The polymorphisms of stearoyl-CoA desaturase (SCD1) and sterol regulatory element binding protein-1 (SREBP-1) genes and their association with the fatty acid profile of muscle and subcutaneous fat in Fleckvieh bulls.

The previously reported genetic polymorphisms of the stearoyl-CoA desaturase (SCD1) and sterol regulatory element binding protein-1 (SREBP-1) genes were investigated in Fleckvieh bulls using the PCR-RFLP and AS-PCR methods, respectively. The genomic DNA was obtained from a total of 370 bulls. The frequencies of alleles A and V of the single nucleotide polymorphism in exon 5 of the SCD1 gene (SNP 878C>T) were 0.555 and 0.445, respectively. In the 84-bp Ins/Del polymorphism in intron 5 of the SREBP-1 gene, the frequency of the L allele (insertion) was markedly higher (0.920) than that of the S allele (deletion; 0.080). Fatty acid profile was determined in a total of 367 samples of muscle fat (MSF) and 150 samples of subcutaneous fat (SCF). The AA genotype of SCD1 polymorphism showed a lower content of C18:0 (P<0.01) and higher contents of C14:1 cis-9 (P<0.001) and C18:1 cis-9 (P<0.05) in MSF compared to the VV genotype. As a result, the bulls with genotypes AA or AV had lower SFA (P<0.01), higher MUFA (P<0.05) and higher MUFA/SFA (P<0.01) than VV animals. The results obtained for SCF were similar. The SREBP-1 polymorphism was associated with a higher content of C14:1 cis-9 (P<0.01) in the LS compared to LL genotype in SCF. The results of this study demonstrated the existence of the polymorphisms in the SCD1 and SREBP-1 genes in the population of Fleckvieh cattle and their associations with the concentrations of several MSF and SCF fatty acids.

Growth performance and fatty acid profiles of intramuscular and subcutaneous fat from Limousin and Charolais heifers fed extruded linseed.

Forty-eight heifers, Limousin (LI) and Charolais (CH) breed, were used to evaluate the effect of a basal mixed diet with linseed supplementation (108g/kg DM) on performance and fatty acid (FA) composition of M. longissimus thoracis (MLT) and subcutaneous fat. The feed intake and weight gains were higher, and feed per gain ratio lower in CH heifers than in LI heifers. The muscle lipids and subcutaneous fat of LI heifers contained significantly more MUFA, PUFA, CLA, and less SFA than the lipids of CH heifers. The feeding of extruded linseed significantly increased the concentration of linolenic acid (C18:3n-3), CLA, and decreased PUFA n-6 to PUFA n-3 ratio in lipids extracted from both tissues. Linseed supplementation decreased SFA and increased PUFA in subcutaneous fat. In MLT lipids of linseed-fed heifers PUFA of the n-3 series were increased. It can be concluded that the growth performance of LI heifers was lower, but that their lipids contained more FA that are thought to be important for human health. The feeding of linseed at 108g/kg DM enhanced the nutritive value of beef in terms of FA profile. Breed differences were generally more important than effects of the diet. Dietary effects, however, were more pronounced in PUFA n-3 and arachidonic acid (C20:4n-6).

Effect of subsidy regimes on economic values of functional traits in beef cattle breeding.

We investigated the impact of five monetary subsidy regimes on economic values of traits in a cow-calf pasture production system with surplus calves fed for slaughter. The following regimes were analysed: (1) maximum prices for slaughter animals actually received in the Czech Republic during 2004, with no subsidies of any kind; (2) prices as in (1), with subsidies awarded per hectare of permanent grassland and per calf born; (3) prices as in (1), with subsidies awarded per hectare of agricultural land, per hectare of pasture and meadow, per beef cow in a forage system and per livestock unit; (4) prices as in (1), with subsidies awarded per hectare of agricultural land; (5) no subsidies, but prices received for slaughter animals that covered production costs and resulted in 1% profitability. The modelled farm showed negative profit under real price conditions with no subsidies (regime 1), which led to an underestimation of economic values for functional traits. The same results were obtained in regimes in which subsidies did not depend on the number of animals (3) or on meat production from the enterprise (4). Economic values of production traits (growth and carcass traits) did not vary among subsidy regimes. To determine optimum economic values for functional traits in beef cattle, we advocate using the method applied in subsidy regime 5, no subsidies but prices for slaughter animals that cover production cost and a small profit.