RESUMO
Introduction: Headache is a common symptom in patients with Coronavirus-19 infection (COVID-19). In this research, we aim to assess the frequency, characteristics, and response to treatment of headache in patients with COVID-19 and its correlation with psychosocial features in Turkey. Methods: To describe the clinical features of headache in COVID-19 positive individuals. Patients were evaluated and followed up with face-to-face visits in a tertiary hospital during the pandemic period. Results: One hundred and seventeen of 150 patients (78%) had a headache diagnosed before and during the pandemic, 62 of 150 (41.3%) had a new type of headache. No significant differences were observed in terms of demographics, Beck Depression Score, Beck Anxiety Score, and quality of life scales (QOLS) between patients with and without headache (p>0.05). The most common triggering factor for headache was stress and fatigue in 59% (n=69), while the second most common (32.4%, n=38) was COVID-19 infection. 46.5% of the patients reported that the severity and frequency of their current headaches increased after the COVID-19 infection. Among new-onset headaches, the social functionality and pain score subgroups of the QOLS form were significantly lower in housewives and unemployed patients compared to the working group (p=0.018; p=0.039 respectively). Twelve of 117 patients had a mild to moderate, throbbing headache in the temporoparietal region, which did not fulfill the International Classification of Headache Disorders diagnosis criteria, but showed as a common feature among COVID-19 patients. Nineteen of 62 patients (30.9%) had a newly diagnosed migraine syndrome. Conclusion: The diagnosis incidence of migraine in patients with COVID-19 disease being more than other headaches types may suggest the existence of a common pathway in possible immune mechanisms.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Autoimmune encephalitis (AIE) and paraneoplastic syndromes (PNS) are both rare groups of neurological diseases that are difficult to diagnose. AIM: We aimed to determine the common and distinct aspects of these two aetiologies of encephalitis as well as the characteristics of our patient group. METHODS: We respectively analysed the records of the patients including symptoms, demographic features, neurological examination, cranial-magnetic-resonance-imaging (MRI), electroencephalography (EEG) findings, cerebrospinal fluid results (CSF) findings. Autoimmune/paraneoplastic autoantibodies in blood and/or CSF were all documented. RESULTS: Forty-six patients fulfilled the diagnostic criteria. Thirty-eight of them were diagnosed with AIE, and 8 of them were diagnosed with PNS. The PNS group had higher nonconvulsive status epilepticus than the AIE (2/8 vs 0/38; p=0.027). PNS patients were diagnosed with a malignancy in their follow-ups more than those in the AIE group [4/38 vs 8/8] (p<0.001). When the symptoms of antibody-positive and negative patients were compared in the AIE group, the rates of consciousness/memory problems (13/15 vs 11/23; p=0.020) and speech impairment (8/15 vs 2/23; p=0.004) were significantly higher in patients without antibodies (n: 15) than in antibody-positive patients (n: 23). In antibody-negative groups, the rates of memory problems in neurological examination (13/15 vs 12/23 p=0.028) and temporal findings on electroencephalography were more prominent than antibody-positive groups (1/23 vs 5/15; p=0.027). The number of patients with cerebellar signs was higher in antibody-positive patients (6/23 vs 0/15; p=0.038). CONCLUSION: Although the positivity of autoantibodies is critical in the diagnosis of AIE and PNS, even minor differences in clinical and laboratory findings of patients are helpful in the diagnosis, especially in the autoantibody-negative patients. Comparing the data with other population studies has shown that several inherited and environmental factors may contribute to the pathophysiology of AIE and PNS, as well as clinical and laboratory differences.
