Elderly patients with stage II gastric cancer do not benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: With the aging of the population, the burden of elderly gastric cancer (EGC) increases worldwide. However, there is no consensus on the definition of EGC and the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage II EGC. Here, we investigated the effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy in defined EGC patients. METHODS: We enrolled 5762 gastric cancer patients of three independent cohorts from the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University (local), the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER), and the Asian Cancer Research Group (ACRG). The optimal age cutoff for EGC was determined using the K-adaptive partitioning algorithm. The defined EGC group and the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy for them were confirmed by Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses. Furthermore, gene set variation analyses (GSVA) were performed to reveal pathway enrichment between groups. RESULTS: The optimal age partition value for EGC patients was 75. In the local, SEER, and ACRG cohorts, the EGC group exhibited significantly worse overall survival and cancer-specific survival than the non-EGC group (P < 0.05) and was an independent risk factor. Stratified analyses based on chemotherapy showed that EGC patients derived little benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. Furthermore, GSVA analysis revealed the activation of DNA repair-related pathways and downregulation of the p53 pathway, which may partially contribute to the observed findings. CONCLUSION: In this retrospective, international multi-center study, 75 years old was identified as the optimal age cutoff for EGC definition, and adjuvant chemotherapy proved to be unbeneficial for stage II EGC patients.

[Impact of neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy followed by surgery for mid-low rectal cancer on patients' erectile function: a prospective randomized trial].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the erectile function of male patients treated by neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone for mid-low rectal cancer. METHODS: The clinical data of 66 patients with rectal cancer from March 2011 to March 2013 were prospectively analyzed. Of all the patients, 56 cases were finally included in the study and were randomly allocated to two groups. Thirty patients were treated by neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy followed by surgery (RCS group), and 26 were treated by neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery (NCS group). The five-item version of the international index of erectile function (IIEF-5) questionnaire were used to determine erectile function before therapy and at least 12 months after surgery. The impacts of age, location, size of tumor, and body mass index on erectile function were analyzed. RESULTS: Total score was decreased significantly at follow-up compared to initial assessment in both RCS and NCS groups (23.4 ± 1.30 vs. 11.7 ± 5.8, t = 10.748, P < 0.01; 23.1 ± 1.3 vs. 15.2 ± 6.7, t = 5.910, P < 0.01, respectively). Score difference was statistically higher in RCS group compared with NCS group (11.7 ± 5.6 vs. 8.0 ± 6.0, t = 2.394, P = 0.020). In terms of tumor location for RCS group, difference was statistically higher in the patients with low rectal cancer compared with those with middle rectal cancer (14.5 ± 3.5 vs. 9.5 ± 6.0, t = 2.894, P = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: The erectile functions of patients treated by neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy followed by surgery are more affected than that of patients treated by neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery in mid-low rectal cancer. Also low rectal cancer are significantly associated with erectile dysfunction in the patients treated by neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy followed by surgery.