A US Retrospective Claims Analysis Comparing Healthcare Costs of Patients Transitioning from Immediate-Release Oxycodone to Two Different Formulations of Extended-Release Oxycodone: Xtampza ER or OxyContin.

Purpose: Opioid therapy for managing chronic pain remains a challenge, as providers must weigh the medical benefit to the patient with the risk of adverse events. Manipulation of many extended-release (ER) opioid formulations may lead to increased serious medical outcomes or death. The economic burden of opioid use disorders due to opioid misuse and abuse may vary depending on which abuse deterrent opioid formulation is prescribed. The study aimed to compare demographic and clinical characteristics and healthcare costs of chronic pain patients treated with two different abuse-deterrent opioid formulations, Xtampza ER and reformulated OxyContin. Methods: The source of data was IBM® MarketScan® Commercial Claims and Encounters Medicare Supplemental database, from January 2016 through February 2020. Patients with chronic pain were assigned to either the Xtampza ER or the OxyContin cohort based on the initial ER opioid prescription set as the index date. Continuous healthcare coverage was required during a minimum 3-month pre-index and 9-month post-index periods. Pre-index patients' characteristics were analyzed. Healthcare costs of Xtampza ER vs OxyContin were assessed in the post-index period. Results: After applying selection criteria, 464 patients were observed in the Xtampza ER cohort versus 1927 patients in the OxyContin cohort. In unmatched patients, ER opioid costs were lower for Xtampza ER than OxyContin ($2645 vs $3141; p<0.001), which ultimately led to lower total prescription costs for the Xtampza ER cohort compared to the OxyContin cohort ($7492 vs $8754; p=0.016). In matched patients, the total healthcare costs were significantly lower in the Xtampza ER cohort than in the OxyContin cohort, $22,630 vs $28,386 (p=0.005), respectively. Conclusion: This study suggests that Xtampza ER may result in lower healthcare costs than OxyContin for a population of chronic pain patients switching from immediate release oxycodone based on real-world data.

The efficiency of the EmERGE platform for medically stable people living with HIV in Portugal.

Background: The aim of this study was to calculate the cost-effectiveness of the EmERGE Pathway of Care for medically stable people living with HIV in the Hospital Capuchos, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Lisboa Central (HC-CHLC). The app enables individuals to receive HIV treatment information and communicate with caregivers. Methods: This before-and-after study collected the use of services data 1 year before implementation and after implementation of EmERGE from November 1, 2016, to October 30, 2019. Departmental unit costs were calculated and linked to mean use of outpatient services per patient-year (MPPY). Annual costs per patient-year were combined with primary (CD4 count; viral load) and secondary outcomes (PAM-13; PROQOL-HIV). Results: Five hundred eighty-six EmERGE participants used HIV outpatient services. Annual outpatient visits decreased by 35% from 3.1 MPPY (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.0-3.3) to 2.0 (95% CI: 1.9-2.1) as did annual costs per patient-year from €301 (95% CI: €288-€316) to €193 (95% CI: €182-€204). Laboratory tests and costs increased by 2%, and radiology investigations decreased by 40% as did costs. Overall annual cost for HIV outpatient services decreased by 5% from €2093 (95% CI: €2071-€2112) to €1984 (95% CI: €1968-€2001); annual outpatient costs decreased from €12,069 (95% CI: €12,047-€12,088) to €11,960 (95% CI: €11,944-€11,977), with 83% of annual cost because of antiretroviral therapy (ART). Primary and secondary outcome measures did not differ substantially between periods. Conclusions: The EmERGE Pathway produced cost savings after implementation-extended to all people living with HIV additional savings are likely to be produced, which can be used to address other needs. Antiretroviral drugs (ARVs) were the main cost drivers and more expensive in Portugal compared with ARV costs in the other EmERGE sites.

The cost of care for people living with stable HIV in Croatia and the efficiency of EmERGE.

AIM: To estimate the cost-effectiveness of the EmERGE Pathway of Care for medically stable people living with HIV (PLHIV) at the University Hospital for Infectious Diseases (UHID), Zagreb. The Pathway includes a mobile application enabling individuals to communicate with their caregivers. METHODS: This study involving 293 participants collected data on the use of HIV outpatient services one year before and after EmERGE implementation. In departments supporting HIV outpatients, a micro-costing exercise was performed to calculate unit costs. These were combined with mean use of HIV services per patient year (MPPY) to estimate average annual costs. Primary outcomes were CD4 count, viral load, and secondary outcomes were patient activation, PAM13; and quality of life, PROQOL-HIV. Information on out-of-pocket expenditures was also collected. RESULTS: Outpatient visits decreased by 17%, from 4.0 (95% CI 3.8-4.3) to 3.3 MPPY (95% CI 3.1-3.5). Tests, including CD4 count, decreased, all contributing to a 33% reduction of annual costs: 7139 HRK (95% CI 6766-7528) to 4781 HRK (95% CI 4504-5072). Annual costs including anti-retroviral drugs (ARVs) decreased by 5%: 43101 HRK (95% CI 42728-43,490) to 40 743 HRK (95% CI 40466-41,034). ARVs remain the main cost driver in stable PLHIV. Primary and secondary outcomes did not change substantially between periods. CONCLUSION: EmERGE Pathway was a cost-saving intervention associated with changes in management, and a reduction in outpatient visits, tests, and costs. ARV costs dominated costs. Future efficiencies are possible if EmERGE is introduced to other PLHIV across the UHID and if ARV prices are reduced.

Patients' and Doctors' Beliefs about Treatment and Long-Term Adherence in Rheumatic Diseases.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to explore the beliefs of rheumatologists and patients about treatment-related factors, long-term adherence, and their communication with regard to rheumatic diseases. METHODS: In a multicentre, observational study conducted in Greece, a structured questionnaire was administered to 75 rheumatologists and 398 rheumatic patients from different regions. Five domains were investigated: i) effectiveness of treatment, ii) choice of treatment, iii) change of ineffective treatment, iv) long-term adherence, and v) the quality of communication between doctors and patients. Descriptive data, confidence intervals, t-tests and factor analysis were employed. RESULTS: Examining the patients' and rheumatologists' beliefs and attitudes about treatment profiles and long-term adherence, a statistically significant convergence in their views on effectiveness and safety as the predominant factors concerning choice of treatment and long-term adherence was found. Although patients reported high trust to their doctors, a divergence of views is recorded regarding communication of the two parts. Statistically significant differences in the views between patients and rheumatologists were found with regards to access (p<0.001), time per visit (p<0.001), mutual understanding (p<0.001), and overall communication (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows a great rate of agreement between patients and rheumatologists regarding the factors determining the efficacy, choice, switching and adherence to treatment while there was significant divergence in the views regarding the quality of communication between the two parts. Co-ordinated efforts are needed in order to improve the communication level between rheumatic patients and rheumatologists.