual anchor. RESULTS: There were no differences in baseline specimen characteristics. There was no difference in elongation during cyclic loading (P = .40). The ultimate load to failure between SB knotless (309.7 ± 125.6 N), SB knotted (226.4 ± 34.8 N), and HB knotless (256.5 ± 90.5 N) did not significantly differ (P = .25). Failure mechanisms differed among groups (P = .008); mechanisms included anchor pullout (SB knotless: 33.3%; SB knotted: 23.8%; HB knotless: 28.6%), suture pull-through (SB knotless: 66.7%; SB knotted: 38.1%; HB knotless: 33.3%), and anchor fixation method failure, defined as knot failure for knotted anchors or locking mechanism failure for knotless anchors (SB knotless: 0.0%; SB knotted: 38.1%; HB knotless: 38.1%).). CONCLUSION: The SB knotless, SB knotted, and HB knotless labral fixation anchors studied exhibited comparable elongation during cyclic loading, stiffness, and ultimate loads to failure in a cadaveric model. However, the failure mechanisms significantly differed, as SB knotless anchors failed primarily from suture pull-through, while SB knotted and HB knotless anchors were subject to knot failure and locking mechanism failure, respectively. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: These data support the benefit of SB knotless anchors for anteroinferior labral repair in limiting knot failure typically seen with knotted anchors, perhaps demonstrating that all-suture anchors may have better locking mechanism quality than their PEEK counterparts.

Long-term outcomes after osteochondral allograft transplantation to the humeral head.

BACKGROUND: Long-term outcomes of osteochondral allograft (OCA) transplantation to the humeral head have been sparsely reported in the literature. PURPOSE: To evaluate outcomes and survivorship of OCA transplantation to the humeral head in patients with osteochondral defects at a minimum of 10 years of follow-up. METHODS: A registry of patients who underwent humeral head OCA transplantation between 2004 and 2012 was reviewed. Patients completed pre and postoperative surveys including the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Simple Shoulder Test, Short Form 12 (SF-12), and the visual analog scale. Failure was defined by conversion to shoulder arthroplasty. RESULTS: Fifteen of 21 (71%) patients with a minimum of ten year of follow-up (mean: 14.2 ± 2.40) were identified. Mean patient age was 26.1 ± 8.8 years at the time of transplantation and eight (53%) patients were male. Surgery was performed on the dominant shoulder in 11 of the 15 (73%) cases. The use of local anesthetic delivered via an intra-articular pain pump was the most often reported underlying etiology of chondral injury (n = 9; 60%). Eight (53%) patients were treated with an allograft plug, while seven (47%) patients were treated with a mushroom cap allograft. At final follow-up, mean American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (49.9 to 81.1; P = .048) and Simple Shoulder Test (43.1 to 83.3; P = .010) significantly improved compared to baseline. Changes in mean SF-12 physical (41.4 to 48.1; P = .354), SF-12 mental (57.5 to 51.8; P = .354), and visual analog scale (4.0 to 2.8; P = .618) did not reach statistical significance. Eight (53%) patients required conversion to shoulder arthroplasty at an average of 4.8 ± 4.7 years (range: 0.6-13.2). Kaplan-Meier graft survival probabilities were 60% at 10 years and 41% at 15 years. CONCLUSION: OCA transplantation to the humeral head can result in acceptable long-term function for patients with osteochondral defects. While patient-reported outcomes metrics were generally improved compared to baseline, OCA graft survival probabilities diminished with time. The findings from this study can be used to counsel future patients with significant glenohumeral cartilage injuries and set expectations about the potential for further surgery.

Single-stage autologous cartilage repair results in positive patient-reported outcomes for chondral lesions of the knee: a systematic review.

AIM: This article aims to perform a systematic review of the clinical literature regarding the efficacy of single-stage autologous cartilage repair. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was performed using PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed. RESULTS: Twelve studies were identified; however, due to overlapping patient cohorts, nine studies were included for data extraction and analysis. Six studies applied minced cartilage, while three studies utilized enzymatically processed cartilage. Two authorship groups described single-stage techniques that exclusively utilized cartilage from the debrided lesion rim, while the remaining groups either utilized healthy cartilage or combined healthy cartilage with cartilage debrided from lesion rim. Among the included techniques, scaffold augments were used in four studies, and three studies implemented bone autograft augmentation. When summarizing patient reported outcome measures for the included studies, single-stage autologous cartilage repair demonstrated an average improvement ranging from 18.7 â€‹± â€‹5.3 to 30.0 â€‹± â€‹8.0 amongst the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores subsections, 24.3 â€‹± â€‹10.5 for the International Knee Documentation Committee subjective score, and 41.0 â€‹± â€‹10.0 for Visual Analogue Scale-Pain. CONCLUSION: Single-stage autologous cartilage repair is a promising technique with positive clinical data to date. The current study highlights the overall improvement in patient reported outcomes after repair for chondral defects to the knee with average follow-up ranging from 12 to 201 months and also the heterogeneity and variability of the single-stage surgical technique. Further discussion on the standardization of practices for a cost-effective single-stage augmented autologous cartilage technique is needed. In the future, a well-designed randomized controlled trial is needed to explore the efficacy of this therapeutic modality relative to established intervention. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Systematic review; Level IV.

Determining the Time Required to Achieve Clinically Significant Outcomes on the PROMIS Upper Extremity Questionnaire After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair.

Background: Clinically significant outcome (CSO) thresholds for the Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System-Upper Extremity (PROMIS-UE) score have been previously defined after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR). However, the time required to achieve CSOs for the PROMIS-UE score is unknown. Purpose: To (1) determine the time required to achieve the minimal clinically important difference (MCID), substantial clinical benefit (SCB), and Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) score thresholds after RCR for the PROMIS-UE questionnaire and (2) identify patient factors associated with earlier or delayed achievement of these clinical benchmarks. Study Design: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A prospectively maintained institutional database was retrospectively reviewed for consecutive patients who underwent RCR between January 2018 and January 2019. Patients were included if they completed the PROMIS-UE questionnaire both preoperatively and at standardized postoperative time intervals: 5 to 7 months (6-month time point), 11 to 13 months (1-year time point), and ≥23 months (2-year time point). Kaplan-Meier survival curves with interval censoring were used to define the cumulative percentage of patients who achieved the MCID, SCB, and PASS. Patient variables associated with earlier or delayed achievement of the MCID, SCB, and PASS were determined using Weibull parametric survival regression analysis. Results: Included were 105 patients undergoing RCR (age, 57.3 ± 10.3 years; body mass index, 31.5 ± 6.1 kg/m2). By 2-year follow-up, the cumulative percentage of patients achieving the MCID, SCB, and PASS was 86.7%, 76.2%, and 74.3%, respectively. The mean time required to reach the MCID, SCB, and PASS score thresholds was 9.5 ± 3.8, 10.3 ± 4.4, and 9.8 ± 4.6 months, respectively. Factors associated with delayed achievement of CSOs included greater baseline PROMIS-UE score (MCID and SCB) and workers' compensation insurance (PASS). Greater baseline PROMIS-UE scores were associated with earlier achievement of the PASS. Conclusion: Most patients achieved CSOs for the PROMIS-UE within 12 months of RCR. Patient-specific factors found to be associated with earlier or delayed achievement of CSOs can be used to inform patient discussions on the expected timeline for recovery after RCR.

Patient-Specific Variables Associated with Failure to Achieve Clinically Significant Outcomes After Meniscal Allograft Transplantation at Minimum 5 Year Follow-Up.

PURPOSE: To determine the improvements in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) necessary to achieve minimal clinically important difference (MCID), patient-acceptable symptomatic state (PASS), and substantial clinical benefit (SCB) after primary meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT) at a minimum of 5-year follow-up, while identifying variables predictive of achieving clinically significant outcomes (CSOs). METHODS: A retrospective review was performed to identify patients undergoing primary MAT at a single institution from 1999 to 2016. Lysholm, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) subscales were collected before surgery and at a minimum of 5-year follow-up. A distribution-based approach was used to calculate MCID, whereas an anchor-based approach was used to calculate SCB and PASS. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to determine factors associated with CSO achievement. RESULTS: A total of 202 patients undergoing MAT (56% medial, 44% lateral) were included with a mean follow-up of 9.8 ± 4.1 years, age of 29.7 ± 8.5 years, and body mass index (BMI) of 26.5 ± 4.7. Thresholds for achieving MCID, PASS, and SCB, respectively, at a minimum 5-year follow-up for Lysholm (10.3, 74.5, 32.5), IKDC (12.1, 55.6, 29.1), and KOOS subscales questionnaires (Pain [11.0, 70.7, 25.1], Symptoms [11.0, 60.8, 19.6], Activities of Daily Living [10.5, 90.3, 17.9], Sport [16.2, 47.4, 37.5], and Quality of Life [13.6, 40.5, 37.3]) were calculated. Reduced odds of achieving MCID were associated with higher preoperative PROM scores, BMI, patient age, concomitant osteotomy, male sex, and worker's compensation (WC) status. Reduced odds of achieving PASS were associated with lower preoperative PROM scores, higher BMI (particularly ≥30), patient age, and WC status. Reduced odds of achieving SCB were associated with higher preoperative PROM scores and WC status. CONCLUSIONS: This study established the MCID, PASS, and SCB at 5-year minimum follow-up for the Lysholm score, IKDC, and KOOS subscales in patients who underwent MAT. Increased BMI and patient age, male sex, performance of concomitant osteotomy, WC status, and preoperative PROM scores were associated with failure to achieve CSOs after primary MAT at a minimum of 5-year follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study, retrospective case series.

Consistent Indications and Good Outcomes Despite High Variability in Techniques for Two-Stage Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.

PURPOSE: To systematically review the current literature regarding the indications, techniques, and outcomes after 2-stage revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). METHODS: A literature search was performed using SCOPUS, PubMed, Medline, and the Cochrane Central Register for Controlled Trials according to the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analyses statement. Inclusion criteria was limited to Level I-IV human studies reporting on indications, surgical techniques, imaging, and/or clinical outcomes of 2-stage revision ACLR. RESULTS: Thirteen studies with 355 patients treated with 2-stage revision ACLR were identified. The most commonly reported indications were tunnel malposition and tunnel widening, with knee instability being the most common symptomatic indication. Tunnel diameter threshold for 2-stage reconstruction ranged from 10 to 14 mm. The most common grafts used for primary ACLR were bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) autograft, hamstring graft, and LARS (polyethylene terephthalate) synthetic graft. The time elapsed from primary ACLR to the first stage surgery ranged from 1.7 years to 9.7 years, whereas the time elapsed between the first and second stage ranged from 21 weeks to 13.6 months. Six different bone grafting options were reported, with the most common being iliac crest autograft, allograft bone dowels, and allograft bone chips. During definitive reconstruction, hamstring autograft and BPTB autograft were the most commonly used grafts. Studies reporting patient-reported outcome measures showed improvement from preoperative to postoperative levels in Lysholm, Tegner, and objective International Knee and Documentation Committee scores. CONCLUSIONS: Tunnel malpositioning and widening remain the most common indications for 2-stage revision ACLR. Bone grafting is commonly reported using iliac crest autograft and allograft bone chips and dowels, whereas hamstring autograft and BPTB autograft were the most used grafts during the second-stage definitive reconstruction. Studies showed improvements from preoperative to postoperative levels in commonly used patient reported outcomes measures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, systematic review of Level I, III, and IV studies.

Biphasic Interpositional Allograft for Rotator Cuff Repair Augmentation Is Safe in an Ovine Model.

PURPOSE: To perform a preclinical histologic assessment of a biphasic acellular interpositional cancellous allograft in an ovine model of rotator cuff repair (RCR) designed to better understand its safety profile and effects on tendon healing after RCR. METHODS: Thirty skeletally mature sheep with clinically normal shoulders with an artificially created degenerative infraspinatus tendon tear were randomized to control and treatment groups. Animals were euthanized at 3 weeks, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks. After gross dissection, rotator cuff specimens were fixed with formalin and polymerized for sectioning and staining. Blinded histologic scores evaluated inflammatory cell infiltrates, signs of degradation, particulate debris, collagen arrangement, neovascularization, and enthesis qualitative measures. RESULTS: There were no treatment specimens that exhibited histologic signs of a significant infection, inflammatory infiltrate, or foreign body reaction such as granuloma or fibrous capsule formation. Histologic scores in all categories were not significantly different at all time points, including the primary end point mean cumulative inflammatory score (control: 3.66 ± 1.21 vs treated: 4.33 ± 1.51, P = .42), when comparing the treatment and control RCR groups. In general, the degree of tendon healing and host tissue response was essentially equivalent between the 2 groups with observation of low overall levels of inflammation and progressive improvements in collagen organization, reduced tenocyte activity, and fibrocartilaginous enthesis reformation. CONCLUSIONS: This histologic study demonstrated the use of a biphasic interpositional allograft for RCR augmentation in an ovine model does not generate an inflammatory response or foreign body reaction. Use of the biphasic interpositional allograft resulted in a histological profile that was essentially equivalent to that of a standard RCR at 3-, 6-, and 12-week postoperative timepoints. These findings suggest that a biphasic interpositional allograft is safe for further clinical investigation in humans before broader clinical application. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Patch augmentation of RCR is a popular technique that has shown clinical success in improving the likelihood of a successful repair in patients at elevated risk for retear. Newer augmentation technologies are being developed to address the biology at the interface between the bone and soft tissue where failure typically occurs.

Complication Rates After Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction Range From 0% to 32% With 0% to 11% Recurrent Instability: A Systematic Review.

PURPOSE: To review the incidence of complications following primary medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction for recurrent patellar instability. METHODS: A literature search was conducted by querying PubMed and Scopus databases from database inception through August 2022 according to the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis guidelines using the terms "Medial Patellofemoral Ligament," "MPFL," "reconstruction," "patellar," and "instability." Inclusion criteria included studies reporting complications following primary MPFL reconstruction for recurrent patellar instability. Exclusion criteria consisted of studies reporting on patients undergoing concurrent osteotomy procedures, revision reconstruction, and biomechanical or anatomic studies. The incidence of specific complications was aggregated from the included studies. RESULTS: Twenty-eight studies, consisting of 1,478 patients (n = 1521 knees), with a mean age of 23.3 years (mean range, 19-34.3 years) were identified. The overall incidence of complications ranged from 0% to 32.3% of knees. Failure ranged from 0% to 10.7% of knees, whereas patellar fractures occurred in 0% to 8.3% of knees, primarily in patients treated with full-length transverse tunnel or 2-tunnel techniques. All patellar fractures occurred in patients with patellar tunnels ranging from 4.5 to 6.0 mm in diameter. The incidence of postoperative knee stiffness/range of motion deficit ranged from 0% to 20%. Persistent anterior knee pain, ranged from 0% to 32.3%. CONCLUSIONS: Complications following primary MPFL reconstruction ranged from 0% to 32.3% of knees, primarily consisting of residual anterior knee pain. Failure ranged from 0% to 10.7% of knees, whereas patellar fractures were reported in 0% to 8.3% of knees. Fractures primarily occurred with a full-length transverse tunnel or 2-tunnel techniques, whereas all fractures occurred with patellar tunnels ranging from 4.5 mm to 6.0 mm in diameter. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV; Systematic Review of Level I-IV studies.

Prospective Randomized Trial of Biologic Augmentation With Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate in Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair.

BACKGROUND: Although initial studies have demonstrated that concentrated bone marrow aspirate (cBMA) injections promote rotator cuff repair (RCR) healing, there are no randomized prospective studies investigating clinical efficacy. HYPOTHESIS/PURPOSE: To compare outcomes after arthroscopic RCR (aRCR) with and without cBMA augmentation. It was hypothesized that cBMA augmentation would result in statistically significant improvements in clinical outcomes and rotator cuff structural integrity. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1. METHODS: Patients indicated for aRCR of isolated 1- to 3-cm supraspinatus tendon tears were randomized to receive adjunctive cBMA injection or sham incision. Bone marrow was aspirated from the iliac crest, concentrated using a commercially available system, and injected at the aRCR site after repair. Patients were assessed preoperatively and serially until 2 years postoperatively via the following functional indices: American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), Simple Shoulder Test, 12-Item Short Form Health Survey, and Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed at 1 year to assess rotator cuff structural integrity according to Sugaya classification. Treatment failure was defined as decreased 1- or 2-year ASES or SANE scores as compared with preoperative baseline, the need for revision RCR, or conversion to total shoulder arthroplasty. RESULTS: An overall 91 patients were enrolled (control, n = 45; cBMA, n = 46): 82 (90%) completed 2-year clinical follow-up and 75 (82%) completed 1-year MRI. Functional indices significantly improved in both groups by 6 months and were sustained at 1 and 2 years (all P < .05). The control group showed significantly greater evidence of rotator cuff retear according to Sugaya classification on 1-year MRI (57% vs 18%; P < .001). Treatment failed for 7 patients in each group (control, 16%; cBMA, 15%). CONCLUSION: cBMA-augmented aRCR of isolated supraspinatus tendon tears may result in a structurally superior repair but largely fails to significantly improve treatment failure rates and patient-reported clinical outcomes when compared with aRCR alone. Additional study is warranted to investigate the long-term benefits of improved repair quality on clinical outcomes and repair failure rates. REGISTRATION: NCT02484950 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).

Lateral Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction: A Biomechanical Comparison of 2 Techniques.

BACKGROUND: The importance of maintaining lateral patellar stabilizing structures has been demonstrated by the presence of iatrogenic medial patellar instability after lateral retinacular release (LRR) procedures. In patients with medial patellar instability, lateral patellofemoral ligament (LPFL) reconstruction has been clinically shown to restore patellar stability while improving patient-reported outcomes. However, the biomechanics associated with different LPFL reconstruction techniques remain largely unknown. PURPOSE: To (1) investigate whether LPFL reconstruction restores medial patellar translation compared with the intact state after LRR and (2) evaluate for any biomechanical differences between soft tissue and osseous LPFL reconstruction techniques. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: A total of 7 knees were included in the final analysis. The knees were dissected, and the tibia and femur were potted. An eye screw was then placed at the midpoint of the patella perpendicular to the medial surface. A custom jig was constructed to allow for a 1-kg load to be applied to the quadriceps muscle. Medial patellar displacement was investigated at 0°, 10°, 20°, 30°, 45°, 60°, and 90° of knee flexion using a tensile testing machine with a 20-N medial force applied to the patella. Medial patellar displacement was assessed in 4 states: intact, LRR, soft tissue LPFL reconstruction (inserted through incisions in the iliotibial band, quadriceps tendon, and patellar tendon), and osseous LPFL reconstruction. RESULTS: The LRR group had significantly greater medial patellar translation compared with the intact group throughout flexion (P < .01 to P = .029). The soft tissue LPFL reconstruction group demonstrated significantly greater medial patellar translation at 30° (P = .020) and 45° (P = .025) compared with the intact group, with less translation compared with the LRR group at all degrees of knee flexion except for 45° (P = .065). The osseous LPFL reconstruction group demonstrated significantly greater medial patellar translation compared with the intact group at 30° of flexion (P = .036), with significantly less translation compared with the LRR group from 0° to 30° (P < .01 to P = .013). The soft tissue LPFL reconstruction group (15.94 ± 2.55 mm) demonstrated significantly greater medial patellar translation at 10° of flexion compared with the osseous LPFL reconstruction group (14.16 ± 2.34 mm) (P = .033). CONCLUSION: Soft tissue LPFL reconstruction led to significantly greater medial patellar translation at 30° and 45° compared with the intact state, while osseous LPFL reconstruction produced significantly greater translation only at 30°. Both the soft tissue and the osseous reconstruction techniques resulted in comparable medial patellar translation at all degrees of knee flexion except for 10°, in which osseous reconstruction was more similar to the intact state. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Compared with LRR, soft tissue LPFL reconstruction was able to restore stability against medial patellar translation at most degrees of knee flexion, while osseous LPFL reconstruction did not provide adequate stabilization beyond 30° of flexion. While the LPFL does appear to have osseous insertions, soft tissue reconstruction functioned more similarly to the intact state after LRR.