Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Langenbecks Arch Surg ; 408(1): 127, 2023 Mar 27.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36973561

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinicopathologic associations of tumor budding (Bd) as well as other potential prognosticators including lymphovascular invasion (LVI) in T3/4aN0 colon cancer patients and to investigate their impact on the outcome. METHODS: The patients were enrolled in three groups according to the number of budding as Bd1 (0-4 buds), Bd2 (5-9 buds), and Bd3 (> 10 buds). These groups were retrospectively compared in terms of demographic features, other tumor characteristics, operative outcomes, recurrences, and survival. The mean follow-up time was 58 ± 22 months. RESULTS: A total of 194 patients were divided as follows: 97 in Bd1, 41 in Bd2, and 56 in Bd3 groups. The Bd3 group was associated with significantly higher LVI and larger tumor size. The rate of recurrence increased progressively from 5.2% in Bd1 to 9.8% in Bd2 and to 17.9% in Bd3 group (p = 0.03). More importantly, the 5-year overall survival (OS: Bd1 = 92.3% vs. Bd2 = 88% vs. Bd3 = 69.5%, p = 0.03) and disease-free survival (DFS: Bd1 = 87.9% vs. Bd2 = 75.3% vs. Bd3 = 66%, p = 0.02) were significantly worse in Bd3 group. In addition, in the subgroup of patients with the presence of Bd3 and LVI together, the 5-year OS (60% vs. 92%, p = 0.001) and DFS (56.1% vs. 85.4%, p = 0.001) were significantly worse. In multivariate analysis, Bd3+LVI was significantly associated with poor OS and DFS (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In patients with T3/4aN0 colon cancer, high tumor budding negatively affects long-term oncological outcomes. These findings strongly suggest that adjuvant chemotherapy be considered for the patients with Bd3 and LVI together.


Assuntos
Neoplasias do Colo , Humanos , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias do Colo/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias do Colo/cirurgia , Neoplasias do Colo/patologia , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Invasividade Neoplásica/patologia
2.
J Clin Ultrasound ; 39(5): 270-3, 2011 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21547927

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy of periprostatic nerve block (PPNB) for control of transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided multicore prostate biopsy-related pain. METHODS: A total of 106 cases with suspicion of prostate cancer underwent TRUS-guided multicore prostate biopsy under local anesthesia using a total of 10 ml of 1% lidocaine for each patient. Lidocaine was injected around the neurovascular bundle at the base of the prostate just lateral to the seminal vesicle-prostate junction. The pain score was assessed using visual analog pain score from 0 to 10. All patients were questioned for whether they would accept repeat biopsy or not, if necessary. RESULTS: Pain score ranged from 0 to 5 (mean: 1.4). Thirty-five percent (37/106) of patients reported a score of 0, whereas 17% (18/106), 32% (34/106), 8.4% (9/106), 6.7% (7/106), 0.9% (1/106) reported pain scores of 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, respectively. There were no pain scores of 6-10. Answers for the question "would you accept repeat biopsy or not, if necessary?" was "yes" for 82% (87/106) of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: PPNB prior to multi-core TRUS-guided prostate biopsy is an easy, safe, and effective technique for the control of procedure-related pain.


Assuntos
Biópsia por Agulha/métodos , Bloqueio Nervoso/métodos , Dor/prevenção & controle , Próstata/diagnóstico por imagem , Próstata/patologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anestésicos Locais , Biópsia por Agulha/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Lidocaína , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Dor/etiologia , Medição da Dor , Satisfação do Paciente , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico por imagem , Ultrassonografia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...