Modulan grip-aids for leprosy patients.

Made-to-measure Modulan grip-aids were fitted to 755 articles for 155 patients with hand deformities due to leprosy. The acceptance of the grip-aids was, in general, good. No instance of contact dermatitis or skin irritation was reported. These grip-aids facilitated a normal grip with crippled hands, and thus considerably improved the quality of the patient's personal and working life. They increased the patient's self-esteem and self-confidence because he/she could handle everyday objects or tools without the help of others and could do his/her job--an important step toward social and economic rehabilitation.

Dermatopharmacologic investigations of halobetasol propionate in comparison with clobetasol 17-propionate.

Both halobetasol propionate and clobetasol 17-propionate exerted very marked antiinflammatory, antiproliferative, and vasoconstrictive effects during evaluation in a range of dermatopharmacologic models. Halobetasol propionate was distinctly more potent than clobetasol 17-propionate in the ultraviolet-induced dermatitis inhibition assay in guinea pigs and in the rat model of oxazolone-induced late inflammatory reaction. Halobetasol propionate was slightly more potent than clobetasol 17-propionate in inhibiting croton oil-induced ear edema in rats and mice and in the mouse model of oxazolone-induced early inflammatory reaction. In the cotton-pellet granuloma assay in rats and the epidermal hyperplasia inhibition assay in guinea pigs, halobetasol propionate was distinctly superior to clobetasol 17-propionate. There was a trend in favor of halobetasol propionate in the cutaneous vasoconstriction assay performed in volunteers with ethanol solutions of halobetasol propionate and clobetasol 17-propionate. In a further vasoconstriction assay, performed with a 0.05% concentration of both halobetasol propionate and clobetasol 17-propionate in cream and ointment formulations, halobetasol propionate ointment yielded the highest blanching score. In a hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis study in volunteers, effects of 0.05% halobetasol propionate ointment and 0.05% clobetasol 17-propionate ointment on serum cortisol levels were similar. The overall efficacy trends demonstrated in these dermatopharmacologic studies are in agreement with predictions made from corticosteroid structure and activity relationships and the results of two clinical trials comparing halobetasol propionate and clobetasol 17-propionate ointments in the treatment of plaque psoriasis.

A double-blind, multicenter comparison of 0.05% halobetasol propionate ointment and 0.05% clobetasol propionate ointment in patients with chronic, localized plaque psoriasis.

In a double-blind, parallel-group, multicenter trial in 134 patients with severe, localized, plaque psoriasis, the success rate (described as "healed" or "marked improvement") at the end of the study was 96% in the halobetasol propionate group and 91% in the clobetasol propionate group. A significantly larger proportion of patients treated with halobetasol had no disease or mild disease after 14 days compared with those treated with clobetasol (86% versus 70%, p = 0.023). Healing within 24 days of starting treatment was noted in 69% and 56% of patients treated with halobetasol and clobetasol, respectively. Adverse effects were reported in a smaller percentage of patients treated with halobetasol propionate ointment than in those treated with clobetasol propionate ointment (7% versus 12%). Cosmetic acceptability and ease of application were recorded as "very good" in a larger percentage of patients treated with halobetasol propionate ointment than in the group treated with clobetasol propionate (90% versus 80%).

A double-blind, multicenter comparison between 0.05% halobetasol propionate ointment and 0.05% betamethasone dipropionate ointment in chronic plaque psoriasis.

In a double-blind, parallel-group, multicenter comparative trial on 104 evaluable patients with severe, localized plaque psoriasis, 0.05% halobetasol propionate ointment demonstrated an 88.7% success rate assessed as "healed" or "marked improvement" compared with 78.5% for 0.05% betamethasone dipropionate ointment. Healing was observed within 24 days of the start of treatment in 40% and 25% of the patients who received halobetasol propionate and betamethasone dipropionate ointments, respectively. After 4 weeks' treatment, tolerability of both ointments was good. Neither skin atrophy nor systemic adverse effects were observed. Patient acceptance of halobetasol propionate ointment, based on cosmetic acceptability and ease of application, was significantly better (p = 0.02) than that of betamethasone dipropionate ointment.

A comparative, multicenter, double blind trial of 0.05% halobetasol propionate ointment and 0.1% betamethasone valerate ointment in the treatment of patients with chronic, localized plaque psoriasis.

In a double-blind, parallel-group, multicenter comparative trial in 84 evaluable patients with severe, localized plaque psoriasis, 0.05% halobetasol propionate ointment proved significantly superior (p = 0.02) to 0.1% betamethasone valerate ointment with respect to the success rate, as indicated by ratings of "healed" or "marked improvement" (88.1% versus 64.3%). The therapeutic effect was observed within 5 days of the start of treatment in 76% and 67% of the patients treated with halobetasol propionate and betamethasone valerate ointments, respectively. Both preparations were well tolerated. Minor adverse effects at the site of application were reported in only 2% of the patients in each treatment group. Neither skin atrophy nor systemic adverse effects were observed.

A double-blind, multicenter trial of 0.05% halobetasol propionate ointment and 0.05% clobetasol 17-propionate ointment in the treatment of patients with chronic, localized atopic dermatitis or lichen simplex chronicus.

In a double-blind, parallel-group, multicenter comparative trial in 127 evaluable patients with chronic, localized atopic dermatitis or lichen simplex chronicus, healing was reported in a higher percentage of patients treated with halobetasol propionate ointment than in those in the clobetasol propionate treatment group (65.1% versus 54.7%). The success rates (described as "healed" and "marked improvement") were practically identical in the two treatment groups (93.7% versus 92.2%). Early onset of therapeutic effect, that is, within 3 days of the start of treatment, was similar in the two treatment groups (24% versus 28%). Both preparations were well tolerated. Adverse effects were reported in 5% and 2% of the patients treated with halobetasol propionate and clobetasol propionate ointments, respectively.

A double-blind, multicenter, parallel-group trial with 0.05% halobetasol propionate ointment versus 0.1% diflucortolone valerate ointment in patients with severe, chronic atopic dermatitis or lichen simplex chronicus.

In a double-blind, parallel-group, multicenter, comparative trial in 120 evaluable patients with chronic, localized atopic dermatitis or lichen simplex chronicus, the success rate (described as "healed" and "marked improvement") was 91.5% in patients treated with halobetasol propionate ointment and 83.6% in those in the diflucortolone valerate treatment group. Of patients treated with halobetasol propionate ointment, 40.7% reported healing within 17 days, whereas of those in the diflucortolone valerate treatment group, 32.8% reported healing within that time. Early onset of therapeutic effect, that is, within 3 days of the start of treatment, was reported in a higher percentage of patients treated with halobetasol propionate ointment than in those treated with diflucortolone valerate ointment (70% versus 59%). Adverse effects at the site of application were less frequently reported in patients belonging to the halobetasol propionate treatment group than in those treated with diflucortolone valerate ointment (3% versus 8%).

Double-blind, comparative clinical trials with halobetasol propionate cream in patients with atopic dermatitis.

In two double-blind, parallel-group, multicenter trials, 0.05% halobetasol propionate cream was compared with 0.05% clobetasol 17-propionate cream and 0.05% betamethasone dipropionate cream in 264 patients with acute, severe exacerbations of atopic dermatitis. The efficacy of halobetasol propionate cream and betamethasone dipropionate cream was similar with regard to the success rate, as indicated by ratings of "healed" and "marked improvement" (88% versus 90%) and by an onset of therapeutic effect within 3 days of the start of treatment (40% versus 39%). The efficacy of halobetasol propionate cream and clobetasol 17-propionate cream was also similar with regard to success rates (89% versus 93%) and an onset of therapeutic effect within 3 days of the start of treatment (41% versus 38%). All three creams were well tolerated. Dryness of the skin and itching at the site of application were the reported adverse effects. Treatment was discontinued because of severe dryness of the skin in 1 of the 121 patients treated with halobetasol propionate cream and in 1 of the 59 patients treated with betamethasone dipropionate cream.

Halobetasol propionate cream by day and halobetasol propionate ointment at night for the treatment of pediatric patients with chronic, localized plaque psoriasis and atopic dermatitis.

In a multicenter, 14-day pediatric study in 81 evaluable patients with severe, localized corticosteroid-susceptible dermatoses, the combined treatment with halobetasol propionate cream once during the day and halobetasol propionate ointment once at night produced a very satisfactory therapeutic effect. The success rates, as indicated by ratings of "healed" and "marked improvement," were 100% and 90.9% in patients with atopic dermatitis and psoriasis vulgaris, respectively. Healing was reported in 86.8% and 72.7% of patients treated for atopic dermatitis and psoriasis, respectively. Both the cream and ointment preparations were well tolerated. Adverse effects at the site of application were reported in only 3 of 81 patients. Mild skin atrophy was observed in one patient. No systemic adverse effects were observed.