Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Infants: Outcomes and Predictors of Mortality.

Background: Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (E-CPR) plays an indispensable role when resuscitation fails; however, extracorporeal life support (ECLS) in infants is different from that in adults. The objective of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of E-CPR in infants. Methods: A single-center retrospective study was conducted, analyzing 51 consecutive patients (age <1 year) who received E-CPR for in-hospital cardiac arrest between 2010 and 2021. Results: The median age and body weight was 51 days (interquartile range [IQR], 17-111 days) and 3.4 kg (IQR, 2.9-5.1 kg), respectively. The cause of arrest was cardiogenic in 45 patients (88.2%), and 48 patients (94.1%) had congenital cardiac anomalies. The median conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (C-CPR) time before the initiation of ECLS was 77 minutes (IQR, 61-103 minutes) and duration of ECLS was 7 days (IQR, 3-12 days). There were 36 in-hospital deaths (70.6%), and another patient survived after heart transplantation. In the multivariate analysis, single-ventricular physiology (odds ratio [OR], 5.05; p=0.048), open sternum status (OR, 8.69; p=0.013), and C-CPR time (OR, 1.47 per 10 minutes; p=0.021) were significant predictors of in-hospital mortality. In a receiver operating characteristic curve, the optimal cut-off of C-CPR time was 70.5 minutes. The subgroup with early E-CPR (C-CPR time <70.5 minutes) showed a tendency for lower in-hospital mortality tendency (54.5% vs. 82.8%, p=0.060), albeit not statistically significant. Conclusion: If resuscitation fails in an infant, E-CPR could be a life-saving option. It is crucial to improve C-CPR quality and shorten the time before ECLS initiation.

Left Coronary Ostial Obstruction by a Dislocated Sutureless Aortic Valve Prosthesis: Redo Aortic Valve Replacement with Hybrid Coronary Revascularization: A Case Report.

Coronary ostium obstruction due to dislodgement of the prosthetic valve is a rare and life-threatening complication, and particular caution is required for sutureless aortic valve replacement (AVR) with concomitant valvular surgery. In general, coronary artery bypass surgery is performed when coronary ostium obstruction occurs after AVR, but other options may need to be considered in some cases. Herein, we present a case of coronary artery occlusion in an 82-year-old female patient who had undergone AVR and mitral valve replacement for aortic valve stenosis and mitral valve stenosis at the age of 77 years. A hybrid procedure involving redo AVR and percutaneous coronary intervention after left main coronary ostium endarterectomy was performed. To summarize, we present a case of hybrid AVR in a patient with coronary artery obstruction after AVR that was successfully managed using this method.

Abrupt Bulla Formation by Visceral Pleural Detachment after Pulmonary Lobectomy: A Case Report.

Pulmonary bullae usually grow slowly and have thin walls. However, we have observed 2 cases of abrupt bulla formation immediately after lobectomy and during surgery. The pathologic findings of what can be called visceral pleural detachment are quite distinctive: these bullae had a broad base connected to the lung, and their walls were thick, including the full extent of visceral pleural and peripheral alveolar tissues, which suggests that the visceral pleura were detached from the distal alveoli. High transpleural pressure might be the key factor in the pathogenesis of this type of bulla, unlike previously known types of bullous lung disease.

Long-term Surgical Outcomes in Oligometastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A Single-Center Study.

Background: We reviewed the clinical outcomes of patients with oligometastatic (OM) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who received multimodal therapy including lung surgery. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 117 patients with OM NSCLC who underwent complete resection of the primary tumor from 2014 to 2017. Results: The median follow-up duration was 2.91 years (95% confidence interval, 1.48-5.84 years). The patients included 73 men (62.4%), and 76 patients (64.9%) were under the age of 65 years. Based on histology, 97 adenocarcinomas and 14 squamous cell carcinomas were included. Biomarker analysis revealed that 53 patients tested positive for epidermal growth factor receptor, anaplastic lymphoma kinase, or ROS1 mutations, while 36 patients tested negative. Metastases were detected in the brain in 74 patients, the adrenal glands in 12 patients, bone in 5 patients, vertebrae in 4 patients, and other locations in 12 patients. Radiation therapy for organ metastasis was performed in 81 patients and surgical resection in 27 patients. The 1-year overall survival (OS) rate in these patients was 82.8%, and the 3- and 5-year OS rates were 52.6% and 37.2%, respectively. Patients with positive biomarker test results had 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates of 98%, 64%, and 42.7%, respectively. These patients had better OS than those with negative biomarker test results (p=0.031). Patients aged ≤65 years and those with pT1-2 cancers also showed better survival (both p=0.008). Conclusion: Surgical resection of primary lung cancer is a viable treatment option for selected patients with OM NSCLC in the context of multimodal therapy.

Comparison of Long-Term Outcomes Between Minimally Invasive Pulmonary Resection With and Without Video-Assisted Mediastinoscopic Lymphadenectomy for Left-Sided Lung Cancer.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to assess the long-term outcomes of video-assisted mediastinoscopic lymphadenectomy (VAMLA) combined with video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) for left-sided lung cancer pulmonary resection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 1194 consecutive patients who underwent VATS anatomical resection for left-sided lung cancer between January 2007 and December 2016. Using propensity score-based inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW), perioperative outcomes and long-term survival outcomes were compared. RESULTS: Among 1194 patients, 295 (24.7%) underwent additional VAMLA (VATS + VAMLA group) and 899 patients (75.3%) underwent VATS only (VATS group). The proportion of patients with advanced N stage were higher in the VATS + VAMLA group (24.7%) than in the VATS group (18.3%). After IPTW adjustment, all baseline profiles between the two groups became similar. The long-term overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates were similar between the VATS + VAMLA group and the VATS group (5-year OS, 77.8% versus 79.3%, p = 0.957; 5-year RFS, 69.6% versus 70.1%, p = 0.498). However, among patients with borderline pulmonary function (FEV1 ≤ 60% or DLCO ≤ 60%), the VATS + VAMLA group (n = 23) had a better prognosis than the VATS group (n = 36) (5-year OS, 67.4% versus 46.7%, respectively; p = 0.047; 5-year RFS, 74.6% versus 53.5%, respectively; p = 0.027). CONCLUSIONS: VAMLA might be a good complement to VATS for left-sided lung cancer, wherein optimal mediastinal lymph node dissection is not feasible under one-lung ventilation, such as when patients have borderline pulmonary function.