A cohort study of mammography-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy in patients with compressed thin breasts (≦ 3 cm).

OBJECTIVES: In the women with compressed thin thickness (≦ 3 cm), mammographic guiding vacuum-assist breast biopsy (MG-VABB) is a technical challenge. We herein report their performance of MG-VABB on suspicious microcalcification by modern mammography. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the consecutive MG-VABB in our hospital from February 2019 to January 2021. All the patients received biopsy because of suspicious microcalcifications discovered by mammography and had at least one-year post-biopsy follow-up. RESULTS: We reviewed 745 consecutive patients revealing 195 with compressed thin breasts ≦ 3 cm (mean age: 50.12 ± 7.0; breast thickness: 24.99 mm range 11.6-30 mm). Of the 191 patients received biopsy, the microcalcification retrieval rate was 97.9%. Using the half-open notch biopsy or horizontal needle approach, the biopsies were technically achieved in 30.4% and 9.4% of patients respectively. Regarding to the gold standard of surgicohistology, the cancer sensitivities was 88.46% and the atypia upgrade rate was 16.67%. There was no statistical difference of the procedure time between stereotactic guided and tomosynthesis guided. CONCLUSIONS: The modern MG-VABB has technically improve the performance of biopsy to the patients with compressed thin breasts (≦ 3 cm), revealing approximate results to those breasts > 3 cm. The diagnosis helps the management of suspicious microcalcifications discovered by mammography.

Predicting Healthy C5 Spinal Nerve Stumps Eligible for Grafting with MRI, Tinel Test, and Rhomboid Electromyography: A Retrospective Study of 295 Consecutive Brachial Plexus Surgeries.

Background MRI, Tinel test, and rhomboid electromyography (EMG) can be used to predict whether C5 spinal nerve stumps are healthy and eligible for grafting in acute adult brachial plexus injuries, but their comparative diagnostic efficacies have not been evaluated. Purpose To compare diagnostic performances of MRI, Tinel test, and rhomboid EMG in predicting healthy C5 spinal nerve stumps that are eligible for grafting. Materials and Methods This retrospective study included consecutive adult patients with acute brachial plexus injury who underwent microreconstructions between January 2008 and December 2018. Healthy C5 spinal nerve stumps eligible for grafting with preceding normal intradural nerve rootlets were diagnosed by an experienced neuroradiologist using an avulsion severity score system based on fast imaging employing steady-state acquisition or FIESTA neurography, which separates intradural nerve rootlets into normal, partial mild, severe, and complete avulsions. Tinel test and rhomboid EMG results were assessed by an experienced nerve surgeon and neurologist, respectively. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the three tests were compared using microdissection as the reference standard. P < .05 was considered to indicate a significant difference. Results A total of 251 patients (mean age, 31 years ± 13 [standard deviation]; 217 men) with brachial plexus injuries who had -undergone MRI (n = 251), Tinel test (n = 235), rhomboid EMG (n = 181) and MRI, Tinel test, and EMG (n = 172) were -included. Accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity, respectively, in predicting healthy C5 spinal nerve stumps eligible for grafting were 93% (233 of 251), 84% (58 of 69), and 96% (175 of 182) for MRI; 59% (139 of 235), 56% (37 of 66), and 60% (102 of 169) for Tinel test; and 39% (71 of 181), 85% (43 of 50), and 21% (28 of 131) for rhomboid EMG. MRI (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC], 0.90; P < .001) -outperformed MRI and Tinel test (AUC, 0.74), Tinel test (AUC, 0.59), and rhomboid EMG (AUC, 0.53). Conclusion MRI performed best in the prediction of healthy graftable C5 spinal nerve stumps in acute adult brachial plexus injuries. © RSNA, 2021 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Imaging Approaches for Accurate Determination of the Quadriceps Angle.

OBJECTIVES: A retrospective study was conducted using magnetic resonance image (MRI) and a full-length standing scanogram (FLSS) to measure the quadriceps angle (Q-angle) while avoiding soft tissue interference. METHODS: Two steps were retrospectively carried out in two case series. The first step involved using MRI to define the standardized patellar center (PC) and the tibial tubercle (TT) on the frontal plane of the MRI in one group of 60 consecutive patients (from July 2016 to December 2016, 29 men and 31 women, average of 46 years). The next step was transferring the location of the standardized PC and the TT from the MRI to the FLSS in another group of 100 consecutive patients (from April 2009 to March 2014, 50 men and 50 women, average of 36 years). The pelvis and intact femur, knee, and tibia were used to determine the Q-angle on the FLSS. RESULTS: The standardized PC was positioned 42% from the lateral end of femur trans-epicondylar line. The TT was 2 cm distal to the tibial articular surface and 37% from the lateral end of tibial width. The average Q-angle was 9.5° in 100 patients (8.8° in 50 men and 10.1° in 50 women, P = 0.02). The average femoral length was 42.9 cm in 100 patients (44.7 cm in 50 men and 41.1 cm in 50 women, P < 0.001). Women and men had similar pelvic width (27.9 vs 27.8 cm, P = 0.89). CONCLUSION: Using the FLSS may help to accurately determine the Q-angle. Men and women have similar pelvic width. A larger Q-angle in women may be mainly due to the shorter femur.

Varied influence of the femoral or tibial component on quadriceps angles: Verified by imaging studies.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the varied influence of femoral or tibial component on Quadriceps angles (Q-angle) measured with magnetic resonance image (MRI) and full-length standing scanogram (FLSS) techniques. METHODS: Two groups of patients were studied. The first group underwent MRI studies and the second group underwent FLSS studies. Two-step procedures were carried out. Knee MRI in 60 consecutive adult patients simply taken for meniscus or ligament injuries were utilized at the first step. The standardized patellar center (PC) and tibial tubercle (TT) on the frontal plane of MRI were positioned. At the second step, the FLSS in other 100 consecutive young adult patients taken for chronic unilateral lower extremity injuries were used for locating the two landmarks from MRI. The Q-angle was then determined on the anterior superior iliac spine, standardized PC, and TT on the FLSS. RESULTS: For 60 patients, the standardized PC was at the point 42% from the lateral end of the trans-epicondylar line of the femur. The TT was at the point 2 cm distal to the tibial articular surface and 37% from the lateral end of the tibial width. For 100 patients, the Q-angle was an average of 9.5° and 65.2% of the Q-angle was contributed by the upper arm (the femur). Women had a larger Q-angle (10.1° vs. 8.8°, p = 0.02) and a shorter femur (41.1 vs. 44.7 cm, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The Q-angle is about 9.5° with 65.2% contributed by the femur. The Q-angle may mainly be influenced by the femoral component. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, Diagnostic Study.