The Efficiency and Toxicity Of Anlotinib in Combination With Docetaxel Followed by Epirubicin and Cyclophosphamide Regimen as Neoadjuvant Treatment in IIB to IIIA Triple Negative Breast Cancer: A Single-Arm, Multicenter, Open-Label, Phase II Study.

BACKGROUND: The combination of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and anti-angiogenesis therapy for patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) remains inadequately supported by evidence. We conducted a single-arm, open-label, multicenter, phase II trial to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of anlotinib plus epirubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel in patients with IIB to IIIA stage TNBC. METHODS: Newly diagnosed patients received epirubicin at 90 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide at 600 mg/m2 followed by docetaxel at 100 mg/m2 (21 days per cycle; total of 4 cycles), along with oral anlotinib (12 mg qd, d1-14; 21 days per cycle; total of 4 cycles). Subsequently, patients underwent surgery. The primary endpoint of this study was pathologic complete response (pCR). RESULTS: Among the 34 included patients, the median age was 46.5 years (range: 27-72); all were female. Pathological assessment revealed that 17 patients achieved RCB 0 response, which is currently defined as pathologic complete response; 3 patients achieved RCB 1; 12 patients achieved RCB 2; and 1 patient achieved RCB 3. The probability of a grade 3 adverse reaction was 17.6%, and no grade 4 adverse reactions occurred. The most common hematological adverse reaction was leukopenia (13/34, 38.2%), of which 5.9% (2/34) were grade 3. The most common non-hematological adverse reactions were oral mucositis (16/34, 58.8%), fatigue (50.0%), hand-foot syndrome (50.0%), hypertension (44.1%), bleeding (44.1%), and alopecia (32.4%). CONCLUSION: The combination of anlotinib and EC-T chemotherapy demonstrated tolerable side effects in the neoadjuvant treatment of early TNBC. pCR was higher than what has been reported in previous clinical studies of chemotherapy alone. This study provides additional rationale for using anlotinib plus docetaxel-epirubicin-based chemotherapy regimen in patients with early-stage TNBCs.

Multi-omics analysis elucidates the relationship between intratumor microbiome and host immune heterogeneity in breast cancer.

Research has indicated that intratumor microbiomes affect the occurrence, progression, and therapeutic response in many cancer types by influencing the immune system. We aim to evaluate the characteristics of immune-related intratumor microbiomes (IRIMs) in breast cancer (BC) and search for potential prognosis prediction factors and treatment targets. The clinical information, microbiome data, transcriptomics data of The Cancer Genome Atlas Breast Invasive Carcinoma (TCGA-BRCA) patients were obtained from Kraken-TCGA-Raw-Data and TCGA portal. The core tumor-infiltrating immune cell was identified using univariate Cox regression analysis. Based on consensus clustering analysis, BC patients were categorized into two immune subtypes, referred to as immune-enriched and immune-deficient subtypes. The immune-enriched subtype, characterized by higher levels of immune infiltration of CD8+ T and macrophage M1 cells, demonstrated a more favorable prognosis. Furthermore, significant differences in alpha-diversity and beta-diversity were observed between the two immune subtypes, and the least discriminant analysis effect size method identified 33 types of IRIMs. An intratumor microbiome-based prognostic signature consisting of four prognostic IRIMs (Acidibacillus, Succinimonas, Lachnoclostridium, and Pseudogulbenkiania) was constructed using the Cox proportional-hazard model, and it had great prognostic value. The prognostic IRIMs were correlated with immune gene expression and the sensitivity of chemotherapy drugs, specifically tamoxifen and docetaxel. In conclusion, our research has successfully identified two distinct immune subtypes in BC, which exhibit contrasting prognoses and possess unique epigenetic and intratumor microbiomes. The critical IRIMs were correlated with prognosis, tumor-infiltrating immune cell abundance, and immunotherapeutic efficacy in BC. Consequently, this study has identified potential IRIMs as biomarkers, providing a novel therapeutic approach for treating BC.IMPORTANCERecent research has substantiated the presence of the intratumor microbiome in tumor immune microenvironment, which could influence tumor occurrence and progression, as well as provide new opportunities for cancer diagnosis and treatment. This study identified the critical immune-related intratumor microbiome (Acidibacillus, Succinimonas, Lachnoclostridium, and Pseudogulbenkiania), which were correlated with prognosis, tumor-infiltrating immune cell abundance, and immunotherapeutic efficacy in breast cancer and might be the novel target to regulate immunotherapy in BC.

Machine learning predicts the risk of osteoporosis in patients with breast cancer and healthy women.

OBJECTIVE: In this study, we investigated the effects of endocrine therapy and related drugs on the body composition and bone metabolism of patients with breast cancer. Additionally, using body composition-related indicators in machine learning algorithms, the risks of osteoporosis in patients with breast cancer and healthy women were predicted. METHODS: We enrolled postmenopausal patients with breast cancer who were hospitalized in a tertiary hospital and postmenopausal women undergoing health checkups in our hospital between 2019 and 2021. The basic information, body composition, bone density-related indicators, and bone metabolism-related indicators of all the study subjects were recorded. Machine learning models were constructed using cross-validation. RESULTS: Compared with a healthy population, the body composition of patients with breast cancer was low in bone mass, protein, body fat percentage, muscle, and basal metabolism, whereas total water, intracellular fluid, extracellular fluid, and waist-to-hip ratio were high. In patients with breast cancer, the bone mineral density (BMD), Z value, and T value were low and the proportion of bone loss and osteoporosis was high. BMD in patients with breast cancer was negatively correlated with age, endocrine therapy status, duration of medication, and duration of menopause, and it was positively correlated with body mass index (BMI) and basal metabolism. The parameters including body composition, age, hormone receptor status, and medication type were used for developing the machine learning model to predict osteoporosis risk in patients with breast cancer and healthy populations. The model showed a high accuracy in predicting osteoporosis, reflecting the predictive value of the model. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with breast cancer may have changed body composition and BMD. Compared with the healthy population, the main indicators of osteoporosis in patients with breast cancer were reduced nonadipose tissue, increased risk of edema, altered fat distribution, and reduced BMD. In addition to age, duration of treatment, and duration of menopause, body composition-related indicators such as BMI and basal metabolism may be considerably associated with BMD of patients with breast cancer, suggesting that BMD status can be monitored in clinical practice by focusing on changes in the aforementioned indexes, which may provide a way to prevent preclinical osteoporosis.

Lymph node and bone metastasis of pulmonary intestinal adenocarcinoma: A case report.

Pulmonary enteric adenocarcinoma (PEAC) is a rare pathological type of lung adenocarcinoma, accounting for ~0.6% of primary lung adenocarcinoma, which has similar morphological and immunohistochemical characteristics to colorectal adenocarcinoma. Making a certain differential diagnosis of PEAC based on morphological and immunohistochemical results is difficult. It is known that PEAC may metastasize to the pancreas, skin, soleus muscle and intestine, but no bone metastasis has been reported. At our department, a rare case of PEAC with bone and lymph node metastasis was previously diagnosed. The present case study reports on a 58-year-old male patient encountered at our hospital with pain in the lumbar, back and right iliac with no obvious cause. Chest CT indicated a space-occupying lesion in the left upper lung lobe, enlarged lymph nodes in the mediastinum and left lung, and partial vertebral bone destruction. Enhanced CT results indicated multiple foci of active bone metabolism in the body, while rectal colonoscopy showed no obvious abnormalities. Histopathological and immunohistochemical results after right iliac bone puncture suggested stage IV PEAC with secondary malignancies in bones, mediastinal lymph node, hilar lymph node and left supraclavicular lymph node.

Causal associations of Sjögren's syndrome with cancers: a two-sample Mendelian randomization study.

BACKGROUND: Several observational studies have explored the associations between Sjögren's syndrome (SS) and certain cancers. Nevertheless, the causal relationships remain unclear. Mendelian randomization (MR) method was used to investigate the causality between SS and different types of cancers. METHODS: We conducted the two-sample Mendelian randomization with the public genome-wide association studies (GWASs) summary statistics in European population to evaluate the causality between SS and nine types of cancers. The sample size varies from 1080 to 372,373. The inverse variance weighted (IVW) method was used to estimate the causal effects. A Bonferroni-corrected threshold of P < 0.0031 was considered significant, and P value between 0.0031 and 0.05 was considered to be suggestive of an association. Sensitivity analysis was performed to validate the causality. Moreover, additional analysis was used to assess the associations between SS and well-accepted risk factors of cancers. RESULTS: After correcting the heterogeneity and horizontal pleiotropy, the results indicated that patients with SS were significantly associated with an increased risk of lymphomas (odds ratio [OR] = 1.0010, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.0005-1.0015, P = 0.0002) and reduced risks of prostate cancer (OR = 0.9972, 95% CI: 0.9960-0.9985, P = 2.45 × 10-5) and endometrial cancer (OR = 0.9414, 95% CI: 0.9158-0.9676, P = 1.65 × 10-5). Suggestive associations were found in liver and bile duct cancer (OR = 0.9999, 95% CI: 0.9997-1.0000, P = 0.0291) and cancer of urinary tract (OR = 0.9996, 95% CI: 0.9992-1.0000, P = 0.0281). No causal effect of SS on other cancer types was detected. Additional MR analysis indicated that causal effects between SS and cancers were not mediated by the well-accepted risk factors of cancers. No evidence of the causal relationship was observed for cancers on SS. CONCLUSIONS: SS had significant causal relationships with lymphomas, prostate cancer, and endometrial cancer, and suggestive evidence of association was found in liver and bile duct cancer and cancer of urinary tract, indicating that SS may play a vital role in the incidence of these malignancies.

Visualized machine learning models combined with propensity score matching analysis in single PR-positive breast cancer prognosis: a multicenter population-based study.

The characteristics of single PR-positive (ER-PR+, sPR+) breast cancer (BC) and its prognosis are not well elucidated due to its rarity and conflicting evidence. There is a lack of an accurate and efficient model for predicting survival, thereby rendering treatment challenging for clinicians. Whether endocrine therapy should be intensified in sPR+ BC patients was another controversial clinical topic. We constructed and cross-validated XGBoost models that showed high precision and accuracy in predicting the survival of patients with sPR+ BC cases (1-year: AUC=0.904; 3-year: AUC=0.847; 5-year: AUC=0.824). The F1 score for the 1-, 3-, and 5-year models were 0.91, 0.88, and 0.85, respectively. The models exhibited superior performance in an external, independent dataset (1-year: AUC=0.889; 3-year: AUC=0.846; 5-year: AUC=0.821). Further, intensified endocrine therapy did not provide a significant overall survival benefit compared to initial or no endocrine therapy (P=0.600, HR: 1.46; 95% CI: 0.35-6.17). Propensity-score matching (PSM)-adjusted data showed that there was no statistically significant difference in the prognosis between ER-PR+HER2+ and ER-PR-HER2+ BC. Patients having the ER-PR+HER2- subtype had a slightly worse prognosis than those with the ER-PR-HER2- subtype. In conclusion, XGBoost models can be highly reproducible and effective in predicting survival in patients with sPR+ BC. Our findings revealed that patients with sPR-positive BC may not benefit from endocrine therapy. Patients with sPR+ BC may benefit from intensive adjuvant chemotherapy compared to endocrine therapy.

Novel models by machine learning to predict prognosis of breast cancer brain metastases.

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer brain metastases (BCBM) are the most fatal, with limited survival in all breast cancer distant metastases. These patients are deemed to be incurable. Thus, survival time is their foremost concern. However, there is a lack of accurate prediction models in the clinic. What's more, primary surgery for BCBM patients is still controversial. METHODS: The data used for analysis in this study was obtained from the SEER database (2010-2019). We made a COX regression analysis to identify prognostic factors of BCBM patients. Through cross-validation, we constructed XGBoost models to predict survival in patients with BCBM. Meanwhile, a BCBM cohort from our hospital was used to validate our models. We also investigated the prognosis of patients treated with surgery or not, using propensity score matching and K-M survival analysis. Our results were further validated by subgroup COX analysis in patients with different molecular subtypes. RESULTS: The XGBoost models we created had high precision and correctness, and they were the most accurate models to predict the survival of BCBM patients (6-month AUC = 0.824, 1-year AUC = 0.813, 2-year AUC = 0.800 and 3-year survival AUC = 0.803). Moreover, the models still exhibited good performance in an externally independent dataset (6-month: AUC = 0.820; 1-year: AUC = 0.732; 2-year: AUC = 0.795; 3-year: AUC = 0.936). Then we used Shiny-Web tool to make our models be easily used from website. Interestingly, we found that the BCBM patients with an annual income of over USD$70,000 had better BCSS (HR = 0.523, 95%CI 0.273-0.999, P < 0.05) than those with less than USD$40,000. The results showed that in all distant metastasis sites, only lung metastasis was an independent poor prognostic factor for patients with BCBM (OS: HR = 1.606, 95%CI 1.157-2.230, P < 0.01; BCSS: HR = 1.698, 95%CI 1.219-2.365, P < 0.01), while bone, liver, distant lymph nodes and other metastases were not. We also found that surgical treatment significantly improved both OS and BCSS in BCBM patients with the HER2 + molecular subtypes and was beneficial to OS of the HR-/HER2- subtype. In contrast, surgery could not help BCBM patients with HR + /HER2- subtype improve their prognosis (OS: HR = 0.887, 95%CI 0.608-1.293, P = 0.510; BCSS: HR = 0.909, 95%CI 0.604-1.368, P = 0.630). CONCLUSION: We analyzed the clinical features of BCBM patients and constructed 4 machine-learning prognostic models to predict their survival. Our validation results indicate that these models should be highly reproducible in patients with BCBM. We also identified potential prognostic factors for BCBM patients and suggested that primary surgery might improve the survival of BCBM patients with HER2 + and triple-negative subtypes.

Causal effects of COVID-19 on cancer risk: A Mendelian randomization study.

In contemporary literature, little attention has been paid to the association between coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) and cancer risk. We performed the Mendelian randomization (MR) to investigate the causal associations between the three types of COVID-19 exposures (critically ill COVID-19, hospitalized COVID-19, and respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection) and 33 different types of cancers of the European population. The results of the inverse-variance-weighted model indicated that genetic liabilities to critically ill COVID-19 had suggestive causal associations with the increased risk for HER2-positive breast cancer (odds ratio [OR] = 1.0924; p-value = 0.0116), esophageal cancer (OR = 1.0004; p-value = 0.0226), colorectal cancer (OR = 1.0010; p-value = 0.0242), stomach cancer (OR = 1.2394; p-value = 0.0331), and colon cancer (OR = 1.0006; p-value = 0.0453). The genetic liabilities to hospitalized COVID-19 had suggestive causal associations with the increased risk for HER2-positive breast cancer (OR = 1.1096; p-value = 0.0458), esophageal cancer (OR = 1.0005; p-value = 0.0440) as well as stomach cancer (OR = 1.3043; p-value = 0.0476). The genetic liabilities to SARS-CoV-2 infection had suggestive causal associations with the increased risk for stomach cancer (OR = 2.8563; p-value = 0.0019) but with the decreasing risk for head and neck cancer (OR = 0.9986, p-value = 0.0426). The causal associations of the above combinations were robust through the test of heterogeneity and pleiotropy. Together, our study indicated that COVID-19 had causal effects on cancer risk.

Comprehensive analysis of NT5DC family prognostic and immune significance in breast cancer.

Among the most common malignancies, breast cancer has a high incidence and mortality rate. NT5DC family is a highly well-conserved 5'-nucleotidase. Previous studies showed that the progression of tumors was associated with some NT5DC family members. However, there are no studies about the comprehensive analysis such as expression, prognosis, and immune properties of NT5DC family in breast cancer. Based on the data from The Cancer Genome Atlas database, we used UALCAN, Tumor Immune Estimation Resource, Breast cancer gene-expression miner (Bc-GenExMiner), Kaplan-Meier Plotter, TISIDB, cBioPortal, GeneMANIA, Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Genes, Metascape, Tumor Immune Single-cell Hub, The Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery, and Gene Set Cancer Analysis databases to explore expression, prognostic and diagnostic value, genetic alterations, biological function, immune value and drug sensitivity of NT5DC family in breast cancer patients. There was a downregulation of NT5C2, NT5DC1, and NT5DC3 in breast cancer compared to normal tissues, and NT5DC2 instead. All NT5DC family members were associated with the clinicopathological parameters of breast cancer patients. Survival and ROC analysis revealed that NT5DC family genes were related to the prognosis and diagnosis of breast cancer. NT5DC family were mainly involved in nucleotide metabolism. Moreover, NT5DC family were significantly associated with tumor immune microenvironment, diverse immune cells, and immune checkpoints in breast cancer. This research showed that NT5DC family might be novel prognostic biomarkers and immunotherapeutic targets of breast cancer.

Knowledge atlas of antibody-drug conjugates on CiteSpace and clinical trial visualization analysis.

Objective: Antibody-drugs conjugates (ADCs) are novel drugs with highly targeted and tumor-killing abilities and developing rapidly. This study aimed to evaluate drug discovery and clinical trials of and explore the hotspots and frontiers from 2012 to 2022 using bibliometric methods. Methods: Publications on ADCs were retrieved between 2012 and 2022 from Web of Science (WoS) and analyzed with CiteSpace 6.1.R2 software for the time, region, journals, institutions, etc. Clinical trials were downloaded from clinical trial.org and visualized with Excel software. Results: A total of 696 publications were obtained and 187 drug trials were retrieved. Since 2012, research on ADCs has increased year by year. Since 2020, ADC-related research has increased dramatically, with the number of relevant annual publications exceeding 100 for the first time. The United States is the most authoritative and superior country and region in the field of ADCs. The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center is the most authoritative institution in this field. Research on ADCs includes two clinical trials and one review, which are the most influential references. Clinical trials of ADCs are currently focused on phase I and phase II. Comprehensive statistics and analysis of the published literature and clinical trials in the field of ADCs, have shown that the most studied drug is brentuximab vedotin (BV), the most popular target is human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), and breast cancer may become the main trend and hotspot for ADCs indications in recent years. Conclusion: Antibody-drug conjugates have become the focus of targeted therapies in the field of oncology. The innovation of technology and combination application strategy will become the main trend and hotspots in the future.