ABO-adjusted cPRA metric for kidney allocation in an Asian-predominant population.

Recent studies showed that ABO-adjusted calculated panel reactive antibody (ABO-cPRA) may better reflect the histocompatibility level in a multi-ethnic population, but such data in Asians is not available. We developed an ABO-adjusted cPRA metric on a cohort of waitlist kidney transplant patients (n = 647, 99% Chinese) in Hong Kong, based on HLA alleles and ABO frequencies of local donors. The concordance between the web-based ABO-cPRA calculator and the impact on kidney allocation were evaluated. The blood group distribution for A, B, O and AB among waitlist kidney candidates were 26.2%, 27.5%, 40.1%, and 6.1%, and their chances of encountering incompatible blood group donors were 32.6%, 32.4%, 57.6%, and 0%, respectively. There is poor agreement between web-based ABO-cPRA calculator and our locally developed metrics. Over 90% of patients showed an increase in cPRA after ABO adjustment, most notably in those with cPRA between 70% and 79%. Blood group O patients had a much greater increase in cPRA scores after adjustment while patients of blood group A and B had similar increment. 10.6% of non-AB blood group waitlist patients had ABO-cPRA elevated to ≥80%. A local ABO-adjusted cPRA metric is required for Asian populations and may improve equity in kidney distribution for patients with disadvantageous blood groups. The result from the current study potentially helps other countries/localities in establishing their own unified ABO-cPRA metrics and predict the impact on kidney allocation.

Effect of Bifidobacterium animalis spp. lactis Bl-04 on Rhinovirus-Induced Colds: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Single-Center, Phase II Trial in Healthy Volunteers.

BACKGROUND: This study was designed to assess the efficacy of Bifidobacterium animalis ssp. lactis (Bl-04) for prevention of rhinovirus colds and to explore the interactions between the probiotic, the viral infection, the host response and the host microbiome. METHODS: The effect of ingestion of the probiotic Bl-04 was evaluated in a randomized, double-blinded rhinovirus (RV) challenge study. Healthy volunteers recruited from a university community in USA were randomized 1:1 using a computer generated code to ingest either Bl-04 (n=165) or placebo (n=169) for 28 days and were then challenged with RV-A39, and followed for 14 days. All study interactions and sample collection occurred in dedicated clinical research space. The primary analysis was the effect of the probiotic on the incidence of RV-associated illness. (Trial registration: NCT02679807, study complete). FINDINGS: The first cohort of volunteers was randomized on March 14, 2016 and the last (5th) cohort was randomized on March 12, 2018. Sixty-three (56%, 95% CI [47%; 66%]) of the 112 subjects in the active group and 60 (50%,95% CI [41%; 59%]) of the 120 subjects in the placebo group had a protocol-defined rhinovirus-associated illness (χ2=0·91, p=0·34). The point estimate of the difference in illness (active-placebo) is 6.3% (95% CI -6.7;19.1). There were no adverse events that were judged as definitely or probably related to the study product. INTERPRETATION: In this study there was no effect of orally administered Bl-04 on the occurrence of RV-associated illness. FUNDING: Danisco Sweeteners Oy (now IFF Health & Biosciences).

The role of decision confidence in advice-taking and trust formation.

In a world where ideas flow freely across multiple platforms, people must often rely on others' advice and opinions without an objective standard to judge whether this information is accurate. The present study explores the hypothesis that an individual's internal decision confidence can be used as a signal to learn the accuracy of others' advice, even in the absence of feedback. According to this "agreement-in-confidence" hypothesis, people can learn about an advisor's accuracy across multiple interactions according to whether the advice offered agrees with their own initial opinions, weighted by the confidence with which these initial opinions are held. We test this hypothesis using a judge-advisor system paradigm to precisely manipulate the profiles of virtual advisors in a perceptual decision-making task. We find that when advisors' and participants' judgments are independent, people can correctly learn advisors' features, like their accuracy and calibration, whether or not objective feedback is available. However, when their judgments (and thus errors) are correlated-as is the case in many real social contexts-predictable distortions in trust can be observed between feedback and feedback-free scenarios. Using agent-based simulations, we explore implications of these individual-level heuristics for network-level patterns of trust and belief formation. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

A simplified method of calculating cPRA for kidney allocation application in Hong Kong: a retrospective study.

Calculated panel reactive antibody (cPRA) represents possibility of encountering an incompatible donor for organ transplant candidates and has gradually replaced traditional PRA as a measurement of sensitization level. We tested two cPRA calculation methods on a cohort of renal candidate (n = 613). HLA typing of 563 Chinese deceased renal donors was used to estimate allele and haplotype frequencies of Hong Kong donor pool. The OPTN formula was adopted to generate cPRA (cPRA (freq)). We also incorporated a computer script to compare unacceptable antigens of patients against HLA phenotype of donors. The cPRA based on historical donor filtering was the percentage of filter out count over total number of donors (cPRA (filter)). Values of cPRA (freq) and cPRA (filter) showed almost perfect agreement with Lin's correlation coefficient equal to 1.000. SD of bias was 0.6 cPRA point. Limit of agreement was 0.9 to -1.5 points difference. Furthermore, the poor agreement between our in-house cPRA and values from other online calculators indicated the necessity to use local population data for accurate cPRA calculation. Built-in donor filtering method was more practicable for Hong Kong due to factors such as cost and flexibility. An on-going donor pool can reflect population allele frequencies and permits efficient periodic update of cPRA.