Experience of kidney transplantation to a patient with Bernard Soulier syndrome: A case report.

Renal transplantation could be a challenging operation in patients with haemorrhagic diathesis, with predictable difficulties or even with unpredictable hurdles. Bernard Soulier Syndrome (BSS) is one of the ethiologies of the thrombocytopenia and it is a rare hereditary disease associated with defects of the platelet glycoprotein complex glycoprotein Ib/V/IX and characterized by large platelets, thrombocytopenia, and severe bleeding symptoms. Here, we present a challenging renal transplantation in BSS.

Propensity score-matched analysis of long-term outcomes for living kidney donation in alternative complement pathway diseases: a pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Atypical hemolytic syndrome (aHUS) and C3 glomerulopathy (C3G) are complement-mediated rare diseases with excessive activation of the alternative pathway. Data to guide the evaluation of living-donor candidates for aHUS and C3G are very limited. The outcomes of living donors to recipients with aHUS and C3G (Complement disease-living donor group) were compared with a control group to improve our understanding of the clinical course and outcomes of living donation in this context. METHODS: Complement disease-living donor group [n = 28; aHUS(53.6%), C3G(46.4%)] and propensity score-matched control-living donor group (n = 28) were retrospectively identified from 4 centers (2003-2021) and followed for major cardiac events (MACE), de novo hypertension, thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA), cancer, death, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and proteinuria after donation. RESULTS: None of the donors for recipients with complement-related kidney diseases experienced MACE or TMA whereas two donors in the control group developed MACE (7.1%) after 8 (IQR, 2.6-12.8) years (p = 0.15). New-onset hypertension was similar between complement disease and control donor groups (21.4% vs 25%, respectively, p = 0.75). There were no differences between study groups regarding last eGFR and proteinuria levels (p = 0.11 and p = 0.70, respectively). One related donor for a recipient with complement-related kidney disease developed gastric cancer and another related donor developed a brain tumor and died in the 4th year after donation (2, 7.1% vs none, p = 0.15). No recipient had donor-specific human leukocyte antigen antibodies at the time of transplantation. Median follow-up period of transplant recipients was 5 years (IQR, 3-7). Eleven (39.3%) recipients [aHUS (n = 3) and C3G (n = 8)] lost their allografts during the follow-up period. Causes of allograft loss were chronic antibody-mediated rejection in 6 recipients and recurrence of C3G in 5. Last serum creatinine and last eGFR of the remaining patients on follow up were 1.03 ± 038 mg/dL and 73.2 ± 19.9 m/min/1.73 m2 for aHUS patients and 1.30 ± 0.23 mg/dL and 56.4 ± 5.5 m/min/1.73 m2 for C3G patients. CONCLUSION: The present study highlights the importance and complexity of living related-donor kidney transplant for patients with complement-related kidney disorders and motivates the need for further research to determine the optimal risk-assessment for living donor candidates to recipients with aHUS and C3G.

Long-Term Outcomes of Living-Related Kidney Donation for Alport Syndrome Spectrum: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Data to guide the evaluation of living-related donor candidates for kidney transplant recipients with Alport syndrome (AS) spectrum are limited. We aimed to examine a cohort of living-related donors to recipients with AS and compare their outcomes with a control group to improve understanding of the clinical course and outcomes of living donation in this context. METHODS: Living donors (LDs) of AS recipients and propensity score-matched control LDs without any family history of AS (control group) were followed for major cardiac events, death, post-donation estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and proteinuria. RESULTS: There were 31 LDs (48.4% male), in whom relationship to AS recipient included mother (45.2%), father (32.3%), sibling (16.1%), grandparent (3.2%), and uncle (3.2%). Long-term outcomes over 10.0 (IQR, 3.0-15.0) years were evaluated in 25 and 25 LDs from study and control groups, respectively. During follow-up, 5 LDs (20.0%) in study group developed major cardiac event (acute coronary ischemia [n = 4] and severe congestive heart failure [n = 1]) after 5.5 (IQR, 4.5-10.3) years, whereas only 2 (8.0%) LDs in control group developed major cardiac events (p = 0.221). New-onset hypertension was higher in study group (56.0%) compared to the control group (16.0%) (p = 0.003). Three donors in study and 2 donors in control group who developed new-onset hypertension died during follow-up (p = 0.297). Major cardiac event rate was significantly higher in donors who developed hypertension after donation (0 vs. 28.0%, p < 0.001). There were no differences between study groups regarding last eGFR and proteinuria levels (p = 0.558 and p = 0.120, respectively). DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: Although the risk of kidney disease can be minimized by careful donor evaluation, our findings suggest that hypertension risk after the donation is higher than expected in related donors of recipients with AS.

Outcome of Renal Transplantation in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus: A Single-Center Experience.

BACKGROUND: An increasing proportion of kidney recipients have diabetes mellitus (DM). Some concerns have been raised about the kidney transplantation results in diabetic patients. Therefore, we assessed the effect of DM on morbidity and mortality of diabetic patients with renal transplantation. METHODS: We retrospectively studied adult patients with and without DM who underwent living donor transplantation between 2007 and 2016. Information concerning demographic and clinical data were retrospectively analyzed by reviewing the patient files. RESULTS: Of the 1536 transplant recipients, 126 (8%) had diabetes mellitus (mean age 49.4 ± 11.8) and 525 patients were evaluated in the non-diabetic control group (mean age 36.2 ± 15.9). The diabetic and non-diabetic patient groups had a mean follow-up after kidney transplantation 42.5 months (0.27-101.7 months) and 58.8 ± 10.6 months, respectively. In the diabetic patient group, only 3 patients had lost graft and 13 patients were exitus. Three patients had lost graft and 5 patients were exitus in non-diabetic patient group. Cardiac death (54.5%) was the most common cause of mortality in diabetic group. The 6-year patient and graft survival rates are 84.9% and 95.3%; 97.5% and 97.2% in the diabetic and non-diabetic patient groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Both infection and cardiovascular diseases increase morbidity and mortality in renal transplant patients with diabetes mellitus. The mortality risk of diabetic patients after renal transplantation is higher than the non-diabetic kidney recipients. Therefore, diabetic patients need meticulous cardiac evaluation before renal transplantation and a close follow-up, in terms of infection, after transplantation.

COVID-19 in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Multicenter Experience from the First Two Waves of Pandemic.

BACKGROUND: Kidney transplant recipients have an increased risk of complications from COVID-19. However, data on the risk of allograft damage or death in kidney transplant recipients recovering from COVID-19 is limited. In addition, the first and second waves of the pandemic occurred at different times all over the world. In Turkey, the Health Minister confirmed the first case in March 2020; after that, the first wave occurred between March and August 2020; afterward, the second wave began in September 2020. This study aims to demonstrate the clinical presentations of kidney transplant recipients in the first two waves of the pandemic in Turkey and explore the impact of COVID-19 on clinical outcomes after the initial episode. METHODS: Patients with COVID-19 from seven centers were included in this retrospective cohort study. Initially, four hundred and eighty-eight kidney transplant recipients diagnosed with COVID-19 between 1 March 2020 to 28 February 2021 were enrolled. The endpoints were the occurrence of all-cause mortality, acute kidney injury, cytokine storm, and acute respiratory distress syndrome. In addition, longer-term outcomes such as mortality, need for dialysis, and allograft function of the surviving patients was analyzed. RESULTS: Four hundred seventy-five patients were followed up for a median of 132 days after COVID-19. Forty-seven patients (9.9%) died after a median length of hospitalization of 15 days. Although the mortality rate (10.1% vs. 9.8%) and intensive care unit admission (14.5% vs. 14.5%) were similar in the first two waves, hospitalization (68.8% vs. 29.7%; p < 0.001), acute kidney injury (44.2% vs. 31.8%; p = 0.009), acute respiratory distress syndrome (18.8% vs. 16%; p = 0.456), and cytokine storm rate (15.9% vs. 10.1%; p = 0.072) were higher in first wave compared to the second wave. These 47 patients died within the first month of COVID-19. Six (1.4%) of the surviving patients lost allografts during treatment. There was no difference in the median serum creatinine clearance of the surviving patients at baseline (52 mL/min [IQR, 47-66]), first- (56 mL/min [IQR, 51-68]), third- (51 mL/min [IQR,48-67]) and sixth-months (52 mL/min [IQR, 48-81]). Development of cytokine storm and posttransplant diabetes mellitus were independent predictors for mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Mortality remains a problem in COVID-19. All the deaths occur in the first month of COVID-19. Also, acute kidney injury is common in hospitalized patients, and some of the patients suffer from graft loss after the initial episode.

Improving the urine spot protein/creatinine ratio by the estimated creatinine excretion to predict proteinuria in pediatric kidney transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Since the daily creatinine excretion rate (CER) is directly affected by muscle mass, which varies with age, gender, and body weight, using the spot protein/creatinine ratio (Spot P/Cr) follow-up of proteinuria may not always be accurate. Estimated creatinine excretion rate (eCER) can be calculated from spot urine samples with formulas derived from anthropometric factors. Multiplying Spot P/Cr by eCER gives the estimated protein excretion rate (ePER). We aimed to determine the most applicable equation for predicting daily CER and examine whether ePER values acquired from different equations can anticipate measured 24 h urine protein (m24 h UP) better than Spot P/Cr in pediatric kidney transplant recipients. METHODS: This study enrolled 23 children with kidney transplantation. To estimate m24 h UP, we calculated eCER and ePER values with three formulas adapted to children (Cockcroft-Gault, Ghazali-Barratt, and Hellerstein). To evaluate the accuracy of the methods, Passing-Bablok and Bland-Altman analysis were used. RESULTS: A statistically significant correlation was found between m24 h UP and Spot P/Cr (p < .001, r = 0.850), and the correlation was enhanced by multiplying the Spot P/Cr by the eCER equations. The average bias of the ePER formulas adjusted by the Cockcroft-Gault, Ghazali-Barratt, and Hellerstein equations were -0.067, 0.031, and 0.064 g/day, respectively, whereas the average bias of Spot P/Cr was -0.270 g/day obtained by the Bland-Altman graphics. CONCLUSION: Using equations to estimate eCER may improve the accuracy and reduce the spot urine samples' bias in pediatric kidney transplantation recipients. Further studies in larger populations are needed for ePER reporting to be ready for clinical practice.

Significance of caveolin-1 immunohistochemical staining differences in biopsy samples from kidney recipients with BK virus viremia.

BK virus infections which usually remains asymptomatic in healthy adults may have different clinical manifestations in immunocompromised patient population. BK virus reactivation can cause BK virus nephropathy in 8% of kidney transplant patients and graft loss may be seen if not treated. Clathrin or Caveolar system is known to be required for the transport of many viruses from Polyomaviruses family including BK viruses. In this study, kidney transplant patients with BK virus viremia were divided into two groups according to the BK virus nephropathy found in kidney biopsy (Group I: Viremia+, Nephropathy+ / Group II: Viremia+, Nephropathy-). Kidney biopsies were examined with immunohistochemical staining to determine the distribution and density of the Caveolin-1 and Clathrin molecules. Immunohistochemical staining of the 31 pathologic specimens with anti-caveolin-1 immunoglobulin revealed statistically significant difference between group-I and group-II. The number of the specimens stained with anti-caveolin-1 was less in group I. On the other hand, we did not find any difference between the groups regarding the anti-clathrin immunochemical analysis. According to these findings, caveolin-1 expression differences in kidney transplant patients may be important in disease progression.

Predicting the outcome of COVID-19 infection in kidney transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to present the demographic characteristics, clinical presentation, and outcomes of our multicenter cohort of adult KTx recipients with COVID-19. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, retrospective study using data of patients hospitalized for COVID-19 collected from 34 centers in Turkey. Demographic characteristics, clinical findings, laboratory parameters (hemogram, CRP, AST, ALT, LDH, and ferritin) at admission and follow-up, and treatment strategies were reviewed. Predictors of poor clinical outcomes were analyzed. The primary outcomes were in-hospital mortality and the need for ICU admission. The secondary outcome was composite in-hospital mortality and/or ICU admission. RESULTS: One hundred nine patients (male/female: 63/46, mean age: 48.4 ± 12.4 years) were included in the study. Acute kidney injury (AKI) developed in 46 (42.2%) patients, and 4 (3.7%) of the patients required renal replacement therapy (RRT). A total of 22 (20.2%) patients were admitted in the ICU, and 19 (17.4%) patients required invasive mechanical ventilation. 14 (12.8%) of the patients died. Patients who were admitted in the ICU were significantly older (age over 60 years) (38.1% vs 14.9%, p = 0.016). 23 (21.1%) patients reached to composite outcome and these patients were significantly older (age over 60 years) (39.1% vs. 13.9%; p = 0.004), and had lower serum albumin (3.4 g/dl [2.9-3.8] vs. 3.8 g/dl [3.5-4.1], p = 0.002), higher serum ferritin (679 µg/L [184-2260] vs. 331 µg/L [128-839], p = 0.048), and lower lymphocyte counts (700/µl [460-950] vs. 860 /µl [545-1385], p = 0.018). Multivariable analysis identified presence of ischemic heart disease and initial serum creatinine levels as independent risk factors for mortality, whereas age over 60 years and initial serum creatinine levels were independently associated with ICU admission. On analysis for predicting secondary outcome, age above 60 and initial lymphocyte count were found to be independent variables in multivariable analysis. CONCLUSION: Over the age of 60, ischemic heart disease, lymphopenia, poor graft function were independent risk factors for severe COVID-19 in this patient group. Whereas presence of ischemic heart disease and poor graft function were independently associated with mortality.

Mortality analysis of COVID-19 infection in chronic kidney disease, haemodialysis and renal transplant patients compared with patients without kidney disease: a nationwide analysis from Turkey.

BACKGROUND: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) and immunosuppression, such as in renal transplantation (RT), stand as one of the established potential risk factors for severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Case morbidity and mortality rates for any type of infection have always been much higher in CKD, haemodialysis (HD) and RT patients than in the general population. A large study comparing COVID-19 outcome in moderate to advanced CKD (Stages 3-5), HD and RT patients with a control group of patients is still lacking. METHODS: We conducted a multicentre, retrospective, observational study, involving hospitalized adult patients with COVID-19 from 47 centres in Turkey. Patients with CKD Stages 3-5, chronic HD and RT were compared with patients who had COVID-19 but no kidney disease. Demographics, comorbidities, medications, laboratory tests, COVID-19 treatments and outcome [in-hospital mortality and combined in-hospital outcome mortality or admission to the intensive care unit (ICU)] were compared. RESULTS: A total of 1210 patients were included [median age, 61 (quartile 1-quartile 3 48-71) years, female 551 (45.5%)] composed of four groups: control (n = 450), HD (n = 390), RT (n = 81) and CKD (n = 289). The ICU admission rate was 266/1210 (22.0%). A total of 172/1210 (14.2%) patients died. The ICU admission and in-hospital mortality rates in the CKD group [114/289 (39.4%); 95% confidence interval (CI) 33.9-45.2; and 82/289 (28.4%); 95% CI 23.9-34.5)] were significantly higher than the other groups: HD = 99/390 (25.4%; 95% CI 21.3-29.9; P < 0.001) and 63/390 (16.2%; 95% CI 13.0-20.4; P < 0.001); RT = 17/81 (21.0%; 95% CI 13.2-30.8; P = 0.002) and 9/81 (11.1%; 95% CI 5.7-19.5; P = 0.001); and control = 36/450 (8.0%; 95% CI 5.8-10.8; P < 0.001) and 18/450 (4%; 95% CI 2.5-6.2; P < 0.001). Adjusted mortality and adjusted combined outcomes in CKD group and HD groups were significantly higher than the control group [hazard ratio (HR) (95% CI) CKD: 2.88 (1.52-5.44); P = 0.001; 2.44 (1.35-4.40); P = 0.003; HD: 2.32 (1.21-4.46); P = 0.011; 2.25 (1.23-4.12); P = 0.008), respectively], but these were not significantly different in the RT from in the control group [HR (95% CI) 1.89 (0.76-4.72); P = 0.169; 1.87 (0.81-4.28); P = 0.138, respectively]. CONCLUSIONS: Hospitalized COVID-19 patients with CKDs, including Stages 3-5 CKD, HD and RT, have significantly higher mortality than patients without kidney disease. Stages 3-5 CKD patients have an in-hospital mortality rate as much as HD patients, which may be in part because of similar age and comorbidity burden. We were unable to assess if RT patients were or were not at increased risk for in-hospital mortality because of the relatively small sample size of the RT patients in this study.

COVID-19 in kidney transplant recipients: A multicenter experience in Istanbul.

INTRODUCTION: Management of COVID-19 in kidney transplant recipients should include treatment of the infection, regulation of immunosuppression, and supportive therapy. However, there is no consensus on this issue yet. This study aimed to our experiences with kidney transplant recipients diagnosed with COVID-19. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Kidney transplant recipients diagnosed with COVID-19 from five major transplant centers in Istanbul, Turkey, were included in this retrospective cohort study. Patients were classified as having moderate or severe pneumonia for the analysis. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. The secondary endpoints were acute kidney injury, the average length of hospital stay, admission to intensive care, and mechanical ventilation. RESULTS: Forty patients were reviewed retrospectively over a follow-up period of 32 days after being diagnosed with COVID-19. Cough, fever, and dyspnea were the most frequent symptoms in all patients. The frequency of previous induction and rejection therapy was significantly higher in the group with severe pneumonia compared to the moderate pneumonia group. None of the patients using cyclosporine A developed severe pneumonia. Five patients died during follow-up in the intensive care unit. None of the patients developed graft loss during follow-up. DISCUSSION: COVID-19 has been seen to more commonly cause moderate or severe pneumonia in kidney transplant recipients. Immunosuppression should be carefully reduced in these patients. Induction therapy with lymphocyte-depleting agents should be carefully avoided in kidney transplant recipients during the pandemic period.

Oligosymptomatic Kidney Transplant Patients With COVID-19: Do They Pose a Risk to Other Recipients?

The clinical course of viral infections in patients under immunosuppression can be atypical and/or fatal if not diagnosed and treated appropriately. The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) may also have an atypical presentation. Contrary to the general opinion, transplant patients may be asymptomatic or oligosymptomatic, which could be a risk factor for underdiagnosis and the dissemination of this viral disease. This study presents the clinical features of 2 oligosymptomatic kidney transplant patients diagnosed with COVID-19. We suggest that new screening algorithms for COVID-19 should be reconsidered for the transplant patient population.

Case report: A kidney transplant patient with mild COVID-19.

Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) is currently a pandemic with a mortality rate of 1%-6% in the general population. However, the mortality rate seems to be significantly higher in elderly patients, especially those hospitalized with comorbidities, such as hypertension, diabetes, or coronary artery diseases. Because viral diseases may have atypical presentations in immunosuppressed patients, the course of the disease in the transplant patient population is unknown. Hence, the management of these patients with COVID-19 is an area of interest, and a unique approach is warranted. Here, we report the clinical features and our treatment approach for a kidney transplant patient with a diagnosis of COVID-19. We believe that screening protocols for SARS-Cov-2 should be re-evaluated in patients with solid-organ transplants.

Fabry Disease Prevalence in Renal Replacement Therapy in Turkey.

BACKGROUND: Fabry disease (FD) is an X-linked lysosomal storage disorder resulting from lack of alpha-galactosidase A (AGALA) activity in lysosomes. OBJECTIVE: In this multicenter study, we aimed to evaluate the prevalence of FD in renal transplant (Tx) recipients in Turkey. We also screened dialysis patients as a control group. METHODS: All Tx and dialysis patients were screened regardless of the presence of a primary disease. We measured the AGALA activity in all male patients as initial analysis. Mutation analysis was performed in male patients with decreased AGALA activity and in female patients as the initial diagnostic assay. RESULTS: We screened 5,657 patients. A total of 17 mutations were identified. No significant difference was observed between the groups regarding the prevalence of patients with mutation. We found FD even in patients with presumed primary kidney diseases. Seventy-one relatives were analyzed and mutation was detected in 43 of them. We detected a patient with a new, unknown mutation (p.Cys223) in the GLA gene. CONCLUSIONS: There are important implications of the screening. First, detection of the undiagnosed patients leads to starting appropriate therapies for these patients. Second, the transmission of the disease to future generations may be prevented by prenatal screening after appropriate genetic counseling. In conclusion, we suggest screening of kidney Tx candidates for FD, regardless of etiologies of chronic kidney disease.

Effects of spironolactone on residual renal function and peritoneal function in peritoneal dialysis patients.

There is increasing evidence that long-term peritoneal dialysis (PD) is associated with structural changes in the peritoneal membrane. Inhibition of the renin-angiotensin system has been demonstrated to lessen peritoneal injury and to slow the decline in residual renal function. Whether spironolactone affects residual renal function in addition to the peritoneal membrane is unknown. We evaluated 23 patients (13 women) with a glomerular filtration rate of 2 mL/min/1.73 m2 or more who were receiving PD. Patients with an active infection or peritonitis episode were excluded. Baseline measurements were obtained for serum high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), transforming growth factor beta (TGF-beta), and connective tissue growth factor (CTGF); for daily ultrafiltration (in milliliters); for end-to-initial dialysate concentration of glucose (4/D0 glucose), Kt/V, and peritoneal transport status; and for dialysate cancer antigen 125 (CA125). Spironolactone therapy (25 mg) was given daily for 6 months, after which all measurements were repeated. Mean age of the patients was 46 +/- 13 years. Duration of PD was 15 +/- 21 months (range: 2-88 months). After spironolactone therapy, mean dialysate CA125 was significantly increased compared with baseline (20.52 +/- 12.06 U/mL vs. 24.44 +/- 13.97 U/mL, p = 0.028). Serum hs-CRP, VEGF, TGF-beta, CTGF, daily ultrafiltration, D/Do glucose, Kt/V and peritoneal transport status were similar at both times. At the end of the study period, residual glomerular filtration rate in the patients was lower. In PD patients, treatment with spironolactone seems to slow the decline of peritoneal function, suppress the elevation of profibrotic markers, and increase mesothelial cell mass.

Evaluation of oxidative status with exhaled breath 8-isoprostane levels in patients with hyperthyroidism.

INTRODUCTION: Studies conducted so far on the effect of hyperthyroidism on oxidative stress (OS) have employed blood and urine samples. Exhaled Breath Condensate (EBC) is a non-invasive technique used to take sample from lungs to determine many biological indications. The aim of the present study was determine the possibility of using 8- isoprostane levels in EBC as an indicator of OS in hyperthyroid patients. METHODS: The present study was performed on 42 patients with hyperthyroidism and 42 healthy control subjects. Hyperthyroid patients included patients with newly diagnosed Graves' disease, toxic multinodular goiter and toxic adenoma. Exhaled breath condensates were collected from patients in each group using a condensing device. 8- isoprostane levels as an indicator of OS in EBC were detected via immunoassay method. RESULTS: Hyperthyroid patients and control groups had 8-isoprostane levels of 6.08±6.31 and 1.56±0.88 pg/ml, respectively. The difference between patient and control groups was statistically significant (p<0.001). Of the hyperthyroid patients, eleven had Graves', 21 multinodular goiter, and 10 toxic adenoma diagnosis. There were no significant differences among patients of different diagnoses for 8-isoprostane levels (p=0.541). No significant correlations were found between 8-isoprostane and free thyroxine (fT4) or thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) levels. CONCLUSION: In the present study, 8-isoprostane levels in EBC of hyperthyroid patients were found to be significantly higher than that in healthy control group. This study is important in that it is the first to evaluate the effects on respiratory system of elevated OS of hyperthyroidism in EBC.

Changes in metabolic and cardiovascular risk factors before and after treatment in overt hypothyroidism.

AIM: Overt hypothyroidism is associated with an increased risk for developing cardiovascular disease. We aimed to assess the changes in renal function, serum lipids, vitamin B12, folic acid and homocysteine levels before and after treatment in hypothyroid patients. METHODS: The study included 54 patients (F/M=47/7) with overt hypothyroidism. All patients were assessed for demographic characteristics such as age, gender, body weight, and body mass index. Fasting blood samples were taken from the patients for analysis of chemical parameters including thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH), free thyroxine (fT4), homocysteine, total cholesterol, triglycerides, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL), folic acid, and vitamin B12 levels before and after L-thyroxine (LT4) treatment. RESULTS: Homocysteine levels in hypothyroidism (9.67 ± 5.24 mmol/l) were significantly higher than in euthyroid state (8.16 ± 3.38 mmol/L, p=0.038). Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was lower before treatment. Following LT4 replacement, renal functions significantly improved. After achieving the euthyroid state, folic acid levels significantly increased although vitamin B12 levels were not changed. There was a significant reduction in serum lipid levels after LT4 replacement. It was demonstrated that there was a significant negative correlation between GFR and lipids and a positive correlation with homocysteine and lipids at hypothyroid state. After normalization of thyroid functions, the correlations became non-significant. CONCLUSION: The hypothyroidism was associated with increased serum homocysteine, lipids, and creatinine concentrations. The improvement of these parameters with LT4 replacement may be associated with the lower risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases in the patients with hypothyroidism.

Insulin resistance and cardiovascular risk factors in women with PCOS who have normal glucose tolerance test.

INTRODUCTION: We aimed to determine the insulin resistance in women with PCOS patients who have normal oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and to evaluate cardiovascular risk by measuring C-reactive protein (CRP) and carotid intimae-media thickness (CIMT). METHODS: A total of 34 patients and age and body mass matched 20 healthy control subjects were included to this prospective study. Both of patients and control groups were consisted of normal oral glucose tolerance test. Insulin resistance (IR) was estimated using HOMA-IR method. CRP, lipid and hormone levels were measured. CIMT was measured by Carotid Artery B-Mode ultrasonography. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between patients and controls in BMI, and waist circumference, lipid, TSH, LH, FSH, estradiol, and prolactin levels. Serum insulin, testosterone, DHEAS, ferritin levels and HOMA values were significantly higher in patient group. We found that 64.7% (n = 22/34) patients with PCOS had insulin resistance. Both of CIMT and CRP levels were significantly higher in the PCOS patients had BMI over 25 kg/m². CRP levels was significantly higher in the PCOS patients had waist circumference greater than 80 cm. CONCLUSION: We found insulin resistance in the women with PCOS even if OGTT was normal. Our data were similar to literature, the women with PCOS have increased risk of premature atherosclerosis and metabolic syndrome.

Lower serum prohepcidin levels associated with lower iron and erythropoietin requirements in hemodialysis patients with chronic hepatitis C.

BACKGROUND: Patients with chronic HCV infection have increased liver iron. Recently identified protein hepcidin synthesized in the liver, is thought to be a key regulator for iron homeostasis and is induced by infection and inflammation. Lower erythropoietin and iron supplementation requirements were previously reported in HD patients with HCV infection. We investigated the association of prohepcidin with inflammation and iron parameters in HD patients with and without chronic HCV infection. METHODS: Sixty patients (27 male, 33 female, mean age 50±15 years) on chronic HD were included. Parameters related to iron metabolism (ferritin, serum iron and total iron binding capacity (TIBC)), inflammation (hs-CRP, TNF-α and IL-6) and prohepcidin levels were measured. The response to treatment (erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) resistance index) was assessed from the ratio of the weekly erythropoietin (rhuEPO) dose to hemoglobin (Hb) per unit weight. RESULTS: Serum prohepcidin levels of HCV positive patients (135±25 ng/mL) were significantly lower than HCV negative patients [148±18 ng/mL, (p=0.025)]. Serum IL-6 levels of HCV positive patients were also significantly lower than HCV negative patients (p=0.016). Serum prohepcidin levels were positively correlated with ferritin (r=0.405, p=0.001) and IL-6 (r=0.271, p=0.050) levels in HD patients. In the HCV positive group, serum prohepcidin levels significantly correlated with ferritin levels (r=0.514 p=0.004). In the HCV negative group, serum prohepcidin levels significantly correlated with serum IL-6 levels (r=0.418, p=0.027). In multiple regression analysis performed to predict prohepcidin in HCV positive patients, serum ferritin was found to be an independent variable (r=0.28, p=0.008). CONCLUSIONS: HCV positive HD patients have low levels of serum prohepcidin and IL-6 which might account for iron accumulation together with lower iron and rhuEPO requirements in these patients.

Outcome of patients with amyloidosis after renal transplantation: a single-center experience.

AIMS: The prognostic outcome of patients with amyloidosis who receive a kidney transplant is controversial. The aim of the study was to analyze the renal transplantation outcome of patients with amyloidosis compared to transplant recipients with other kidney diseases. METHODS: Among 940 patients who had renal transplantation in our unit between 1983 and 2009, 44 patients with amyloidosis were compared regarding early and late complications and survival, retrospectively, with a control group of 41 consecutive patients with the same donor type and a matched renal transplantation date. RESULTS: The groups were similar regarding demographic parameters, HLA mismatch numbers and mean follow-up period. Groups were similar regarding early and late infectious and non-infectious complications, except recurrence of the primary disease, which was more common in the amyloidosis group. As the cause of graft loss, rejection (acute or chronic) was more common in the control group; whereas primary non-functioning graft, and death with a functioning graft were more common in the amyloidosis group. Patient survival rates at 1, 5, and 10 years were 87.6%, 78.1%, and 62.3 in the amyloidosis group; and 93.2%, 82.6%, and 69.3% in the control group. Graft survival rates at 1, 5 and 10 years were 87.6%, 75.4%, 56.4% in the amyloidosis group; and 93.2%, 80.3%, and 60.6% in the control group, respectively. These values did not show any statistical difference. CONCLUSIONS: The outcomes of renal transplantation in patients with amyloidosis are comparable with recipients whose primary problems are due to other kidney diseases; therefore, amyloidosis patients should be accepted as good candidates for transplantation.