Glucose management team significantly improves glycaemic care and commitment to in-hospital guidelines within arthroplastic patients.

BACKGROUND: Perioperative dysglycaemias are a risk for harm but guidelines to improve glucose management are poorly adhered to. AIM: To determine whether a specialized team and diabetes education improves the implementation of guidelines and glucose values. METHODS: We conducted a prospective study of 611 nonselected, consecutive patients attending for elective hip or knee arthroplasty. The first 209 patients received conventional care and the following 402 patients received intervention (Acute Glucose Service, AGS) in two chronological groups; either perioperatively (AGS1) or also preoperatively (AGS2). The AGS-team provided diabetes education, identified the patients with diabetes risk and adjusted the medication when needed. Capillary plasma glucose (CPG) was repeatedly measured and glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) obtained before and after the surgery. The study objectives were to evaluate the staff actions when hyperglycaemia was severe (CPG >10 mmol/L), and to assess improvement of the glycaemic values and the complication rate within 3 months. RESULTS: None of the severely hyperglycaemic events in the reference group were treated according to guidelines. In the AGS 1 group, 50% and in the AGS2 group, 53% were appropriately managed (p < .001). The events of hyperglycaemia (CPG >7.8 mmol/L at least twice) and of severe hyperglycaemia (CPG >10 mmol/L) decreased in all patient groups. The medians of the highest, mean and variability of CPG values improved. The mean HbA1c improved significantly within AGS 2. There was no association between improved glycaemic care and early complications. CONCLUSIONS: AGS intervention significantly improves adherence to guidelines and glucose values.

Perioperative hyperglycaemia in elective arthroplasties. Should we do better?

BACKGROUND: Perioperative dysglycaemia is associated with deleterious outcomes but guidelines to improve glucose management are poorly or inconsistently adhered to. We evaluated glucose management among diabetic and non-diabetic patients undergoing elective hip or knee arthroplasty. METHODS: Capillary plasma glucose (CPG) was measured prospectively four times daily of 209 patients undergoing elective hip or knee surgery. Actions of the attending teams to CPG values and detection of patients at risk were analysed. RESULTS: A total of 209 patients were enrolled. All diabetic patients on insulin (6/6) had hyperglycaemia (≥7.8 mmol/l) more than twice and severe hyperglycaemia (>10 mmol/l) at least once. Of the 27 diabetic patients not on insulin 26 (96.3%) had CPG ≥ 7.8 mmol/l ≥ 2 times and 17 (63%) >10 mmol/l. The corresponding figures of the 176 non-diabetic patients were 137 (77.8%) and 61 (34.7%). Severe hyperglycaemia occurred in 54/176 (30.1%) of the non-diabetic patients with pre-operative HbA1c < 42 mmol/mol and random plasma glucose < 7.8 mmol/l. Of the 84 hyperglycaemic episodes > 10 mmol/l, none was treated. Patients with a FINDRISC score ≥ 12 (corresponding to moderate to high risk of diabetes) and hyperglycaemia went unnoticed. CONCLUSIONS: Hyperglycaemia is common among elective orthopaedic surgery patients with or without diabetes. More than 80% of the 209 patients had hyperglycaemia and 40% had severe hyperglycaemia. None of the patients was treated according to guidelines and none of the patients at risk of hyperglycaemia or diabetes was noticed. There is an obvious need for further education and support by diabetes specialists. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical trials, gov. NCT03306810.