Does coronavirus disease 2019 affect peripheral and central auditory systems? Matched group cross-sectional study and six-month follow up.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the peripheral-to-central auditory systems of people with coronavirus disease 2019 to a well-matched control group and examine the long-term effects of coronavirus disease 2019 on the auditory system. METHOD: Participants who were outpatients of coronavirus disease 2019 (n = 30) were compared with a well-matched control group (n = 30). Behavioural and electrophysiological tests were performed, and tests were repeated at six months in the coronavirus disease 2019 group. RESULTS: Statistically significant differences were observed in the right ear at 10 kHz (p = 0.007) and 12.5 kHz (p = 0.028), and in the left ear at 10 kHz (p = 0.040) and 12.5 kHz (p = 0.040) between groups. The groups had no difference regarding the other audiological test results (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Extended high-frequency thresholds were affected in the coronavirus disease 2019 patients. No other findings indicated that the peripheral-to-central auditory system was affected. The effect on extended high-frequency thresholds appeared permanent, but no clinically significant new, late-onset auditory system effects were observed.

Comparison of 300 mg versus 600 mg daily maintenance doses of aspirin treatment after desensitization in N-ERD: A three-year multicentre experience.

Background: Aspirin treatment after desensitization (ATAD) is effective in preventing nasal polyps recurrence as well as respiratory symptoms in patients with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)-exacerbated respiratory diseases (N-ERD). However, there is no consensus on effective daily maintenance doses in ATAD. Therefore, we aimed to compare the effects of two different maintenance doses of aspirin on clinical outcomes for 1-3 years of ATAD. Methods: This was a retrospective, multicenter study that involved four tertiary centers. The maintenance doses of daily aspirin were 300 mg in one center and 600 mg in the remaining three. The data of patients who were on ATAD for 1-3 years were included. Study outcomes (nasal surgeries, sinusitis, asthma attacks, hospitalization, oral corticosteroid use, and medication uses) were assessed in a standardized way and recorded from case files. Results: The study initially included 125 subjects, 38 and 87 were receiving 300 and 600 mg daily aspirin for ATAD, respectively. Number of nasal polyp surgeries decreased after 1 -3 years compared with before ATAD in both groups (group 1, baseline: 0.44 ± 0.07 versus first year: 0.08 ± 0.05; p < 0.001 and baseline: 0.44 ± 0.07 versus 3rd year: 0.01 ± 0.01; p < 0.001; and group 2, baseline 0.42 ± 0.03 versus first year: 0.02 ± 0.02; p < 0.001 and baseline: 0.42 ± 0.03 versus 3rd year: 0.07 ± 0.03; p < 0.001). Conclusion: Given the comparable effects of 300 mg and 600 mg aspirin daily as maintenance treatment of ATAD on both asthma and sinonasal outcomes in N-ERD, our results suggest using 300 mg of aspirin daily in ATAD owing to its better safety profile.

Aspirin desensitization following endoscopic sinus surgery is effective in patients with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug exacerbated respiratory disease.

INTRODUCTION: Aspirin desensitization (AD) is effective in relieving asthma and sinonasal outcomes in patients with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)-exacerbated respiratory disease (N-ERD). So far, only a limited number of studies evaluated the effect of AD prospectively in a controlled manner in N-ERD. It is also a current approach to recommend endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) before AD. This study aimed to prospectively document the clinical effects of AD for 1 year in patients with N-ERD who underwent ESS in the presence of a control group. METHODS: The study included patients with N-ERD who underwent AD (group 1, n = 22) and patients with N-ERD in whom desensitization was indicated but was not performed (group 2, n = 21). All patients had ESS before enrollment in the study. Asthma and rhinosinusitis outcomes were assessed at baseline and after 1 year. RESULTS: The study included a total of 43 subjects (F/M:28/15, mean age: 44.7 ± 2.8 years). Fewer patients had nasal polyp recurrency in group 1 (5/22, 22.7%) than in group 2 (11/21, 52.3%) at the end of the first year (p = 0.035). Smell-test scores were preserved only in group 1 after 1 year. There were significant decreases in the use of both asthma and nasal medications only in group 1. CONCLUSION: Our results strongly support the use of AD for the improvement of both nasal and asthmatic outcomes in patients with N-ERD for 1 year. We also recommend patients undergo ESS before AD. Further controlled studies are necessary to evaluate whether this effect lasts longer.

Outcomes of Treatment of Multicanal Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo by Means of TRV Chair.

INTRODUCTION: Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) is one of the most common causes of peripheral vertigo and can manifest in different forms. Multicanal BPPV is rare and difficult to treat. TRV Chair is a method that offers diagnosis and treatment at the same time. The aim was to analyze the outcomes of treatment of multicanal BPPV by means of TRV Chair and compare those results with manual maneuvers. METHODS: Forty-nine subjects aged 26-73 and diagnosed with multicanal BPPV were included. Appropriate maneuvers were performed on affected canals either by TRV Chair or manually. The number of maneuvers required by TRV Chair and manual maneuver were analyzed and compared. RESULTS: The mean number of maneuvers performed until the treatment was completed in manual treatment group was 2.57 ± 1.03, and in TRV group, it was 2.25 ± 1.16. No significant difference was observed between the number of maneuvers performed in either group until the end of the treatment (p > 0.05). DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS: Neither TRV Chair nor manual maneuvers were superior to the other in the treatment of multicanal BPPV cases.

Preference and Perception of Enhanced Images During Endonasal Endoscopic Surgery.

Image enhancement is used widely in endoscopic sinonasal surgery. It is yet to be established whether image enhancement has advantages over white-light endoscopy. The authors aimed to evaluate the preferences and subjective visual perception of image enhancement in diagnostic images acquired at the beginning of endonasal endoscopic surgeries. An online survey consisting of 12 endoscopic images, 4 enhanced with Clara mode, 4 enhanced with Chroma mode, and 4 enhanced with Clara+Chroma mode, was distributed. The enhanced images were randomly presented with nonenhanced white-light images. These images were captured at the beginning of endonasal endoscopic surgeries for septal perforation, septal deviation, and chronic rhinosinusitis. Survey respondents (n = 205) included 81 otorhinolaryngologists, 94 other specialty physicians (35 endoscopy/laparoscopy users and 59 nonusers), and 30 nonmedical image experts. They were asked to choose superior images according to brightness, contrast and sharpness, depth of field, and overall preference. A quantitative study was also conducted to evaluate different enhancement modes. The authors found that Clara enhanced brightness and Chroma enhanced contrast and sharpness significantly (P < 0.001). Overall, 91.8% chose Clara and 91.7% chose Clara+Chroma-enhanced images for brightness enhancement. For contrast and sharpness, 87% chose Clara+Chroma and 86.7% chose Chroma. There was no significant difference between perception scores among the groups. Our survey group showed a significantly high overall preference for enhanced images. This preference was independent of profession or experience, but closely related to the quantitative enhancement of the specific mode. Continuous use of image enhancement in endonasal surgery may have advantages over white-light endoscopy.

How Often Does Isolated Sphenoid Sinus Disease Turn Out to be a Neoplasm?

Isolated sphenoid sinus disease (ISSD) describes a wide spectrum of pathologies including inflammatory, vascular, bony dysplastic, and neoplastic diseases. The aim of this study was to assess the frequency with which a neoplastic process was diagnosed in patients of ISSD and patient management strategies. A retrospective analysis was conducted for all ISSD patients who underwent surgery between January 2005 and January 2014 at a tertiary center. The clinical characteristics, radiologic studies, operative findings, endoscopic surgical techniques, pathology results, and treatment outcomes of the patients were analyzed. In all, 42 patients (31 women and 11 men) were included in the study. Histopathologic examinations revealed that 10 patients (23.4%) had neoplasms (8 benign and 2 malignant), 19 (45.2%) had mucocele, 7 (16.7%) had fungal disease, and 6 (14.3%) had meningoencephalocele and cerebrospinal fluid leakage. With the exception of 2 patients with plasmacytoma, complete removal of the lesions was achieved in all patients using transnasal or transethmoidal endoscopic approaches, and no local recurrences were observed during the mean follow-up period of 42 months. More than one fifth of the patients with ISSD were diagnosed with neoplasms. The results indicated that endonasal endoscopic approaches could effectively help manage patients with ISSD lesions, including those that were neoplastic. It is clear that precaution during preoperative planning is imperative to avoid unexpected situations and complications that may put surgeons in a difficult position during surgery.

Immunoserologic pepsin detection in the saliva as a non-invasive rapid diagnostic test for laryngopharyngeal reflux.

BACKGROUND: The most common tool for the diagnosis of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) is still 24-hours esophageal pH monitoring; there is lack of non-invasive, less expensive and accurate diagnostic tools for this frequent disease. AIMS: To evaluate the accuracy of immunoserologic pepsin detection in the saliva for the diagnosis of LPR. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: A two channeled 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring catheter was placed in patients with a suspicion of LPR. During the 24-hour period, each patient gave one sample of sputum for the immunoserologic pepsin detection test. Pathologic gastroesophageal reflux (GER) findings, LPR findings, pH score in the proximal and distal probes when the sputum sample was given were recorded. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of the pepsin detection test were analyzed and compared to pH monitoring scores. RESULTS: The study group consisted of 20 patients who met the criteria. A positive pepsin detection test was elicited from 6 patients. The sensitivity and specificity of the pepsin detection test was 33% and 100%, respectively. A positive predictive value of 100% was recorded. When the pH results of the pepsin positive patients (PPP) and the rest of the study group in the proximal probe at the sample time were compared, the PPP had an apparent acidic pH value compared to the pepsin negative patients (pH: 3.26 for the PPP, pH: 6.81 for the pepsin negative patients). CONCLUSION: Pepsin detection in the saliva is a recent method and becoming increasingly popular. Because of the benefits and ease of application, a positive salivary pepsin test in a patient suspected of having LPR can be a cost effective, accurate and alternative diagnostic method. Increasing the daily number of sputum samples may increase the sensitivity of the test.

Hidden unilateral agenesis of the frontal sinus: human cadaver study of a potential surgical pitfall.

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to attract attention to the surgical significance of unilateral agenesis of the frontal sinus hidden by the overlapping expansion of the contralateral sinus toward the agenetic side. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective review of endoscopic transnasal sinus dissections of 55 human cadavers (42, formalin fixated; 13, fresh frozen) was done in a tertiary care academic medical center. Surgical and radiologic findings were noted. RESULTS: Absence of right frontal sinus ostium in the presence of a connection between the right and left frontal sinuses was demonstrated in 2 (3.6%) cadavers. An absent and an incomplete septum between the frontal sinuses were also noted in these cadavers. No accompanying abnormality of other sinuses was found, and no evidence of previous sinus surgery was noted in these 2 cadavers. CONCLUSIONS: If one of the frontal sinus ostia cannot be found during sinus surgery, although this sinus and its recess can be seen on the thick-sliced coronal computed tomographic (CT) scans, keep in mind that it may be (3.6%) an agenetic frontal sinus hidden by the extensive pneumatization of the contralateral sinus that is crossing the midline. It may not be possible to foresee this variant preoperatively by endoscopic examinations or thick-sliced CT scans. If there is suspicion, thin-sliced CT scans with reconstruction will be ideal to confirm the agenesis of the frontal sinus and to avoid complications. In the presence of such variant of frontal sinus, 1-sided successful frontal sinusotomy is adequate because this sinus or cell will already be drained through the treated frontal recess.

Demographic, epidemiologic, and surgical characteristics of maxillofacial fracture repair in a developing country.

We conducted a retrospective epidemiologic study to assess demographic data and characteristics of the etiology and management of maxillofacial fractures treated by surgery in Ankara, Turkey, over a 6-year period. We studied 293 maxillofacial fractures in 167 adults-122 men and 45 women (ratio: 2.7:1), aged 17 to 76 years (mean: 33.8). In addition to demographic and etiologic data, study parameters included the time of day, day of the week, and month of the year that the injury had been sustained; the site of the fracture; the length of time between the accident and surgery; and the specific treatment modality. Of the 293 fractures, 177 were midface fractures (60%), 102 were mandibular fractures (35%), and 14 were frontal fractures (5%). The most common causes were motor vehicle accidents (67%), fights/assaults (20%), and falls (9%). Half of all patients were injured on a weekend (including Friday night), and more than half of all patients had been injured from September through December. The most common midface fractures were maxillary fractures (37%), and the most common mandibular fractures were fractures in the symphysis/parasymphysis area (36%). Surgery was performed an average of 6 days following the injury. Open reduction with internal rigid fixation was the choice of treatment for most (82%) fractures. We believe that studies of the demographic and epidemiologic characteristics of maxillofacial fractures in different countries may help guide surgeons in the management of these injuries.

The clinical value of pharyngeal pH monitoring using a double-probe, triple-sensor catheter in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the clinical value of pharyngeal pH monitoring for the diagnosis of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) by using a double-probe, triple-sensor catheter in patients with symptoms of LPR. DESIGN: Prospective review of pH values recorded at the pharyngeal sensor, with the sensor placed in the proximal esophagus in patients with suspected LPR. SETTING: Tertiary care university hospital. PATIENTS: Thirty-three consecutive patients with symptoms of LPR. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: A pH test result was considered abnormal if a single reflux episode was detected in the hypopharynx and if, in the proximal esophagus, the total percentage of time the pH value was below 4 was 1.0% or higher. Data obtained from sensors were compared to determine the validity of pharyngeal sensor. Correlation between patients' reflux finding scores, reflux finding indexes, and reflux episodes were analyzed. RESULTS: Of 33 patients, 17 had more than 1 reflux episode detected by the pharyngeal sensor and 19 had pathological reflux detected by the proximal esophageal sensor. Four patients who had pharyngeal reflux had a normal esophageal acid exposure time, and 6 patients who had pathological reflux detected by the proximal esophageal sensor did not experienced any pharyngeal reflux episode. Four patients would have had a false-negative test result and 6 subjects would have had a false-positive test result if a hypopharyngeal pH sensor was not implemented. CONCLUSIONS: The adjustable, bifurcated, triple-sensor pH probe allows identifying true hypopharyngeal reflux episodes. If single-probe, double-sensor pH monitoring is to be performed, the proximal probe should be placed in the pharynx, not in the upper esophagus.

Is laryngopharyngeal reflux an important risk factor in the development of laryngeal carcinoma?

Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) as a causative irritating factor in the development of laryngeal carcinoma has been suggested. However, the association between LPR and laryngeal carcinoma remains unclear. The aim of this study was to compare the prevalence and severity of reflux between patients with laryngeal carcinoma and clinical LPR. The intention was to find out if a correlation exists between the laryngeal findings and the level of acid reflux. The study population consisted of 29 patients with laryngeal cancer (group I), 33 LPR patients with normal laryngeal findings (group II) and 70 LPR patients with related laryngeal pathology (group III). The results of 24-h, double-channel ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring were analyzed comparing the three groups. The occurrence and severity of abnormal acid reflux at the upper and lower esophageal segments were evaluated. The incidence of LPR or gastroesophageal reflux (GER) did not vary in any of the three groups (LPR was present in 62, 42 and 56% of the patients, while GER was present in 45, 24 and 37% of the patients, respectively). Patients with LPR or GER from the three groups did not differ significantly in terms of the number of acid reflux episodes and percentage of times when the pH was <4. Our data do not support the hypothesis that LPR can be an independent risk factor in the development of larynx cancers. However, the data also do not thoroughly exclude the possibility. The reason why LPR leads to variable pathologies in the larynx may be uncovered by studies probing the differences between patients via detailed examinations of the local anti-reflux barriers such as epithelial morphology and functions.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease: symptoms versus pH monitoring results.

OBJECTIVES: The reason why some patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) have symptoms of upper aerodigestive system irritation, while others mainly have gastroenterologic symptoms, is not well established. This retrospective case series study was designed to examine the existence of a correlation between symptoms and reflux characteristics, based on data obtained from esophageal pH monitoring. METHODS: The study population consisted of 139 patients; 97 patients presented with laryngopharyngeal symptoms of GERD, including unexplained hoarseness, throat clearing, chronic cough, laryngospasm, globus, throat pain, and 42 patients presented with gastroenterologic symptoms, including heartburn and regurgitation. The results of 24-hour, double-channel ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring were analyzed comparing 2 symptom groups. The incidence of abnormal acid reflux at the upper and lower esophageal segments and the effects of upright and supine positions on reflux parameters were evaluated. RESULTS: The incidence of laryngopharyngeal reflux was significantly higher in the laryngopharyngeal symptom group than in the other (52% versus 38%). The patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux from both groups showed no significant differences in terms of number of acid reflux episodes, percentage of times pH was 4, and esophageal acid clearance. Upright and supine parameters did not show significant differences between the patient groups. Upright acid reflux episodes were, however, common in both groups at the lower esophageal and laryngopharyngeal segments. CONCLUSION: Recent studies suggesting that otolaryngologic patients commonly show upright, daytime reflux with normal esophageal clearance and that typical GERD patients commonly have supine, nocturnal reflux with prolonged esophageal clearance are not supported by this study. This study indicates that acid reflux parameters and positional changes are not sufficient to explain why patients with GERD experience different symptoms. The regional symptoms of GERD may be attributed to the impairment of epithelial resistance, motor activity, and buffering systems for the esophageal antireflux barrier.