The efficacy of accelerated, multiple, double-dose hepatitis B vaccine against hepatitis B virus infection in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy carries high morbidity and mortality. Conventional hepatitis B vaccination with three doses at 0, 1, and 6 months apart is ineffective in prevention of HBV infection. OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy of accelerated, multiple, double-dose HB vaccine with conventional HB vaccine in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy (CT). METHODS: Patients of cancer who were planned for CT were screened for HBV markers (HBsAg, total anti-HB core, anti-HBs antibody and HBV DNA). Patients with negative HBV serum markers received HB vaccine in two groups. Group A received three double doses (40 µg) of recombinant HB vaccine at 0, 1, and 3 weeks before CT and additional three double doses post CT. Group B received HB vaccine (20 µg) at 0, 1, and 6 months. Efficacy of vaccine in the two groups was compared by anti-HBs titers achieved at 3, 6, and 9 months and by HBsAg positivity following CT at 1 year follow up. RESULTS: Protective anti-HBs titers (>10 mIU/mL) at 3, 6, and 9 months in group A and B was 41.1 %, 66.2 %, and 76% and 26 %, 37.7 %, and 49% respectively (p = 0.001). Seven of 454 (1.5%) patients in group A became HBsAg positive after vaccination compared to 19/472 (4.0%) in group B (p = 0.022). CONCLUSION: Accelerated, multiple, double-dose HB vaccine increases seroprotection and is more effective than conventional HB vaccine in preventing HBV infection.

Occult hepatitis B virus infection as a cause of posttransfusion hepatitis in patients with cancers.

BACKGROUND: Prevalence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is increased in patients of cancer with increased mortality. Multiple transfusions of blood and blood-related products are a potential source. AIMS: This study aims to assess the incidence of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) seroconversion in cancer patients receiving transfusion of blood or blood-related products and identify possible reasons for infection in these patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients of cancer receiving blood products, who were HBsAg-, anti-hepatitis B core (HBc)-, and HBV DNA-negative prior to transfusion, were tested for HBsAg by ELISA at 6, 12, and 24 weeks after the last transfusion. Blood donors were screened for HBsAg by ELISA. RESULTS: Twenty of 3,600 (0.56 %) blood donors tested positive for HBsAg and were rejected. Nine of 150 (6 %) cancer patients became HBsAg-positive posttransfusion which included seven patients who presented with acute hepatitis B and other two patients who remained HBsAg-positive without hepatitis. In 6/9 (66.6 %) patients, HBsAg positivity was related to blood transfusion as their corresponding blood donors on retesting the stored samples were positive for anti-HBc antibody and HBV DNA. In other three patients, the cause of their HBsAg positivity could not be ascertained. CONCLUSION: Occult HBV infection in blood donors is a potential source of posttransfusion HBV infection in recipients. Anti-HBc antibody and HBV DNA should be tested in blood donors especially when blood is given to cancer patients receiving chemotherapy.