Investigation of treatment continuity, usefulness, and nocebo effect in switching from the original etanercept to its biosimilar in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A JET observational study in Japanese clinical practice.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the usefulness and onset of nocebo effects after switching from the original etanercept (ETN) to a biosimilar (BS) in routine clinical practice at rheumatology clinics in Japan (13 sites). METHODS: A total of 165 patients (87.0% women, age = 57.88 ± 15.07 years, and disease duration = 10.32 ± 7.71 years), whose low disease activity was maintained with the original ETN for ≥12 weeks, and who agreed to switch treatment to its BS, were included. The end-points were disease activity score 28 (DAS28)-C-reactive protein and DAS28-erythrocyte sedimentation rate. RESULTS: No significant difference was observed between the changes in DAS28-C-reactive protein and DAS28-erythrocyte sedimentation rate >12 weeks before switching and >12 weeks after switching (P = 0.132 and 0.334, respectively). The treatment continuation rate during the 52 weeks after switching to BS was 97.3%. During this period, BS was discontinued in only four patients, and no nocebo effects were suspected in these four patients. CONCLUSION: Switching from ETN to BS was effective even in routine clinical practice at rheumatology clinics in Japan, and no nocebo effects were observed. Sufficient explanations to patients by rheumatologists and the additional payment for drug costs between patients at hospital visits effectively improved the continuation rate without any nocebo effect.

Prognostic nutritional index as an indicator for the development of bone fragility fracture in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVES: The validity of prognostic nutritional index (PNI) as an index of incident bone fragility fracture (inc-BFF) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients was investigated. METHODS: RA patients whom continuously followed up for >3 years were picked up. Patients were classified in accordance with inc-BFF positivity (BFF+ and BFF-). Their clinical background including PNI was statistically examined for inc-BFF. The background factors were compared between the two groups. Patients were narrowed into subgroups according to the factor that showed a significant difference between the two groups, and they were statistically examined according to the PNI for the inc-BFF. The two groups were narrowed with propensity score matching and compared to the PNI. RESULTS: A total of 278 patients with 44 BFF+ and 234 BFF- were recruited. In the background factors, the presence of prevalent BFF and the simplified disease activity index remission rate had a significantly higher risk ratio. In a subgroup who comorbid lifestyle-related diseases, PNI had a significantly higher risk ratio for the inc-BFF. After the propensity score matching, the PNI showed no significant difference between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: PNI is available when patients with RA comorbid lifestyle-related diseases. PNI is not an independent key for the inc-BFF in RA patients.

The impact of time length to Boolean remission for tight disease activity control after acquisition in rheumatoid arthritis patients.

Clinical importance of time length from initiation under treat-to-target (T2T) strategy to acquisition of clinical remission (TL) in treating patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) on disease activity control, daily activities, and quality of life maintenance was investigated. In patients who achieved Boolean remission once or more, relationship between TL and patients' background data at initiation, and relationship between TL and mean simplified disease activity score (SDAI), Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) score, pain score with visual analog scale (PS-VAS), Sharp/van der Heijde Score (SHS) and quality of life score (QOLS) at the first remission and thereafter were evaluated statistically. Patients were divided into two groups whether TL was within 6 months or longer (G ≤ 6 and G > 6). Change of the parameters and Boolean remission rate (BRR) after the first remission between the two groups were compared statistically. In 465 patients, TL correlated significantly with the SDAI score, the HAQ score, PS-VAS, SHS, and the QOLS after the remission. The SDAI score and the BRR after the remission were significantly better in the G ≤ 6 than in the G > 6. TL is an important key to guarantee good and stable clinical course in treating under T2T.

Clinical significance of serum cystatin C-to-creatinine ratio as a surrogate marker for incident osteoporotic fracture predictions.

Background: Detection of appropriate indicators is valuable for preventing incidental osteoporotic fractures. We statistically evaluated the significance of serum cystatin C-to-creatinine ratio (CysC/Cr) as a surrogate marker for incident major osteoporotic fractures (MOF) prediction. Methods: Eligible patients with simultaneous measurement of CysC/Cr and bone mineral density in the lumbar spine and proximal femur were selected, and their fracture histories until 5 years after baseline were observed in the retrospective area cohort data. Patients who were followed up until termination or the first osteoporotic fracture were included, and loss of follow-up or death was excluded. Candidate risk factors for osteoporotic fractures were tested for risk ratios using a cox regression analysis. Receiver operating characteristic tests were performed on factors with significantly higher risk ratios and evaluated with Kaplan-Meier survival analysis to determine the hazard ratios of the factors. Results: A total of 175 patients of whom 28 had incident MOF, 38 men, and 137 women, were enrolled. The mean age was 70.2 years. A significantly higher risk ratio was shown in the presence of prevalent MOF, hyper fall-ability, lifestyle-related diseases, chronic kidney diseases ≥ Grade3a, and higher CysC/Cr. All parameters had cutoff indices and showed significantly higher hazard ratios. Conclusions: These results suggested that CysC/Cr may be a predictive marker of incident osteoporotic fractures. It might work as a screening tool for MOF risk.

Associations between clinical metrics of joint deformity, disease duration, disease activity, functional capacity, quality of life, pain, and fatigue in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVES: Aim of this study is to clarify associations between metrics of patient's clinical status statistically using retrospective cohort data. METHODS: Patients with RA who were followed up more than 3 years were recruited. Their EuroQol-5th dimension (EQ5D) as an index of quality of life (QOL), Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ) as an index of functional capacity (FC), simplified disease activity index (SDAI), pain score using visual analog scale (PS-VAS), and fatigue score using visual analog scale (FS-VAS) were monitored every three months. Sharp/van der Heijde score (SHS) was calculated annually. Associations between average values of these factors at beginning of follow-up (baseline) and change from baseline to final year in follow-up (change), and patient's sex, age, and disease duration (DD) were evaluated statistically. RESULTS: A total of 447 patients were analyzed. EQ5D score correlated significantly with HAQ score both at baseline and change of that, and FS-VAS. HAQ score correlated significantly with EQ5D and HAQ score at baseline. SDAI score correlated significantly with SHS and FS-VAS at baseline. SHS correlated significantly with the SHS at baseline. PS-VAS correlated significantly with the PS-VAS, EQ5D at baseline, change of theEQ5D and HAQ scores. FS-VAS correlated significantly with change of the EQ5D score and FS-VAS at baseline. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggested that these clinical metrics are influenced by each variable at baseline. QOL and fatigue are correlated each other, as well as QOL and FC, whereas disease activity correlated with joint deformity level and fatigue. Key Points • It is questionable whether improvement of disease activity leads to improvements in functional capacity and QOL in treating rheumatoid arthritis. • We evaluated the association among metrics of clinical outcomes, such as EQ5D, HAQ, SDAI, SHS, pain score, and fatigue score using retrospective cohort data. • Results suggested that metrics are influenced by each items at baseline, and QOL and fatigue are correlated each other, as well as QOL and functional capacity.

Pain score as a predictor of subsequent fragility fracture in postmenopausal patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A retrospective case-control study.

Objectives: Bone fragility fracture (BFF) is a serious incident in treating rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We hypothesized that pain degree during treatment RA correlated with incident BFF and validated how pain affects incident BFF (inc-BFF). Methods: Postmenopausal RA patients treated for at least 3 years were recruited. The primary endpoint was the development of inc-BFF. Follow-up began with the first bone mineral density measurement (baseline) and continued until the development of the first BFF or termination of the study. Clinical indicators at baseline, including pain score using a visual analog scale (PS-VAS), were analyzed statistically using Cox regression analysis, receiver operation characteristics (ROC), Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis (K-M), and chi-square test. Results: A total of 239 patients were recruited. Using a multivariate Cox regression analysis, the baseline's PS-VAS and prevalent BFF (pr-BFF) demonstrated significantly higher risk ratios. For ROC, pr-BFF and PS-VAS had significant cutoff index (COI) (positive, 21.0) and an area under-curve of 0.692 (P < 0.001) and 0.616 (P < 0.01), respectively. PS-VAS > COI had a 2.24-fold higher hazard ratio than PS-VAS ≤ COI using K-M. When these 2 conditions were combined, patients with pr-BFF-positive and PS-VAS-positive had a sensitivity of 42.3% and a specificity of 88.8% for the inc-BFF. PS-VAS > COI had no statistical significance in the subgroup without pr-BFF, whereas the existence of pr-BFF had a significantly higher risk ratio in the PS-VAS ≤ COI. Conclusions: The PS-VAS during RA treatment is a good indicator for predicting the inc-BFF in postmenopausal RA patients with pr-BFF.

Clinical Advantage of Attaining Index-Based Remission Prior to Composite Remission in Treating Rheumatoid Arthritis / Ventaja clínica de lograr la remisión basada en índices antes que la remisión compuesta en el tratamiento de la artritis reumatoide

Background and objectives: The clinical advantage of targeting index-based remission prior to Boolean remission was evaluated retrospectively. Materials and methods: A total of 578 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), who were treated for more than three years, were recruited. Patients who were treated to targeted index-based remission and composite measure remission criteria such as Boolean remission from the first consultation were divided according to the turn of attaining Boolean remission and index-based remission: G-IBR, a group that matched index-based remission at the same time Boolean remission is attained or earlier; G-BR_IF, a group that attained Boolean remission followed by index-based remission or failed; G-IR_BF, a group that could not attain Boolean remission despite attaining index-based remission; G-BothF, a group that failed to attain either Boolean remission or index-based remission. Background factors were statistically compared among groups. The Boolean remission rate in patients who attained index-based remission (BRR) and the rate of failure to attain index-based remission in patients who failed to attain Boolean remission (BFR) were statistically evaluated. Results: Groups comprising 225, 231, and 482 in G-IBR; 160, 154, and 8 in G-BR_IF; 18, 18, and 75 in G-IR_BF; and 175, 175, and 13 in G-BothF when indexing the clinical disease activity index (CDAI), simplified disease activity index (SDAI), and 28-joints disease activity score with C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP), respectively. Disease activity indices’ scores after Boolean remission were demonstrated to be significantly higher in the G-BR_IF group than in the G-IBR group. BRR was 92.6%, 92.8%, and 86.5%, while BFR was 71.3%, 71.3%, and 13.8% when indexing CDAI, SDAI, and DAS28-CRP, respectively. Conclusions: Targeting CDAI and SDAI remission prior to Boolean remission contributes to a stable clinical course.(AU)

Antecedentes y objetivos: Se evaluó prospectivamente la ventaja clínica de centrarse en la remisión basada en índices de manera previa a la remisión booleana. Materiales y métodos: Se seleccionó a un total de 578 pacientes con artritis reumatoide que habían sido tratados durante más de 3 años. Se dividió en grupos a los pacientes según los criterios de remisión: remisión basada en índices o remisión de medidas compuestas, tales como remisión booleana desde la primera consulta, de acuerdo con el plazo de logro: G-IBR, un grupo que equiparó la remisión basada en índices al mismo tiempo que logró la remisión booleana o antes; G-BR_IF, un grupo que logró la remisión booleana seguida de remisión basada en índices o que fracasó; G-IR_BF, un grupo que no logró la remisión booleana a pesar de lograr la remisión basada en índices; G-BothF, un grupo que no logró la remisión booleana ni la remisión basada en índices. Se compararon entre los grupos los factores antecedentes. Se evaluaron estadísticamente la tasa de remisión booleana en los pacientes que lograron la remisión basada en índices (BRR) y la tasa de fracaso en el logro de la remisión booleana (BFR). Resultados: Los grupos estuvieron formados por 225, 231 y 482 en G-IBR; 160, 154 y 8 en G-BR_IF; 18, 18 y 75 en G-IR_BF y 175, 175 y 13 en G-BothF al indexar el índice de actividad de la enfermedad clínica (CDAI), el índice simplificado de actividad de la enfermedad (SDAI) y el índice DAS-28 con proteína C reactiva (DAS28-CRP), respectivamente. Las puntuaciones de los índices de actividad de la enfermedad tras la remisión booleana fueron significativamente más altas en el grupo G-BR_IF que en el grupo G-IBR. BRR fue del 92,6; 92,8 y 86,5%, mientras que BFR fue del 71,3; 71,3 y 13,8% al indexar CDAI, SDAI y DAS28-CRP, respectivamente. Conclusiones: Centrarse en las remisiones CDAI y SDAI de forma previa a la remisión booleana contribuye a un curso clínico estable.(AU)

Clinical Advantage of Attaining Index-Based Remission Prior to Composite Remission in Treating Rheumatoid Arthritis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The clinical advantage of targeting index-based remission prior to Boolean remission was evaluated retrospectively. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 578 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), who were treated for more than three years, were recruited. Patients who were treated to targeted index-based remission and composite measure remission criteria such as Boolean remission from the first consultation were divided according to the turn of attaining Boolean remission and index-based remission: G-IBR, a group that matched index-based remission at the same time Boolean remission is attained or earlier; G-BR_IF, a group that attained Boolean remission followed by index-based remission or failed; G-IR_BF, a group that could not attain Boolean remission despite attaining index-based remission; G-BothF, a group that failed to attain either Boolean remission or index-based remission. Background factors were statistically compared among groups. The Boolean remission rate in patients who attained index-based remission (BRR) and the rate of failure to attain index-based remission in patients who failed to attain Boolean remission (BFR) were statistically evaluated. RESULTS: Groups comprising 225, 231, and 482 in G-IBR; 160, 154, and 8 in G-BR_IF; 18, 18, and 75 in G-IR_BF; and 175, 175, and 13 in G-BothF when indexing the clinical disease activity index (CDAI), simplified disease activity index (SDAI), and 28-joints disease activity score with C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP), respectively. Disease activity indices' scores after Boolean remission were demonstrated to be significantly higher in the G-BR_IF group than in the G-IBR group. BRR was 92.6%, 92.8%, and 86.5%, while BFR was 71.3%, 71.3%, and 13.8% when indexing CDAI, SDAI, and DAS28-CRP, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Targeting CDAI and SDAI remission prior to Boolean remission contributes to a stable clinical course.

Clinical characteristics and variants that predict prognosis of difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis.

Factors influencing prognosis after administration of the last biologic or targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (b/tsDMARD) to patients with difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis (D2T_RA) were evaluated in a clinical setting. RA patients who met the EULAR definition of D2T_RA were recruited. These patients were grouped according to success/failure. Success was defined as sustained within light disease activity or discontinued after clinical remission, and all of the following were met, including glucocorticoid (GCS) < 7.5 mg/day, no rapid radiographic progression, and improved quality of life from the beginning of the b/tsDMARD (baseline). Failure was defined as any other condition from success. The primary endpoint of the study was success or failure at 12 months after baseline. Factors influencing success/failure were statistically evaluated. A total of 71 D2T_RA patients were selected, 22 were in the success group and 49 in the failure group. For patients taking GCS and methotrexate (MTX) ≤ 8.6 mg/week, only one was included in the success group and the other 24 were included in the failure group (p < 0.001). Of the 18 patients without GCS and with MTX ≥ 8.7 mg, 12 patients whose 28-joint disease activity score ≤ 1.90 at 3 months or ≤ 2.54 at 6 months were in the success group (p < 0.01). D2T_RA patients with GCS or MTX ≤ 8.6 mg at baseline are considered to be at high risk of repeat D2T_RA. Patients with no GCS and MTX ≥ 8.7 mg are more likely to withdraw from D2T_RA if their disease activity is tightly controlled.

Validity and risk of adopting PGA ≤ 2 as a remission criteria of Boolean in clinical practice in patient with rheumatoid arthritis.

Validity and risk of setting patient's global assessment (PGA) ≤ 2 as a Boolean remission criteria substituting PGA ≤ 1 in treating rheumatoid arthritis (RA) was investigated. Patients were recruited from an area cohort, of whom attained Boolean remission (Boolean-1) or near remission with PGA ≤ 2 and the rest components were ≤ 1 (Boolean-2). Simplified disease activity index (SDAI) score was compared according to the criteria variations. A total of 517 patients were studied. Mean SDAI score of patients with Boolean-1 was significantly lower than that of patients with Boolean-2 at acquisition. The trend was evident in the patients who attained Boolean-1 remission. Mean SDAI score at acquisition, 6 months after, and 1 year after of patients who attained Boolean-2 first and then Boolean-1, was significantly inferior to that of patients who attained the remissions at the same time. The mean SDAI score at month 6 in the Boolean-2 was not SDAI remission at all. We concluded that setting PGA ≤ 2 as a remission criteria may not have statistical difference in disease activity from PGA ≤ 1, however, there was an determinant risk to misread that includes patient who losses clinical remission after acquisition.

Usefulness of cortical thickness ratio of the third metacarpal bone for prediction of major osteoporotic fractures.

OBJECTIVE: Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are at high risk for osteoporotic fractures. We developed an index called the third metacarpal cortical thickness ratio (CTR), which reflects bone mineral density (BMD) in RA patients. A longitudinal study was conducted to verify the usefulness of CTR during the follow-up period. METHODS: Patients with RA who underwent dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and hand X-ray simultaneously were monitored for disease activity and activities of daily living at 3-month intervals, and BMD and CTR were measured at 1-year intervals. Mean CTR during follow-up was tested for correlation with mean BMD at both the lumbar spine (LS) and femoral neck (FN) during follow-up. Correlations were examined, including other variants potentially correlated with BMD. The risk ratio of accidental major osteoporotic fractures (MOF) in the variance including CTR and BMD was evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 300 patients, 40 men and 260 women, were enrolled. Mean follow-up length was 49.6 months. CTR was significantly associated with BMD in FN using a multivariate model of linear regression analysis (p < 0.0001), whereas CTR was significantly associated with BMD in LS using only a univariate model (p < 0.01). The only variant with a significantly higher risk ratio for incident MOF was the presence of prevalent MOF. CTR and BMD did not show a significantly higher risk ratio using Cox regression analysis. CONCLUSION: CTR correlated significantly with BMD even during follow-up, especially in FN. However, CTR and BMD were not risk factors for major MOF.

Musculoskeletal ambulation disability symptom complex as a risk factor of incident bone fragility fracture.

OBJECTIVES: Influence of presenting musculoskeletal ambulation disability symptom complex (MADS) on occurrence of bone fragility fracture (BFF) is investigated with retrospective cohort study. METHODS: A total of 931 subjects joined in the study. Subjects were selected as bone fragility risk positive in the fracture assessment tool questionnaire. Their assumed risk factors were harvested from the medical records and X-ray pictures. They were followed up at least 8 years consecutively, and occurrence of incident BFF was set as primary endpoint. Each assumed risk factor including MADS was evaluated using Cox regression analysis. Subjects were divided into 2 groups according to presence of MADS (G-MADS and G-noMADS). Adjusted hazard ratios between the 2 groups was evaluated using Cox regression analysis. The statistical procedures were performed before and after propensity score matching (PSM) procedures in order to make parallel with assumed risk factors. RESULTS: Statistically significant risk factors within 5% were prevalent vertebral body fracture, disuse, MADS, cognitive disorder, hypertension, contracture, Parkinsonism, being female sex, hyperlipidemia, insomnia, T-score in the femoral neck ≤ -2.3, chronic kidney disease ≥ stage 2, chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases, glucocorticoid steroid administrated, and osteoarthritis in order of the adjusted hazard ratios (from highest to lowest). Adjusted hazard ratios between G-MADS and G-noMADS were 2.70 and 1.83 for before and after PSM, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: MADS demonstrated as a significant risk factor of BFF occurrence. In treating osteoporosis, fall risk should be aware of as well as bone fragility risk.

The impact of shrunken pore syndrome in patient with rheumatic diseases on bone mineral metabolism.

The study aimed to investigate the influence of shrunken pore syndrome (SPS), defined as a cystatin C (CysC)-based estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFRCysC) <60% of the creatinine (Cr)-based eGFR (eGFRCr), on bone mineral density (BMD) in patients with rheumatic diseases. A total of 831 patients with rheumatic diseases were enrolled in the study. Patients were classified into the SPS group (G-SPS) and non-SPS group (G-nSPS). The correlation between the presence of SPS and BMD of the lumbar spine (BMD_LS), BMD of the femoral neck (BMD_FN), serum parathyroid hormone (PTH) level, chronic kidney dysfunction (CKD), and parameters were evaluated statistically. The prevalence of SPS was 4.0%. Serum PTH level, tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase-5b (TRACP-5b), and eGFRCr in the G-SPS were significantly higher than in the G-nSPS, whereas BMD_LS and BMD_FN in the G-SPS were significantly lower than in the G-nSPS. Serum PTH level was significantly correlated with CysC. BMD_LS had no significant correlation with BMD_FN. The presence of SPS was the only factor that demonstrated significant negative correlation with both BMD_LS and BMD_FN. Relationship between BMD_LS and the presence of SPS was present regardless of CKD stage; however, the negative relationship between BMD_LS and serum PTH was observed only in CKD stage 1 and 2 patients. BMD_FN demonstrated significant negative correlation with serum PTH in the group with progression of CKD. These results suggest that there is a serious potential risk of osteoporosis in patients with SPS and increased PTH, and BMD_LS poses a higher risk in CKD stage 1 and 2.

Rheumatoid arthritis in tight disease control is no longer risk of bone mineral density loss.

OBJECTIVES: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an independent risk factor of osteoporosis. However, if disease activity is successfully controlled using the treat-to-target (T2T) strategy, the risk of bone mineral density (BMD) loss can be diminished. We evaluated if RA is a risk factor even when the T2T is applied in clinical cases. METHODS: From September 2017 to August 2019, 741 patients were examined using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry; of these, 279 were diagnosed with RA who attained clinical remission within 6 months (RA-rem) and 53 could not attain clinical remission (RA-nonrem), while 409 were not diagnosed with RA (non-RA). The following characteristics between RA-rem and non-RA were matched using the propensity score matching (PSM) technique: age, sex, past bone fragility fracture experience, osteoporosis drug intervention ratio, glucocorticoid administration ratio, mean dose, Barthel Index score, body mass index, serum-creatinine-to-cystatin C ratio, and the number of comorbidities. The BMDs and changes of the lumbar spine, femoral neck, total hip, and greater trochanter were statistically compared between the RA-rem and the non-RA after PSM, and between RA-nonrem and RA-rem after PSM using the Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: In total, 107 patients of RA-rem and 108 of non-RA were recruited. BMDs and changes of every part demonstrated no significant differences between the 2 groups. BMDs in every part of RA-rem after PSM were significantly greater than those in every part of RA-nonrem, while no significant difference in change during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: If disease activity is controlled in clinical remission, RA will not contribute to BMD reduction.

Cortical thickness relative to the transverse diameter of third metacarpal bone reflects bone mineral density in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is accompanied by potential risk of bone mineral loss. In this study, we developed a screening index for the osteoporosis related level of bone mineral density loss for RA patients as a substitute to the dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) method. METHODS: X-ray pictures of both sides of the hand were taken in order to evaluate Sharp/van der Heijde Scores (SHSs). This score was calculated for RA patients at the first consultation and routinely thereafter. We measured cortical thickness and the transverse diameter of the mid-portion of the metacarpal bone of the right middle finger with the same radiograph. Cortical Thickness Ratio (CTR) was then calculated as cortical thickness relative to the transverse diameter. Bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar spine (LS) and femoral neck (FN) was measured at the same time. The relationship between BMD and CTR was evaluated using multivariate linear regression analysis. Clinical backgrounds and disease indices were also evaluated. The cut-off index (COI) of the CTR for osteoporosis criteria that represented with a T-score < -2.5 for both bones was calculated using the Receivers Operation Characteristics technique. RESULTS: In 300 subjects, the CTR demonstrated significant correlation with BMD in both bones (p < 0.01). The COI was determined to be 0.25 and the odds ratio was 4.19 and 4.90 for the LS and FN, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicated that the CTR correlated with BMD. This index may represent a promising screening tool for the judgment of osteoporosis in RA patients.

Efficacy and Safety of Targeted Strategy for Treating Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Aged 75 Years or Older.

The efficacy and safety of targeted treatment for elderly patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) was considered. Patients with RA who met the ACR/EULAR 2010 classification criteria and were treated consecutively for > 3 years, were recruited and classified into three age groups with 10-year increments from 65 years. Treatment protocol that aims to achieve clinical remission within 6 months was commonly adopted. The salient features are the rapid increase in dosages of conventional synthetic anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) and the administration of need-based concomitant biologic/targeted synthetic drugs and/or glucocorticoid steroid, and immediate tapering of glucocorticoid steroid and csDMARDs is required on attaining clinical remission. Disease activity score and other clinical indices specific for RA treatment, and the prevalence of adverse events were compared between the groups. The numbers of patients in the groups of the < 65 years, 65-74 years, and ≥ 75 years were 269, 155, and 152. No significant difference was observed between any pairs of groups with respect to disease activity; stable course after achievement of minimum disease activity was observed in all groups. However, the prevalence of adverse events, especially serious infection, in the oldest group was higher than that in the younger groups, which was likely attributable to the higher frequency of administration of glucocorticoid steroid after minimum disease activity obtained and higher prevalence of cardiovascular comorbidities. Targeted treatment is feasible even for patients aged ≥ 75. However, glucocorticoid steroid administration is considered as a risk of adverse events and should be tapered immediately.