Improving quality and patient safety in surgical care through standardisation and harmonisation of perioperative care (SAFEST project): A research protocol for a mixed methods study.

INTRODUCTION: Adverse events in health care affect 8% to 12% of patients admitted to hospitals in the European Union (EU), with surgical adverse events being the most common types reported. AIM: SAFEST project aims to enhance perioperative care quality and patient safety by establishing and implementing widely supported evidence-based perioperative patient safety practices to reduce surgical adverse events. METHODS: We will conduct a mixed-methods hybrid type III implementation study supporting the development and adoption of evidence-based practices through a Quality Improvement Learning Collaborative (QILC) in co-creation with stakeholders. The project will be conducted in 10 hospitals and related healthcare facilities of 5 European countries. We will assess the level of adherence to the standardised practices, as well as surgical complications incidence, patient-reported outcomes, contextual factors influencing the implementation of the patient safety practices, and sustainability. The project will consist of six components: 1) Development of patient safety standardised practices in perioperative care; 2) Guided self-evaluation of the standardised practices; 3) Identification of priorities and actions plans; 4) Implementation of a QILC strategy; 5) Evaluation of the strategy effectiveness; 6) Patient empowerment for patient safety. Sustainability of the project will be ensured by systematic assessment of sustainability factors and business plans. Towards the end of the project, a call for participation will be launched to allow other hospitals to conduct the self-evaluation of the standardized practices. DISCUSSION: The SAFEST project will promote patient safety standardized practices in the continuum of care for adult patients undergoing surgery. This project will result in a broad implementation of evidence-based practices for perioperative care, spanning from the care provided before hospital admission to post-operative recovery at home or outpatient facilities. Different implementation challenges will be faced in the application of the evidence-based practices, which will be mitigated by developing context-specific implementation strategies. Results will be disseminated in peer-reviewed publications and will be available in an online platform.

Comparison of prevalence of depression symptoms and history of suicidality in students of medical schools and other study programmes of Charles University.

OBJECTIVES: Medical students represent a group of undergraduate students who are exposed to specific risk factors that may lead to the onset of depression and the occurrence of suicidal ideation. The aim of the article is to present information about the prevalence of symptoms of depression in medical students of different faculties at Charles University, Prague, compared to other students of this university. METHODS: We used a standardized Beck's Inventory scale II (BDI-II) with added specific questions electronically distributed to undergraduate students of the full-time forms of study of all faculties of Charles University. The data collection was anonymous and took place in December 2020. The data were statistically assessed in relation to the occurrence of moderate and severe depression using univariate and multivariable analysis. RESULTS: Moderate and severe depression rate (MSDR) was recorded in 19.6% of medical school students, who returned the questionnaire, compared to 23.4% of students of other faculties (p = 0.001) of Charles University in Prague. Differences in MSDR among students of different faculties of medicine of Charles University were not statistically significant. The total number of previous suicide attempts among respondents was 542, of which 115 were medical students, with the lifetime prevalence of suicide attempts among all students participating in the study 6.96% and in medical students of Charles University 5.73%. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of our study highlight the need for systematic, accessible and timely assistance to university students, both in terms of prevention and early intervention, which can take place at the university level and within the mental healthcare system.

Safe environment management in acute psychiatric wards in the Czech Republic, foundation for recommendations for preventive practice.

OBJECTIVES: Suicides of hospitalized patients present rare but very serious adverse events in healthcare settings. The aim of this article is to describe and analyse the facilities and material equipment of acute psychiatric settings in the Czech Republic and contrast these with recommendations for effective prevention of suicidal behaviour. Since there are currently no universally accepted protocols for risk assessment and prevention of suicides in hospital settings in the Czech Republic, these recommendations draw on international guidelines. Based on the outcomes of our study we provide recommendations for risk management and effective prevention of suicidal behaviour of patients hospitalized in acute care settings. METHODS: In order to describe and analyse the environment of acute psychiatric wards in the Czech Republic we have developed a questionnaire based on international recommendations for risk management and prevention of suicidal behaviour. We also collected data on the prevalence of attempted and completed suicides and their respective methods in these hospitals. RESULTS: We have established that acute psychiatric wards in the Czech Republic operate within insufficient safety regimes, especially with respect to the prevention of suicide by hanging and the accessibility of objects for cutting. Our findings demonstrate that only 75% of the wards are equipped with safety glass, and only 50% of the wards with safety mirrors. Only just over 40% of hospitals have safety door handles and shower heads. CONCLUSION: While it is impossible to entirely eliminate the risk of suicidal behaviour it is possible to manage it. The risk reduction is attainable by providing a safe-proofed environment and minimizing opportunities of suicide attempts by hanging and cutting. In order to effectively prevent suicides, it is essential to increase the awareness of the possibilities of safe proofing of the environment as well as standardization of risk assessment of potential suicidal behaviour of patients.