Hepatic venous pressure gradient: Inaccurately estimates portal venous pressure gradient in alcoholic cirrhosis and portal hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Portal hypertension (PHT) in patients with alcoholic cirrhosis causes a range of clinical symptoms, including gastroesophageal varices and ascites. The hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG), which is easier to measure, has replaced the portal venous pressure gradient (PPG) as the gold standard for diagnosing PHT in clinical practice. Therefore, attention should be paid to the correlation between HVPG and PPG. AIM: To explore the correlation between HVPG and PPG in patients with alcoholic cirrhosis and PHT. METHODS: Between January 2017 and June 2020, 134 patients with alcoholic cirrhosis and PHT who met the inclusion criteria underwent various pressure measurements during transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt procedures. Correlations were assessed using Pearson's correlation coefficient to estimate the correlation coefficient (r) and determination coefficient (R2). Bland-Altman plots were constructed to further analyze the agreement between the measurements. Disagreements were analyzed using paired t tests, and P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: In this study, the correlation coefficient (r) and determination coefficient (R2) between HVPG and PPG were 0.201 and 0.040, respectively (P = 0.020). In the 108 patients with no collateral branch, the average wedged hepatic venous pressure was lower than the average portal venous pressure (30.65 ± 8.17 vs. 33.25 ± 6.60 mmHg, P = 0.002). Hepatic collaterals were identified in 26 cases with balloon occlusion hepatic venography (19.4%), while the average PPG was significantly higher than the average HVPG (25.94 ± 7.42 mmHg vs 9.86 ± 7.44 mmHg; P < 0.001). The differences between HVPG and PPG < 5 mmHg in the collateral vs no collateral branch groups were three cases (11.54%) and 44 cases (40.74%), respectively. CONCLUSION: In most patients, HVPG cannot accurately represent PPG. The formation of hepatic collaterals is a vital reason for the strong underestimation of HVPG.

A novel nomogram predicting overt hepatic encephalopathy after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in portal hypertension patients.

We aim to develop a nomogram to predict overt hepatic encephalopathy (OHE) after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) in patients with portal hypertension, according to demographic/clinical indicators such as age, creatinine, blood ammonia, indocyanine green retention rate at 15 min (ICG-R15) and percentage of Portal pressure gradient (PPG) decline. In this retrospective study, 296 patients with portal hypertension who received elective TIPS in Beijing Shijitan Hospital from June 2018 to June 2020 were included. These patients were randomly divided into a training cohort (n = 207) and a validation cohort (n = 89). According to the occurrence of OHE, patients were assigned to OHE group and non-OHE group. Both univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine independent variables for predicting OHE after TIPS. Accordingly, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to compare the accuracy and superiority of a novel model with conventional Child-Pugh and MELD scoring model. Age (OR 1.036, 95% CI 1.002-1.070, p = 0.037), Creatinine (OR 1.011, 95% CI 1.003-1.019, p = 0.009), Blood ammonia (OR 1.025, 95% CI 1.006-1.044, p = 0.011), ICG-R15 (OR 1.030, 95% CI 1.009-1.052, p = 0.004) and Percentage decline in PPG (OR 1.068, 95% CI 1.029-1.109, p = 0.001) were independent risk factors for OHE after TIPS using multifactorial analysis. A nomogram was constructed using a well-fit calibration curve for each of these five covariates. When compared to Child-Pugh and MELD score, this new nomogram has a better predictive value (C-index = 0.828, 95% CI 0.761-0.896). Consistently, this finding was reproduceable in validation cohort and confirmed with DCA. A unique nomogram was developed to predict OHE after TIPS in patients with PHT, with a high prediction sensitivity and specificity performance than commonly applied scoring systems.

Correlation between hepatic venous pressure gradient and portal pressure gradient in patients with autoimmune cirrhotic portal hypertension and collateral branches of the hepatic vein.

AIM: To assess the correlation and agreement between hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) and portal pressure gradient (PPG) in patients with autoimmune liver diseases (ALD) and portal hypertension, and to investigate the extent to which hepatic vein collateralization affects the accuracy of this assessment. METHODS: Ninety-eight patients with ALD between 2017 and 2021 who underwent transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt with conventional and innovative 15 mL pressurized contrast were selected to measure wedged hepatic venous pressure (WHVP) and portal venous pressure and to calculate the HVPG and PPG. Pearson's correlation was used for correlation analysis between the two groups. Bland-Altman plots were plotted to estimate the agreement between paired pressures. RESULTS: The r values of PPG and HVPG in the early, middle, late, and portal venous visualization were 0.404, 0.789, 0.807, and 0.830, respectively, and the R2 values were 0.163, 0.622, 0.651, and 0.690, respectively. The p value for the r and R2 values in the early group was 0.015, and the p values in the remaining groups were less than 0.001. Bland-Altman plots showed that patients in the portal venous visualization group had the narrowest 95% limits of agreement. The mean value of the difference was close to the zero-scale line. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with ALD, the correlation between the HVPG and PPG was good, and the later the collateral development, the better the correlation. Hepatic vein collateral was an essential factor in underestimating WHVP and HVPG, and the earlier the collateral appeared, the more obvious the underestimation.

Innovative angiography: a new approach to discover more hepatic vein collaterals in patients with cirrhotic portal hypertension.

BACKGROUND: The hemodynamics of patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension are complex and variable. We aimed to investigate differences in venous pressures determined by innovative angiography and conventional angiography using balloon occlusion of the hepatic veins in patients with alcoholic cirrhosis and portal hypertension. METHODS: A total of 134 patients with alcoholic cirrhosis who fulfilled the inclusion criteria from June 2017 to June 2020 were included. During transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt, conventional and innovative angiography were performed, and venous pressures were measured. A paired t-test and Pearson's correlation coefficient were used for analysis. RESULTS: Conventional and innovative hepatic angiography detected lateral branches of the hepatic vein in 26 (19.4%) and 65 (48.5%) cases, respectively (P < 0.001). Innovative angiography detected a total of 65 patients with lateral shunts, of whom 37 (56.9%) had initial shunts. The average wedged hepatic venous pressure and portal venous pressure of the initial lateral branches were 21.27 ± 6.66 and 35.84 ± 7.86 mmHg, respectively, with correlation and determination coefficients of 0.342 (P < 0.05) and 0.117, respectively. The mean hepatic venous pressure gradient and portal pressure gradient were 9.59 ± 7.64 and 26.86 ± 6.78 mmHg, respectively, with correlation and determination coefficients of 0.292 (P = 0.079) and 0.085, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Innovative angiography reveals collateral branches of the hepatic veins more effectively than conventional angiography. Hepatic vein collateral branches are the primary factors leading to underestimation of wedged hepatic venous pressures and hepatic venous pressure gradients, with the initial hepatic vein collateral branches resulting in the most severe underestimations.

Adverse events after the transjugular intrahepatic portal shunt are linked to serum metabolomic changes following the procedure.

Background and Objective: Transjugular intrahepatic portal shunt (TIPS) insertion could promote weight gain and muscle and fat mass increase in patients with cirrhosis. However, few studies have focused on metabolic changes after TIPS. This study aims to explore metabolic changes after TIPS and potential biomarkers of adverse events. Methods: Peripheral and portal serum samples were collected before and after TIPS insertion. Untargeted metabolomics was performed using ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Spearman's correlation analysis was used to determine the relationship between metabolites and clinical parameters. Metabolite set enrichment analysis was performed to explore enriched pathways. The predictive value of the metabolites was calculated by receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis. Results: Metabolites in the peripheral and portal serum significantly changed early after TIPS. Some lipid metabolites were significantly correlated with liver function parameters. Both elevated and depleted metabolites were mainly enriched in amino acid metabolism. Nine and 12 portal metabolites have moderate predictive value in post-TIPS liver function decline and hepatic encephalopathy (HE), separately (area under curve >0.7). Conclusion: Metabolites in the peripheral and portal veins significantly changed after TIPS. Some metabolic changes might be ascribed to liver function decline early after TIPS. Nine and 12 portal metabolites might be potential biomarkers in prediction of liver function decline and HE, separately.

Computed tomography perfusion in differentiating portal hypertension: A correlation study with hepatic venous pressure gradient.

BACKGROUND: Hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) is the gold standard for diagnosis of portal hypertension (PH), invasiveness and potential risks in the process of measurement limited its widespread use. AIM: To investigate the correlation of computed tomography (CT) perfusion parameters with HVPG in PH, and quantitatively assess the blood supply changes in liver and spleen parenchyma before and after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS). METHODS: Twenty-four PH related gastrointestinal bleeding patients were recruited in this study, and all patients were performed perfusion CT before and after TIPS surgery within 2 wk. Quantitative parameters of CT perfusion, including liver blood volume (LBV), liver blood flow (LBF), hepatic arterial fraction (HAF), spleen blood volume (SBV) and spleen blood flow (SBF), were measured and compared before and after TIPS, and the quantitative parameters between clinically significant PH (CSPH) and non-CSPH (NCSPH) group were also compared. Then the correlation of CT perfusion parameters with HVPG were analyzed, with statistical significance as P < 0.05. RESULTS: For all 24 PH patients after TIPS, CT perfusion parameters demonstrated decreased LBV, increased HAF, SBV and SBF, with no statistical difference in LBF. Compared with NCSPH, CSPH showed higher HAF, with no difference in other CT perfusion parameters. HAF before TIPS showed positive correlation with HVPG (r = 0.530, P = 0.008), while no correlation was found in other CT perfusion parameters with HVPG and Child-Pugh scores. CONCLUSION: HAF, an index of CT perfusion, was positive correlation with HVPG, and higher in CSPH than NCSPH before TIPS. While increased HAF, SBF and SBV, and decreased LBV, were found after TIPS, which accommodates a potential non-invasive imaging tool for evaluation of PH.

Short-term efficacy assessment of transarterial chemoembolization combined with radioactive iodine therapy in primary hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is an effective treatment for primary hepatocellular carcinoma (PHC). Radioactive iodine therapy has been used in the treatment of advanced PHC, especially in patients with portal vein tumor thrombosis. However, data on the therapeutic effect of TACE combined with radioactive iodine therapy in PHC are scarce. AIM: To investigate the clinical efficacy of TACE combined with radioactive iodine implantation therapy in advanced PHC via perfusion computed tomography (CT). METHODS: For this study, 98 advanced PHC patients were recruited and divided randomly into the study and control groups. Patients in the study group were treated with TACE combined radioactive iodine implantation therapy. Patients in the control group were treated with only TACE. The tumor lesion length, clinical effect, serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and CT perfusion parameters were compared before and after therapy, and statistical analysis was performed. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in tumor length and serum AFP between the study and control groups (P > 0.05) before treatment. However, the tumor length and serum AFP in the study group were lower than those in the control group 1 mo and 3 mo after therapy. After 3 mo of treatment, the complete and partial remission rate of the study group was 93.88%, which was significantly higher than the control group (77.55%) (P < 0.05). Before treatment, there were no significant differences between the two groups on the perfusion CT variables, including the lesion blood volume, permeability surface, blood flow, hepatic artery flow and mean transit time (P > 0.05). After 3 mo of treatment, all perfusion CT variables were lower in the study group compared to the control group (P < 0.05). The survival time of patients in the study group was 22 mo compared to 18 mo in the control group, which was significantly different [log rank (Mantel-Cox) = 4.318, P = 0.038]. CONCLUSION: TACE combined with radioactive iodine implantation in the treatment of advanced PHC can inhibit the formation of blood vessels in tumor tissue and reduce the perfusion level of tumor lesions, thereby improving the clinical efficacy and prolonging the survival time of patients.

Computed tomography perfusion in liver and spleen for hepatitis B virus-related portal hypertension: A correlation study with hepatic venous pressure gradient.

BACKGROUND: Hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) is the gold standard for diagnosis of portal hypertension (PH). However, its use can be limited because it is an invasive procedure. Therefore, it is necessary to explore a non-invasive method to assess PH. AIM: To investigate the correlation of computed tomography (CT) perfusion of the liver with HVPG and Child-Pugh score in hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related PH. METHODS: Twenty-eight patients (4 female, 24 male) with gastroesophageal variceal bleeding induced by HBV-related PH were recruited in our study. All patients received CT perfusion of the liver before transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent-shunt (TIPS) therapy. Quantitative parameters of CT perfusion of the liver, including liver blood flow (LBF), liver blood volume (LBV), hepatic artery fraction, splenic blood flow and splenic blood volume were measured. HVPG was recorded during TIPS therapy. Correlation of liver perfusion with Child-Pugh score and HVPG were analyzed, and the receiver operating characteristic curve was analyzed. Based on HVPG (> 12 mmHg vs ≤ 12 mmHg), patients were divided into moderate and severe groups, and all parameters were compared. RESULTS: Based on HVPG, 18 patients were classified into the moderate group and 10 patients were classified into the severe group. The Child-Pugh score, HVPG, LBF and LBV were significantly higher in the moderate group compared to the severe group (all P < 0.05). LBF and LBV were negatively associated with HVPG (r = -0.473, P < 0.05 and r = -0.503, P < 0.01, respectively), whereas splenic blood flow was positively associated with hepatic artery fraction (r = 0.434, P < 0.05). LBV was negatively correlated with Child-Pugh score. Child-Pugh score was not related to HVPG. Using a cutoff value of 17.85 mL/min/100 g for LBV, the sensitivity and specificity of HVPG ≥ 12 mmHg for diagnosis were 80% and 89%, respectively. CONCLUSION: LBV and LBF were negatively correlated with HVPG and Child-Pugh scores. CT perfusion imaging is a potential non-invasive quantitative predictor for PH in HBV-related liver cirrhosis.

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt with radioactive seed strand for main portal vein tumor thrombosis with cirrhotic portal hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma complicated with main portal vein tumor thrombosis (mPVTT) and cirrhotic portal hypertension (CPH) have an extremely poor prognosis, and there is a lack of a clinically effective treatment paradigm. AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) combined with radioactive seed strand for the treatment of mPVTT patients with CPH. METHODS: The clinical data of 83 consecutive patients who underwent TIPS combined with 125I seed strand placement for mPVTT and CPH from January 2015 to December 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Procedure-related data (success rate, relief of portal vein pressure and CPH symptoms, and adverse events), PVTT response, and patient survival were assessed through a 2-year follow-up. RESULTS: The success rate was 100.0% without perioperative death or procedure-related severe adverse events. The mean portal vein pressure was significantly decreased after the procedure (22.25 ± 7.33 mmHg vs 35.12 ± 7.94 mmHg, t = 20.61, P < 0.001). The symptoms of CPH were all effectively relieved within 1 mo. The objective response rate of PVTT was 67.5%. During a mean follow-up of 14.5 ± 9.4 mo (range 1-37 mo), the cumulative survival rates at 6, 12 and 24 mo were 83.1%, 49.7%, and 21.8%, respectively. The median survival time was 12.0 ± 1.3 mo (95% confidence interval: 9.5-14.5). In multivariate Cox regression analysis, body mass index, Child-Pugh grade, cTNM stage, and PVTT response were independent prognostic factors (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: TIPS combined with radioactive seed strand might be effective and safe in treating mPVTT patients with CPH.

Correlation between hepatic venous pressure gradient and portal venous pressure gradient in hepatitis B cirrhosis with different hepatic veins anatomy.

PURPOSE: The hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) has been employed as the gold standard for indicating the portal venous pressure gradient (PPG) in the diagnosis of portal hypertension (PHT). However, little has been reported on whether the HVPG can accurately estimate the PPG in patients with hepatic vein collateral shunts. We aimed to explore the correlation between the HVPG and the PPG in hepatitis B cirrhosis patients with different hepatic vein anatomies. METHODS: A total of 461 hepatitis B cirrhosis patients with portal hypertension (PHT) who were treated with a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) between January 2016 and June 2020 were included. All patients underwent various venous pressure measurements and balloon-occluded compression hepatic venography during the TIPS operation. Agreements were evaluated by Pearson's correlation and the Bland-Altman method. Disagreements were assessed by paired t tests. RESULTS: The correlation coefficient (r) values (P < 0.001) between the HVPG and the PPG of the early (151 patients, 32.8 %), middle (73 patients, 15.8 %), late (46 patients, 10.0 %), portal vein (151 patients, 32.8 %), and no lateral branch development groups (40 patients, 8.7 %) were 0.373, 0.487, 0.569, 0.690, and 0.575, respectively; the determination coefficient (R2) values were 0.139, 0.238, 0.323, 0.475, and 0.330, respectively. According to the Bland-Altman method, agreement was the greatest in the portal vein development group, with the 95 % limits of agreement (95 % LoA, mean differences ± 1.96 SD) being the smallest. The differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The correlation between the HVPG and the PPG is the worst in early lateral branch development, followed by middle development, and the influence of lateral branches becomes significantly reduced in late development. Hepatic venous collateral formation is a vital factor for underestimation of the HVPG, which is the most accurate predictor of PPG in patients with portal vein development. Patients with no collateral channel development in the hepatic vein have a higher HVPG than PPG, which is an important reason for overestimation of the HVPG.

Correlation of pressure gradient in three hepatic veins with portal pressure gradient.

BACKGROUND: The liver is one of the most important organs in the human body, with functions such as detoxification, digestion, and blood coagulation. In terms of vascular anatomy, the liver is divided into the left and the right liver by the main portal vein, and there are three hepatic efferent veins (right, middle, and left) and two portal branches. Patients with impaired liver function have increased intrahepatic vascular resistance and splanchnic vasodilation, which may lead to an increase in the portal pressure gradient (PPG) and cause portal hypertension (PHT). In order to measure the increased pressure gradient of portal vein, the hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) can be measured to reflect it in clinical practice. The accuracy of PPG measurements is directly related to patient prognosis. AIM: To analyze the correlation between HVPG of three hepatic veins and PPG in patients with PHT. METHODS: From January 2017 to December 2019, 102 patients with PHT who met the inclusion criteria were evaluated during the transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt procedure and analyzed. RESULTS: The mean HVPG of the middle hepatic vein was 17.47 ± 10.25 mmHg, and the mean HVPG of the right and left hepatic veins was 16.34 ± 7.60 and 16.52 ± 8.15 mmHg, respectively. The average PPG was 26.03 ± 9.24 mmHg. The correlation coefficient and coefficient of determination of the right hepatic vein, middle hepatic vein, and left hepatic vein were 0.15 and 0.02 (P = 0.164); 0.25 and 0.05 (P = 0.013); and 0.14 and 0.02 (P = 0.013), respectively. The mean wedged hepatic vein/venous pressure (WHVP) of the middle and left hepatic veins was similar at 29.71 ± 12.48 and 29.1 ± 10.91 mmHg, respectively, and the mean WHVP of the right hepatic vein was slightly lower at 28.01 ± 8.95 mmHg. The mean portal vein pressure was 34.11 ± 8.56 mmHg. The correlation coefficient and coefficient of determination of the right hepatic vein, middle hepatic vein, and left hepatic vein were 0.26 and 0.07 (P = 0.009); 0.38 and 0.15 (P < 0.001); and 0.26 and 0.07 (P = 0.008), respectively. The average free hepatic venous pressure (FHVP) of the right hepatic vein was lowest at 11.67 ± 5.34 mmHg, and the average FHVP of the middle and left hepatic veins was slightly higher at 12.19 ± 4.88 and 11.67 ± 5.34 mmHg, respectively. The average inferior vena cava pressure was 8.27 ± 4.04 mmHg. The correlation coefficient and coefficient of determination of the right hepatic vein, middle hepatic vein, and left hepatic vein were 0.30 and 0.09 (P = 0.002); 0.18 and 0.03 (P = 0.078); and 0.16 and 0.03 (P = 0.111), respectively. CONCLUSION: Measurement of the middle hepatic vein HVPG could better represent PPG. Considering the high success rate of clinical measurement of the right hepatic vein, it can be the second choice.

Hepatic parenchyma and vascular blood flow changes after TIPS with spectral CT iodine density in HBV-related liver cirrhosis.

To compare changes in spectral CT iodine densities of hepatic parenchyma and vessels before and after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) in hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related liver cirrhosis. Twenty-five patients with HBV-related liver cirrhosis who received TIPS for gastroesophageal varices bleeding were recruited. Each patient underwent three phases contrast CT before and after TIPS within 4 weeks, with the raw data reconstructed at 1.25-mm-thick slices. Iodine density (in milligrams per milliliter) was measured on iodine-based material decomposition image. Multiple regions of interest (ROIs) in liver parenchyma, aorta and portal vein were selected from three slices of images. Portal vein trunk was set as the central one, and mean liver parenchymal iodine densities from arterial phase (AP), venous phase (VP) and equilibrium phase (EP) were recorded. Quantitative indices of iodine density (ID), including normalized ID in liver parenchyma for arterial phase (NIDLAP), ID of liver parenchyma for venous phase (IDLVP), ID of portal vein in venous phase (IDPVP) and liver arterial iodine density fraction (AIF), were measured and compared before and after TIPS. Based on Child-Pugh stage, 4, 12 and 9 patients were classified as grade A, B, and C, respectively. Liver volume was comparable before and after TIPS (1110.5 ± 287.4 vs. 1092.0 ± 276.3, P = 0.28). After TIPS, ID was decreased in aorta (146.0 ± 34.5 vs. 120.9 ± 30.7, P < 0.01) whereas increased in liver parenchyma at arterial phase, as demonstrated by IDAP (9.3 ± 3.1 vs. 13.4 ± 4.4 mg/mL) and AIF (0.40 ± 0.11 vs. 0.58 ± 0.11, P < 0.01). For venous or equilibrium phase, quantitative indices remained stable (23.1 ± 4.5 vs. 23.0 ± 5.3, 19.8 ± 4.1 vs. 19.4 ± 4.6) mg/mL (Ps > 0.05). For portal vein, ID and NID were increased after TIPS (23.1 ± 11.7 vs. 36.5 ± 13.0, 16.4 ± 8.5 vs. 31.8 ± 12.8) (P < 0.01). No positive correlation between iodine density and preoperative Child-Pugh score was observed. Based on iodine density measurement, spectral CT as a noninvasive imaging modality may assess hepatic parenchyma and vascular blood flow changes before and after TIPS in HBV-related liver cirrhosis.Clinical registration number: ChiCTR- DDC-16009986.

Comparative study of indocyanine green-R15, Child-Pugh score, and model for end-stage liver disease score for prediction of hepatic encephalopathy after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt.

BACKGROUND: Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) remains an enormous challenge in patients who undergo transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) implantation. The preoperative indocyanine green retention rate at 15 min (ICG-R15), as one of the liver function assessment tools, has been developed as a prognostic indicator in patients undergoing surgery, but there are limited data on its role in TIPS. AIM: To determine whether the ICG-R15 can be used for prediction of post-TIPS HE in decompensated cirrhosis patients with portal hypertension (PHT) and compare the clinical value of ICG-R15, Child-Pugh score (CPS), and model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score in predicting post-TIPS HE with PHT. METHODS: This retrospective study included 195 patients with PHT who underwent elective TIPS at Beijing Shijitan Hospital from January 2018 to June 2019. All patients underwent the ICG-R15 test, CPS evaluation, and MELD scoring 1 wk before TIPS. According to whether they developed HE or not, the patients were divided into two groups: HE group and non-HE group. The prediction of one-year post-TIPS HE by ICG-R15, CPS and MELD score was evaluated by the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs). RESULTS: A total of 195 patients with portal hypertension were included and 23% (45/195) of the patients developed post-TIPS HE. The ICG-R15 was identified as an independent predictor of post-TIPS HE. The AUCs for the ICG-R15, CPS, and MELD score for predicting post-TIPS HE were 0.664 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.557-0.743, P = 0.0046), 0.596 (95%CI: 0.508-0.679, P = 0.087), and 0.641 (95%CI: 0.554-0.721, P = 0.021), respectively. The non-parametric approach (Delong-Delong & Clarke-Pearson) showed that there was statistical significance in pairwise comparison between AUCs of ICG-R15 and MELD score (P = 0.0229). CONCLUSION: The ICG-R15 has appreciated clinical value for predicting the occurrence of post-TIPS HE and is a choice for evaluating the prognosis of patients undergoing TIPS.

Accurate ultrasonography-based portal pressure assessment in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Portal pressure is of great significance in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but direct measurement is complicated and costly; thus, non-invasive measurement methods are urgently needed. AIM: To investigate whether ultrasonography (US)-based portal pressure assessment could replace invasive transjugular measurement. METHODS: A cohort of 102 patients with HCC was selected (mean age: 54 ± 13 years, male/female: 65/37). Pre-operative US parameters were assessed by two independent investigators, and multivariate logistic analysis and linear regression analysis were conducted to develop a predictive formula for the portal pressure gradient (PPG). The estimated PPG predictors were compared with the transjugular PPG measurements. Validation was conducted on another cohort of 20 non-surgical patients. RESULTS: The mean PPG was 17.32 ± 1.97 mmHg. Univariate analysis identified the association of the following four parameters with PPG: Spleen volume, portal vein diameter, portal vein velocity (PVV), and portal blood flow (PBF). Multiple linear regression analysis was performed, and the predictive formula using the PVV and PBF was as follows: PPG score = 19.336 - 0.312 × PVV (cm/s) + 0.001 × PBF (mL/min). The PPG score was confirmed to have good accuracy with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.75 (0.68-0.81) in training patients. The formula was also accurate in the validation patients with an AUC of 0.820 (0.53-0.83). CONCLUSION: The formula based on ultrasonographic Doppler flow parameters shows a significant correlation with invasive PPG and, if further confirmed by prospective validation, may replace the invasive transjugular assessment.

High-mobility group protein B1: A predictive biomarker for hepatic encephalopathy after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to investigate whether portal level of high-mobility group protein B1 (HMGB1) is associated with hepatic encephalopathy (HE) after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS). METHODS: We enrolled 127 consecutive patients who underwent TIPS and collected portal and peripheral blood samples in our department from December 2017 to May 2019. HMGB1 levels were determined using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kits. HMGB1 and other HE related parameters were estimated by competing risk analysis, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: Patients with HE after TIPS were older (P = .019) and had higher portal HMGB1 level (P = .038) than those without. Univariate competing risk analysis: age (sHR 1.025, P = .026), hepatorenal syndrome (sHR 3.149, P = .010), model for end-of-stage liver disease (MELD) score (sHR 1.055, P = .024), prior HE (sHR 4.029, P = .0005), portal HMGB1 before TIPS (sHR 1.177, P = .001) reached statistical significance. Multivariate analysis: age (sHR 1.025, P = .037), MELD score (sHR 1.062, P = .011), prior HE (sHR 2.492, P = .030) and portal HMGB1 level before TIPS (sHR 1.217, P = .0002) were significantly different. ROC analyses and Kaplan-Meier curve showed portal HMGB1 level changes before and after TIPS (ΔHMGB1) had good predictive value in the cut-off 0.012 ng/mL (AUC = 0.748, P < .001, Sensitivity = 0.743, Specificity = 0.655). CONCLUSIONS: Portal HMGB1 may be a therapeutic target for post-TIPS HE.

Safety and efficacy of transfemoral intrahepatic portosystemic shunt for portal hypertension: A single-center retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Transfemoral intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TFIPS) can be performed to treat portal hypertension. However, few studies have evaluated the safety and efficacy of this technique. AIM: To retrospectively evaluate the safety and clinical outcomes of TFIPS and compare them with those of typical transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS). METHODS: This retrospective study was approved by our hospital ethics committee. From November 2012 to November 2015, 19 patients who underwent successful TFIPS placement were included. In addition, 21 patients treated with TIPS during the same period were selected as controls. Data collected included the success rate and complications of TIPS and TFIPS. Continuous data were expressed as the mean ± SD and were compared using the Student's t test. All categorical data were expressed as count (percentage) and were compared using the χ 2 test or Fisher's exact test. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate cumulative survival rate and survival curves. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were comparable between the two groups. The success rate of TFIPS and TIPS was 95% (19/20) and 100% (21/21), respectively. Effective portal decompression and free antegrade shunt flow was completed in all patients. The portal pressure gradient prior to TIPS and TFIPS placement was 23.91 ± 4.64 mmHg and 22.61 ± 5.39 mmHg, respectively, and it was significantly decreased to 10.85 ± 3.33 mmHg and 10.84 ± 3.33 mmHg after stent placement, respectively. Time-to-event calculated rates of shunt patency at one and two years in the TFIPS and TIPS groups were not statistically different (94.7% vs 95.2% and 94.7% vs 90.5%, respectively). De nova hepatic encephalopathy was 27.5% (11/40) with five patients in the TFIPS group (26.3%) and six patients (28.6%) in the TIPS group experiencing it (P = 0.873). The cumulative survival rates were similar between the two groups: 94.7% and 94.7% at 1 and 2 years, respectively, in the TFIPS group vs 100% and 95.2% at 1 and 2 years, respectively, in the TIPS group (P = 0.942). CONCLUSION: TFIPS may be a valuable adjunct to traditional approaches in patients with portal hypertension.

Iodine-125 implantation with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt for main portal vein tumor thrombus.

BACKGROUND: Main portal vein tumor thrombus (MPVTT), which has a high incidence, is the major complication of terminal liver cancer. The occurrence of MPVTT is always a negative prognostic factor for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Therefore, attention should be paid to the treatment of MPVTT and its complications. AIM: To evaluate the efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization/transarterial embolization (TACE/TAE)+125I seeds implantation with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) in treating MPVTT and its complications. METHODS: From January 2007 to March 2015, 85 consecutive patients with MPVTT were nonrandomly assigned to undergo treatment with TACE/TAE + TIPS and 125I implantation (TIPS-125I group) or TACE/TAE + TIPS only (TIPS only group) in Beijing Shijitan Hospital, and all clinical data were collected. During 24 mo follow-up, the incidence of overall survival, stent stenosis and symptom recurrence was analyzed to evaluate the efficacy of TIPS-125I. RESULTS: During 24 mo follow-up of all patients, we collected data at 6, 12 and 24 mo. The rates of survival were 80%, 45%, and 20%, respectively, in the TIPS-125I group, whereas those in the TIPS only group were 64.4%, 24.4%, and 4.4%, respectively (P < 0.05). The rates of symptom recurrence were 7.5%, 22.5%, and 35%, respectively, in the TIPS-125I group, whereas those in the TIPS only group were 31.1%, 62.2%, and 82.2% (P < 0.05). The rates of stent restenosis were 12.5%, 27.5%, and 42.5%, respectively, in the TIPS-125I group, and 42.2%, 68.9%, and 84.4%, respectively, in the TIPS only group (P < 0.05). TIPS-125I was found to be significantly favorable in treating MPVTT and its complications in patients with HCC. CONCLUSION: TACE/TAE+125I combined with TIPS is effective in treating MPVTT and its complications, improving quality of life of patients and reducing mortality.

Iodine density Changes in Hepatic and Splenic Parenchyma in Liver Cirrhosis with Dual Energy CT (DECT): A Preliminary Study.

PURPOSE: To investigate the hemodynamic changes in liver cirrhosis by comparing iodine density in hepatic and splenic parenchyma with 8 cm detector dual energy CT (DECT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-six consecutive patients with liver cirrhosis and 22 healthy volunteers were recruited in this study, and they were all performed contrast enhanced examination with 8 cm detector DECT. All raw data were reconstructed with 1.25 mm slice thickness, Iodine density (in milligrams per milliliter) were measured on iodine-based material decomposition images. Quantitative indices of iodine density (ID), including normalized ID of liver parenchyma for arterial phase (NIDLAP), ID of liver parenchyma for venous phase (IDLVP), ID of splenic parenchyma for arterial phase (IDSAP), ID of splenic parenchyma for venous phase (IDSVP), ID of portal vein in venous phase (IDPVP) and Liver arterial iodine density fraction (AIF) were measured and compared between two groups. The correlation between Child-Pugh grade and other quantitative indices were calculated, with statistical significance as P<0.05. RESULTS: For all 46 liver cirrhosis patients, 10 were classified in grade A, 24 in Grade B and 12 in Grade C. Compared with control group, patients with liver cirrhosis showed (1) no statistical difference in general data (age, gender, height and weight) (all P>0.05), (2) higher iodine density of NIDLAP, IDSVP, IDPVP and AIF, and lower NIDSAP (all P<0.01), (3) NIDLAP, AIF, IDSVP and IDPVP in grade A were all lower than Grade B and C (all P<0.01). (4) AIF and NIDLAP showed positive correlation with Child-Pugh grade, with coefficient of R = 0.71 and R = 0.46, respectively. CONCLUSION: Based on iodine density measurement in DECT, it is possible to evaluate the hemodynamic changes in liver and spleen parenchyma in liver cirrhosis. Quantitative indices of AIF and NIDLAP demonstrate positive correlation with Child-Pugh grade, which accommodates potential possibility for DECT as a noninvasive tool in assessing the severity of liver cirrhosis.

Benefits of Early Treatment for Patients with Hepatic Myelopathy Secondary to TIPS: A Retrospective Study in Northern China.

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is an effective therapy for reducing portal pressure. Hepatic myelopathy (HM), a rare complication of chronic liver diseases, remains obscure in terms of treatment and prognosis. We aimed to determine an optimal treat strategy for patients with HM after TIPS. Twenty-nine patients who developed HM after TIPS were stratified by time-lapse from onset to treatment: group A (n = 16), <6 months; group B (n = 13), ≥6 months. Therapeutic measures included shunt-limiting and medical treatments. Overall survival, lower-limb muscle strength, Fugl-Meyer score, Barthel index, and serum ammonia were recorded. Median survival time in group A or B was 30 months or 16.5 months, respectively (log rank p = 0.0172). All patients in group A obtained improvement in grading of muscle strength (p < 0.0001), Fugl-Meyer score (p = 0.0021), and Barthel index (p = 0.0003), particularly male patients and those subjected to shunt-limiting. Serum ammonia levels were decreased significantly in both group A (p = 0.0007) and group B (p = 0.0007). Collectively, once HM is confirmed after TIPS, active intervention is imperative and urgent, especially within the first 6 months from onset of symptom. TIPS shunt-limiting is particularly beneficial for rehabilitation in patients with early-onset HM.

Pathological Features of Mitochondrial Ultrastructure Predict Susceptibility to Post-TIPS Hepatic Encephalopathy.

Background: Post-TIPS hepatic encephalopathy (PSE) is a complex process involving numerous risk factors; the root cause is unclear, but an elevation of blood ammonia due to portosystemic shunt and metabolic disorders in hepatocytes has been proposed as an important risk factor. Aims: The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of pathological features of mitochondrial ultrastructure on PSE via transjugular liver biopsy at TIPS implantation. Methods: We evaluated the pathological damage of mitochondrial ultrastructure on recruited patients by the Flameng classification system. A score ≤2 (no or low damage) was defined as group A, and a score >2 (high damage level) was defined as group B; routine follow-up was required at 1 and 2 years; the incidence of PSE and multiple clinical data were recorded. Results: A total of 78 cases in group A and 42 in group B completed the study. The incidence of PSE after 1 and 2 years in group B (35.7% and 45.2%, respectively) was significantly higher than that in group A (16.7% and 24.4%, respectively); the 1- and 2-year OR (95% CI) were 2.778 (1.166-6.615) and 2.565 (1.155-5.696), respectively, for groups A and B. Importantly, group B had worse incidence of PSE than group A [P=0.014, hazard ratio (95%CI): 2.172 (1.190-4.678)]. Conclusion: Aggressive damage to mitochondrial ultrastructure in liver shunt predicts susceptibility to PSE. The registration number is NCT02540382.