The effect of vitamin D status on different neuromuscular blocker agents reverse time

Background/aim: This study is aimed to investigate the effects of vitamin D levels on sugammadex and neostigmine reversal times. Material and methods: Eighty patients between the ages of 18 and 65 years, with ASA I-III status who were undergoing surgery under general anesthesia were included in the study. A double blind fashion was used to randomly divide all the patients into two groups. At the end of the operation, sugammadex 2 mg/kg was administered to one group (Group sugammadex) and atropine and neostigmine was administered to the other group (Group neostigmine) intravenously. In the data analysis stage, the group was divided into two subgroups according to sugammadex and group neostigmine in itself, with vitamin D levels above and below 30 ng/mL. Statistical analysis was performed on these 4 groups (Group neostigmine and vitamin D < 30 ng/mL), (Group neostigmine and vitamin D ≥ 30 ng/mL), ( Group sugammadex and vitamin D < 30 ng/mL), (Group sugammadex and vitamin D ≥ 30 ng/mL). When two responses to train of four (TOF) stimulation were taken, the following times were recorded until extubation phase. The time until TOF value 50%, 70%, 90%, and extubation were recorded. Results: There were statistically significant differences between Group sugammadex and vitamin D < 30 ng/mL and Group sugammadex and vitamin D ≥ 30 ng/mL (P = 0.007) for extubation times and 50% TOF reach times (P = 0.015). However, there was no difference observed between Group neostigmine and vitamin D < 30 ng/mL and Group neostigmine and vitamin D ≥ 30 ng/mL (P = 0.999). Conclusion: Vitamin D deficiency is important for anesthesiologists in terms of muscle strength and extubation time. Vitamin D deficiency seems to affect sugammadex reverse times but seems not to affect neostigmine reverse times. This conclusion needs further studies.

Tramadol and levobupivacaine wound infiltration at cesarean delivery for postoperative analgesia.

PURPOSE: The aim of the present study was to investigate whether levobupivacaine and tramadol wound infiltration decreases postoperative pain following Cesarean section and reduces the need for analgesics in the immediate post-delivery period. METHODS: Ninety patients (aged 18-40 years) scheduled for elective Cesarean section under general anesthesia were randomly allocated to one of the three groups: the placebo group (group P) received 20 mL local wound infiltration with 0.9 % saline solution; the levobupivacaine group (group L) received 20 mL local wound infiltration with levobupivacaine 0.25 %; and the tramadol group (group T) received 20 mL local wound infiltration with 1.5 mg/kg tramadol within 0.9 % saline solution. Following the closure of the uterine incision and the rectus fascia, 20 mL solution was infiltrated subcutaneously along the skin wound edges. The primary outcome was 24-h tramadol consumption. Secondary outcomes were recorded VAS scores, diclofenac requirement, fever, vomiting, and wound infection. RESULTS: At 15 min postoperatively, VAS values were lower in groups T and L than group P (P = 0.0001). The mean 24-h tramadol consumption was lowest in group T (P = 0.0001) and it was lower in the group L compared to group P (P = 0.007) (401.6, 483.3, and 557.5 mg for T, L, and P groups, respectively). There was no difference among groups regarding the need for supplemental analgesia (rescue diclofenac doses) (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that wound infiltration with tramadol and levobupivacaine in patients having Cesarean section under general anesthesia may be a good choice for postoperative analgesia.