Erdheim-Chester Disease with Pancreatic Enlargement Observed Using Contrast-enhanced Endoscopic Ultrasonography.

We herein report an unusual case of Erdheim-Chester disease (ECD), a rare non-Langerhans cell histiocytosis, and emphasize its unique presentation and diagnostic challenges. Our patient exhibited uncommon symptoms and significant organ involvement, particularly pancreatic enlargement that is not typically associated with ECD. Contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography (CEH-EUS) and EUS-fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) play crucial roles in the comprehensive assessment of the disease, demonstrating their superiority in identifying and characterizing elusive ECD lesions. This is the first report to document pancreatic lesions in patients with ECD evaluated using CEH-EUS. EUS-FNA is valuable for diagnosing rare diseases, including ECD, with diffuse pancreatic enlargement.

[Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis from duodenal papillary carcinoma].

A woman in her 50s presented with ataxia and repeated falls during 2nd line S-1 therapy for duodenal papillary carcinoma with metastasis. She was diagnosed with leptomeningeal carcinomatosis based on gadolinium contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) examination, although plain computed tomography (CT) and MRI of the head showed no intracranial occupying lesions. This is a rare leptomeningeal carcinomatosis case with duodenal papillary carcinoma as the primary lesion, although aggressive treatment was not possible due to the decreased consciousness level.

The role of EUS elastography-guided fine needle biopsy in the histological diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions: a prospective exploratory study.

This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of Endoscopic ultrasound elastography-guided fine needle biopsy (EUS-EG-FNB) for the diagnosis of pancreatic mass lesions. EUS-EG images were classified into heterogeneous and homogeneous groups. For the heterogeneous group, EUS-FNB was separately performed in both hard areas and soft areas. Only samples obtained during the first two passes (hard/soft areas) were used to compare the diagnostic accuracy as well as the quality and quantity of the specimens. We investigated the association of EUS-EG findings using strain histogram analysis with the histological findings. Fifty-five patients were enrolled including 25 patients with heterogeneous group. The homogeneous group had significantly lower mean strain value (hard) lesions. The adequate sampling rates from hard and soft areas were 88 and 92%, respectively (P = 0.6374). Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy and the quality and quantity of the histological core between hard and soft areas showed no significant differences. In pancreatic adenocarcinoma cases, the proportion of fibrous stroma in the core tissue was significantly correlated with the elasticity of the region. (R2 = 0.1226: P = 0.0022) EUS-EG may reflect tissue composition in pancreatic tumors, however, EUS-EG did not affect either the quality and quantity of the tissues obtained.Clinical Trial Registry No: UMIN-000033073.

Factors associated with misdiagnosis of preoperative endoscopic ultrasound in patients with pancreatic cystic neoplasms undergoing surgical resection.

PURPOSE: Pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) include various types of cysts. Accurate preoperative diagnosis is essential to avoid unnecessary surgery on benign cysts. In this study, we aimed to identify the factors associated with misdiagnosis in preoperative endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) imaging and clinicopathological findings for PCLs. METHODS: This study included 302 surgically resected patients with PCLs who underwent preoperative EUS. The preoperative EUS findings were re-evaluated and compared with the pathological diagnosis. Additionally, the factors associated with misdiagnosis of PCLs were investigated by multivariate analysis. RESULTS: The preoperative diagnoses of PCLs were intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) in 213 patients (70.5%), mucinous cystic neoplasm (MCN) in 33 patients (10.9%), serous neoplasm (SN) in 7 patients (2.3%), cystic degeneration cyst of solid tumor in 46 patients (15.2%), and pancreatic cancer with cystic degeneration in three patients (1.0%). A discrepancy between preoperative and postoperative diagnosis was found in 47 patients (15.6%). Based on the pathological diagnosis, the sensitivity of preoperative EUS imaging was IPMN 97.6% (206/211), MCN 90.0% (18/19), cystic degeneration 87.1% (27/31), and SN 15.4% (2/13). Multivariate analysis revealed that main pancreatic duct (MPD) communication ( - ) (odds ratio (OR), 4.54; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.29-15.9), honeycomb-like structure ( +) (OR, 14.7; 95% CI 2.61-83.3), and MPD size â‰¦ 2 mm (OR, 16.3; 95% CI 3.93-67.6) were independently associated with misdiagnosis. CONCLUSION: For cases in which MCN and cystic degeneration of solid tumor are presumed based on preoperative EUS imaging and cases with PCLs with a honeycomb-like structure, diagnosis with multimodalities or fluid analysis with EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration should be considered.

Usefulness of Macroscopic On-Site Evaluation Using a Stereomicroscope during EUS-FNB for Diagnosing Solid Pancreatic Lesions.

METHODS: We reviewed a total of 60 consecutive patients who underwent both S-MOSE and rapid on-site cytopathological evaluation (ROSE) during EUS-FNB between July 2019 and October 2020, and the usefulness of S-MOSE in comparison with histology was evaluated. A 22-gauge Franseen needle was used to perform EUS-FNB in all patients, and only the specimens obtained by the first pass were evaluated. The final diagnosis was based on the surgical specimen or the clinical course consistent with the EUS-FNB results. RESULTS: The final diagnoses of the 60 patients included 45 patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, 6 with autoimmune pancreatitis, 4 with mass-forming pancreatitis, 1 with pancreatic metastasis, 2 with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor, and 2 with intraductal papillary mucinous carcinoma. The histological diagnostic accuracy of the first pass of EUS-FNB was 83.3% (50/60). The agreement between the S-MOSE and the histological diagnosis was 90% (54/60). The positive predictive value of S-MOSE for histological diagnosis was 90.7%, which can be an indicator of when to stop the EUS-FNB procedure. There were no immediate or delayed adverse events reported after the FNB based on the chart and medical visit history review. CONCLUSION: In the EUS-FNB of SPLs, S-MOSE can be an alternative to ROSE for specimen evaluation and has the potential to shorten the procedure time.

Double common bile duct associated with pancreaticobiliary maljunction.

A 45-year-old female was admitted to the hospital with a diagnosis of acute pancreatitis. A computed tomography scan showed two extrahepatic bile ducts. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography suggested a stone in one of the bile ducts. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography revealed two extrahepatic bile ducts joining at the hilum of the liver accompanied with pancreaticobiliary maljunction. Sphincterotomy was performed and a protein plug was drained from the bile duct. Several treatment options were discussed, and the patient was treated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy without extrahepatic bile duct resection and planned to be followed up considering the risk of carcinogenesis in the bile ducts.

An initial trial of quantitative evaluation of autoimmune pancreatitis using shear wave elastography and shear wave dispersion in transabdominal ultrasound.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: We aimed to examine therapeutic efficacy and prognosis prediction of autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) using shear wave elastography (SWE) and shear wave dispersion (SWD) in transabdominal ultrasound (US). METHODS: The subjects were 23 patients with diffuse type 1 AIP who underwent SWE and SWD, and 34 controls with a normal pancreas. Elasticity and dispersion were defined as the pancreatic elastic modulus (PEM) and dispersion slope, respectively. PEM and dispersion slope were compared between AIP and control cases, and the short-term therapeutic effect and long-term prognosis were examined. RESULTS: PEM (30.9 vs. 6.6 kPa, P < 0.001) and dispersion slope (15.3 vs. 13.0 (m/sec)/kHz, P = 0.011) were significantly higher in AIP cases than in controls. Among the 17 AIP patients followed-up in two weeks after treatment, these parameters were 12.7 kPa and 10.5 (m/sec)/kHz with median decrease rate of 37.2% and 32.8%, respectively, which were significantly higher than the change in the size of pancreatic parenchyma (14.4%, P = 0.026). Fourteen of these subjects were followed up for >12 months, during which 2 had relapse; diabetes improved in 5 and worsened in 2; in 60% of cases, the pancreatic parenchyma was atrophied. The % change in PEM after two weeks was tended to be higher in non-atrophy cases. CONCLUSION: SWE and SWD measurement in US may be useful for quantitative assessment of AIP and evaluation of short-term treatment efficacy.

Utility of multiphase contrast enhancement patterns on CEH-EUS for the differential diagnosis of IPMN-derived and conventional pancreatic cancer.

BACKGROUND: Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) is reported as a high-risk factor for pancreatic cancer (PC) that includes IPMN-derived cancers (IPMC) and the development of invasive pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) concomitant with IPMN. Since invasive IPMC and PDAC exhibit different oncological behaviors, their differentiation is clinically important. We aimed to investigate the use of contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasound (CEH-EUS) for the differential diagnosis between invasive IPMC and PDAC. METHODS: This study involved 183 consecutive patients with PC (invasive IPMC: 42, PDAC concomitant with IPMN: 9, without IPMN: 132) who underwent CEH-EUS preoperatively. While investigating the patterns, enhanced effects in the solid part of the tumor were compared with those in the surrounding pancreatic parenchyma after administration of Sonazoid® and evaluated as hyperenhanced, isoenhanced, or hypoenhanced. We retrospectively compared the enhanced pattern of CEH-EUS by using multiphasic analysis and clinicopathological factors between invasive IPMC and PDAC. RESULTS: In multiphase evaluations at 20, 40 and 60 s in CEH-EUS, 75.2% (106/141) of PDACs were hypoenhanced (-) at ≥2 of the 3 time points, with significant differences from those of invasive IPMC (P < 0.001). The solid tumor diameter was significantly larger in PDAC than in invasive IPMC, and the tumor stage and preoperative serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 level were higher. After propensity score matching of stage and solid tumor diameter, contrast enhancement patterns were significantly more persistent in invasive IPMC than in PDAC (P = 0.0013). CONCLUSIONS: Multiphase evaluation using CEH-EUS is a useful method for differentiating between invasive IPMC and PDAC.

Clinical characteristics and long-term prognosis of autoimmune pancreatitis with renal lesions.

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is recognized as the pancreatic manifestation of a systemic IgG4-related disease that can involve various organs, including the kidney. However, renal lesions tend to be overlooked when AIP is diagnosed, and the clinical characteristics and long-term prognosis of AIP with renal lesions are unclear. We retrospectively reviewed 153 patients with AIP diagnosed at our hospital with a median follow-up period of 41 months (interquartile range, 10-86) and classified them into two groups: the KD group (n = 17), with characteristic renal imaging features, and the non-KD group (n = 136). Serum IgG4 levels were significantly higher in the KD group (663 vs. 304.5 mg/dl, P = 0.014). No differences were observed between the two groups in terms of steroid treatment [14/17 (82.4%) vs. 112/136 (82.4%), P = 1] or in the number of patients who exhibited exacerbation of renal function during treatment [1/17 (5.9%) vs. 8/136 (5.9%), P = 1]. However, the cumulative relapse rate was significantly higher in the KD group [61% vs. 21.9% (3 years), P < 0.001]. Patients in the KD group had different clinical features with high relapse rates compared with those in the non-KD group, and thus, it is important to confirm the presence of renal lesions in AIP patients.

Diagnostic performance of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided elastography for solid pancreatic lesions: Shear-wave measurements versus strain elastography with histogram analysis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) elastography (EUS-EG) is a minimally invasive diagnostic method for evaluating tissue elasticity. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of newly developed EUS shear-wave measurement (EUS-SWM) and to compare diagnostic performance between EUS-SWM and the conventional strain elastography (SE) for the measurement of elasticity of solid pancreatic lesions (SPLs). METHODS: From December 2017 until August 2019, we retrospectively reviewed 64 consecutive cases with SPLs who underwent both EUS-SWM and SE. EUS-SWM was used to measure the shear-wave velocity, Vs (m/s), and the unique measurement reliability index, VsN (%), in the target lesion. SE images were assessed by strain histogram (SH) analysis, and the mean strain value of the elasticity index was measured. We evaluated the diagnostic performance of EUS-SWM and SE with SH to characterize the SPLs. RESULTS: The Vs (m/s) values of SPLs were 2.19 for pancreatic cancer (PC), 1.31 for pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm (PanNEN), 2.56 for mass-forming pancreatitis (MFP) and 1.58 for metastatic tumors. Vs showed no significant difference based on the disease. The mean strain values were 45.5 for PC, 47.3 for PanNEN, and 74.5 for MFP. In the comparison of tissue elasticity between PC and MFP, Vs showed no significant difference (P = 0.5687); however, the mean strain value was significantly lower in PC cases (45.4 vs 74.5: P = 0.0007). CONCLUSION: Endoscopic ultrasound SWM tended to be unstable for the measurement of elasticity of SPLs, and conventional SE with SH was superior for their characterization.

Can contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography accurately diagnose main pancreatic duct involvement in intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms?

BACKGROUND: Main pancreatic duct (MPD) involvement in branch duct-type intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (BD-IPMNs) is a high risk finding for malignant IPMNs. However, discrepancies exist in the identification of MPD involvement between imaging findings and pathological diagnosis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of preoperative assessment of MPD involvement in IPMNs using contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasound (CH-EUS). METHODS: This study involved 166 consecutive patients with BD-IPMNs who underwent surgical resection. CH-EUS was used to evaluate the MPD involvement according to the presence of mural nodules (MN) that advanced into the MPD or involved the MPD. The CH-EUS findings were compared with the pathological findings. Additionally, we analyzed the risk factors for malignant BD-IPMNs using multivariate analysis. RESULTS: A total of 77, 51, and 38 patients were pathologically diagnosed with low-grade or intermediate-grade dysplasia, high-grade dysplasia and invasive IPMNs, respectively. MPD involvement was diagnosed using CH-EUS (MPD-inv.-EUS) in 90 (54.2%) patients with a sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of 83.5%, 87.0% and 84.9%, respectively. The malignancy rate in patients with MPD-inv.-EUS was 71.6% (63/90). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that MPD-inv.-EUS (OR, 3.61; 95% CI:1.45-8.98), age (OR, 5.70; 95% CI: 1.47-22.2), cyst size (OR, 2.45; 95% CI:1.04-5.78) and MN size (OR, 7.05; 95% CI:2.48-20.0) were significant for malignant BD-IPMNs. CONCLUSIONS: MPD-inv.-EUS accurately represents the pathological involvement of IPMN and may be a useful predictor of malignant BD-IPMNs.

Risks and characteristics of pancreatic cancer and pancreatic relapse in autoimmune pancreatitis patients.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: We examined the differences in the risks and characteristics of pancreatic relapse (PR) and pancreatic cancer (PC) in patients with autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 123 type 1 AIP patients with a median follow-up of 55 months (interquartile range, 27-98). The following items were evaluated: (i) cumulative relapse rates and risk factors, (ii) the incidence of PC, (iii) PR versus PC, and (iv) outcomes after the appearance of morphological changes in the pancreas (focal enlargement, apparent mass lesions, or main pancreatic duct dilation). RESULTS: (i) The cumulative PR rates were 1.7% within 1 year, 11.5% within 3 years, and 22.6% within 5 years. Lack of maintenance therapy, IgG4-related sclerosing cholangitis, and IgG4-related kidney disease were identified as independent predictors of relapse. (ii) Two patients (1.6%) were diagnosed with PC at 17 and 22 months after initial AIP diagnosis. (iii) Thirteen (59.1%) and four (18.2%) patients with PR had focal enlargement and main pancreatic duct dilation, respectively. The median CA19-9 level at initial diagnosis was significantly higher in PC patients (21 vs 220.5 U/mL, P = 0.014). (iv) Eight PR patients underwent endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration, none of whom had malignant findings. PC was diagnosed by ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in both cancer patients. CONCLUSIONS: Although the incidence of PC is low, it may mimic PR in AIP patients. Surveillance is important, and when morphological changes occur, biopsy and evaluation of serum IgG4 and CA19-9 levels (particularly if the levels were high before) should be considered.

A case of mucinous cystic neoplasm of the pancreas misdiagnosed as a pancreatic pseudocyst at the initial exam and resected after a 2-year follow-up.

A 44-year-old woman was referred to our hospital because of a cystic lesion in the pancreatic body that was found by computed tomography (CT) as a result of a screening for impaired liver function after the patient presented with a high fever in 2011. Trans-abdominal ultrasonography (US) revealed a 33-mm unilocular cyst within the pancreatic body and a 5-mm hypoechoic mass in the pancreatic neck. Contrast-enhanced CT showed a slight enhancement around the cyst and a mild dilation of the main pancreatic duct, but neither septum nor nodule was detected inside. Contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasonography (CE-EUS) revealed a hyperechoic elevated lesion inside the cystic lesion without enhancement in the pancreatic body; CE-EUS also revealed a 5-mm homogeneous hypoechoic mass with a remarkable enhancement in the pancreatic neck with the use of Sonazoid(®) as a contrast medium. These lesions were diagnosed as a pancreatic pseudocyst and a neuroendocrine tumor (NET), respectively, and were followed up with periodic examinations. The cystic lesion showed contraction 6 months after the initial exam. However, US revealed an enlargement of the cystic lesion to 40 mm in diameter 2 years after the initial exam, and EUS showed irregular thickening of the wall with a cyst-in-cyst appearance. The diagnoses of a mucinous cystic neoplasm (MCN) and a concomitant small NET were made after a distal pancreatectomy. We herein report a rare case of MCN that showed various morphological changes over 2 years of observation.