Fusion and patient-reported outcomes after navigated decortication and direct arthrodesis in minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion using cylindrical threaded implants: a case series and literature review.

OBJECTIVE: Sacroiliac joint (SIJ) dysfunction is a significant cause of back pain. Despite recent advances in minimally invasive (MIS) SIJ fusion, the fusion rate remains controversial. This study sought to demonstrate that a navigated decortication and direct arthrodesis technique in MIS SIJ fusion would result in satisfactory fusion rates and patient-reported outcomes (PROs). METHODS: The authors retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients who underwent MIS SIJ fusion from 2018 to 2021. SIJ fusion was performed using cylindrical threaded implants and SIJ decortication employing the O-arm surgical imaging system and StealthStation. The primary outcome was fusion, evaluated using CT at 6, 9, and 12 months postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included revision surgery, time to revision surgery, visual analog scale (VAS) score for back pain, and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), measured preoperatively and 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Patient demographics and perioperative data were also collected. PROs over time were analyzed using ANOVA followed by a post hoc analysis. RESULTS: One hundred eighteen patients were included in this study. The mean (± SD) patient age was 58.56 ± 13.12 years, and most patients were female (68.6% vs 31.4% male). There were 19 smokers (16.1%) with an average BMI of 29.92 ± 6.73. One hundred twelve patients (94.9%) underwent successful fusion on CT. The ODI improved significantly from baseline to 6 months (Δ7.73, 95% CI 2.43-13.03, p = 0.002) and from baseline to 12 months (Δ7.54, 95% CI 1.65-13.43, p = 0.008). Similarly, VAS back pain scores improved significantly from baseline to 6 months (Δ2.31, 95% CI 1.07-3.56, p < 0.001) and from baseline to 12 months (Δ1.63, 95% CI 0.25-3.00, p = 0.015). CONCLUSIONS: MIS SIJ fusion with navigated decortication and direct arthrodesis was associated with a high fusion rate and significant improvement in disability and pain scores. Further prospective studies examining this technique are warranted.

Preventing Postoperative Urinary Retention (POUR) in Patients Undergoing Elective Lumbar Surgery: A Quality Improvement Project.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Postoperative urinary retention (POUR) is associated with significant morbidity. Our institution's POUR rate was elevated among patients undergoing elective lumbar spinal surgery. We sought to demonstrate that our quality improvement (QI) intervention would significantly lower our POUR rate and length of stay (LOS). METHODS: A resident-led QI intervention was implemented from October 2017 to 2018 on 422 patients in an academically affiliated community teaching hospital. This consisted of standardized intraoperative indwelling catheter utilization, postoperative catheterization protocol, prophylactic tamsulosin, and early ambulation after surgery. Baseline data on 277 patients were collected retrospectively from October 2015 to September 2016. Primary outcomes were POUR and LOS. The focus, analyze, develop, execute, and evaluate (FADE) model was used. Multivariable analyses were used. P value <.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: We analyzed 699 patients (277 pre-intervention vs 422 post-intervention). The POUR rate (6.9% vs 2.6%, Δ confidence interval [CI] 1.15-8.08, P = .007) and mean LOS (2.94 ± 1.87 days vs 2.56 ± 2.2 days, Δ CI 0.066-0.68, P = .017) were significantly improved following our intervention. Logistic regression demonstrated that the intervention was independently associated with significantly decreased odds for developing POUR (odds ratio [OR] = 0.38, CI 0.17-0.83, P = .015). Diabetes (OR = 2.25, CI 1.03-4.92, P = .04) and longer surgery duration (OR = 1.006, CI 1.002-1.01, P = .002) were independently associated with increased odds of developing POUR. CONCLUSIONS: After implementing our POUR QI project for patients undergoing elective lumbar spine surgery, the institutional POUR rate significantly decreased by 4.3% (62% reduction) and LOS, by 0.37 days. We demonstrated that a standardized POUR care bundle was independently associated with a significant decrease in the odds of developing POUR.

Women in Neurosurgery: A PRISMA-Compliant Systematic Review of Where We Stand and a Pilot Study on How to Move Forward.

BACKGROUND: Surgical specialties struggle to recruit women. In this study, the authors performed a systematic review to describe progress of women in neurosurgery and highlight areas where further research is needed. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were queried with "women in neurosurgery" OR "female neurosurgeon," and publications with empiric research were included. Bias was assessed on the basis of study designs. RESULTS: We found 127 papers, and 36 met inclusion criteria. Much of this research is recent-85% has been published within the past 3 years. These papers detail differences between genders and examine possible causes, but they do not test interventions to remedy inequities. The authors designed an intervention focusing on medical students' perceptions of gender issues within neurosurgery. A seminar was designed with 2 objectives: inform medical students about changes within neurosurgery and introduce them to a female neurosurgery attending who could serve as a potential future mentor. Student attitudes were assessed before and after the seminar by survey. Fourteen students completed both surveys: 10 females and 4 males. CONCLUSIONS: The 1-hour seminar significantly reduced the mean perceived difficulty to enter neurosurgery from 4.4 to 4.1 (P = 0.014); additionally, the mean perceived additional difficulty for career advancement faced by women in neurosurgery decreased from 3.6 to 2.8 (P = 0.026). Much research has gone into documenting the advancement and potential impediments for women in neurosurgery. Less research has tested solutions. Our pilot was small and susceptible to bias, but given that some results achieved significance, it merits more rigorous study.

Impact of Interspace Distraction on Fusion and Clinical Outcomes in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Longitudinal Cohort Study.

STUDY DESIGN: Longitudinal cohort study. PURPOSE: To determine the effect of change in interspace height on fusion and postoperative neck pain. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: The optimal height of a cervical interbody device (cage) in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is not well defined. In addition, the effect of interspace distraction on fusion and postoperative neck pain remains unclear. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of consecutive patients who underwent one- or two-level ACDF using polyetheretherketone cages by multiple surgeons from January 2015 to June 2016. We excluded patients younger than 18 years old, patients who had prior surgery at the same level (s), those with two-stage procedures, and those with less than 3 months of followup. Fusion was determined using the "Song" criteria. Ordinal regression was used to determine predictors of fusion. Patient-reported outcomes (PRO) were analyzed. RESULTS: We identified 323 consecutive patients. Twenty-two patients met the exclusion criteria. A total of 435 operative levels were included in the 301 remaining patients. Interspace fusion did not significantly vary by increasing interspace height with fusion rates between 76.2% and 82.8% at a mean follow-up of 17.9±12.6 months. The effect of an increase in interspace height and neck pain PRO was available for 163 patients who underwent one-level ACDF at a mean follow-up period of 16.2±13.1 months. We found no significant difference in fusion rate or neck pain score with increasing interspace height from 1 to 8 mm. Ordinal regression demonstrated no significant predictors of fusion. CONCLUSIONS: Interspace distraction from 1 to 8 mm did not result in significantly different pseudarthrosis rates or postoperative neck pain.

The effect of ketorolac on posterior minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: an interim analysis from a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Postoperative pain control following posterior lumbar fusion continues to be challenging and often requires high doses of opioids for pain relief. The use of ketorolac in spinal fusion is limited due to the risk of pseudarthrosis. However, recent literature suggests it may not affect fusion rates with short-term use and low doses. PURPOSE: We sought to demonstrate noninferiority regarding fusion rates in patients who received ketorolac after undergoing minimally invasive (MIS) posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Additionally, we sought to demonstrate ketorolac's opioid-sparing effect on analgesia in the immediate postoperative period. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: This is a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. We are reporting our interim analysis. PATIENT SAMPLE: Adults with degenerative spinal conditions eligible to undergo a one to three-level MIS transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). OUTCOME MEASURES: Six-month and 1-year radiographic fusion as determined by Suk criteria, postoperative opioid consumption as measured by intravenous milligram morphine equivalent, length of stay, and drug-related complications. Self-reported and functional measures include validated visual analog scale, short-form 12, and Oswestry Disability Index. METHODS: A double-blinded, randomized placebo-controlled, noninferiority trial of patients undergoing 1- to 3-level MIS TLIF was performed with bone morphogenetic protein (BMP). Patients were randomized to receive a 48-hour scheduled treatment of either intravenous ketorolac (15 mg every 6 hours) or saline in addition to a standardized pain regimen. The primary outcome was fusion. Secondary outcomes included 48-hour and total postoperative opioid use demonstrated as milligram morphine equivalence, pain scores, length of stay (LOS), and quality-of-life outcomes. Univariate analyses were performed. The present study provides results from a planned interim analysis. RESULTS: Two hundred and forty-six patients were analyzed per protocol. Patient characteristics were comparable between the groups. There was no significant difference in 1-year fusion rates between the two treatments (p=.53). The difference in proportion of solid fusion between the ketorolac and placebo groups did not reach inferiority (p=.072, 95% confidence interval, -.07 to .21). There was a significant reduction in total/48-hour mean opioid consumption (p<.001) and LOS (p=.001) for the ketorolac group while demonstrating equivalent mean pain scores in 48 hours postoperative (p=.20). There was no significant difference in rates of perioperative complications. CONCLUSIONS: Short-term use of low-dose ketorolac in patients who have undergone MIS TLIF with BMP demonstrated noninferior fusion rates. Ketorolac safely demonstrated a significant reduction in postoperative opioid use and LOS while maintaining equivalent postoperative pain control.

Surgical and clinical efficacy of minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion surgery: a meta-analysis protocol.

INTRODUCTION: Sacroiliac joint (SIJ) dysfunction has been shown to cause significant morbidity. Current treatment includes conservative management and surgical intervention. Previously published data reporting clinical and surgical outcomes reached conflicting conclusions. This protocol aims to conduct a meta-analysis to determine fusion rates and patient-reported outcomes of minimally invasive (MIS) SIJ fusions compared with conservative treatment. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We drafted our protocol according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols guidelines. We will search PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library, supplemented by manual search when necessary. Two independent reviewers will screen for eligibility by title/abstract, then full text, arbitrated by a third reviewer if necessary. The two reviewers will carry out a risk of bias assessment using the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias tool for randomised controlled trial and the Methodological Index for Non-Randomised Studies tool for observational cohort studies. A third reviewer will arbitrate any disagreement. We will perform data synthesis using Review Manager (RevMan for Windows, V.5.4.1, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2020) and Comprehensive Meta-Analysis (V.3.3.070). Meta-bias will be evaluated and confidence determined using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation guidelines. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval for this review will not be required as no patient data is being collected. The results of this study will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021273481.

Encapsulated Intracerebral Hematoma Presenting as Cerebral Abscess.

Chronic encapsulated intracerebral hematoma is a rare pathology which may present after spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) or radiosurgery for arteriovenous malformations. A 66-year-old male presented with recent diagnosis of cerebrovascular accident (CVA) status post-treatment with tissue plasminogen activator and mechanical thrombectomy. His recent diagnoses included infective endocarditis, septic bacteremia, meningitis, and aspiration pneumonia. One month following his CVA, the patient presented with delayed altered mental status. In the setting of increasing lethargy, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging of the brain were performed, which suggested a brain abscess, septic emboli, and ventriculitis. The patient was taken to surgery emergently. Intraoperatively, the patient was found to have an encapsulated mass of liquid consistency. Tissue pathology demonstrated ischemic cortical tissue and hemorrhage. Multiple cultures were negative for growth. The patient was ultimately determined to have an encapsulated intracerebral hematoma. Encapsulated intracerebral hematoma should be a part of the differential diagnosis when presented with a brain abscess in the setting of a patient who is at risk of ICH.

Patient Satisfaction with Neurosurgery Telemedicine Visits During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic: A Prospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Telemedicine refers to various modalities for remote care, including telephone calls, imaging review, and real-time video teleconferencing visits. Although it has not been widely used in outpatient neurosurgery settings, the COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) pandemic has necessitated a broader adoption. Our goal is to show the level of patient satisfaction with their telemedicine care. METHODS: We prospectively studied consecutive telemedicine patients who scheduled outpatient neurosurgery visits from May 15 to June 8, 2020. Patients were seen by the surgeon via real-time video conferencing using Google Meet, and then completed a telemedicine satisfaction survey. Our primary outcome was telemedicine satisfaction scores. We compared satisfaction scores between new and established patients and between patients within and outside of a 15-mile radius of the nearest clinic location. Sensitivity analyses were performed to account for the nonrespondents. Descriptive and univariate analyses were performed. A P value of <0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Five-hundred and ninety patients completed a telemedicine visit during the study period. One patient from out of state was excluded. Three-hundred and ten patients (52.6%) responded. The average age was 60.9 ± 13.60 years; 59% were female, 20.6% were new patients; the average distance to the clinic was 28.03 ± 36.09 km (17.42 ± 22.43 miles). The mean overall satisfaction score was 6.32 ± 1.27. Subgroup analyses by new/established patient status and distance from their home to the clinic showed no significant difference in mean satisfaction scores between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Telemedicine provided a viable and satisfactory option for neurosurgical patients in the outpatient setting during the COVID-19 pandemic.

The Impact of Intraoperative Local Ketorolac on Opioid Use in the Management of Postoperative Pain in Thoracolumbar Spinal Fusions: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: The United States is facing an opioid addiction epidemic with >63,600 deaths from drug overdoses in 2016 alone. Ketorolac is a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug that has been shown to decrease postoperative pain in decompressive lumbar laminectomies. We sought to demonstrate that intraoperative intramuscular (IM) ketorolac is associated with decreased opioid use in the management of acute postoperative pain in thoracolumbar spinal fusions. METHODS: A retrospective review of consecutive patients undergoing open and minimally invasive (MIS) thoracolumbar fusions between 2017 and 2018. Ketorolac (30 mg) was injected into the paraspinal muscles adjacent to the operative site before closure. Patients were placed on a standard pain control regimen. All demographic and surgical data were assessed with univariate analysis to assess for differences between groups. Univariate analysis was used to identify significant covariates for the linear regressions with postoperative morphine equivalents, length of stay (LOS), and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain as dependent variables. A P < .025 was considered significant to account for multiple covariates. RESULTS: Two hundred twenty-five consecutive patients were included with 58 patients receiving intraoperative IM ketorolac. The average age of the ketorolac groups was 63.4 years (23-87 years) with an even distribution between genders. There was no significant difference in demographic or surgical data between the 2 cohorts. Postoperative opioid use, when corrected for LOS, showed no significance between cohorts, ketorolac 16.4 mg (95% confidence interval [CI]: 12.3-20.5) and nonketorolac 6.7 mg (95% CI: 14.1-19.4, P = .8729). Other than postoperative day zero VAS (P = .05), ketorolac was not a predictor of opioid use, LOS, or VAS. CONCLUSION: The use of a single dose of intraoperative IM ketorolac did not decrease the overall opioid requirements or shorten the LOS following open or MIS lumbar fusions. However, we did demonstrate benefit in early pain control, which makes this promising for further investigation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This article promotes attention to the opioid crisis and the need for multimodal nonopioid based pain management in spine surgery.

Elderly as a Predictor for Perioperative Complications in Patients Undergoing Multilevel Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Regression Modeling Study.

STUDY DESIGN: This was a single-institute retrospective study. OBJECTIVE: To describe perioperative and postoperative complications in elderly who underwent multilevel minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF) while identifying predictors of complications. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The number of elderly patients undergoing spinal fusion is rising. Spinal surgery in the elderly is considered high risk with high rates of complications. Perioperative and postoperative complications in elderly undergoing multilevel MIS TLIF is, however, not known. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on 467 consecutive patients who underwent multilevel MIS TLIF at a single institution from 2013 to 2017. Two cohorts, 70 years or older and 50 to 69 years old were analyzed. Multiple logistic regressions with minor and major complication rates as the dependent variables were performed to identify predictors of complication based on previously cited risk factors. A p-value of 0.008 or less was considered significant. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-two elderly and 315 nonelderly patients underwent multilevel MIS TLIFs. The average age was 76.4 and 60.4 years for the elderly and nonelderly cohorts. We observed 13 major (8.44%) and 72 minor (47.4%) complications in the elderly. No difference was noted in complication rates between the cohorts, except for urinary tract infection (P = .004) and urinary retention (P = .014). There were no myocardial infarctions; hardware complications; visceral, vascular, and neural injuries; or death. Length of stay, comorbidity, and length of surgery were predictive of major and minor complications. CONCLUSION: Elderly may undergo multilevel MIS TLIF with comparable complication rates. Age was not a predictor of complications. Rather, attention should focus on evaluation of comorbidity and limiting operative times. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Big Cat Coalitions: A Comparative Analysis of Regional Brain Volumes in Felidae.

Broad-based species comparisons across mammalian orders suggest a number of factors that might influence the evolution of large brains. However, the relationship between these factors and total and regional brain size remains unclear. This study investigated the relationship between relative brain size and regional brain volumes and sociality in 13 felid species in hopes of revealing relationships that are not detected in more inclusive comparative studies. In addition, a more detailed analysis was conducted of four focal species: lions (Panthera leo), leopards (Panthera pardus), cougars (Puma concolor), and cheetahs (Acinonyx jubatus). These species differ markedly in sociality and behavioral flexibility, factors hypothesized to contribute to increased relative brain size and/or frontal cortex size. Lions are the only truly social species, living in prides. Although cheetahs are largely solitary, males often form small groups. Both leopards and cougars are solitary. Of the four species, leopards exhibit the most behavioral flexibility, readily adapting to changing circumstances. Regional brain volumes were analyzed using computed tomography. Skulls (n = 75) were scanned to create three-dimensional virtual endocasts, and regional brain volumes were measured using either sulcal or bony landmarks obtained from the endocasts or skulls. Phylogenetic least squares regression analyses found that sociality does not correspond with larger relative brain size in these species. However, the sociality/solitary variable significantly predicted anterior cerebrum (AC) volume, a region that includes frontal cortex. This latter finding is despite the fact that the two social species in our sample, lions and cheetahs, possess the largest and smallest relative AC volumes, respectively. Additionally, an ANOVA comparing regional brain volumes in four focal species revealed that lions and leopards, while not significantly different from one another, have relatively larger AC volumes than are found in cheetahs or cougars. Further, female lions possess a significantly larger AC volume than conspecific males; female lion values were also larger than those of the other three species (regardless of sex). These results may reflect greater complexity in a female lion's social world, but additional studies are necessary. These data suggest that within family comparisons may reveal variations not easily detected by broad comparative analyses.