The Association Between Atherogenic Index of Plasma and No-Reflow Phenomenon in Acute Coronary Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: The atherogenic index of plasma (AIP) is a biomarker of plasma atherogenicity. Elevated AIP is linked with adverse cardiac events. We sought to examine the association of admission AIP and no-reflow phenomenon (NRP) in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patient population treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS: Eight hundred eight-four ACS patients were included to statistical tests retrospectively and classified according to the occurrence of NRP: NRP (-) (n = 662) and NRP (+) (n = 186). AIP levels were calculated through the formula log10 (triglyceride-to-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio). RESULTS: AIP levels were higher in NRP (+) patients compared to NRP (-) group patients. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis for AIP to predict NRP yielded an area under the ROC curve value 0.643 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.596-0.690, P <.001]. AIP was associated with NRP in univariate logistic regression analysis [Odds Ratio (OR): 2.46; P =.001; CI: 1.44 (lower limit)-4.21 (upper limit)]. However, AIP did not emerge as a significant prognostic factor of NRP in multiple logistic regression analysis [OR: 2.11; P =.422; CI: 0.34 (lower limit)-13.11 (upper limit)]. On the other hand, peak troponin T (log10) was an independent prognostic factor for NRP [OR: 0.13; P <.001; CI: 0.10 (lower limit)-0.37 (upper limit)] occurrence. CONCLUSION: The AIP level on admission is not a statistically significant prognostic factor of NRP. However, peak troponin T (log10) is an independent prognostic parameter of NRP.

Disaster area triage in the first 24 h of earthquakes, evaluation of pre-hospital and hospital procedures: 6.6 Elazig earthquake.

BACKGROUND: Earthquakes are natural events, but the destruction they cause is quite high. Since it is not possible to prevent an earthquake, it is necessary to raise conscious and sensitive individuals about earthquakes and to seek solutions. It was aimed to present the triage, consumables, fluids, and drugs used in the 2020 Elazig earthquake. METHODS: After the earthquake, the epicenter of which was Sivrice/Elazig on January 24, 2020, all affected victims, pre-hospital triage status, management of emergency, and other inpatient services during the hospitalization, medical interventions including sur-geries, consumables, fluids, and drugs were evaluated retrospectively with the data in the first 24 h. RESULTS: The total number of injured after the earthquake in Elazig, which had a magnitude of 6.6 on the Richter scale and lasted for 22 s, was 974. While 37 (3.7%) people died, 18 (1.8%) of them were women. While 34 people died in the wreckage and 3 people in the emergency department, their mean age was 46.0±12.5 years. While 654 patients were registered in the first 24 h, 30 of them were by 112 Command and Control Center and 624 were outpatients. Temporary registration was provided to 320 people as they did not have their identity information. CONCLUSION: Being prepared and organized before an earthquake, and taking early intervention will provide significant success in the survival of the disaster victims.