RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Cardiocerebral infarction (CCI), which is concomitant with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and acute ischemic stroke (AIS), is a rare but severe presentation. However, there are few data on CCI, and the treatment options are uncertain. We investigated the characteristics and outcomes of CCI compared with AMI or AIS alone. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of 120â 531 patients with AMI and AIS from the national stroke and AMI registries in Singapore. Patients were categorized into AMI only, AIS only, synchronous CCI (same-day), and metachronous CCI (within 1 week). The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, and the secondary outcome was cardiovascular mortality. The mortality risks were compared using Cox regression. Multivariable models were adjusted for baseline demographics, clinical variables, and treatment for AMI or AIS. RESULTS: Of 127â 919 patients identified, 120â 531 (94.2%) were included; 74â 219 (61.6%) patients had AMI only, 44â 721 (37.1%) had AIS only, 625 (0.5%) had synchronous CCI, and 966 (0.8%) had metachronous CCI. The mean age was 67.7 (SD, 14.0) years. Synchronous and metachronous CCI had a higher risk of 30-day mortality (synchronous: adjusted HR [aHR], 2.41 [95% CI, 1.77-3.28]; metachronous: aHR, 2.80 [95% CI, 2.11-3.73]) than AMI only and AIS only (synchronous: aHR, 2.90 [95% CI, 1.87-4.51]; metachronous: aHR, 4.36 [95% CI, 3.03-6.27]). The risk of cardiovascular mortality was higher in synchronous and metachronous CCI than AMI (synchronous: aHR, 3.03 [95% CI, 2.15-4.28]; metachronous: aHR, 3.41 [95% CI, 2.50-4.65]) or AIS only (synchronous: aHR, 2.58 [95% CI, 1.52-4.36]; metachronous: aHR, 4.52 [95% CI, 2.95-6.92]). In synchronous CCI, AMI was less likely to be managed with PCI and secondary prevention medications (P<0.001) compared with AMI only. CONCLUSIONS: Synchronous CCI occurred in 1 in 200 cases of AIS and AMI. Synchronous and metachronous CCI had higher mortality than AMI or AIS alone.
RESUMO
This study aim to investigate if remote intensive coaching for the first 6 months post-AMI will improve adherence to the twice-a-day antiplatelet medication, ticagrelor. Between July 8, 2015, to March 29, 2019, AMI patients were randomly assigned to remote intensive management (RIM) or standard care (SC). RIM participants underwent 6 months of weekly then two-weekly consultations to review medication side effects and medication adherence coaching by a centralized nurse practitioner team, whereas SC participants received usual cardiologist face-to-face consultations. Adherence to ticagrelor were determined using pill counting and serial platelet reactivity measurements for 12 months. A total of 149 (49.5%) of participants were randomized to RIM and 152 (50.5%) to SC. Adherence to ticagrelor was similar between RIM and SC group at 1 month (94.4 ± 0.7% vs. 93.6±14.7%, p = 0.537), 6 months (91.0±14.6% vs. 90.6±14.8%, p = 0.832) and 12 months (87.4±17.0% vs. 89.8±12.5%, p = 0.688). There was also no significant difference in platelet reactivity between the RIM and SC groups at 1 month (251AU*min [212-328] vs. 267AU*min [208-351], p = 0.399), 6 months (239AU*min [165-308] vs. 235AU*min [171-346], p = 0.610) and 12 months (249AU*min [177-432] vs. 259AU*min [182-360], p = 0.678). Sensitivity analysis did not demonstrate any association of ticagrelor adherence with bleeding events and major adverse cardiovascular events. RIM, comprising 6 months of intensive coaching by nurse practitioners, did not improve adherence to the twice-a-day medication ticagrelor compared with SC among patients with AMI. A gradual decline in ticagrelor adherence over 12 months was observed despite 6 months of intensive coaching.