Regeneration of cervix after excisional treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a study of collagen distribution.

OBJECTIVE: To study the distribution of collagen in the regenerated cervical tissue after excisional treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN). DESIGN: Cohort study. SETTING: A large tertiary teaching hospital in London. POPULATION: Women who underwent repeat excisional treatment for treatment failure or persistent CIN. METHODS: Eligible women who underwent a repeat excisional treatment for treatment failure, including hysterectomy, between January 2002 and December 2007 in our colposcopy unit were identified by the Infoflex(®) database and SNOMED encoded histopathology database. Collagen expression was assessed using picro-Sirius red stain and the intensity of staining was compared in paired specimens from the first and second treatments. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Differences in collagen expression were examined in the paired excisional treatment specimens. RESULTS: A total of 17 women were included. Increased collagen expression in the regenerated cervical tissue of the second cone compared with the first cone was noted in six women, decreased expression was noted in five women, and the pattern of collagen distribution was equivocal in six women. CONCLUSION: There is no overall change in collagen distribution during regeneration following excisional treatment for CIN.

Secondary excision for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: an evaluation of two treatment methods.

A small proportion of women require repeat treatments for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN). This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of two cervical excisional techniques offered within a London teaching hospital (large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) and laser cone biopsy) when carried out as secondary procedures. A significantly larger volume of tissue was excised following laser cone biopsy, however the depth of the specimen did not differ significantly. A trend for a larger percentage of secondary specimens, resulting in complete endo-cervical margins and a larger proportion of women achieving cytology negative for CIN post-treatment was shown within the laser cone biopsy group.

The volume perspective: a comparison of two excisional treatments for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (laser versus LLETZ).

OBJECTIVE: To compare two excisional treatments, laser cone biopsy and large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ), in terms of the volume of tissue removed, and to determine the relation between the height and the total volume of the cone specimen. DESIGN: Retrospective cross-sectional study. SETTING: Large teaching hospital in London. POPULATION: A total of 1136 eligible excisional treatments (laser cone or large loop excision of the transformation zone, LLETZ). METHODS: Eligible excisional treatments (laser cone or LLETZ) performed between 1 January 2002 and 31 December 2007 in our colposcopy unit were identified using the Infoflex(R) database. The total volume of the cone biopsy was calculated mathematically using the data provided in the histopathology reports. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The volume of the cone biopsy was compared with the technique of excision and the histology grades. RESULTS: Three hundred and thirty-nine laser cone biopsies were performed, whereas 797 LLETZ biopsies were recorded, during the study period. There was no difference in the mean age in the two groups. However, there is a proportional increase in the volume of the cone as the height of the cone increases, and a significant number of the values are skewed, suggesting that the diameter of the base of the cone contributes significantly to the total volume. Laser cone biopsies (median volume 1.84 cm(3), 95% CI 1.98-2.54 cm(3)) account for a larger volume of tissue excised compared with LLETZ (median volume 0.78 cm(3), 95% CI 0.91-1.02 cm(3)) (P < 0.0001). This relationship is not altered when the two procedures are stratified for grade of lesion, i.e. excision for low-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) (laser median volume 1.55 cm(3), 95% CI 1.46-2.06; LLETZ median volume 0.62 cm(3), 95% CI 0.73-0.88 cm(3)) (P < 0.0001) or high-grade CIN (laser median volume 1.84 cm(3), 95% CI 2.11-2.53 cm(3); LLETZ median volume 0.82 cm(3), 95% CI 0.94-1.07 cm(3)) (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The volume of cervical tissue removed during laser conisation is significantly more than that removed with LLETZ. The indication of the cone biopsy does influence the volume of tissue removed.

Comparison of particle penetration with non-spherical polyvinyl alcohol versus trisacryl gelatin microspheres in women undergoing premyomectomy uterine artery embolization.

AIM: The purpose of this study was to compare the depth of vascular penetration of non-spherical polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) versus trisacryl gelatin microspheres (MS) in women undergoing uterine artery embolization (UAE) immediately before transabdominal myomectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 17 patients who had been referred for embolization before myomectomy underwent bilateral uterine artery embolization using either 355-500 microm PVA (group A) or 700-900 microm MS (group B). The depth of penetration of the particles was assessed by identifying their presence and location in the resected specimen. RESULTS: Of the 17 women enrolled in this study, 10 were in group A and 6 in group B. One woman underwent embolization using both types of particle and was excluded from the analysis. Embolic particles were significantly (p = 0.048) more frequently located within the fibroid (4/6, 67%) in Group B than Group A (1/10, 10%). Particles were also identified in the perifibroid tissues in 4/6 (67%) in Group B and 4/10 (40%) in Group A, with no statistical difference. There were no procedural complications. CONCLUSION: MS particles (700-900 microm) penetrate significantly deeper into leiomyomata compared with non-spherical PVA (355-500 microm). MS may therefore confer advantages in UAE, as they may more specifically target the fibroid, allowing an earlier end-point to embolization and minimizing ischaemic damage to normal myometrium and ovaries.

Anterior prostate cancer: is it more difficult to diagnose?

UNLABELLED: OBJECTIVE; To determine whether anterior prostatic tumours are adequately sampled using the Stamey sextant protocol, as a fifth of prostate cancers are anterior in distribution at radical prostatectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All tumours (62) with an anterior distribution (>or=75% of the tumour anterior to the urethra) on radical prostatectomy whole-mounts, and in which the number and results of the sextant biopsies were available, were extracted from a prostate cancer database. Sixty-one posterior tumours (>or=75% of the malignant tissue posterior to the urethra) and their corresponding sextant biopsies were also retrieved for comparison. The number of biopsy sessions, the number of cores involved and the summated tumour length were recorded, together with the prostate gland weight, the tumour volume and the site of >or=75% of tumour in the superior-inferior axis. RESULTS: Anterior tumours required significantly more biopsy sessions to diagnose prostate cancer than posterior neoplasms (anterior, one set 47; > one set 15; posterior, one set 57; > one set, four, P=0.007). Anterior tumours had fewer cores with tumour involvement and less summated tumour length than had posterior cancers. The mean (sd) number of positive cores was; anterior 1.8 (1.01), posterior 2.50 (1.30) (P=0.001); the summated tumour length was; anterior 5.05 (4.10) mm, posterior 9.25 (7.80) mm (P<0.001). There was no significant difference in gland weight (mean anterior 43.8 g; posterior 48.3 g, P=0.3) or tumour volume (mean anterior 1.85 mL; posterior 1.49 mL, P=0.11) between the groups. There was no significant difference between the incidence of anterior and posterior neoplasms with respect to their position in the superior-inferior axis (P=0.96). CONCLUSIONS: Anterior prostate tumours account for 21% of all prostate cancers. They more often require multiple sets of sextant biopsies for diagnosis, and yield smaller areas of cancer on core biopsies than do posterior tumours in glands of similar weight and tumour volume. If prostate cancer is suspected clinically but biopsies are negative, targeting the anterior gland at subsequent prostatic biopsy should be considered.

Prevalence of prostatic intra-epithelial neoplasia (PIN) in biopsies from hospital practice and pilot screening: clinical implications.

As high grade PIN is commonly associated with concomitant cancer, current literature recommends re-biopsy of patients with high grade PIN. This paper describes the prevalence of high grade prostatic intra-epithelial neoplasia (PIN) from three independent clinical settings, reported by a single pathologist (MCP). High grade PIN was diagnosed in biopsies from 131 of the 1205 (11%) of patients in whom cancer was suspected in hospital practice, 42 of the 202 (20%) asymptomatic men screened for prostate cancer and 29 of the 118 (25%) patients presenting with prostatism in a case finding study. Re-biopsy on this scale has major clinical and cost implications. However, from a literature review, there is evidence to suggest that the risk of concomitant cancer with high grade PIN may be stratified according to serum PSA. This opinion should be tested prospectively.