Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Can J Surg ; 67(4): E295-E299, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39089817

RESUMO

SummaryCentralized referral systems have been successfully implemented to shorten and equalize surgical wait times; however, ongoing expenses make sustaining these projects challenging. We trialed a low-cost centralized booking project for hernia surgery in a community hospital from July to November 2019. Eligible patients (i.e., those with visible or palpable inguinal or umbilical hernias who were agreeable to an open mesh repair) were booked with the first available surgeon after initial consultation. Centrally booked patients with either inguinal or umbilical hernias waited a mean of 82 (standard deviation [SD] 32) and 80 (SD 66) days, respectively, while those who did not use the centralized system waited 137 (SD 89) and 181 (SD 92) days, respectively. Centralized booking increased operating room utilization as a larger pool of patients was available to call when last-minute cancellation occurred; centralized booking also effectively equalized wait-lists among 6 surgeons. Selective centralized booking is a promising concept that led to more efficient utilization of available operating room time with a significant decrease in wait times; this system could potentially improve access for all patients awaiting general surgery without requiring additional funding.


Assuntos
Agendamento de Consultas , Hérnia Inguinal , Herniorrafia , Encaminhamento e Consulta , Listas de Espera , Humanos , Encaminhamento e Consulta/organização & administração , Encaminhamento e Consulta/economia , Encaminhamento e Consulta/estatística & dados numéricos , Herniorrafia/economia , Hérnia Inguinal/cirurgia , Hérnia Inguinal/economia , Hérnia Umbilical/cirurgia , Hérnia Umbilical/economia , Salas Cirúrgicas/economia , Salas Cirúrgicas/organização & administração , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
2.
Am J Surg ; 231: 91-95, 2024 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38480062

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: We aimed to investigate the prevalence, characteristics, and management of nephrolithiasis in primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) patients. METHODS: Medical records of patients who underwent parathyroidectomy at a tertiary care hospital in British Columbia from January 2016 to April 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. Demographic data, laboratory results, imaging reports, and urologic consultations were examined. Descriptive statistics and relevant statistical tests, including logistic regressions, were utilized for data analysis. RESULT: Of the 413 PHPT patients included in the study population, 41.9% harbored renal stones, and nearly half (48.6%) required urological interventions. Male sex, elevated preoperative serum ionized calcium (iCa) and 24-h urinary calcium (24 â€‹h urine Ca) levels were independent risk factors for stone formation. Additionally, male sex, younger age, and lower preoperative serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) level were associated with higher odds of requiring urological intervention for stones. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified significant prevalence of asymptomatic renal calcifications in PHPT patients, with a substantial proportion necessitating urological intervention. These findings emphasize the importance of incorporating screening and treatment of renal stones into the management of PHPT patients.


Assuntos
Hiperparatireoidismo Primário , Nefrolitíase , Humanos , Masculino , Cálcio , Hiperparatireoidismo Primário/complicações , Hiperparatireoidismo Primário/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Nefrolitíase/complicações , Nefrolitíase/diagnóstico , Nefrolitíase/epidemiologia , Colúmbia Britânica , Paratireoidectomia/efeitos adversos , Hormônio Paratireóideo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA