Analysis of clinical and patient-reported outcomes in post-ELAPE perineal reconstruction with IGAP flap - A 5-year review.

BACKGROUND: Extralevator abdominoperineal excisions (ELAPE) are now the accepted treatment option for low rectal cancers, which result in large perineal defects necessitating reconstruction. The aim of our study was to assess the clinical outcomes as well as the quality-of-life parameters (QOLP) following these reconstructions. METHODS: A series of 27 patients who underwent ELAPE and immediate reconstruction with inferior gluteal artery perforator flaps (IGAP) between December 2013 to December 2018 were retrospectively analysed on patient demographics, disease and treatment, complications, and QOLP. RESULTS: With a mean age of 71.6 years, all patients had low rectal cancers and underwent ELAPE (24 open, 3 lap-assisted) and immediate IGAP flap reconstruction. The follow-up period was 1 year. The overall perineal early minor complication rate was 25.9% and the early major complication rate of 14.8%. QOLP, such as tolerance to sit, perineal pain, perineal aesthetics, showed high patient satisfaction of 77.7%, 40.74%, and 66.6%, respectively at 1 year. The perineal hernia rate was 14.8% with all patients being female (p 0.0407; significant). CONCLUSION: IGAP flaps are a reliable option for reconstructing post-ELAPE defects with good patient satisfaction and outcomes.

WALANT: A Discussion of Indications, Impact, and Educational Requirements.

Wide-awake, local anesthesia, no tourniquet (WALANT) is a technique that removes the requirement for operations to be performed with a tourniquet, general/regional anesthesia, sedation or an anesthetist. We reviewed the WALANT literature with respect to the diverse indications and impact of WALANT to discuss the importance of future surgical curriculum integration. With appropriate patient selection, WALANT may be used effectively in upper and lower limb surgery; it is also a useful option for patients who are unsuitable for general/regional anesthesia. There is a growing body of evidence supporting the use of WALANT in more complex operations in both upper and lower limb surgery. WALANT is a safe, effective, and simple technique associated with equivalent or superior patient pain scores among other numerous clinical and cost benefits. Cost benefits derive from reduced requirements for theater/anesthetic personnel, space, equipment, time, and inpatient stay. The lack of a requirement for general anesthesia reduces aerosol generating procedures, for example, intubation/high-flow oxygen, hence patients and staff also benefit from the reduced potential for infection transmission. WALANT provides a relatively, but not entirely, bloodless surgical field. Training requirements include the surgical indications, volume calculations, infiltration technique, appropriate perioperative patient/team member communication, and specifics of each operation that need to be considered, for example, checking of active tendon glide versus venting of flexor tendon pulleys. WALANT offers significant clinical, economic, and operative safety advantages when compared with general/regional anesthesia. Key challenges include careful patient selection and the comprehensive training of future surgeons to perform the technique safely.

Perioperative Thromboprophylaxis in Digital Replantation: A Systematic Review.

There is no international consensus on the use of perioperative thromboprophylaxis in digital replantation. Suboptimal perioperative management may lead to replant failure, which compromises extremity function, worsens psychosocial outcomes for patients, and incurs significant cost. This systematic review evaluates and compares the efficacy and safety of perioperative antithrombotic protocols used in digital replantation. METHODS: A Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)--compliant prospectively registered (PROSPERO, CRD42018108695) systematic review was conducted. Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Medline, EMBASE, and Scopus were searched up until December 2019. Articles were assessed for eligibility in duplicate by 2 independent reviewers. All comparative studies that examined the use of perioperative thromboprophylaxis in digital replantation were eligible for inclusion. RESULTS: Collectively, 1,025 studies were identified of which 7 met full inclusion criteria reporting data from 635 patients (908 digital replants, 86% men, average age 37.3 years). Laceration was the most commonly reported mechanism of injury (68%), with 33% of replantation occurring in Tamai zone III. Fourteen distinct perioperative protocols were identified. One study reported significantly higher digital survival with continuous heparin infusion versus bolus heparin. Five studies demonstrated a significantly higher incidence of complications among patients treated with systemic heparin. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical efficacy and safety of perioperative antithrombotic therapy following digital replantation remains equivocal. The perceived benefits of improved digital survival must be tempered against the adverse systemic side effects of antithrombotic and anticoagulant therapies until further prospectively collected data sets become available.

Case series: The modified skoog approach for definitive management of severe hidradenitis suppurativa of the axilla.

Hidradenitis Suppurativa (HS) is a chronic, recurrent, suppurative, cutaneous disease, manifested by abscesses, fistulating sinus tracts and scarring (Brown, Rosen, & Orengo, 1998). After failed conservative management, surgical excision is the only definitive option (Edlich et al. 1986). There are several approaches to the excision and wound closure of axillary HS, mostly involving radical excision with associated risks of poor wound healing despite advanced wound closure techniques. We present a case series using the Modified Skoog approach for the management of axillary HS as a skin sparing technique that offers adequate wound healing, a short hospital stay and high patient satisfaction.

Association between the appendix and the fecalith in adults.

BACKGROUND: We sought to determine the association between the presence of a fecalith and acute/nonperforated appendicitis, gangrenous/perforated appendicitis and the healthy appendix. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed appendectomies performed between October 2003 and February 2012. We collected data on age, sex, appendix histology and the presence of a fecalith. RESULTS: During the study period, 1357 appendectomies were performed. Fecaliths were present in 186 patients (13.7%). There were 94 male (50.5%) and 92 female patients, and the mean age was 32 (range of 10-76) years. The fecalith rate was 13%- 16% and was nonexistant after age 80 years. The main groups with fecaliths were those with acute/nonperforated appendicitis (n = 121, 65.1%, p = 0.041) and those with a healthy appendix (n = 65, 34.9%, p = 0.003). The presence of fecaliths in the gangrenous/perforated appendicitis group was not significant (n = 19, 10.2%, p = 0.93). There were no fecaliths in patients with serositis, carcinoid or carcinoma. CONCLUSION: Our data confirm the theory of a statistical association between the presence of a fecalith and acute (nonperforated) appendicitis in adults. There was also a significant association between the healthy appendix and asymptomatic fecaliths. There was no correlation between a gangrenous/perforated appendix and the presence of a fecalith. The fecalith is an incidental finding and not always the primary cause of acute (nonperforated) appendictis or gangrenous (perforated) appendicitis. Further research on the topic is recommended.

CONTEXTE: Nous avons voulu examiner le lien entre la présence d'un fécalome et l'appendicite aiguë/non perforée, l'appendicite gangreneuse/perforée et un appendice sain. MÉTHODES: Nous avons analysé de manière rétrospective les appendicectomies effectuées entre octobre 2003 et février 2012. Nous avons recueilli des données sur l'âge, le sexe, l'histologie de l'appendice et la présence d'un fécalome. RÉSULTANTS: Durant la période de l'étude, 1357 appendicectomies ont été effectuées. Des fécalomes étaient présents chez 186 patients (13,7 %). L'étude regroupait 94 hommes (50,5 %) et 92 femmes; l'âge moyen était de 32 ans (entre 10 et 76 ans). Le taux de fécalome était de 13 % à 16 % et non existant après l'âge de 80 ans. Les principaux groupes porteurs de fécalomes étaient ceux qui présentaient une appendicite aiguë/non perforée (n = 121, 65,1 %, p = 0,041) et ceux dont l'appendice était sain (n = 65, 34,9 %, p = 0,003). La présence de fécalomes dans le groupe souffrant d'appendicite gangreneuse/perforée s'est révélée non significative (n = 19, 10,2 %, p = 0,93). Les patients qui souffraient de sérosite, de carcinoïde ou de carcinome ne présentaient pas de fécalomes. CONCLUSION: Nos données confirment la théorie d'un lien statistique entre la présence d'un fécalome et une appendicite aiguë (non perforée) chez l'adulte. On a également observé un lien significatif entre un appendice sain et des fécalomes asymptomatiques. On n'a observé aucune corrélation entre un appendice gangreneux/perforé et la présence de fécalomes. Le fécalome est une observation accessoire qui n'est pas toujours la principale cause de l'appendicite aiguë (non perforée) ou de l'appendicite gangreneuse (perforée). Une recherche plus approfondie à ce sujet est recommandée.