Low-dose SoluMatrix diclofenac in the treatment of osteoarthritis: A 1-year, open-label, Phase III safety study.

INTRODUCTION: Diclofenac is used for the treatment of osteoarthritis (OA); however, like other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) it can be associated with serious dose-related adverse events (AEs). Low-dose SoluMatrix® diclofenac has been developed to provide efficacy at lower diclofenac doses. A recently published Phase III study evaluated the efficacy and safety of SoluMatrix diclofenac 35 mg twice daily (b.i.d.) and thrice daily (t.i.d.) in patients with OA pain treated for 12 weeks. METHODS: This Phase III multicenter, open-label study assessed the safety of SoluMatrix diclofenac in patients with OA dosed up to 52 weeks (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01510912). The study enrolled 602 chronic NSAID/acetaminophen users, aged ≥40 years with OA of the knee or hip. Patients received SoluMatrix diclofenac 35 mg b.i.d., which could be increased to t.i.d. and subsequently reduced to b.i.d. as needed. Safety assessments included AEs, vital signs, physical examination findings, 12-lead electrocardiogram, and clinical laboratory test results. Patient-reported outcomes were evaluated by the Short Form-36 (SF-36). RESULTS: A total of 601 patients received SoluMatrix diclofenac; 373 of 601 patients (62.1%) received treatment for ≥11 months. The most frequent AEs included upper respiratory tract infection, headache, urinary tract infection, diarrhea, nasopharyngitis, and nausea. Serious gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, renal, and hepatic AEs were uncommon. A small proportion (99 patients, 16.5%) of patients discontinued participation in the study due to AEs. Clinically meaningful improvements from baseline in Physical Component Summary Scores of the SF-36 were noted at week 12 and were sustained through week 52. Improvements in six of the eight individual physical and mental SF-36 domains were also noted. CONCLUSION: SoluMatrix diclofenac treatment for up to 1 year was generally well tolerated in patients with OA pain and associated with improvement in quality of life measures. TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT01510912.

Pharmacokinetics and safety of low-dose submicron indomethacin 20 and 40 mg compared with indomethacin 50 mg.

INTRODUCTION: Indomethacin is a potent analgesic that, similar to other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, is associated with serious dose-related adverse events. There is a need for newer nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug products with improved tolerability. Low-dose submicron indomethacin was developed using SoluMatrix Fine Particle Technology™ to enable treatment at lower doses than commercially available indomethacin drug products. This study evaluated the pharmacokinetics and safety of submicron indomethacin 20 and 40 mg compared with indomethacin 50-mg capsules. METHODS: This was a phase 1, randomized, open-label, 4-period, 4-sequence, single-dose crossover study. Forty healthy volunteers received low-dose submicron indomethacin 20- or 40-mg capsules, or indomethacin 50-mg capsules under fasting or fed conditions. Pharmacokinetic parameters and safety were assessed. RESULTS: Comparable fasting peak plasma levels (mean ± standard deviation) were demonstrated for submicron indomethacin 40 mg (2368.79 ± 631.38 ng/ml) and indomethacin 50 mg (2369.40 ± 969.06 ng/ml). The overall systemic exposure (geometric least squares mean; 95% CI) was > 21% lower for submicron indomethacin 40 mg (6007.71 ng·h/mL; 5585.73-6461.58) compared with indomethacin 50 mg (7646.23 ng·h/ml; 7110.44-8222.40) under fasting conditions. Food delayed the rate but did not affect the extent of indomethacin absorption from submicron indomethacin 40 mg. Submicron indomethacin 40 mg administration resulted in earlier time to peak plasma levels (median 1.67; min-max 0.5-3.5 hours) under fasting conditions compared with indomethacin 50 mg (2.02; 0.5-5.0 hours). Submicron indomethacin 20 and 40 mg were dose proportional and generally well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Compared with indomethacin 50 mg, submicron indomethacin 40 mg achieved similar peak plasma concentrations, lower systemic exposure, and a faster time to peak plasma concentration, indicating rapid absorption. The current formulation of low-dose submicron indomethacin has recently demonstrated efficacy in 2 phase 3 studies in patients with acute pain following bunionectomy and represents a new, low-dose treatment option for patients with acute pain.

Pharmacokinetic properties and tolerability of low-dose SoluMatrix diclofenac.

PURPOSE: This study compared the pharmacokinetic properties and safety profile of low-dose (18- and 35-mg) diclofenac capsules manufactured using SoluMatrix Fine Particle Technology (Trademark of iCeutica Inc. (Philadelphia, Pennsylvania), and the technology is licensed to Iroko Pharmaceuticals, LLC (Philadelphia, Pennsylvania) for exclusive use in NSAIDs), which produces submicron-sized drug particles with enhanced dissolution properties, to those of diclofenac potassium immediate-release (IR) 50-mg tablets. METHODS: This Phase 1, single-center, randomized, open-label, single-dose crossover study was conducted in 40 healthy volunteers. Subjects received, in randomized order, SoluMatrix diclofenac 18- or 35-mg capsules in the fasting condition, SoluMatrix diclofenac 35-mg capsules under fed conditions, and diclofenac potassium IR 50-mg tablets under fasting and fed conditions. Pharmacokinetic parameters (T(max), C(max), AUC(0-t), AUC(0-∞)) were calculated from the concentrations of diclofenac in the plasma. Absorption, food effect, and dose proportionality were determined using a mixed-model ANOVA for C(max), AUC(0-t), AUC(0-∞). Tolerability was assessed by recording adverse events, physical examination findings, vital sign measurements: clinical laboratory test results. FINDINGS: Overall, 35 healthy volunteers aged 18 to 52 years completed the study. The mean age of the subjects was 33.4 years, and approximately half were men (47.5%). Median T(max) values were similar between the low-dose SoluMatrix diclofenac 35-mg capsules and the diclofenac potassium IR 50-mg tablets (both, ~1.0 hour). The mean maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) after the administration of low-dose SoluMatrix diclofenac 35-mg capsules was 26% lower than that with diclofenac potassium IR 50-mg tablets under fasting conditions (868.72 vs 1194.21 ng/mL). The administration of low-dose SoluMatrix diclofenac 35-mg capsules was associated with a 23% lower overall systemic exposure compared with that of diclofenac potassium IR 50-mg tablets under fasting conditions. Food decreased the rate but not the overall extent of absorption of SoluMatrix diclofenac. No serious AEs and no clinically significant abnormalities in physical examination findings, including vital sign measurements, or clinical laboratory test results, were noted during this study. IMPLICATIONS: The pharmacokinetic properties of low-dose SoluMatrix diclofenac capsules in the healthy volunteers in this study suggest rapid diclofenac absorption as measured by T(max). Low-dose SoluMatrix diclofenac capsules represent a potential option for the management of acute and osteoarthritis-related pain.

Efficacy and safety of low-dose submicron diclofenac for the treatment of osteoarthritis pain: a 12 week, phase 3 study.

OBJECTIVE: NSAIDs, such as diclofenac, are the most commonly used medications to treat osteoarthritis (OA), but they are associated with dose-related adverse events (AEs). Low-dose submicron diclofenac was developed using a new, proprietary dry milling process that creates submicron drug particles (SoluMatrix Fine Particle Technology * ), enabling effective treatment at lower doses than other commercially available diclofenac drug products. This phase 3 study evaluated the efficacy and safety of low-dose submicron diclofenac 35 mg three times daily (tid) and twice daily (bid) in patients with OA pain. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This double-blind study enrolled patients ≥40 years of age with clinically and radiographically confirmed (Kellgren-Lawrence grade II-III) hip or knee OA. Eligible patients were chronic NSAID and/or acetaminophen (APAP) users with baseline Western Ontario and McMasters Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain subscale scores ≥40 mm by visual analog scale and an OA flare (≥15 mm increase in WOMAC pain subscale score following discontinuation of NSAIDs/APAP at screening). Patients were randomized to submicron diclofenac 35 mg tid, submicron diclofenac 35 mg bid, or placebo for 12 weeks. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01461369. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Efficacy parameters included mean change from baseline in WOMAC pain subscale score at week 12 (primary efficacy parameter) and in average total WOMAC score over 12 weeks. RESULTS: Submicron diclofenac 35 mg tid significantly improved WOMAC pain subscale scores from baseline at 12 weeks (-44.1; p = 0.0024) compared with placebo (-32.5). Submicron diclofenac 35 mg bid provided numerical improvement in pain at week 12 that did not reach statistical significance (-39.0; p = 0.0795) compared with placebo. Submicron diclofenac 35 mg tid (-35.9; p = 0.0002) and 35 mg bid (-30.3; p = 0.0363) improved the average total WOMAC score in treated patients over 12 weeks compared with placebo (-23.2). The most frequent AEs in the submicron diclofenac-treated groups were diarrhea, headache, nausea, and constipation. The inclusion of patients with a documented requirement for analgesic therapy (OA 'flare') at baseline and the high rates of rescue medication usage in the placebo group may have impacted the study outcome for the submicron diclofenac treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Low-dose submicron diclofenac is an effective therapeutic option for the treatment of OA pain.

A phase 2 study of lower-dose, indomethacin submicron particle capsules demonstrates early onset of acute pain relief.

OBJECTIVES: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are efficacious for the treatment of acute and chronic pain; however, they have the potential for serious adverse events (AEs). The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of investigational, lower-dose, indomethacin submicron particle capsules compared with placebo in a study of patients with postsurgical pain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This phase 2, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, single-dose, and placebo-controlled study enrolled 203 patients (18 to 50 y old) following extraction of ≥ 2 third molars who experienced moderate-to-severe pain intensity ≤ 6 hours after surgery. Patients received indomethacin submicron particle capsules (20 or 40 mg), celecoxib 400 mg, or placebo. The primary efficacy endpoint was the sum of total pain relief over 0 to 8 hours (TOTPAR-8) determined from the area under the curve for pain relief over 0 to 8 hours following administration of the study drug, where pain relief was measured on a 0 to 4 scale. Safety and tolerability were also assessed. RESULTS: Mean ± SE TOTPAR-8 scores were 10.8 ± 1.4 (indomethacin submicron particle capsules 20 mg), 12.6 ± 1.3 (indomethacin submicron particle capsules 40 mg), 14.8 ± 1.3 (celecoxib), and 3.0 ± 1.3 (placebo; P<0.001 for active treatments vs. placebo). Indomethacin submicron particle capsules treatment groups demonstrated better mean TOTPAR over 4 hours than placebo (P<0.001). Similar rates and profiles of treatment-emergent AEs were reported by patients across treatment groups. DISCUSSION: Lower-dose, indomethacin submicron particle capsules provide good overall pain relief in patients with postsurgical pain and are generally well tolerated. Indomethacin submicron particle capsules are a potentially promising option for treatment of acute pain and warrant further study.

Indomethacin submicron particle capsules provide effective pain relief in patients with acute pain: a phase 3 study.

Although frequently prescribed to relieve acute pain in patients, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are associated with dose-related gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, and renal complications. Investigational, submicron particle NSAIDs are being developed that could provide effective pain relief at lower doses than currently available oral NSAIDs. This is the first phase 3 study evaluating the analgesic efficacy and safety of lower-dose indomethacin submicron particle capsules in patients following elective surgery. This multicenter, double-blind study enrolled patients aged 18 to 68 years who underwent bunionectomy under regional anesthesia. Patients with a pain intensity rating of ≥40 mm on a 100-mm Visual Analog Scale were randomized to receive indomethacin submicron particle capsules (40 mg 3 times daily [TID], 40 mg twice daily [BID], or 20 mg TID), celecoxib (400 mg loading dose, then 200 mg BID), or placebo. The primary efficacy parameter was the overall (summed) pain intensity difference measured by a Visual Analog Scale during a period of 48 hours. Scheduled assessments measured secondary efficacy parameters such as patient pain intensity differences. Indomethacin submicron particle capsules 40 mg 3 times daily (509.6 ± 91.9 overall [summed] pain intensity difference), 40 mg twice daily (328.0 ± 92.9 overall [summed] pain intensity difference), and 20 mg 3 times daily (380.5 ± 92.9 overall [summed] pain intensity difference) reduced pain intensity from 0 to 48 hours (P ≤ 0.046 for all 3 groups) compared with placebo (67.8 ± 91.4 overall [summed] pain intensity difference). There was some evidence of patient analgesia for celecoxib (279.4 ± 91.9 overall [summed] pain intensity difference; P = 0.103). Some evidence of pain control was observed in patients as early as 2 hours following administration of indomethacin submicron particle capsules and was sustained throughout the treatment period. Indomethacin submicron particle capsules were generally well tolerated by patients. These results suggest that lower-dose indomethacin submicron particle capsules are a potentially promising treatment option for patients with acute pain.

A phase 2 study of naproxen submicron particle capsules in patients with post-surgical dental pain.

BACKGROUND: Naproxen is an NSAID with documented efficacy in pain management; however, it is associated with serious dose-related adverse events. A lower-dose naproxen drug product with comparable efficacy to commercially available naproxen could address these concerns. We studied the efficacy and safety of naproxen submicron particle capsules in patients with acute post-surgical dental pain. METHODS: A phase 2, multicenter, randomized, single-dose study (NCT01229228) enrolled 254 patients (18-34 years old) undergoing third molar extraction. Patients who experienced moderate-to-severe pain ≤6 h following surgery received naproxen submicron particle capsules 200 or 400 mg, naproxen tablets 250 or 500 mg, or placebo. The primary efficacy parameter was patient-reported total pain relief over 0-12 h following administration of study medication. Secondary efficacy parameters included patient-reported total pain relief over 0-4 and 0-8 h; pain intensity assessments from 0 to 4, 0 to 8, and 0 to 12 h; and time to onset of analgesia. Safety and tolerability were also assessed. RESULTS: Naproxen submicron particle capsules 200 mg (25.9 ± 2.0; 95% CI 21.9-29.8), naproxen tablets 250 mg (24.4 ± 2.0; 95% CI 20.4-28.3), naproxen submicron particle capsules 400 mg (31.9 ± 2.0; 95% CI 28.1-35.8), and naproxen tablets 500 mg (28.5 ± 2.0; 95% CI 24.7-32.4) groups experienced greater pain relief over 12 h compared with placebo (P < 0.001). Similar trends were observed for secondary outcomes of total pain relief over 0-4, 0-8 h, and time to onset of analgesia. Adverse events were generally similar across all treatment groups. CONCLUSION: Lower-dose naproxen submicron particle capsules provided effective analgesia in acute post-surgical dental pain and warrant further evaluation as a potentially promising treatment for acute pain conditions.

Lower-dose diclofenac submicron particle capsules provide early and sustained acute patient pain relief in a phase 3 study.

BACKGROUND: Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are prescribed for the treatment of patients with acute pain but use of such analgesics is associated with dose-dependent adverse events (AEs). Diclofenac submicron particle capsules have been developed using SoluMatrix technology to provide analgesia at lower doses than available solid oral dosing forms. Our study evaluated the analgesic efficacy and safety of lower-dose diclofenac submicron particle capsules in patients with acute pain following elective surgery. METHODS: A phase 3, multicenter, double-blind study enrolled 428 patients, aged 18 to 65 years, with moderate-to-severe pain following bunionectomy under regional anesthesia. Patients experiencing a pain intensity rating of ≥ 40 mm on a 100-mm Visual Analog Scale were randomized to receive lower-dose diclofenac submicron particle capsules (35 or 18 mg, 3 times daily [TID]), celecoxib (200 mg, twice daily [BID], 400-mg loading dose), or placebo. The primary efficacy parameter was the overall (summed) pain intensity difference measured over 0 to 48 hours (SPID-48). Secondary efficacy parameters included pain intensity difference (PID) at scheduled assessments. RESULTS: Lower-dose diclofenac submicron particle capsules 35 mg TID (524.05; P < 0.001), 18 mg TID (393.25; P = 0.010), and celecoxib 200 mg BID (390.22; P = 0.011) demonstrated significant pain control compared with placebo (77.10) for the primary efficacy parameter, mean SPID-48. Diclofenac submicron particle capsules 35 mg TID (4.52) provided some pain control (higher mean PID) at 30 minutes following administration, in contrast to celecoxib 200 mg BID (0.80), diclofenac submicron particle capsules 18 mg TID (0.31), and placebo (0.12). Better pain control (PID) was noted across all active treatment groups at 5 hours compared with placebo (P ≤ 0.03), and pain relief was sustained throughout the treatment period. The most frequent non-procedure-related AEs were nausea, headache, dizziness, and vomiting. CONCLUSION: Lower-dose diclofenac submicron particle capsules provided effective analgesia in this phase 3 clinical study in patients with acute pain and are a potentially promising option for the treatment of patients with acute pain.

Oral famciclovir for the suppression of recurrent genital herpes: the combined data from two randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Genital herpes is a very common sexually transmitted disease. Safe and effective therapies are needed for patients with frequent recurrences. OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to determine the efficacy and safety of famciclovir for suppression of herpes simplex virus (HSV) infection in patients with history of clinically diagnosed recurrent genital HSV infection. METHOD: An analysis was conducted of the combined data from two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies of 52 weeks' duration involving a total of 469 patients (201 men, 268 women) from 47 university, hospital, or private referral centers in Europe and North America. The patients were 18 years or older with a history of six or more episodes of genital herpes during 12 of the 14-months prior to study entry and were not receiving suppressive therapy. They were randomized to receive oral famciclovir 250 mg twice daily or placebo for 52 weeks. The primary outcome measures were (1) the proportion of patients who remained free from clinical HSV recurrences, confirmed by viral culture, for at least 6 months after the start of study medication; (2) the time to first clinically confirmed lesional episode; and (3) the frequency of adverse events. RESULTS: A significantly greater proportion of famciclovir-treated patients (151/191, 79%) were free from HSV recurrences at 6 months compared with placebo recipients (48/184, 26%) (p<0.001); efficacy was maintained at 12 months. The median time for the first clinically confirmed lesional episode was significantly prolonged for famciclovir recipients (more than one year) compared with placebo recipients (59 days; p<0.0001). Famciclovir was well tolerated, with an adverse-experience profile comparable with placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Oral famciclovir 250 mg twice daily is an effective, well-tolerated treatment for the suppression of genital HSV infection in patients with frequent recurrences.