Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Safety of Edoxaban in Pediatric Subjects: A Phase I Single-Dose Study.

This was an open-label, single-dose, phase I study to characterize the pharmacokinetics (PKs), pharmacodynamics (PDs), and safety of edoxaban in pediatric subjects from birth to 18 years at risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE). Children requiring anticoagulant therapy were enrolled into 5 age cohorts (0 to < 6 months (N = 12), 0.5 to < 2 years (N = 13), 2 to < 6 years (N = 13), 6 to < 12 years (N = 13), and 12 to < 18 years (N = 15)) receiving tablet or oral suspension of edoxaban at doses expected to be equivalent to 30 or 60 mg once daily (q.d.) in adult subjects with VTE. Sixty-six pediatric subjects were enrolled and completed the study. Edoxaban plasma concentration peaked between 1 and 3 hours and declined rapidly until 4-8 hours. The range of mean total apparent clearance across 5 age cohorts at low and high doses was 0.47 to 1.11 L/h/kg. The ranges of mean volume of central compartment and apparent peripheral volume were 2.31 to 3.59 L/kg and 1.92 to 4.14 L/kg, respectively. Across all age groups, the estimated median exposures were within the 0.5- to 1.5-fold of the median area under the plasma drug concentration-time curve (AUC) in adult subjects receiving corresponding doses (30 mg q.d. for low dose and 60 mg q.d. for high dose). In all age groups, PD parameters (prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, and anti-Factor Xa activity) showed a linear PK-PD relationship and were in line with previous adult data. The results support further evaluation of the pediatric doses in larger pivotal trials.

Dosing Recommendation Based on the Effects of Different Meal Types on Pexidartinib Pharmacokinetics in Healthy Subjects: Implementation of Model-informed Drug Development Strategy.

Pexidartinib, an oral small molecule inhibitor of the colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor, is approved for treatment of adults with symptomatic tenosynovial giant cell tumor associated with severe morbidity or functional limitations and not amenable to improvement with surgery. The original dosing regimen is 400 mg of pexidartinib (2 × 200-mg capsules) twice daily, administered on an empty stomach at least 1 hour before or 2 hours after a meal or snack. Because pexidartinib is likely to be taken over an extended period of time, the ability to take pexidartinib with a meal would simplify timing of administration and potentially improve compliance. Since administering 400 mg of pexidartinib with a low-fat meal increases exposure by ≈60% relative to the fasted state, administering 250 mg of pexidartinib with a low-fat meal (low-fat meal dosing regimen) was predicted to achieve an exposure similar to 400 mg administered during a fasted state (original dosing regimen). Based on clinical trial simulations with two one-sided t-tests and bootstrapping (ie, resampling) analyses, a bioequivalence study (n = 24) would have >90% power to conclude that the original dosing regimen (400 mg fasted twice daily) and the low-fat meal dosing regimen (250 mg with a low-fat meal twice daily) are bioequivalent. This report provides the outcome of the implementation of the model-informed drug development strategy to recommend and justify a low-fat meal dosing regimen for pexidartinib that has the potential to improve patient compliance while maintaining drug exposure.

Pharmacokinetics of the Multi-kinase Inhibitor Pexidartinib: Mass Balance and Dose Proportionality.

Pexidartinib is an oral small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor that selectively targets colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor. Two phase 1 single-center trials were conducted in healthy subjects to determine the absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion of pexidartinib using radiolabeled drug and to assess the dose proportionality of pexidartinib following single oral doses. In the mass balance study, eight male subjects received a single oral dose of [14 C]-pexidartinib 400 mg with radioactivity assessed in plasma, urine, and feces samples taken at various timepoints postdose. In the dose-proportionality study, 18 subjects received single doses of pexidartinib 200, 400, and 600 mg using randomization sequences. Peak pexidartinib and total radioactivity were observed at 1.75-2.0 hours after the oral dose and then declined in a multiphasic manner. The overall mean recovery of administered radioactivity was 92.2% over 240 hours with 64.8% in the feces and 27.4% in the urine. Major components detected in plasma were pexidartinib and glucuronide (M5, ZAAD-1006a), with M5 and pexidartinib detected in urine and feces, respectively. A glucuronide of dealkylated form (M1) in the urine and multiple oxidized forms (M2, M3, and M4) in feces were detected. The dose-proportionality study found dose-proportional drug exposure between the 200- and 400-mg doses and slightly less than proportional exposure between the 400- and 600-mg doses. These results from these studies provide insight into pexidartinib disposition after oral administration and support the development of dosing guidance in subjects with renal or hepatic impairment or subjects taking cytochrome P450 3A and uridine disphosphate-glucuronosyl transferase inhibitors and inducers.

Evaluation of Absorption and Metabolism-Based DDI Potential of Pexidartinib in Healthy Subjects.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Pexidartinib is a novel oral small-molecule inhibitor that selectively targets colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor, KIT proto-oncogene receptor tyrosine kinase, and FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 harboring an internal tandem duplication mutation. It is approved in the United States for the treatment of adult patients with symptomatic tenosynovial giant cell tumor (TGCT) associated with severe morbidity or functional limitations and not amenable to improvement with surgery. Pexidartinib in vitro data indicate the potential for absorption- and metabolism-related drug-drug interactions (DDIs). The objective was to present a comprehensive DDI risk assessment of agents that can impact pexidartinib exposure by altering its absorption and metabolism potentially affecting efficacy and safety of pexidartinib. METHODS: Four open-label crossover studies were performed to assess the effects of a pH modifier (esomeprazole), a strong cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 inhibitor (itraconazole), a strong CYP3A/5'-diphospho-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) inducer (rifampin), and a UGT inhibitor (probenecid) on the single-dose pharmacokinetics of pexidartinib. In addition, a physiologically based pharmacokinetic model was developed to predict the effect of a moderate CYP3A4 inhibitor (fluconazole) and a moderate CYP3A inducer (efavirenz) on the pharmacokinetics of pexidartinib. RESULTS: Co-administration of pexidartinib with esomeprazole modestly decreased pexidartinib exposure (maximum plasma concentration [Cmax], ng/mL: geometric mean ratio [90% confidence interval (CI)], 45.4% [36.8-55.9]; area under the drug plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity [AUC∞], ng•h/mL: geometric mean ratio [90% CI], 53.1% [47.4-59.3]), likely related to decreased solubility of pexidartinib at increased pH levels. As expected, the strong CYP3A4 inhibitor itraconazole increased pexidartinib exposure (Cmax, ng/mL: geometric mean ratio [90% CI], 148.3% [127.8-172.0]; AUC∞, ng•h/mL: geometric mean ratio [90% CI], 173.0% [160.7-186.3]) while the strong CYP3A/UGT inducer rifampin decreased exposure (Cmax, ng/mL: geometric mean ratio [90% CI], 67.1% [53.1-84.8]; AUC∞, ng•h/mL: geometric mean ratio [90% CI], 37.0% [30.6-44.8]). In addition, UGT inhibition increased pexidartinib exposure (Cmax, ng/mL: geometric mean ratio [90% CI], 105.8% [92.4-121.0]; AUC∞, ng•h/mL: geometric mean ratio [90% CI], 159.8% [143.4-178.0]), consistent with the fact that pexidartinib is a substrate of the UGT1A4 enzyme, which is responsible for the generation of the major metabolite, ZAAD-1006a. CONCLUSIONS: The physiologically based pharmacokinetic model predicted that a moderate CYP3A4 inhibitor and a moderate CYP3A inducer would produce modest increases and decreases, respectively, in pexidartinib exposure. These results provide a basis for pexidartinib dosing recommendations when administered concomitantly with drugs with drug-drug interaction potential, including dose adjustments when concomitant administration cannot be avoided. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Probenecid: phase I trial, NCT03138759, 3 May, 2017; esomeprazole, itraconazole, rifampin: phase I trials, not registered with ClinicalTrials.gov.

Effect of Mild and Moderate Hepatic Impairment (Defined by Child-Pugh Classification and National Cancer Institute Organ Dysfunction Working Group Criteria) on Pexidartinib Pharmacokinetics.

Pexidartinib is a novel oral small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting the colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor. Pexidartinib undergoes extensive hepatic metabolism via multiple cytochrome P450 and uridine 5'-diphospho-glucuronosyl transferase enzymes, with ZAAD-1006a as the only major metabolite in human plasma. As pexidartinib is extensively metabolized, hepatic impairment (HI) could lead to increased exposure to pexidartinib. The objective of the two phase 1, open-label studies was to determine the pharmacokinetics of pexidartinib after a single 200-mg dose in subjects with mild and moderate HI, based on Child-Pugh classification (PL3397-A-U123: 8 mild HI and 8 moderate HI vs 16 matched healthy controls) and National Cancer Institute Organ Dysfunction Working Group (NCI-ODWG) criteria (PL3397-A-U129: 8 moderate HI versus 8 matched healthy controls [NCT04223635]). Based on Child-Pugh classification, exposure to pexidartinib (maximum observed concentration [Cmax ], area under the plasma concentration-time curve up to the last measurable concentration [AUClast ], and extrapolated to infinity [AUCinf ]) was similar in subjects with mild and moderate HI and in respective matched healthy controls, whereas ZAAD-1006a exposure (AUC) was approximately 27% to 28% and 41% to 48% higher in mild and moderate HI, respectively. According to NCI-ODWG criteria, total pexidartinib exposure was 42% to 46% higher in subjects with moderate HI, compared with healthy controls, and total ZAAD-1006a exposure was 70% to 79% higher for subjects with moderate HI, compared with matched healthy controls with normal hepatic function. These findings were used to develop appropriate dose recommendations in patients with hepatic impairment.

Phase I studies of the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of DS-1211, a tissue-nonspecific alkaline phosphatase inhibitor.

Tissue-nonspecific alkaline phosphatase (TNAP) hydrolyzes and inactivates inorganic pyrophosphate (PPi), a potent inhibitor of calcification; therefore, TNAP inhibition is a potential target to treat ectopic calcification. These two first-in-human studies evaluated safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PKs), and pharmacodynamics (PDs) of single (SAD) and multiple-ascending doses (MAD) of DS-1211, a TNAP inhibitor. Healthy adults were randomized 6:2 to DS-1211 or placebo, eight subjects per dose cohort. SAD study subjects received one dose of DS-1211 (range, 3-3000 mg) or placebo, whereas MAD study subjects received DS-1211 (range, 10-300 mg) once daily, 150 mg twice daily (b.i.d.), or placebo for 10 days. Primary end points were safety and tolerability. PK and PD assessments included plasma concentrations of DS-1211, alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity, and TNAP substrates (PPi, pyridoxal 5'-phosphate [PLP], and phosphoethanolamine [PEA]). A total of 56 (DS-1211: n = 42; placebo: n = 14) and 40 (DS-1211: n = 30; placebo: n = 10) subjects enrolled in the SAD and MAD studies, respectively. In both studies, adverse events were mild or moderate and did not increase with dose. PKs of DS-1211 were linear up to 100 mg administered as a single dose and 150 mg b.i.d. administered as a multiple-dose regimen. In multiple dosing, there was minimal accumulation of DS-1211. Increased DS-1211 exposure correlated with dose-dependent ALP inhibition and concomitant increases in PPi, PLP, and PEA. In two phase I studies, DS-1211 appeared safe and well-tolerated. Post-treatment PD assessments were consistent with exposure-dependent TNAP inhibition. These data support further evaluation of DS-1211 for ectopic calcification diseases.

CYP2C8-Mediated Formation of a Human Disproportionate Metabolite of the Selective NaV1.7 Inhibitor DS-1971a, a Mixed Cytochrome P450 and Aldehyde Oxidase Substrate.

Predicting human disproportionate metabolites is difficult, especially when drugs undergo species-specific metabolism mediated by cytochrome P450s (P450s) and/or non-P450 enzymes. This study assessed human metabolites of DS-1971a, a potent Nav1.7-selective blocker, by performing human mass balance studies and characterizing DS-1971a metabolites, in accordance with the Metabolites in Safety Testing guidance. In addition, we investigated the mechanism by which the major human disproportionate metabolite (M1) was formed. After oral administration of radiolabeled DS-1971a, the major metabolites in human plasma were P450-mediated monoxidized metabolites M1 and M2 with area under the curve ratios of 27% and 10% of total drug-related exposure, respectively; the minor metabolites were dioxidized metabolites produced by aldehyde oxidase and P450s. By comparing exposure levels of M1 and M2 between humans and safety assessment animals, M1 but not M2 was found to be a human disproportionate metabolite, requiring further characterization under the Metabolites in Safety Testing guidance. Incubation studies with human liver microsomes indicated that CYP2C8 was responsible for the formation of M1. Docking simulation indicated that, in the formation of M1 and M2, there would be hydrogen bonding and/or electrostatic interactions between the pyrimidine and sulfonamide moieties of DS-1971a and amino acid residues Ser100, Ile102, Ile106, Thr107, and Asn217 in CYP2C8, and that the cyclohexane ring of DS-1971a would be located near the heme iron of CYP2C8. These results clearly indicate that M1 is the predominant metabolite in humans and a human disproportionate metabolite due to species-specific differences in metabolism. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: This report is the first to show a human disproportionate metabolite generated by CYP2C8-mediated primary metabolism. We clearly demonstrate that DS-1971a, a mixed aldehyde oxidase and cytochrome P450 substrate, was predominantly metabolized by CYP2C8 to form M1, a human disproportionate metabolite. Species differences in the formation of M1 highlight the regio- and stereoselective metabolism by CYP2C8, and the proposed interaction between DS-1971a and CYP2C8 provides new knowledge of CYP2C8-mediated metabolism of cyclohexane-containing substrates.

Exposure-response analysis of efficacy and safety for pexidartinib in patients with tenosynovial giant cell tumor.

This analysis was conducted to assess exposure-response relationships for efficacy and safety of pexidartinib in patients with tenosynovial giant cell tumor. Efficacy was assessed categorically by overall response rate (ORR) with Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 and longitudinally (changes in tumor size and volume). Safety included hepatic parameters (i.e., alanine aminotransferase [ALT], aspartate aminotransferase [AST], and total bilirubin). Average pexidartinib concentration (Cavg ) was identified as the primary exposure parameter correlated with response. In categorical and longitudinal analyses, higher Cavg coincided with greater ORR and tumor size reduction, respectively, with smaller joint size having a greater impact. For safety, a significant relationship was observed between Cavg and incidence of ALT-related and AST-related adverse events (AEs). With increased exposure, an increase in efficacy was predicted with near maximum effect at 800 mg/day. Higher initial dose (1000 mg/day) during the first 2 weeks did not improve efficacy. Higher doses were associated with an increased risk of ALT-related and AST-related AEs. These results support the US Food and Drug Administration-approved dose (400 mg two times/day without initial loading dose).

Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Pexidartinib in Healthy Subjects and Patients With Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor or Other Solid Tumors.

Pexidartinib is a kinase inhibitor that induces tumor response and improvements in symptoms and functional outcomes in adult patients with symptomatic tenosynovial giant cell tumor (TGCT). A population pharmacokinetic (PK) model for pexidartinib and its metabolite, ZAAD, was developed, and effects of demographic and clinical factors on the PK of pexidartinib and ZAAD were estimated. The analysis included pooled data from 7 studies in healthy volunteers (N = 159) and 2 studies in patients with TGCT or other solid tumors (N = 216). A structural 2-compartment model with sequential zero- and first-order absorption and lag time, and linear elimination from the central compartment adequately described pexidartinib and ZAAD PKs. Clearance of pexidartinib was estimated at 5.83 L/h in a typical patient with reference covariates (male, non-Asian, weight = 80 kg, creatinine clearance ≥90 mL/min, aspartate aminotransferase ≤80 U/L, and total bilirubin ≤20.5 µmol/L). In the covariate analysis, Asians and healthy subjects had modestly lower pexidartinib exposure (21% decrease each) in terms of steady-state area under the curve values from 0 to 24 hours (AUC0-24,ss ). Effects of body weight, sex, and hepatic function parameters on pexidartinib AUC0-24,ss were generally <20%. Patients with TGCT with mild renal impairment were predicted to have approximately 23% higher AUC0-24,ss than those with normal renal function. The effects of covariates on ZAAD exposure were similar to those on pexidartinib. These results indicate small and generally clinically nonmeaningful effects of patient demographic and clinical characteristics on pexidartinib and ZAAD PK profiles.

Evaluation of Potential Drug-Drug Interaction Risk of Pexidartinib With Substrates of Cytochrome P450 and P-Glycoprotein.

Pexidartinib is approved for treatment of adults with symptomatic tenosynovial giant cell tumor. In vitro data showed pexidartinib's potential to inhibit and induce cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A, inhibit CYP2C9, CYP2C19 and P-glycoprotein (P-gp). Herein, 2 open-label, single-sequence, crossover studies evaluated the drug-drug interaction potential of pexidartinib on CYP enzymes (CYP2C9, CYP2C19, and CYP3A) and P-gp. Thirty-two subjects received single oral doses of midazolam (CYP3A substrate) and tolbutamide (CYP2C9 substrate) alone and after single and multiple oral doses of pexidartinib. Twenty subjects received single oral doses of omeprazole (CYP2C19 substrate) and digoxin (P-gp substrate) alone or with pexidartinib. Analysis of variance was conducted to determine the effect of pexidartinib on various substrates' pharmacokinetics. No drug-drug interaction was concluded if the 90% confidence interval of the ratio of test to reference was within the range 80% to 125%. Coadministration of single and multiple doses of pexidartinib resulted in 21% and 52% decreases, respectively, in the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to the last measurable time point (AUClast ) of midazolam, whereas AUClast values of tolbutamide increased 15% and 36%, respectively. Omeprazole exposure decreased on concurrent administration with pexidartinib, the metabolite-to-parent ratio was similar following omeprazole administration alone vs coadministration with pexidartinib; pexidartinib did not affect CYP2C19-mediated metabolism. Maximum plasma concentrations of digoxin slightly increased (32%) with pexidartinib coadministration; no significant effect on digoxin AUClast . These results indicate that pexidartinib is a moderate inducer of CYP3A and a weak inhibitor of CYP2C9 and does not significantly affect CYP2C19-mediated metabolism or P-gp transport.

Abuse potential of mirogabalin in recreational polydrug users.

Mirogabalin is a selective calcium channel α2δ subunit ligand being developed to treat neuropathic pain. In accordance with US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidance, the human abuse potential of mirogabalin (15-105 mg) was examined, relative to placebo, diazepam (15 or 30 mg), and pregabalin (200 or 450 mg), in two single-dose, randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled crossover studies in recreational polydrug users who could discern between positive comparator and placebo. The primary endpoint was maximum observed effect (E max) for Drug Liking Visual Analog Scale. At therapeutic doses, mirogabalin Drug Liking E max did not differ significantly from placebo and was significantly lower than diazepam and pregabalin. This indicates therapeutic doses mirogabalin may have less abuse potential versus diazepam or pregabalin. At supratherapeutic doses (⩾4× therapeutic dose), mirogabalin had significantly higher Drug Liking E max than placebo, but lower E max than pregabalin. In both studies, therapeutic doses of mirogabalin demonstrated limited evidence of abuse potential.

Open-Label Single-Dose Study to Assess the Effect of Mild and Moderate Hepatic Impairment on the Pharmacokinetics of Mirogabalin.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Mirogabalin is an α2δ ligand being developed to treat neuropathic pain. A small fraction of mirogabalin is metabolized by the liver, where hepatic impairment may affect exposure. The objective of this phase I, open-label single-dose study was to determine if mild or moderate hepatic impairment alters the pharmacokinetics of mirogabalin. METHODS: Serial blood samples were collected for determination of maximum observed concentration, time to maximum concentration, and area under the concentration-time curve until the last quantifiable concentration of the active free form (A200-700) and inactive lactam metabolite (A204-4455) of mirogabalin. RESULTS: The A200-700 maximum observed concentration was similar in subjects with mild hepatic impairment but lower in subjects with moderate hepatic impairment vs. control subjects. The A204-4455 maximum observed concentration was lower in subjects with mild and moderate hepatic impairment vs. control groups. The A200-700 area under the concentration-time curve until the last quantifiable concentration was slightly lower in subjects with mild hepatic impairment and slightly higher in subjects with moderate hepatic impairment vs. control subjects. Peak A204-4455 levels were approximately 22% and 31% lower for subjects with mild and moderate hepatic impairment vs. control individuals, respectively. Exposure to A204-4455 was approximately 37% lower in subjects with mild hepatic impairment but unaffected in subjects with moderate hepatic impairment vs. control groups. Two subjects in the mild hepatic impairment group reported a treatment-emergent adverse event of mild somnolence. No serious or severe treatment-emergent adverse events, discontinuations as a result of treatment-emergent adverse events, or deaths were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Mild hepatic impairment resulted in lower A200-700 and A204-4455 exposure, while moderate hepatic impairment did not affect A200-700 exposure. Overall, mild-to-moderate hepatic impairment did not have a significant effect on mirogabalin exposure. A single 15-mg dose of mirogabalin was well tolerated by subjects with mild or moderate hepatic impairment.

Tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of mirogabalin in healthy subjects: Results from phase 1 studies.

Three phase 1 pharmacokinetic (PK)/pharmacodynamics (PD) studies were conducted in healthy men and women to further characterize the safety, tolerability, and PK/PD of mirogabalin administration with or without food and to guide the dose selection and regimen for phase 2 and 3 clinical development. The 3 studies included 2 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single- and multiple-ascending-dose studies, and 1 open-label, crossover study to evaluate the PK of mirogabalin administered under fasting and fed (high-fat meal) conditions. Forty-eight and 47 healthy volunteers completed the single- and multiple-dose studies, respectively. Thirty subjects were enrolled and completed the food effect study. Mirogabalin was well tolerated in the fed and fasted states. The most frequent treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs)-dizziness and somnolence-were expected based on mirogabalin's mechanism of action. Subjects receiving the highest mirogabalin doses (50 and 75 mg single dose) showed greater dizziness and sedation and higher rates of TEAEs than subjects receiving 3-30 mg. After oral administration, mirogabalin was rapidly absorbed (time to maximum concentration, ∼1 hour) and eliminated through urine unchanged (61%-72% urinary excretion). Exposure increased in a dose-proportional manner after single or multiple mirogabalin doses. No significant accumulation occurred with multiple doses over 14 days. After single doses of mirogabalin (15 mg), the bioavailability was considered equivalent in the fed and fasted states, indicating that mirogabalin can be taken without food restrictions. Based on these data, mirogabalin 15 mg twice daily was selected as the highest target dose for further clinical development.

Effect of coadministration of metformin with mirogabalin: Results from a phase 1, randomized, open-label, drug-drug interaction study
.

Mirogabalin, a selective voltage-dependent calcium channel α2δ ligand under development for treatment of neuropathic pain, may be coadministered with metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who have diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain. A randomized, open-label, single-dose, 3-treatment, 3-period crossover study evaluated the pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety of mirogabalin and metformin upon coadministration. Eligible subjects received 3 treatments separated by a 7-day washout period: 1 oral dose of mirogabalin 15 mg; 1 oral dose of metformin 850 mg; and coadministration of mirogabalin 15 mg with metformin 850 mg. PK assessments included maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax); time of maximum plasma concentration; area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to the last quantifiable concentration, and from 0 to infinity (AUClast and AUC0-inf, respectively). Safety assessments included adverse event (AE) monitoring and physical and clinical laboratory evaluations. 21 healthy men with a mean age of 30.4 years were enrolled and completed the study. Geometric least square means ratios (coadministration vs. alone; 90% confidence interval) for metformin Cmax, AUClast, and AUC0-inf were 1.00 (0.95 - 1.05), 1.04 (1.00 - 1.07), and 1.03 (1.00 - 1.07), respectively; ratios for mirogabalin were 0.94 (0.87 - 1.02), 0.99 (0.95 - 1.04), and 1.00 (0.96 - 1.04), respectively. Three subjects reported treatment-emergent AEs: dyspepsia, headache, and increased hepatic enzymes (resolved upon follow-up without sequelae). There were no deaths, serious AEs, or discontinuations due to AEs. Coadministration of mirogabalin and metformin is well tolerated in healthy subjects with no evidence of a drug-drug interaction.
.

Coadministration of probenecid and cimetidine with mirogabalin in healthy subjects: A phase 1, randomized, open-label, drug-drug interaction study.

AIMS: The primary aim of this study was to assess the individual effects of probenecid and cimetidine on mirogabalin exposure. METHODS: This phase 1, open-label, crossover study randomized healthy adults to receive three treatment regimens, each separated by ≥5-day washout: a single oral dose of mirogabalin 15 mg on day 2, mirogabalin 15 mg on day 2 plus probenecid 500 mg every 6 h from days 1 to 4, and mirogabalin 15 mg on day 2 plus cimetidine 400 mg every 6 h from days 1 to 4. RESULTS: Coadministration of mirogabalin with probenecid or cimetidine increased the maximum and total mirogabalin exposure. The geometric mean ratios of Cmax and AUC(0-t) (90% CI) with and without coadministration of probenecid were 128.7% (121.9-135.7%) and 176.1% (171.9-180.3%), respectively. The geometric mean ratios of Cmax and AUC(0-t) (90% CI) with and without coadministration of cimetidine were 117.1% (111.0-123.6%) and 143.7% (140.3-147.2%), respectively. Mean (standard deviation) renal clearance of mirogabalin (l h-1 ) was substantially slower after probenecid [6.67 (1.53)] or cimetidine [7.17 (1.68)] coadministration, compared with mirogabalin alone [11.3 (2.39)]. Coadministration of probenecid or cimetidine decreased mirogabalin mean (standard deviation) apparent total body clearance [10.5 (2.33) and 12.8 (2.67) l h-1 , respectively, vs. 18.4 (3.93) for mirogabalin alone]. CONCLUSIONS: A greater magnitude of change in mirogabalin exposure was observed when coadministered with a drug that inhibits both renal and metabolic clearance (probenecid) vs. a drug that only affects renal clearance (cimetidine). However, as the increase in exposure is not clinically significant (>2-fold), no a priori dose adjustment is recommended.

Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, Safety, and Tolerability of Mirogabalin When Coadministered With Lorazepam, Zolpidem, Tramadol, or Ethanol: Results From Drug-Drug Interaction Studies in Healthy Subjects.

Four randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 4-period drug-drug interaction studies were conducted in healthy subjects to evaluate the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic (PD) interactions between mirogabalin and commonly used central nervous system depressants. Mirogabalin or placebo was administered alone or with single-dose lorazepam, zolpidem, tramadol, ethanol, or interacting drug placebo. Safety was assessed and serial samples for pharmacokinetic parameters were collected for up to 48 hours postdose. PD assessments included body sway (except tramadol), digit symbol substitution test, vertigo symptom scale short form, brief ataxia rating scale, and the Bond and Lader visual analog scale. Coadministration of mirogabalin with any of the 4 drugs did not cause any clinically relevant pharmacokinetic interactions. Peak mirogabalin concentration decreased by 28% (least squares mean ratio, 0.72; 90% confidence interval, [CI] 0.67, 0.76) following tramadol coadministration, and increased by 20% (least squares mean ratio, 1.20; 90%CI, 1.12, 1.28) following ethanol coadministration. Mirogabalin alone had little to no effect on PD parameters, but coadministration of mirogabalin with either lorazepam or ethanol increased the PD effects in body sway and digit symbol substitution test assays. Mirogabalin/lorazepam and mirogabalin/zolpidem increased occurrence of somnolence. Increased incidence of nausea and headache was noted with mirogabalin/tramadol and mirogabalin/ethanol, respectively.

Evaluation of the pharmacokinetic drug interaction potential of tivantinib (ARQ 197) using cocktail probes in patients with advanced solid tumours.

AIMS: This phase 1, open-label, crossover study sought to evaluate drug-drug interactions between tivantinib and cytochrome P450 (CYP) substrates and tivantinib and P-glycoprotein. METHODS: The effect of tivantinib doses on the pharmacokinetics of the probe drugs for CYP1A2 (caffeine), CYP2C9 (S-warfarin), CYP2C19 (omeprazole), and CYP3A4 (midazolam), and for P-glycoprotein (digoxin) was investigated in 28 patients with advanced cancer using a cocktail probe approach. Patients received single doses of probe drugs alone and, after 5 days of treatment, with tivantinib 360 mg twice daily. RESULTS: The ratios of geometric least squares mean (90% confidence interval) for the area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to the last quantifiable concentration in the presence/absence of tivantinib were 0.97 (0.89-1.05) for caffeine, 0.88 (0.76-1.02) for S-warfarin, 0.89 (0.60-1.31) for omeprazole, 0.83 (0.67-1.02) for midazolam, and 0.69 (0.51-0.94) for digoxin. Similar effects were observed for maximum plasma concentrations; the ratio for digoxin in the presence/absence of tivantinib was 0.75 (0.60-0.95). CONCLUSIONS: The data suggest that tivantinib 360 mg twice daily has either a minimal or no effect on the pharmacokinetics of probe drugs for CYP1A2, CYP2C9, CYP2C19 and CYP3A4 substrates, and decreases the systemic exposure of P-glycoprotein substrates when administered with tivantinib.

Nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant activity: challenges in measurement and reversal.

BACKGROUND: Four nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are approved for the prevention of stroke in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and for the treatment of venous thromboembolism. These include the direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran and the direct factor Xa inhibitors rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban. Bleeding is a complication for all anticoagulants and concerns regarding bleeding risk and the suitability of effective reversal strategies may be a barrier to their prescription. Despite the reduced risk of bleeding compared with vitamin K antagonists, questions persist regarding the management of bleeding related to NOAC use. MAIN TEXT: To date, although a number of assays are responsive to NOACs, no single routine laboratory test has been identified to accurately measure the clinical anticoagulation state of patients on NOACs or established as a reliable predictor of bleeding risk. In addition, the establishment of a reliable human bleeding model to test novel inhibitors of the coagulation cascade has proved challenging. Although routine monitoring of anticoagulant levels is not necessary in patients taking NOACs, anticoagulant reversal and a means of measuring reversal may be required for patients who present with bleeding or require urgent surgery. Prothrombin complex concentrates are pooled plasma products containing varying amounts of inactive vitamin K-dependent clotting factors in addition to vitamin K-dependent proteins and can replenish factors in the intrinsic and extrinsic coagulation cascade, reversing an anticoagulant effect. Only one agent, idarucizumab, has been approved for rapid reversal of dabigatran-induced anticoagulation and one more agent, andexanet alfa, has been submitted for approval to reverse the anticoagulatory effects of direct and indirect factor Xa inhibitors. CONCLUSIONS: This review discusses the laboratory tests available for assessing anticoagulation, human models of bleeding, and the use of current strategies-including prothrombin complex concentrates for reversal of anticoagulation by NOACs-to manage bleeding in patients.

Edoxaban drug-drug interactions with ketoconazole, erythromycin, and cyclosporine.

AIMS: Edoxaban, a novel factor Xa inhibitor, is a substrate of cytochrome P450 3 A4 (CYP3A4) and the efflux transporter P-glycoprotein (P-gp). Three edoxaban drug-drug interaction studies examined the effects of P-gp inhibitors with varying degrees of CYP3A4 inhibition. METHODS: In each study, healthy subjects received a single oral dose of 60 mg edoxaban with or without an oral dual P-gp/CYP3A4 inhibitor as follows: ketoconazole 400 mg once daily for 7 days, edoxaban on day 4; erythromycin 500 mg four times daily for 8 days, edoxaban on day 7; or single dose of cyclosporine 500 mg with edoxaban. Serial plasma samples were obtained for pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Safety was assessed throughout the study. RESULTS: Coadministration of ketoconazole, erythromycin, or cyclosporine increased edoxaban total exposure by 87%, 85%, and 73%, respectively, and the peak concentration by 89%, 68%, and 74%, respectively, compared with edoxaban alone. The half-life did not change appreciably. Exposure of M4, the major active edoxaban metabolite, was consistent when edoxaban was administered alone or with ketoconazole and erythromycin. With cyclosporine, M4 total exposure increased by 6.9-fold and peak exposure by 8.7-fold, suggesting an additional interaction. Pharmacodynamic effects were reflective of increased edoxaban exposure. No clinically significant adverse events were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Administration of dual inhibitors of P-gp and CYP3A4 increased edoxaban exposure by less than two-fold. This effect appears to be primarily due to inhibition of P-gp. The impact of CYP3A4 inhibition appears to be less pronounced, and its contribution to total clearance appears limited in healthy subjects.

Edoxaban effects on bleeding following punch biopsy and reversal by a 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate.

BACKGROUND: The oral factor Xa inhibitor edoxaban has demonstrated safety and efficacy in stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation and in the treatment and secondary prevention of venous thromboembolism. This study investigated the reversal of edoxaban's effects on bleeding measures and biomarkers by using a 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC). METHODS AND RESULTS: This was a phase 1 study conducted at a single site. This was a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, 2-way crossover study to determine the reversal effect of descending doses of 4F-PCC on bleeding duration and bleeding volume following edoxaban treatment. A total of 110 subjects (17 in part 1, 93 in part 2) were treated. Intravenous administration of 4F-PCC 50, 25, or 10 IU/kg following administration of edoxaban (60 mg) dose-dependently reversed edoxaban's effects on bleeding duration and endogenous thrombin potential, with complete reversal at 50 IU/kg. Effects on prothrombin time were partially reversed at 50 IU/kg. A similar trend was seen for bleeding volume. CONCLUSIONS: The 4F-PCC dose-dependently reversed the effects of edoxaban (60 mg), with complete reversal of bleeding duration and endogenous thrombin potential and partial reversal of prothrombin time following 50 IU/kg. Edoxaban alone and in combination with 4F-PCC was safe and well tolerated in these healthy subjects. A dose of 50 IU/kg 4F-PCC may be suitable for reversing edoxaban anticoagulation. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02047565.