Impact of metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease on the incidence of Helicobacter pylori-negative gastric cancer.

AIM: The incidence of Helicobacter pylori-negative gastric cancer (HPNGC) is increasing worldwide. Recently, metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) has been reported to be associated with various cancers, but its association with HPNGC has not been reported. We aimed to identify important independent factors associated with HPNGC, including MAFLD. METHODS: This multicenter observational cohort study enrolled patients with gastric cancer (n = 1078) and health checkup examinees (n = 17 408). We analyzed patients with HPNGC (n = 26) and healthy participants with no H. pylori infection or any abnormal findings on upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (n = 1130). A logistic regression model was used to identify independent factors associated with HPNGC. The priority of the factors associated with HPNGC was evaluated using a decision-tree algorithm and random forest analysis. RESULTS: Among all patients with gastric cancer, 2.4% (26/1078) were diagnosed with HPNGC (mean age, 64 years; male/female, 13/13). In the logistic regression analysis, age, smoking, and MAFLD (odds ratio, 6.5359; 95% confidence interval, 2.5451-16.7841; p < 0.0001) were identified as independent factors associated with HPNGC. Metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease was also identified as the most important classifier for the presence of HPNGC in decision-tree analyses. Helicobacter pylori-negative gastric cancer was observed in 5.2% of patients with MAFLD and 0.8% of patients without MAFLD. In the random forest analysis of the HPNGC, MAFLD was identified as the distinguishing factor with the highest variable importance (0.32). CONCLUSIONS: Metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease was the most influential independent factor associated with HPNGC. These findings suggest that fatty liver and metabolic dysfunction could be involved in the pathogenesis of HPNGC.

MAFLD associated with COPD via systemic inflammation independent of aging and smoking in men.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Metabolic dysfunction and associated systemic inflammation are risk factors for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and COPD is highly prevalent in men. We investigated the impact of metabolic-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) and MAFLD-related systemic inflammation on COPD in men. METHODS: We enrolled 2,041 men with fatty liver. Patients were classified into the COPD (n = 420/2041) and non-COPD (n = 1621/2041) groups. COPD and its high-risk group were diagnosed using the Japanese Respiratory Society Disease statement. Systemic inflammation was evaluated using the C-reactive protein (CRP)/albumin ratio. Independent factors for COPD were investigated by multivariate analysis and decision-tree analysis. RESULTS: The prevalence of MAFLD was significantly higher in the COPD group than in the non-COPD group. In multivariable analysis, in addition to heavy smoking and aging, MAFLD was identified as an independent factor for COPD (OR 1.46, 95% CI 1.020-2.101, P = 0.0385). Decision-tree analysis showed that MAFLD, rather than heavy smoking, was the most influential classifier for COPD in non-elderly men (14% in MAFLD vs 6% in non-MAFLD groups). MAFLD was also the second most influential factor in elderly men who were not heavy smokers. In both groups, the CRP/albumin ratio was the first classifier for COPD (16% in the high CRP/albumin ratio group vs 3% in the low CRP/albumin ratio group of non-elderly men). CONCLUSIONS: MAFLD is an independent predictor of COPD in men. MAFLD had a significant impact on COPD through systemic inflammation in men of all ages who were not heavy smokers. MAFLD may be useful to broadly identify COPD in men.

Lean/normal-weight metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease is a risk factor for reflux esophagitis.

AIM: Reflux esophagitis is associated with metabolic dysfunction. Recently, fatty liver has been redefined as metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD). We investigated the impact of MAFLD and its subtypes on the incidence of reflux esophagitis. METHODS: This multicenter, observational cohort study enrolled 9100 consecutive health-check examinees who underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy and ultrasonography. All patients were classified into the MAFLD or non-MAFLD group. Based on the Asian cut-off value for body mass index (BMI), the MAFLD group was further classified into the lean/normal-weight (BMI <23 kg/m2 ) and overweight/obese (BMI ≥23 kg/m2 ) subgroups. The impact of MAFLD and its subtypes on the cumulative incidence of reflux esophagitis was evaluated using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. RESULTS: MAFLD was diagnosed in 26.5% (2416/9100) of patients. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis indicated that MAFLD (hazard ratio [HR] 1.2183; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.0954-1.3550; p = 0.0003), hiatal hernia, and aging were independent risk factors for reflux esophagitis. Stratification analysis indicated that cumulative incidence of reflux esophagitis among patients with MAFLD was significantly higher in the lean/normal-weight than in the overweight/obese group (HR 1.3274; 95% CI 1.0043-1.7547; p = 0.0466). Among various metabolic factors, visceral adiposity was the only independent metabolic risk factor for reflux esophagitis (HR 2.8331; 95% CI 1.0201-7.8691; p = 0.0457) in the lean/normal-weight MAFLD group. CONCLUSIONS: MAFLD, in particular lean/normal-weight MAFLD, is independent risk factor for reflux esophagitis. Furthermore, visceral adiposity was identified as the most strong metabolic risk factor for reflux esophagitis in lean/normal-weight patients with MAFLD.

Prevalence and Independent Factors for Fatty Liver and Significant Hepatic Fibrosis Using B-Mode Ultrasound Imaging and Two Dimensional-Shear Wave Elastography in Health Check-up Examinees.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Exercise is beneficial for metabolic syndrome. Fatty liver and significant hepatic fibrosis, hepatic manifestations of metabolic syndrome, are becoming an epidemic. We aimed to investigate the prevalence of fatty liver and significant fibrosis and examined the independent factors for these conditions. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We enrolled 1,361 health check-up examinees (median age, 53 years; female/male, 813/548). Fatty liver and fibrosis were evaluated by B-mode ultrasound imaging and shear wave elastography. Factors associated with fatty liver and significant fibrosis were analyzed by logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Fatty liver and significant fibrosis were observed in 50.5% and 42.7% of enrolled subjects, respectively. Independent factors associated with fatty liver were BMI (OR 1.46; 95%CI 1.397-1.537; P<0.0001) and no exer cise habits (OR 1.47; 95% CI 1.101-1.984; P=0.0093). Independent factors associated with significant fibrosis were age, female, BMI (OR 1.37; 95%CI 1.311-1.436; P<0.0001), and no exercise habits (OR 1.49; 95% CI 1.102-2.031; P=0.0097). CONCLUSIONS: Fatty liver and significant fibrosis were frequently seen in health check-up examinees and the common independent factors were higher BMI and no exercise habits. Thus, weight loss and exercise may ameliorate fatty liver and significant hepatic fibrosis in the general population.

MAFLD better predicts the progression of atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk than NAFLD: Generalized estimating equation approach.

AIM: Metabolic associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) partly overlaps with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Thus, using a generalized estimating equation (GEE) approach, we aimed to investigate the difference in worsening of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk between patients with MAFLD and NAFLD. We also investigated factors related to the difference between the two groups. METHODS: We enrolled 2306 subjects with fatty liver (MAFLD 80.7%, NAFLD 63.4%). Subjects with MAFLD/NAFLD were sub-classified into three groups: NAFLD with no metabolic dysfunction (non-Met NAFLD), overlapping, and MAFLD with moderate alcohol consumption (mod-Alc MAFLD). ASCVD risk was estimated by non-invasive tests, including the Suita score. An event was defined as worsening of these scores from the low-risk to the high-risk group. Independent factors for the event were analyzed by Cox regression analysis with the GEE. RESULTS: In Cox regression analysis, MAFLD (HR 1.08, 95% CI 1.02-1.15, p = 0.014) and alcohol consumption (20-39 g/day; HR 1.73, 95% CI 1.26-2.36, p = 0.001) were independently associated with worsening of the Suita score. In a subanalysis, the incidence of the event was significantly lower in non-Met NAFLD than in the overlapping group (HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.50-0.98, p = 0.042). However, no significant difference was observed in the incidence between the overlapping and mod-Alc MAFLD group (HR 1.19, 95% CI 0.89-1.58, p = 0.235). CONCLUSIONS: The GEE approach demonstrates that MAFLD better identifies patients with worsening of ASCVD risk than NAFLD. Moreover, the superiority of MAFLD over NAFLD was due to the presence of metabolic dysfunction rather than moderate alcohol consumption.

MAFLD identifies patients with significant hepatic fibrosis better than NAFLD.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Diagnostic criteria for metabolic associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) have been proposed, but not validated. We aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of the MAFLD definition vs the existing NAFLD criteria to identify patients with significant fibrosis and to characterize the impact of mild alcohol intake. METHODS: We enrolled 765 Japanese patients with fatty liver (median age 54 years). MAFLD and NAFLD were diagnosed in 79.6% and 70.7% of patients respectively. Significant fibrosis was defined by FIB-4 index ≥1.3 and liver stiffness ≥6.6 kPa using shear wave elastography. Mild alcohol intake was defined as <20 g/day. Factors associated with significant fibrosis were analysed by logistic regression and decision-tree analyses. RESULTS: Liver stiffness was higher in MAFLD compared to NAFLD (7.7 vs 6.8 kPa, P = .0010). In logistic regression, MAFLD (OR 4.401; 95% CI 2.144-10.629; P < .0001), alcohol intake (OR 1.761; 95% CI 1.081-2.853; P = .0234), and NAFLD (OR 1.721; 95%CI 1.009-2.951; P = .0463) were independently associated with significant fibrosis. By decision-tree analysis, MAFLD, but not NAFLD or alcohol consumption was the initial classifier for significant fibrosis. The sensitivity for detecting significant fibrosis was higher for MAFLD than NAFLD (93.9% vs 73.0%). In patients with MAFLD, even mild alcohol intake was associated with an increase in the prevalence of significant fibrosis (25.0% vs 15.5%; P = .0181). CONCLUSIONS: The MAFLD definition better identifies a group with fatty liver and significant fibrosis evaluated by non-invasive tests. Moreover, in patients with MAFLD, even mild alcohol consumption is associated with worsening of hepatic fibrosis measures.

Profiles of advanced hepatic fibrosis evaluated by FIB-4 index and shear wave elastography in health checkup examinees.

AIM: Advanced hepatic fibrosis is seen in individuals with potential hepatocellular carcinoma and cardiovascular disease. Hepatic fibrosis can be assessed using a combination of the FIB-4 index and imaging modalities, including shear wave elastography. We aimed to investigate the prevalence of advanced fibrosis in the general population and the profiles associated with advanced fibrosis using a data-mining analysis. METHODS: We enrolled 1155 health checkup examinees (median age 53 years, 685 women, 470 male). Advanced fibrosis was defined by FIB-4 index ≥1.3 and liver stiffness ≥8.07 kPa using shear wave elastography. Participants were classified as normal-mild fibrosis (n = 1035) or advanced fibrosis (n = 120). Factors associated with advanced fibrosis were analyzed by logistic regression and decision-tree analyses. RESULTS: Advanced fibrosis was observed in 10.4% of participants (120/1155). In the logistic regression analysis, independent factors for advanced fibrosis were age (≥75 years; OR 2.12, 95% CI 1.021-4.415; P = 0.0419) and the presence of metabolic syndrome (OR 2.51, 95% CI 1.416-4.462; P = 0.0017). The decision-tree analysis showed two profiles associated with advanced fibrosis: profile 1 - individuals aged ≥65 years with metabolic syndrome and mild-to-moderate alcohol consumption (prevalence of advanced fibrosis 73.3%); and profile 2 - individuals without metabolic syndrome, aged ≥75 years, with no exercise habit (prevalence of advanced fibrosis 56.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Advanced fibrosis was observed in 10.4% of health checkup examinees. Furthermore, we showed that aging, metabolic syndrome with mild-to-moderate alcohol consumption, and physical inactivity were associated with advanced fibrosis. Thus, prevention of metabolic syndrome and alcohol withdrawal, as well as exercise habits, might inhibit the progression of hepatic fibrosis.