Evidence based rehabilitation after hip arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Hip arthroplasty is considered the treatment of choice to improve the quality of life of patients affected by degenerative arthritis. The post-op rehabilitation regimen, however, is still a matter of debate. The goal of this study was to perform a systematic review of the available best evidence to provide recommendations for rehabilitation after hip arthroplasty. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Biomedical databases were accessed to identify guidelines, systematic reviews and randomised controlled trials addressing rehabilitation after hip arthroplasty published between 2004 and 2019. Studies were selected and extracted by two independent evaluators with standardised tools. RESULTS: 1 guideline, 8 systematic reviews and 5 randomised controlled trials were included. All included papers were organised according the available evidence of clinical course chronology both in pre- and post-operation rehabilitation up to 6 weeks and thereafter. Although the value of a rehabilitation program after hip arthroplasty is universally recognised, the exact timing and number of sessions is still unknown. A solid literature review allows us to partially answer to this question. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence-based rehabilitation recommendations are proposed according to literature research findings. Clinical practice is still somewhat dependent on dogma and traditions, highlighting the need for additional high-quality clinical studies to address areas of uncertainty.

Hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: is it necessary to sacrifice the gracilis?

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine if there was a difference in the clinical results of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction when using the semitendinosus tendon (ST) alone versus the semitendinosus and gracilis (STG) construct. TYPE OF STUDY: Prospective randomized study. METHODS: We prospectively followed up a group of 97 patients who underwent reconstruction with either an ST graft (50 patients) or STG graft (47 patients). The patients were evaluated according to standard knee scales (IKDC, Noyes, Lysholm, Tegner), self-evaluation score (SANE), clinical findings, computerized knee laxity analysis, and functional tests. Isokinetic flexion, extension, and internal rotation-external rotation testing were also performed. The results were subjected to statistical analysis. RESULTS: We did not find any significant difference between the 2 groups according to the standard knee scores; self-evaluation score; clinical findings; computerized knee laxity analysis; flexion, extension, and external rotation strengths; or functional tests. However, we did note that the internal rotation torque deficit was significantly higher in the STG group (P = .039). Likewise, the external-to-internal rotation ratio was significantly greater in the STG group (P = .006). CONCLUSIONS: Although there is not much clinical difference when using the ST alone versus the STG construct, internal rotation weakness following harvest of 2 tendons may need to be evaluated further. We suggest that, whenever possible, only 1 tendon should be used when performing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring tendons. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I, Randomized Controlled Study.

Patellar tendon versus quadrupled bone-semitendinosus anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective clinical investigation in athletes.

PURPOSE: Patellar tendon and hamstrings are both used in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, and comparisons have been reported with different results. The purpose of this clinical study was to compare the results of ACL reconstruction in athletes with 2 different graft types, both using bone-to-bone healing: bone-patellar tendon-bone graft and a quadrupled bone-semitendinosus graft. TYPE OF STUDY: Outcomes study. METHODS: From 1994 to 1997, 2 groups of 40 athletes who underwent ACL replacement with patellar tendon and quadrupled bone-semitendinosus grafts were prospectively evaluated. Preinjury activity level, age, and gender were comparable in both groups. All patients were operated on by the same surgeon within 5 months from injury and underwent group-specific rehabilitation programs. An independent examiner performed the final evaluations at 36 months. Review included clinical examination, radiographs, computed analysis, isokinetic and functional strength tests, and subjective and objective evaluation with standard knee scores. Additional procedures were recorded. Statistical analysis was performed with both parametric and nonparametric tests. RESULTS: Average surgical time was longer with the semitendinosus graft, and postoperative pain was higher in the patellar tendon group. Standard knee evaluation scores and subjective assessment revealed no significant differences. Isokinetic testing of flexion-extension and internal-external rotation showed lower quadriceps strength and a mild deficit of external rotation in the patellar tendon group and slightly lower flexor strength in the semitendinosus group at 12 months. Computerized laxity analysis showed no difference between the 2 groups with 90% of patients having less than 3 mm side-to-side difference, with a gender difference in the semitendinosus group. Kneeling pain was higher in patellar tendon group. CONCLUSIONS: The bone-patellar tendon-bone and quadrupled bone-semitendinosus autograft provide excellent grafts for ACL reconstruction. Both techniques are comparable regarding final stability, but in patients with extensor mechanism problems or those who engage in sports with a high incidence of patellar tendonitis, the semitendinosus graft should be considered.

Patellar tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with conical press-fit femoral fixation: 5-year results in athletes population.

Bone-patellar tendon autograft is probably the most widely used graft for ACL reconstruction. Several methods for graft fixation have been described. To avoid intra-articular hardware we adopt biological fixation with a femoral conical press-fit fixation. A prospective study was performed on 40 consecutive active athletes who underwent ACL reconstruction with this technique by the same surgeon between November 1994 and September 1995 (mean follow-up 46 months, range 36-62). Results were evaluated by an independent examiner using radiography, computed tomography, subjective and objective evaluation, and isokinetic and functional strength tests. Assessment using the IKDC knee scoring revealed 85% of the patients with a normal or nearly normal knee joint; Tegner's score was 7.5 preoperatively and 6.0 postoperatively, with 60% of the athletes returning to the preinjury sport and level. No patients had instability, with 90% having less than 3 mm side-to-side difference on computerized analysis. The isokinetic test showed mild quadriceps deficit at 3 and 6 months, with no deficit at final follow-up; four patients complained of anterior knee pain and had a positive kneeling test. We found no graft dislocation. All cases showed radiological evidence of graft integration at 3 months time. Long-term results support this technique asx a simple, cost-effective, and reliable alternative for patellar tendon fixation in ACL reconstruction.